Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 179
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Arthroplasty ; 2024 May 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38735545

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Depression is common in osteoarthritis (OA) and is associated with poor outcomes following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Depression can increase pain sensitivity and may be related to an increased likelihood of TKA. METHODS: Nationally distributed electronic health record data from 2010 to 2018 were used to identify eligible patients (n = 9,466) who had knee OA and were 45 to 80 years of age. Cox proportional hazard models were computed to estimate the association between depression and incident TKA for all patients and by age group (45 to 54, 55 to 64, and 65 to 80 years of age). Confounding was controlled using entropy balancing. Sensitivity analyses determined if the association between depression and TKA differed when depression occurred in the 12 months occurring 90, 60, 30, and 0 days lag time before TKA. RESULTS: The mean age of the sample was 63 (range, 45 to 80), 64.0% were women, 83.3% were White race, and approximately 50% resided in the Midwest. There was no association between depression and incident TKA (hazard ratio = 0.97; confidence interval = 0.81 to 1.16]). Results did not differ in age-stratified analyses. Sensitivity analyses revealed a higher percentage of TKA among depressed versus nondepressed patients (24.2 versus 21.6%; P = .028) when the patient's depression diagnosis was established in the 12 months with no lag time before TKA. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who have knee OA and comorbid depression, compared to those who have only knee OA, do not have an increased likelihood of TKA. The multifactorial, complex decision to obtain TKA does not appear to be influenced by depression, but depression is a common comorbidity.

2.
J Gen Intern Med ; 38(4): 1016-1023, 2023 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36385413

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has been associated with increased opioid prescribing. It is not known if perceived COVID-19 related stress is associated with increased odds of long-term opioid use. OBJECTIVE: To determine if greater COVID-19-related stress and worsening pain attributed to the pandemic was associated with LTOT over a 6-month observation period. DESIGN: Longitudinal cohort. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (n=477) from two midwestern health care systems, with any acute or chronic non-cancer pain, starting a new period of 30-90-day prescription opioid use, were invited to participate in the Prescription Opioids and Depression Pathways Cohort Study, a longitudinal survey study of pain, opioid use, and mental health outcomes. MAIN MEASURES: Baseline and 6-month follow-up assessments were used to measure the association between perceived COVID-19 stressors, the perception that pain was made worse by the pandemic and the odds of persistent opioid use, i.e., remaining a prescription opioid user at 6-month follow-up. Multivariate models controlled for demographics, opioid dose, and change in pain characteristics, mental health measures, and social support. KEY RESULTS: Participants were, on average, 53.9 (±11.4) years of age, 67.1% White race, and 70.9% female. The most frequently endorsed COVID-19 stressor was "worry about health of self/others" (85.7% endorsed) and the least endorsed was "worsened pain due to pandemic" (26.2%). After adjusting for all covariates, "worsened pain due to pandemic" (OR=2.88; 95%CI: 1.33-6.22), change in pain interference (OR=1.20; 95%CI: 1.04-1.38), and change in vital exhaustion (OR=0.90; 95%CI: 0.82-0.99) remained significantly associated with persistent opioid use. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who attribute worsening pain to the COVID-19 pandemic are more likely to be persistent opioid users. Further research is warranted to identify mechanisms underlying this association. Clinicians may consider discussing pain in the context of the pandemic to identify patients at high risk for persistent opioid use.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Dolor Crónico , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Masculino , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Pandemias , Estudios de Cohortes , Dolor Crónico/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Crónico/epidemiología , Salud Mental , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , COVID-19/epidemiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/epidemiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/tratamiento farmacológico , Prescripciones de Medicamentos
3.
Prev Med ; 174: 107646, 2023 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37499919

