RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Seltorexant, a selective antagonist of human orexin-2 receptors, demonstrated antidepressant effects in a previous exploratory study in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). METHODS: To replicate and extend this observation, a double-blind, adaptive dose-finding study was performed in patients with MDD who had an inadequate response to 1-3 selective serotonin/serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors in the current episode. Patients were randomized (2:1:1) to placebo or seltorexant (20 mg or 40 mg) once-daily, administered adjunctively to the antidepressant the patient had been receiving at screening. After an interim analysis (6 weeks post-randomization of 160th patient), newly recruited patients randomly received (3:3:1) placebo or seltorexant 10 mg or 20 mg; the 40-mg dose was no longer assigned. Patients were stratified by baseline Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) scores (ISI ≥ 15 vs < 15). The primary endpoint was change from baseline Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score at week 6. RESULTS: Mixed-Model for Repeated Measures analysis showed a greater improvement in MADRS total score in the seltorexant 20-mg group vs placebo at weeks 3 and 6; least-square means difference (90% CI): -4.5 (-6.96; -2.07), P = .003; and -3.1 (-6.13; -0.16), P = .083, respectively. The improvement in MADRS score at week 6 for seltorexant 20 mg was greater in patients with baseline ISI ≥ 15 vs those with ISI < 15; least-square means difference (90% CI) vs placebo: -4.9 (-8.98; -0.80) and -0.7 (-5.16; 3.76), respectively. The most common (≥5%) adverse events with seltorexant were somnolence, headache, and nausea. CONCLUSIONS: A clinically meaningful reduction of depressive symptoms was observed for seltorexant 20 mg. In the subset of patients with sleep disturbance (ISI ≥ 15), a larger treatment difference between seltorexant 20 mg and placebo was observed, warranting further investigation. No new safety signal was identified. REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03227224. PREVIOUS PRESENTATION: Poster presented at 58th Annual Meeting of American College of Neuropsychopharmacology (ACNP), December 8-11, 2019, Orlando, FL.
Asunto(s)
Antidepresivos/administración & dosificación , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/tratamiento farmacológico , Pirimidinas/administración & dosificación , Pirroles/administración & dosificación , Triazoles/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Anciano , Método Doble Ciego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) models were developed to describe the relationship between the time course of paliperidone plasma concentrations and the risk of relapse of schizophrenia symptoms following administration of paliperidone palmitate 1-month (PP1M) and 3-month (PP3M) long-acting injectables, and to identify relevant covariates for relapse and dropout events. METHODS: Patient data from two global phase 3, relapse prevention studies comparing PP3M to placebo (study A) and PP3M to PP1M (study B) were analyzed. Dropout and relapse data were assessed using survival analysis as two separate single time-to-event models. Baseline covariates included age, sex, race/country, duration of illness, previous hospitalizations, prior use of long-acting injectables and use of multiple (≥2) antipsychotics at screening. RESULTS: The PK/PD analysis data set included 305 patients who were randomized to receive PP3M or placebo in the double-blind phase of study A and 1002 patients randomized to receive PP3M or PP1M in the double-blind phase of study B. Risk of relapse decreased with increasing paliperidone concentrations for both PP1M and PP3M, while it appeared to increase in patients with higher number of previous hospitalizations and/or with higher prerandomization (trough) paliperidone concentration (study A), and in patients on concomitant benzodiazepine medication and/or at Japan centers (study B). These findings are reflective of different illness severity in the population and of differences in medical practice for Japanese patients. In model-based simulations, PP3M and PP1M displayed similar relapse rates over time. CONCLUSIONS: This PK/PD analysis confirmed that PP1M and PP3M provide comparable efficacy in terms of relapse prevention, and that PP3M is superior to placebo. The PK/PD models presented here may as well be applied to studies with similar designs as either study A or B.
Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos/administración & dosificación , Antipsicóticos/farmacocinética , Trastornos Mentales/tratamiento farmacológico , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Palmitato de Paliperidona/administración & dosificación , Palmitato de Paliperidona/farmacocinética , Pacientes Desistentes del Tratamiento , Prevención Secundaria , Adulto , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Inyecciones , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Clinical response to the atypical antipsychotic paliperidone is known to vary among schizophrenic patients. We carried out a genome-wide association study to identify common genetic variants predictive of paliperidone efficacy. METHODS: We leveraged a collection of 1390 samples from individuals of European ancestry enrolled in 12 clinical studies investigating the efficacy of the extended-release tablet paliperidone ER (n1=490) and the once-monthly injection paliperidone palmitate (n2=550 and n3=350). We carried out a genome-wide association study using a general linear model (GLM) analysis on three separate cohorts, followed by meta-analysis and using a mixed linear model analysis on all samples. The variations in response explained by each single nucleotide polymorphism (hSNP) were estimated. RESULTS: No SNP passed genome-wide significance in the GLM-based analyses with suggestive signals from rs56240334 [P=7.97×10 for change in the Clinical Global Impression Scale-Severity (CGI-S); P=8.72×10 for change in the total Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)] in the intron of ADCK1. The mixed linear model-based association P-values for rs56240334 were consistent with the results from GLM-based analyses and the association with change in CGI-S (P=4.26×10) reached genome-wide significance (i.e. P<5×10). We also found suggestive evidence for a polygenic contribution toward paliperidone treatment response with estimates of heritability, hSNP, ranging from 0.31 to 0.43 for change in the total PANSS score, the PANSS positive Marder factor score, and CGI-S. CONCLUSION: Genetic variations in the ADCK1 gene may differentially predict paliperidone efficacy in schizophrenic patients. However, this finding should be replicated in additional samples.
Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos/administración & dosificación , Estudio de Asociación del Genoma Completo/métodos , Palmitato de Paliperidona/administración & dosificación , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , Proteínas Quinasas/genética , Esquizofrenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Antipsicóticos/farmacocinética , Niño , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Palmitato de Paliperidona/farmacocinética , Variantes Farmacogenómicas , Proteínas Quinasas/metabolismo , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter, phase-3 study was designed to test the noninferiority of paliperidone palmitate 3-month formulation (PP3M) to the currently marketed 1-month formulation (PP1M) in patients (age 18-70 years) with schizophrenia, previously stabilized on PP1M. METHODS: After screening (≤3 weeks) and a 17-week, flexible-dosed, open-label phase (PP1M: day 1 [150mg eq. deltoid], day 8 [100mg eq. deltoid.], weeks 5, 9, and 13 [50, 75, 100, or 150mg eq., deltoid/gluteal]), clinically stable patients were randomized (1:1) to PP3M (fixed-dose, 175, 263, 350, or 525mg eq. deltoid/gluteal) or PP1M (fixed-dose, 50, 75, 100, or 150mg eq. deltoid/gluteal) for a 48-week double-blind phase. RESULTS: Overall, 1016/1429 open-label patients entered the double-blind phase (PP3M: n=504; PP1M: n=512) and 842 completed it (including patients with relapse). PP3M was noninferior to PP1M: relapse rates were similar in both groups (PP3M: n=37, 8%; PP1M: n=45, 9%; difference in relapse-free rate: 1.2% [95% CI:-2.7%; 5.1%]) based on Kaplan-Meier estimates (primary efficacy). Secondary endpoint results (changes from double-blind baseline in positive and negative symptom score total and subscale scores, Clinical Global Impression-Severity, and Personal and Social Performance scores) were consistent with primary endpoint results. No clinically relevant differences were observed in pharmacokinetic exposures between PP3M and PP1M. Both groups had similar tolerability profiles; increased weight was the most common treatment-emergent adverse event (double-blind phase; 21% each). No new safety signals were detected. CONCLUSION: Taken together, PP3M with its 3-month dosing interval is a unique option for relapse prevention in schizophrenia.
