Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Br J Surg ; 106(10): 1327-1340, 2019 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31318456

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Conflicting evidence challenges clinical decision-making when breast reconstruction is considered in the context of radiotherapy. Current literature was evaluated and key statements on topical issues were generated and discussed by an expert panel at the International Oncoplastic Breast Surgery Meeting in Milan 2017. METHODS: Studies on radiotherapy and breast reconstruction (1985 to September 2017) were screened using MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL. The literature review yielded 30 controversial key questions. A set of key statements was derived and the highest levels of clinical evidence (LoE) for each of these were summarized. Nineteen panellists convened for dedicated discussions at the International Oncoplastic Breast Surgery Meeting to express agreement, disagreement or abstention for the generated key statements. RESULTS: The literature review identified 1522 peer-reviewed publications. A list of 22 key statements was produced, with the highest LoE recorded for each statement. These ranged from II to IV, with most statements (11 of 22, 50 per cent) supported by LoE III. There was full consensus for nine (41 per cent) of the 22 key statements, and more than 75 per cent agreement was reached for half (11 of 22). CONCLUSION: Poor evidence exists on which to base patient-informed consent. Low-quality studies are conflicting with wide-ranging treatment options, precluding expert consensus regarding optimal type and timing of breast reconstruction in the context of radiotherapy. There is a need for high-quality evidence from prospective registries and randomized trials in this field.


ANTECEDENTES: El hecho de que la evidencia disponible sea conflictiva supone un reto para la toma de decisiones a la hora de considerar la reconstrucción mamaria en el contexto de radioterapia (radiotherapy, RT). En el seno de un panel de expertos reunidos durante el International Oncoplastic Breast Surgery Meeting celebrado en Milán en 2017, se revisó la literatura disponible y se generaron y discutieron los aspectos más relevantes. MÉTODOS: Se hizo una búsqueda bibliográfica de los estudios de RT y reconstrucción mamaria (1985-septiembre de 2017) en las bases MEDLINE, EMBASE y CENTRAL. La revisión de la literatura permitió identificar 30 cuestiones clave controvertidas. A partir de ellas, se construyeron una serie de afirmaciones, para las que se obtuvo el mayor nivel de evidencia (levels of clinical evidence, LoE) posible. El acuerdo, desacuerdo o abstención respecto a las cuestiones propuestas fueron el resultado de las discusiones de 19 expertos reunidos durante el International Oncoplastic Breast Surgery Meeting. RESULTADOS: Se identificaron 1.522 artículos publicados en revistas con peer review. Se elaboró una lista de 22 afirmaciones clave y se anotó el LoE más alto obtenido para cada una de ellas. El grado de variabilidad fue de II a IV, pero la mayoría de las afirmaciones (54,5%) obtuvieron un LoE III. Hubo un consenso total en el 41% (9/22) de las afirmaciones, mientras que se obtuvo más de un 75% de acuerdo en la mitad de las afirmaciones (11/22). CONCLUSIÓN: La evidencia en la que basar el consentimiento informado en estos pacientes es escasa. Se trata de estudios de baja calidad con gran variedad de opciones terapéuticas, que dificultan el consenso de los expertos acerca del tipo y momento óptimo para la reconstrucción mamaria en el contexto de RT. Para obtener datos de mayor calidad se precisan estudios prospectivos y ensayos clínicos en este campo.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Mamoplastia/métodos , Mastectomía/métodos , Implantes de Mama , Neoplasias de la Mama/radioterapia , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Consenso , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Femenino , Humanos , Factores de Tiempo
3.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol ; 148(6): 1543-1550, 2022 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35396978

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Physical examinations and annual mammography (minimal follow-up) are as effective as laboratory/imaging tests (intensive follow-up) in detecting breast cancer (BC) recurrence. This statement is now challenged by the availability of new diagnostic tools for asymptomatic cases. Herein, we analyzed current practices and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in monitoring high-risk BC patients treated with curative intent in a comprehensive cancer center. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-two consecutive triple negative BC patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy and surgery were prospectively enrolled. Data from plasma samples and surveillance procedures were analyzed to report the diagnostic pattern of relapsed cases, i.e., by symptoms, follow-up procedures and ctDNA. RESULTS: Besides minimal follow-up, 97% and 79% of patients had at least 1 non-recommended imaging and laboratory tests for surveillance purposes. During a median follow-up of 5.1(IQR, 4.1-5.9) years, 13 events occurred (1 contralateral BC, 1 loco-regional recurrence, 10 metastases, and 1 death). Five recurrent cases were diagnosed by intensive follow-up, 5 by symptoms, and 2 incidentally. ctDNA antedated disseminated disease in all evaluable cases excepted two with bone-only and single liver metastases. The mean time from ctDNA detection to suspicious findings at follow-up imaging was 3.81(SD, 2.68), and to definitive recurrence diagnosis 8(SD, 2.98) months. ctDNA was undetectable in the absence of disease and in two suspected cases not subsequently confirmed. CONCLUSIONS: Some relapses are still symptomatic despite the extensive use of intensive follow-up. ctDNA is a specific test, sensitive enough to detect recurrence before other methods, suitable for clarifying equivocal imaging, and exploitable for salvage therapy in asymptomatic BC survivors.


