Thin flexible arrays for long-term multi-electrode recordings in macaque primary visual cortex.

Objective.Basic, translational and clinical neuroscience are increasingly focusing on large-scale invasive recordings of neuronal activity. However, in large animals such as nonhuman primates and humans-in which the larger brain size with sulci and gyri imposes additional challenges compared to rodents, there is a huge unmet need to record from hundreds of neurons simultaneously anywhere in the brain for long periods of time. Here, we tested the electrical and mechanical properties of thin, flexible multi-electrode arrays (MEAs) inserted into the primary visual cortex of two macaque monkeys, and assessed their magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compatibility and their capacity to record extracellular activity over a period of 1 year.Approach.To allow insertion of the floating arrays into the visual cortex, the 20 by 100µm2shafts were temporarily strengthened by means of a resorbable poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) coating.Main results. After manual insertion of the arrays, theex vivoandin vivoMRI compatibility of the arrays proved to be excellent. We recorded clear single-unit activity from up to 50% of the electrodes, and multi-unit activity (MUA) on 60%-100% of the electrodes, which allowed detailed measurements of the receptive fields and the orientation selectivity of the neurons. Even 1 year after insertion, we obtained significant MUA responses on 70%-100% of the electrodes, while the receptive fields remained remarkably stable over the entire recording period.Significance.Thus, the thin and flexible MEAs we tested offer several crucial advantages compared to existing arrays, most notably in terms of brain tissue compliance, scalability, and brain coverage. Future brain-machine interface applications in humans may strongly benefit from this new generation of chronically implanted MEAs.

Objective evaluation of stimulation artefact removal techniques in the context of neural spike sorting.

Objective. We present a framework to objectively test and compare stimulation artefact removal techniques in the context of neural spike sorting.Approach. To this end, we used realistic hybrid ground-truth spiking data, with superimposed artefacts fromin vivorecordings. We used the framework to evaluate and compare several techniques: blanking, template subtraction by averaging, linear regression, and a multi-channel Wiener filter (MWF).Main results. Our study demonstrates that blanking and template subtraction result in a poorer spike sorting performance than linear regression and MWF, while the latter two perform similarly. Finally, to validate the conclusions found from the hybrid evaluation framework, we also performed a qualitative analysis onin vivorecordings without artificial manipulations.Significance. Our framework allows direct quantification of the impact of the residual artefact on the spike sorting accuracy, thereby allowing for a more objective and more relevant comparison compared to indirect signal quality metrics that are estimated from the signal statistics. Furthermore, the availability of a ground truth in the form of single-unit spiking activity also facilitates a better estimation of such signal quality metrics.