Asunto(s)
Palmitato de Paliperidona/uso terapéutico , Esquizofrenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Antipsicóticos/efectos adversos , Antipsicóticos/sangre , Antipsicóticos/farmacocinética , Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada/efectos adversos , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada/farmacocinética , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada/uso terapéutico , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Inyecciones Intramusculares , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Palmitato de Paliperidona/efectos adversos , Palmitato de Paliperidona/sangre , Palmitato de Paliperidona/farmacocinética , Esquizofrenia/sangre , Prevención Secundaria , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
AIMS: To prospectively select the dose of the paliperidone palmitate 3-month (PP3M) formulation, using a pharmacometric bridging strategy based on the paliperidone palmitate 1-month (PP1M) formulation previously approved for schizophrenia treatment. METHODS: Pharmacokinetic (PK) data from a 6-month interim analysis of a single dose PP3M Phase I clinical trial was integrated with a previously developed PP1M population-PK model. The model was updated to incorporate formulation as a covariate on absorption parameters and to explore the most critical design element of the Phase III study: the PP1M-to-PP3M dose multiplier for patients switching formulations. Plasma paliperidone concentrations were measured at predetermined intervals during Phase III, enabling comparison of the multiple-dose PK between PP1M and PP3M. Exposure matching was assessed graphically to determine whether paliperidone plasma concentrations from the two formulations overlapped. RESULTS: Prospective steady-state PK simulations revealed that a 3.5 multiple of the PP1M dose would yield a corresponding PP3M dose with comparable exposure. The prospective pharmacometric simulation and observed Phase III PK data agreed closely. Phase III results confirmed the hypothesis that efficacy of PP3M was noninferior to that of PP1M. The similarity in exposures between the two formulations was likely a key determinant of the equivalent efficacy between the two products observed in the Phase III study. CONCLUSIONS: Successful prospective PP3M Phase III clinical trial dose selection was achieved through the use of pharmacometric bridging, without conducting a Phase II study and using only limited Phase I data for PP3M. We estimate that this strategy reduced development time by 3-5 years and may be applicable to other drug development projects.
Asunto(s)
Esquema de Medicación , Composición de Medicamentos , Palmitato de Paliperidona/administración & dosificación , Palmitato de Paliperidona/farmacocinética , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada/administración & dosificación , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada/farmacocinética , Cálculo de Dosificación de Drogas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Biológicos , Palmitato de Paliperidona/sangre , Estudios Prospectivos , Esquizofrenia/sangre , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Clinical response to antipsychotic medications can vary markedly in patients with schizophrenia. Identifying genetic variants associated with treatment response could help optimize patient care and outcome. To this end, we carried out a large-scale candidate gene study to identify genetic risk factors predictive of paliperidone efficacy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A central nervous system custom chip containing single nucleotide polymorphisms from 1204 candidate genes was utilized to genotype a discovery cohort of 684 schizophrenia patients from four clinical studies of paliperidone extended-release and paliperidone palmitate. Variants predictive of paliperidone efficacy were identified and further tested in four independent replication cohorts of schizophrenic patients (N=2856). RESULTS: We identified an SNP in ERBB4 that may contribute toward differential treatment response to paliperidone. The association trended in the same direction as the discovery cohort in two of the four replication cohorts, but ultimately did not survive multiple testing corrections. The association was not replicated in the other two independent cohorts. We also report several SNPs in well-known schizophrenia candidate genes that show suggestive associations with paliperidone efficacy. CONCLUSION: These preliminary findings suggest that genetic variation in the ERBB4 gene may differentially affect treatment response to paliperidone in individuals with schizophrenia. They implicate the neuregulin 1 (NRG1)-ErbB4 pathway for modulating antipsychotic response. However, these findings were not robustly reproduced in replication cohorts.
Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos/administración & dosificación , Estudios de Asociación Genética/métodos , Isoxazoles/administración & dosificación , Pirimidinas/administración & dosificación , Receptor ErbB-4/genética , Esquizofrenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Preescolar , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neurregulina-1/genética , Palmitato de Paliperidona , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , Esquizofrenia/genética , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Patients with comorbid schizophrenia and panic symptoms share a distinct clinical presentation and biological characteristics, prompting some to propose panic psychosis as a separate subtype of schizophrenia. Less is known about these patients' neuropsychological profiles, knowledge of which may facilitate target-specific treatments and research into the etiopathophysiology for such cases. A total of 255 schizophrenia patients with panic disorder (n=39), non-panic anxiety disorder (n=51), or no anxiety disorder (n=165) were assessed with the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised, the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, the Trail Making Test, the Controlled Oral Word Association Test, the Animal Naming subtest of the Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination, and the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised. Psychotic symptoms were assessed with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale. Patients with panic disorder demonstrated a higher verbal IQ and better problem solving, set switching, delayed recall, attention, and verbal fluency as compared to schizophrenia patients without comorbid anxiety. The schizophrenia-panic group reported a higher level of dysthymia on stable medication. Our findings suggest that patients with schizophrenia and comorbid panic disorder exhibit distinct cognitive functioning when compared to other schizophrenia patients. These data offer further support for a definable panic-psychosis subtype and suggest new etiological pathways for future research.
Asunto(s)
Cognición , Trastorno de Pánico/epidemiología , Esquizofrenia/epidemiología , Psicología del Esquizofrénico , Adulto , Trastornos de Ansiedad/epidemiología , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Pruebas de Inteligencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas/estadística & datos numéricos , New York/epidemiología , Trastorno de Pánico/diagnóstico , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica/estadística & datos numéricos , Esquizofrenia/diagnósticoRESUMEN
Panic is commonly co-morbid with schizophrenia. Panic may emerge prodromally, contribute to specific psychotic symptoms, and predict medication response. Panic is often missed due to agitation, impaired cognition, psychotic symptom overlap and limited clinician awareness. Carbon dioxide exposure has been used reliably to induce panic in non-psychotic panic subjects, but has not been systematically studied in schizophrenia. Eight inpatients with schizophrenia, recent auditory hallucinations, none preselected for panic, all on antipsychotic medication, received a structured Panic and Schizophrenia Interview (PaSI), assessing DSM-IV panic symptoms concurrent with paroxysmal auditory hallucinations. On that interview, all eight subjects reported panic concurrent with auditory hallucinations. At one sitting, subjects were exposed, in random order, to 35% carbon dioxide and to placebo room air, blinded to condition. All subjects experienced panic to carbon dioxide, one with limited symptoms. Only one subject panicked to placebo. One subject (one of only two without antipanic medication) had paroxysmal voices concurrent with induced panic. With added adjunctive clonazepam, that patient had marked clinical improvement and no response to carbon dioxide re-challenge. This first systematic examination offers preliminary evidence that carbon dioxide safely induces panic symptoms in schizophrenia. Panic may be prevalent and pathophysiologically significant in schizophrenia with auditory hallucinations.
Asunto(s)
Dióxido de Carbono/efectos adversos , Alucinaciones/complicaciones , Trastorno de Pánico/inducido químicamente , Trastorno de Pánico/diagnóstico , Esquizofrenia/complicaciones , Adulto , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Clonazepam/uso terapéutico , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastorno de Pánico/tratamiento farmacológico , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Esquizofrenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Following a partial response of first-line antidepressant therapy for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD), there is a choice to augment treatment with another agent or switch to a different antidepressant. OBJECTIVE: To report the prevalence and compare the characteristics of patients switching from their initial selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor or serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SSRI/SNRI) to a new SSRI/SNRI versus those augmenting SSRI/SNRI therapy with a second-generation antipsychotic (SGA). METHODS: MDD patients receiving first-line SSRI/SNRI treatment were identified from a large US-based claims database during 2000-2019. Patients augmenting therapy with an SGA were compared with those who switched to a new SSRI/SNRI. The date of the treatment change was the index date. Previously diagnosed comorbid conditions, medication use and demographics were captured. Treatment patterns following the index date were also captured. Standardized differences (StdDiff) were used to quantify dissimilarities between the two groups. RESULTS: There were 4572 SGA add-on and 24,409 switching patients identified. SGA augmentation patients had more severe disease (diagnosed severe recurrent major depression: 24.7% vs. 9.5%, StdDiff = 0.41) and more diagnosed psychiatric conditions, including: suicidal thoughts (10.7% vs. 3.2%, StdDiff = 0.29), post-traumatic stress disorder (6.1% vs. 2.6%, StdDiff = 0.17) and alcohol abuse (5.4% vs. 2.7%, StdDiff = 0.14). SGA augmentation patients had higher rates of prior use of anxiolytics (37.4% vs. 28.2%, StdDiff = 0.20) and anticonvulsants (26.0% vs. 13.1%, StdDiff = 0.33). CONCLUSIONS: Patients adding an SGA to their SSRI/SNRI therapy appeared to have more severe depression and comorbid psychiatric profile than those switching their SSRI/SNRI. These differences are important to consider and adequately control for in any future comparative outcome research between these two groups.
Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Inhibidores de Captación de Serotonina y Norepinefrina , Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/epidemiología , Humanos , Norepinefrina , Serotonina/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Captación de Serotonina y Norepinefrina/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Schizophrenia (SZ) is associated with devastating emotional, cognitive and language impairments. Understanding the deficits in each domain and their interactions is important for developing novel, targeted psychotherapies. This study tested whether negative-threat word processing is altered in individuals with SZ compared to healthy controls (HC), in relation to SZ symptom severity across domains. METHODS: Thirty-one SZ and seventeen HC subjects were scanned with functional magnetic resonance imaging while silently reading negative-threat and neutral words. Post-scan, subjects rated the valence of each word. The effects of group (SZ, HC), word type (negative, neutral), task period (early, late), and severity of clinical symptoms (positive, negative, excitement/hostility, cognitive, depression/anxiety), on word valence ratings and brain activation, were analyzed. RESULTS: SZ and HC subjects rated negative versus neutral words as more negative. The SZ subgroup with severe versus mild excitement/hostility symptoms rated the negative words as more negative. SZ versus HC subjects hyperactivated left language areas (angular gyrus, middle/inferior temporal gyrus (early period)) and the amygdala (early period) to negative words, and the amygdala (late period) to neutral words. In SZ, activation to negative versus neutral words in left dorsal temporal pole and dorsal anterior cingulate was positively correlated with excitement/hostility scores. CONCLUSIONS: A negatively-biased behavioral response to negative-threat words was seen in SZ with severe versus mild excitement/hostility symptoms. The biased behavioral response was mediated by hyperactivation of brain networks associated with semantic processing of emotion concepts. Thus, word-level semantic processing may be a relevant psychotherapeutic target in SZ.
Asunto(s)
Esquizofrenia , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagen , Emociones , Hostilidad , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Esquizofrenia/complicaciones , Esquizofrenia/diagnóstico por imagen , SemánticaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess cognitive functioning in adolescents (12-17 years old) with schizophrenia during open-label treatment with paliperidone extended-release (pali ER). METHODS: In this exploratory analysis, adolescents treated with pali ER (oral, flexibly dosed, 1.5-12 mg/day) underwent cognitive assessments at baseline and month 6 using a battery of cognitive tests validated in adolescents. Correlation analysis was used to explore the relationship between cognitive assessments and clinical symptoms (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scales [PANSS] and factors) and functionality (Children Global Assessment Scale [CGAS]) at baseline and at 6 months. RESULTS: A total of 324 of 393 patients had evaluable neurocognitive data. Changes in cognition function tests from baseline to endpoint were generally small to modest, with improvement noted for most cognitive domains (motor speed, attention/working memory, verbal learning and memory, social cognition, speed of processing, executive functioning). No improvement was noted for visual learning and memory. At baseline, there were modest negative correlations between disorganized thoughts and most cognitive domains; these correlations persisted at 6 months. Other significant negative correlations at 6 months were between speed of processing and PANSS total score, positive symptoms, negative symptoms and uncontrolled hostility (p < 0.05). At 6 months, higher CGAS scores (improved functioning) positively correlated with speed of processing and executive functioning, especially among pali ER responders. CONCLUSIONS: In this large sample of adolescents with schizophrenia, frank cognitive deficits across multiple domains were observed. Treatment with pali ER over 6 months did not worsen neurocognitive functioning and was possibly associated with positive improvement in certain domains.
RESUMEN
Despite the existence of effective behavioral interventions for people diagnosed with serious mental illness (SMI), these continue to be underutilized. Barriers to implementation include a low frequency of staff-patient interactions, as well as a lack of knowledge about, and negative attitudes toward, behavioral interventions. Therefore, we examined the effects of a mandatory behavioral staff-training program on staff-patient interactions on a long-term psychiatric inpatient program for individuals with SMI. Staff-training consisted of two-phases: didactic training followed by a written exam, and in vivo training and assessment. From pre- to posttraining, all staff demonstrated increased positive and therapeutic behaviors and decreased negative behaviors when interacting with patients. Additionally, at baseline, nonmedical staff (psychologists, social workers) displayed significantly more therapeutic and fewer negative behaviors compared with medical staff (psychiatrists, nurses, mental health workers), and this pattern persisted at posttraining despite improvements in both groups. Importantly, completion of the staff-training program was associated with improvements in patient behavior. Although both written and in vivo test scores significantly predicted change in negative staff behaviors toward patients, the in vivo test performance increased predictive ability over and above that of written test performance. Staff who disagreed with behavioral management principles displayed less improvement in negative behaviors from pre- to postassessment. These data have implications for clarifying staff training needs in programs for chronically ill people with SMI. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
Asunto(s)
Evaluación Educacional/estadística & datos numéricos , Personal de Salud/educación , Pacientes Internos , Capacitación en Servicio , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Rehabilitación Psiquiátrica , Adulto , Femenino , Hospitales , Humanos , MasculinoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Sudden discontinuation from antipsychotic treatment is a common occurrence in patients with schizophrenia. Lower rates of relapse could be expected for patients discontinuing treatment from longer-acting formulations vs their shorter-acting equivalents. OBJECTIVE: To compare relapse rates and time-to-relapse between the active (analogous to adherent patients) and placebo (analogous to non-adherent patients in the real-world) arms of three different formulations of paliperidone (oral paliperidone extended release [paliperidone ER], paliperidone palmitate once monthly [PP1M], and paliperidone palmitate three monthly [PP3M] long-acting injectables). METHODS: Data from three similarly designed, randomized relapse prevention studies in adult patients with schizophrenia were analyzed. RESULTS: In total, 922 patients were included (active treatment: 473, placebo: 449). Lowest percentage of patients experienced relapse with PP3M
RESUMEN
Disturbances in sustained attention commonly interfere with the ability of persons with schizophrenia to benefit from evidence-based psychosocial treatments. Cognitive remediation interventions have thus far demonstrated minimal effects on attention, as have medications. There is thus a gap between the existence of effective psychosocial treatments and patients' ability to effectively engage in and benefit from them. We report on the results of a multisite study of attention shaping (AS), a behavioral intervention for improving attentiveness and learning of social skills among highly distractible schizophrenia patients. Patients with chronic schizophrenia who were refractory to skills training were assigned to receive either the UCLA Basic Conversation Skills Module (BCSM) augmented with AS (n = 47) or in the standard format (n = 35). AS, a reward-based learning procedure, was employed to facilitate patients' meeting clearly defined and individualized attentiveness and participation goals during each session of a social skills training group. Primary outcome measures were observational ratings of attentiveness in each session and pre- and post-BCSM ratings of social skill and symptoms. Patients receiving social skills training augmented with AS demonstrated significantly more attentiveness in group sessions and higher levels of skill acquisition; moreover, significant relationships were found between changes in attentiveness and amount of skills acquired. Changes in attentiveness were unrelated to level or change in antipsychotic medication dose. AS is an effective example of supported cognition, in that cognitive abilities are improved within the environmental context where the patient is experiencing difficulty, leading to gains in both attention and functional outcome.
Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos/farmacología , Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Atención/efectos de los fármacos , Clorpromazina/farmacología , Clorpromazina/uso terapéutico , Trastornos del Conocimiento/etiología , Trastornos del Conocimiento/terapia , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/métodos , Aprendizaje , Recompensa , Esquizofrenia/complicaciones , Esquizofrenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Refuerzo en Psicología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotic paliperidone palmitate 3-month formulation (PP3M) is indicated in the United States for the treatment of schizophrenia only after adequate treatment with paliperidone palmitate 1-month formulation (PP1M) for ≥4 months. This analysis aimed to identify patient and disease characteristics during PP1M treatment associated with greater likelihood of achieving remission after transition to PP3M. METHODS: A post hoc analysis of a randomized, Phase III, double-blind, noninferiority trial of PP3M vs PP1M (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01515423) was conducted in adult patients with schizophrenia. Patients achieving clinical stability after 17 weeks of open-label PP1M were randomized to 48 weeks of double-blind treatment with PP3M or PP1M. The primary objective of this exploratory post hoc analysis was to identify demographic and/or clinical variables associated with persistent remission after treatment with PP3M. Multiple logistic regression analysis identified the following significant predictors of remission: Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Marder negative symptom factor score, Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) total score, and Personal and Social Performance (PSP) total score. RESULTS: At double-blind baseline, a 1-point reduction in Marder negative symptom factor score was associated with a 20% increase in the odds of achieving remission after PP3M treatment; 1-point reduction in CGI-S was associated with a doubling in remission odds; and 7- and 10-point improvements in PSP scores, respectively, were associated with 42% and 65% increases in remission odds. CONCLUSION: Patients with early clinically meaningful improvements in disease symptoms and severity while establishing stable PP1M dosage are more likely to achieve remission after transition to PP3M.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the efficacy and safety of paliperidone palmitate 3-monthly (PP3M) in Latin American patients with schizophrenia vs. rest-of-world (ROW). METHODS: We analyzed data from two multinational, double-blind (DB), randomized, controlled phase 3 studies including patients with schizophrenia (DSM-IV-TR) previously stabilized on PP1M/PP3M (open-label [OL] phase). Patients were randomized to PP3M or PP1M (noninferiority study A) and PP3M or placebo (study B) in DB phase. The subgroup analysis included Latin American (Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Mexico) patients. Primary efficacy endpoints were relapse-free rates (study A) and time-to-relapse (study B). RESULTS: In study A, 63/71 (88.7%) and in study B 38/43 (88.4%) Latin American patients completed the DB phase. In study A, relapse-free percentage was similar in Latin America (PP3M: 97%, PP1M: 100%) and ROW (PP3M: 91%, PP1M: 89%). In study B, median time-to-relapse was not estimable in the Latin American subgroup for either placebo or PP3M groups, nor for the ROW PP3M group; the median time-to-relapse in the ROW placebo group was 395 days. Caregiver burden improved in patients switching from oral antipsychotics (OL baseline) to PP3M/PP1M in DB phase (Involvement Evaluation Questionnaire score mean ± SD change, -9.4±15.16; p < 0.001). Treatment emergent adverse events with PP3M during DB phase were similar in Latin America (study A: 24/34 [70.6%]; study B: 15/21 [71.4%]) and ROW (study A: 318/470 [67.7%]; study B: 84/139 [60.4%]) subgroups. CONCLUSION: PP3M was efficacious and showed no new safety concerns in patients with schizophrenia from Latin America, corroborating ROW findings. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01515423, NCT01529515.
Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos/administración & dosificación , Palmitato de Paliperidona/administración & dosificación , Esquizofrenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , América Latina , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Efecto Placebo , Recurrencia , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Prevención Secundaria , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
PURPOSE: This randomized, double-blind (DB), non-inferiority phase 3 study was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of paliperidone palmitate 3-month (PP3M) vs 1-month formulation (PP1M) in European and non-European patients with schizophrenia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this randomized, DB, parallel-group study, adult patients (18-70 years) with schizophrenia (per DSM-IV-TR) having Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score between 70 and 120; previously stabilized on PP1M were enrolled. The study had 4 phases: screening (3 weeks), open-label (OL) stabilization (17 weeks), DB (48 weeks) and follow-up (4-12 weeks) phase. Patients were treated with fixed-dose PP3M (175-525 mg eq deltoid/gluteal) or PP1M (50-150 mg eq deltoid/gluteal) for 48 weeks in DB phase. RESULTS: In total, 487 European (PP3M, n=242; PP1M, n=245) and 508 non-European patients (PP3M, n=241; PP1M, n=267) entered DB phase (modified intent-to-treat (mITT) [DB] analysis set). Among the 508 non-European patients in mITT set, 67.7% were from Asia (n=344) and 32.3% were from rest of world (ROW, n=164). During the DB phase, similar percentage of Europeans (PP3M: 7%; PP1M: 8%) and non-Europeans (PP3M: 9%; PP1M: 10%) experienced relapse (Kaplan-Meier estimate PP3M-PP1M [95% CI] of percentage of relapse-free patients at the end of DB phase [primary endpoint]: European: 1.0% [-4.3%; 6.2%]; non-European: 1.4% [-4.4%; 7.1%]; Asian: 1.6% [-5.7%; 9.0%]; and ROW: 1.4% [-7.0%, 9.8%], per-protocol analysis set). Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was lower in Europeans (PP3M: 56%, PP1M: 59%) than non-Europeans (PP3M: 80%, PP1M: 73%). The most commonly reported TEAE was weight gain. CONCLUSION: PP3M showed similar efficacy to PP1M in Europeans and non-Europeans, consistent with non-inferiority of PP3M to PP1M observed in overall population. Rates of AEs were higher in non-Europeans. However, weight gain was greater in non-Europeans, especially the Asian population.