Asunto(s)
ADN Tumoral Circulante , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , ADN Tumoral Circulante/genética , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas/genética
4.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol ; 148(4): 775-781, 2022 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35037102

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Mammographic density (MD) is a risk factor for breast cancer (BC) development, and recurrence. However, its predictive value has been less studied. Herein, we challenged MD as a biomarker associated with response in patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). METHODS: Data on all NAT treated BC patients prospectively collected in the registry of Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy (2009-2019) were identified. Diagnostic mammograms were used to evaluate and score MD as categorized by the Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS), which identifies 4 levels of MD in keeping with relative increase of fibro-glandular over fat tissue. Each case was classified according to the following categories a (MD < 25%), b (26-50%), c (51-75%), and d (> 75%). The association between MD and pathological complete response (pCR), i.e., absence of BC cells in surgical specimens, was analyzed in multivariable setting used logistic regression models with adjustment for clinical and pathological variables. RESULTS: A total of 442 patients were analyzed, 120 of which (27.1%) attained a pCR. BI-RADS categories a, b, c, and d accounted for 10.0%, 37.8%, 37.1% and 15.2% of cases. Corresponding pCR were 20.5%, 26.9%, 30.5%, 23.9%, respectively. At multivariable analysis, when compared to cases classified as BI-RADS a, those with denser breast showed an increased likelihood of pCR with odds ratio (OR) of 1.70, 2.79, and 1.47 for b, c and d categories, respectively (p = 0.0996), independently of age, BMI [OR underweight versus (vs) normal = 3.76], clinical nodal and tumor status (OR T1/Tx vs T4 = 3.87), molecular subtype (HER2-positive vs luminal = 10.74; triple-negative vs luminal = 8.19). In subgroup analyses, the association of MD with pCR was remarkable in triple-negative (ORs of b, c and d versus a: 1.85, 2.49 and 1.55, respectively) and HER2-positive BC cases (ORs 2.70, 3.23, and 1.16). CONCLUSION: Patients with dense breast are more likely to attain a pCR at net of other predictive factors. The potential of MD to assist decisions on BC management and as a stratification factor in neoadjuvant clinical trials should be considered.


Asunto(s)
Densidad de la Mama , Neoplasias de la Mama , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Humanos , Mamografía , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Oportunidad Relativa , Receptor ErbB-2
5.
Br J Radiol ; 73(871): 698-705, 2000 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11089459

RESUMEN

Non-palpable breast cancers are often in situ or smaller and have less nodal and distant metastases than palpable lesions. They represent a heterogeneous group of tumours, which may have different prognostic behaviour. We analysed a retrospective series of 982 non-palpable breast cancers assessed histologically at the National Cancer Institute of Milan from 1985 to 1995, following pre-operative mammography-guided localization. The association between mammographic data (parenchymal pattern and findings), patient age and tumour histology was investigated by review of clinical records and statistical modelling. We also investigated the association between the presence or absence of microcalcification as a mammographic finding and pathological tumour characteristics (tumour size, axillary nodes status and grading) or receptor status for oestrogen (ER) and progesterone (PgR). In situ disease or invasive tumour with an intraductal component, whether extensive or not, were commoner in young women and mammography more frequently showed a dense parenchymal pattern and microcalcifications in these cases. In older women (55 years or more), a fatty breast pattern, nodular opacities with or without microcalcifications, and invasive tumours of the ductal, lobular, mixed or other types were closely related. When the relationships between mammographic findings, pathological tumour characteristics and receptor status were investigated for invasive cancers, there was an association between the presence of microcalcifications and less favourable tumour characteristics.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Calcinosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Calcinosis/patología , Carcinoma/patología , Carcinoma in Situ/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinoma in Situ/patología , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/patología , Carcinoma Lobular/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinoma Lobular/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Mamografía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos
6.
Abdom Imaging ; 25(3): 239-42, 2000.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10823441

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous gastrostomy is generally performed for permanent enteral nutrition or gastric decompression. METHODS: In our series of oncologic patients, percutaneous gastrostomy was also used temporarily in some patients for enteral nutrition while awaiting functional recovery of swallowing, in preparation for surgery, or for the treatment of fistulas in the upper digestive tract. Fifty-one procedures were performed in 50 patients: 42 for feeding, eight for decompression, and one for transgastric drainage of a duodenal fistula. RESULTS: Of the 35 patients treated for permanent enteral nutrition, four are still alive, with a total survival time of 2,167 days. In three patients, gastrostomy was performed for temporary feeding and was removed once the ability to swallow was restored. In four patients, it was created to restore metabolic balance before surgery. In the patient with a duodenal fistula, healing was achieved in 19 days. The seven patients in whom the procedure was performed for decompression survived for a mean of 19.2 days. There was only one major procedure-related complication (peritonitis). CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous gastrostomy is a safe, low-cost method that allows the patient to maintain essential nutrition without the discomfort of a nasogastic tube and therefore warrants wider and earlier use. We feel that its application should also be extended to temporary feeding of patients about to undergo long courses of chemotherapy and radiotherapy, which can lead to severe deterioration of nutritional status.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma/complicaciones , Trastornos de Deglución/cirugía , Estenosis Esofágica/cirugía , Gastrostomía/métodos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/complicaciones , Neoplasias Peritoneales/complicaciones , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma/cirugía , Trastornos de Deglución/etiología , Enfermedades Duodenales/complicaciones , Enfermedades Duodenales/cirugía , Nutrición Enteral/métodos , Estenosis Esofágica/complicaciones , Femenino , Gastrostomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Fístula Intestinal/complicaciones , Fístula Intestinal/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cuidados Paliativos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Neoplasias Peritoneales/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA