Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo de estudio
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 32(8): 1368-1372, 2018 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29575357

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients treated with vemurafenib for metastatic melanoma often develop skin lesions similar to those observed after exposure to dioxin-like compounds. We previously called these lesions MADISH (metabolizing acquired dioxin-induced skin hamartoma) when analysing a case of acute dioxin poisoning. OBJECTIVE: We performed a clinical trial aimed at comparing the skin lesions observed under vemurafenib treatment with MADISH in order to bring to light a possible crosstalk between vemurafenib and dioxin pathways. METHODS: In this case series study, we explored the histological aspect of skin lesions in 10 cases treated with vemurafenib for malignant melanoma. We also analysed the ability of vemurafenib and tyrosine kinase inhibitors to induce dioxin-AhR pathway. RESULTS: All patients had skin lesions diagnosed as 'non-inflammatory acneiform eruption' by dermatologists. These were predominantly facial with notable retroauricular involvement and clinically compatible with chloracne/MADISH when assessed by dioxin expert. Histological analysis showed mostly comedone-like lesions and dermal cysts containing epithelial wall with basal or lateral epithelial projections and lamellar keratinization and alterations of remaining sebaceous glands. The expression of CYP1A1, a gene highly induced following dioxin exposure, was not observed in these lesions. Vemurafenib and the tyrosine kinase inhibitors erlotinib and gefitinib did not induce CYP1A1 activity. DISCUSSION: Although the skin lesions under vemurafenib treatment were morphologically similar to MADISH, the absence of CYP1A1 expression in dermal cysts of patients and the absence of CYP1A1 activation by vemurafenib led us consider that these skin lesions were different from true MADISH and not mediated by a crosstalk of AhR signalling, but rather to a hyperactivation of PI3K-Akt pathway as a consequence of vemurafenib treatment. A strong expression of CYP1A1 in the epithelial wall of dermal cysts must be required, parallel to the morphology of the lesions, to make the diagnosis of MADISH, the hallmark of an exposure to dioxin-like/chloracnegen compounds.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Cloracné/patología , Quiste Epidérmico/metabolismo , Melanoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Cutáneas/tratamiento farmacológico , Vemurafenib/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos/farmacología , Cloracné/etiología , Cloracné/metabolismo , Citocromo P-450 CYP1A1/metabolismo , Dioxinas/efectos adversos , Erupciones por Medicamentos/etiología , Erupciones por Medicamentos/metabolismo , Erupciones por Medicamentos/patología , Activación Enzimática/efectos de los fármacos , Quiste Epidérmico/inducido químicamente , Clorhidrato de Erlotinib/farmacología , Femenino , Gefitinib/farmacología , Células Hep G2 , Humanos , Masculino , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/farmacología , Vemurafenib/farmacología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA