Reduced post-operative urinary tract infection using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of post-operative urinary tract infection (UTI) is frequently unknown or underestimated. Failure to recognize a clinical problem results in no action occurring to improve outcomes. The aims of this study were firstly to define the incidence of post-operative UTI in general surgery patients using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP). Secondly to design and implement an intervention to reduce the incidence of post-operative UTI and assess the extent of improvement. METHODS: ACS-NSQIP data were collected and analysed from June 2015 to June 2016 and reported in the Semi Annual Report (SAR). A quality improvement programme was designed and implemented to manage the high incidence of UTI. The outcomes were assessed by the subsequent ACS-NSQIP SAR. RESULTS: The SAR in 2016 reported that Nepean Hospital as a significant outlier with an incidence of post-operative UTI of 3.62% (odds ratio 2.21, confidence limits 1.51-3.44, P < 0.001). A hospital-wide policy for catheter insertion in surgical patients was developed including: education, workshops, accreditation for aseptic technique for catheter insertion, reduced rates of insertion, reduced duration of use and improved catheter care. There was a significant improvement in the incidence of UTI (1.21%) reported by the 2018 SAR (odds ratio 1.01, confidence limits 0.64-1.60, P = 0.68). CONCLUSIONS: ACS-NSQIP identified a 2.2-fold increased risk of post-operative UTI. There was no increased risk of UTI after the programme to reduce UTI was introduced.

Quality improvement in surgery: introduction of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program into New South Wales.

BACKGROUND: Quality improvement in surgery requires accurate, reliable, risk-adjusted and comparative data. The American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) takes reliable clinical data and provides risk-adjusted comparisons with more than 800 hospitals. This paper describes the early outcomes of introducing this programme into New South Wales (NSW). METHODS: Four NSW hospitals formed a collaborative. Surgical clinical reviewers were trained and data collected. Risk-adjusted reports were returned to individual hospitals and the NSW Collaborative. RESULTS: The results identified that the NSW Collaborative were outliers for the following causes of morbidity: urinary tract infections, surgical site infections, pneumonia and 30-day readmissions. CONCLUSION: We have shown that ACS-NSQIP can be adapted to Australia and there is a plan to widen the programme in NSW.