RESUMEN
Antipsychotics are the mainstay in schizophrenia management, and long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics contribute to the successful maintenance of treatment by improving non-adherence and preventing relapses. Paliperidone palmitate 3-monthly (PP3M) formulation is the only available LAI antipsychotic that offers an extended 3-month window of stable plasma drug concentration, enabling only four injections per year. This paper summarizes clinically relevant endpoints from available evidence for PP3M to bridge translational research gaps and provide measurable outcomes that can be interpreted in clinical practice. Low number-needed-to-treat (NNT) for relapse prevention (NNT [95% CI] 6-month estimate: 4.8 [3.2; 10.0]; 12-month estimate: 3.4 [2.2; 7.0]), and high number-needed-to-harm (NNH [95% CI] akathisia, 27.1 [12.3; -667.1]; tremor, 80.0 [22.5; 67.3]; dyskinesia, -132.6 [44.5; -23.2]; parkinsonism, 160.0 [28.9; -49.8]) quantify the relative benefits and low propensity for adverse events with PP3M. Symptom remission and reductions in positive and negative symptoms indicate treatment stability. Additionally, meaningful functional remission, reduced dosing frequency, and freedom from daily negotiations favorably impact patient preference and attenuate burdensome aspects of caregiving, representing important healthcare determinants that enhance prospects of treatment continuity in schizophrenia. This information can potentially improve clinicians' judgment of treatment choices, clinical response, and patient selection in routine care. Taken together, PP3M is a valuable antipsychotic treatment option, meriting consideration for a broader role in the long-term management of schizophrenia; its utility should not be limited to patients with poor adherence or when oral antipsychotics have failed.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Antipsychotic blood levels (ABLs) may help identify patients at risk for treatment failure. Reference ranges (RR) for plasma concentrations of ABLs that account for between-patient variability were developed for risperidone and olanzapine based on population pharmacokinetic models. The Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) collected clinical outcomes and ABLs, allowing testing of the relationship of ABLs with outcomes. METHODS: ABLs from 694 patients who were randomized to olanzapine or risperidone were compared to the 80% RRs and were assessed as below or within/above the RR. Treatment failure was defined per any of these criteria: (1) emergency room visit for psychiatric reasons, (2) hospitalization for psychiatric reasons, (3) adverse event of completed suicide, suicidal ideation, or suicide attempt, (4) assaultive behavior, (5) arrested or jailed, (6) 2-point increase from baseline in Clinical Global Impression-Severity score, (7) 25% increase in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score. Patients assessed with treatment failure within 100â¯days of drug concentration measurement were analyzed. RESULTS: Treatment failure occurred in 126 of 323 patients. The proportion of patients with ABLs below RR was 18.3% (59/323) compared to 10% expected in a fully adherent population. Among the 59 with ABLs below RR, 50.8% had treatment failure (compared to 36.4% for the 264 with ABLs within/above RR). The difference between groups was significant (odds ratioâ¯=â¯1.810; 95% CIâ¯=â¯1.025, 3.197; pâ¯=â¯0.0408). CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of CATIE data showed that ABLs within the context of RRs may identify patients with higher risk of relapse.