RESUMEN

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a common comorbidity in type 2 diabetes (T2D). ED has been studied as an outcome in diabetes, but it is not known if ED is a risk factor for T2D. We determined if patients with ED have an increased risk for prediabetes and/or T2D and measured the duration between ED and prediabetes/T2D diagnosis. Retrospective cohort study using de-identified medical record data from a large mid-western health care system to measure ED, T2D and potential confounding factors. Patients were 18 to 40 years of age because we were interested in early onset pre-diabetes/T2D. Eligible patients had ED and were free of prediabetes, hyperglycemia and T2D at index. Entropy balancing controlled for confounding. Modified Poisson regression models with robust error variances calculated relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals for the association of ED and pre-diabetes/T2D. Patients' mean age was 28.3 (±7.0) years, 81.7% were White and 14.0% were Black. After controlling for confounding, ED was associated with increased risk for prediabetes/T2D (RR = 1.34; 95%CI:1.16-1.55). This association was similar to that between ED and T2D alone (RR = 1.38; 95% CI: 1.10-1.74). About 30% had ED and prediabetes/T2D diagnosed on the same day and nearly 75% were diagnosed within a year of ED. ED is a marker for undiagnosed prediabetes/T2D and a risk factor for near term onset of prediabetes/T2D. ED may offer the opportunity for earlier detection and diagnoses of T2D, particularly in younger men. Younger patients presenting with ED should be screened for hyperglycemia.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Disfunción Eréctil , Hiperglucemia , Estado Prediabético , Masculino , Humanos , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Estado Prediabético/diagnóstico , Disfunción Eréctil/diagnóstico , Disfunción Eréctil/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
4.
J Nerv Ment Dis ; 211(7): 530-536, 2023 07 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37040181

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT: Suicide rates differ over time. Our objective was to determine when significant changes occurred by age, race, and ethnicity in the United States between 1999 and 2020. National Center for Health Statistics WONDER data were used in joinpoint regression. The annual percent change in suicide rate increased for all race, ethnic, and age groups, except for those 65 years and older. For American Indian/Alaska Natives, the largest increase occurred between 2010 and 2020 for those with ages 25 to 34 years. For Asian/Pacific Islander, the largest increase occurred among those 15 to 24 years old between 2011 and 2016. For Black/African-Americans, the largest increases occurred between 2010 and 2020 among 15- to 34-year-olds. For Whites, the largest increase occurred between 2014 and 2017 among 15- to 24-year-olds. Between 2018 and 2020, suicide rates significantly declined among Whites 45 to 64 years of age. Among Hispanics, significant increases in suicide rate occurred between 2012 and 2020 among those with ages 15 to 44 years. Between 1999 and 2020, the contour of suicide burden varied by age groups, race, and ethnicity.


Asunto(s)
Suicidio , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Humanos , Adulto Joven , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Suicidio/etnología , Suicidio/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Blanco/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Indio Americano o Nativo de Alaska/estadística & datos numéricos , Asiático Americano Nativo Hawáiano y de las Islas del Pacífico/estadística & datos numéricos , Grupos Raciales/etnología , Grupos Raciales/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Edad , Factores de Tiempo
5.
Prev Med ; 164: 107344, 2022 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36368340

RESUMEN

Due to a large number of small studies and limited control for confounding, existing evidence regarding patient characteristics associated with PrEP initiation is inconsistent. We used a large electronic health record cohort to determine which demographic, physical morbidity and psychiatric conditions are associated with PrEP initiation. Eligible adult (≥18 years) patients were selected from the Optum® de-identified Electronic Health Record dataset (2010-2018). Non-HIV sexually transmitted diseases and high risk sexual behavior was used to identify patients eligible for PrEP. A fully adjusted Poisson regression model estimated the association between age, gender, race, insurance status, comorbidity index, depression, anxiety, dysthymia, severe mental illness, substance use disorder and nicotine dependence/smoking and rate of PrEP initiation. The cohort (n = 30,909) was mostly under 40 years of age (64.3%), 67.6% were female and 58.2% were White. The cumulative incidence of PrEP initiation was 1.3% (n = 408). Patients ≥60 years of age, compared to 18-29 year olds and Black compared to White patients had significantly lower rates of PrEP initiation. Anxiety disorder was significantly associated with higher rate of PrEP initiation (RR = 1.67; 95%CI:1.20-2.33) and nicotine dependence/smoking with a lower rate (RR = 0.73; 95%CI:0.54-0.97). PrEP is underutilized, and a race disparity exists in PrEP initiation. In the context of existing research, nicotine dependence/smoking is the patient characteristic most consistently associated lower rates of starting PrEP. Given the high prevalence of smoking in PrEP eligible patients, physicians may want to integrate discussions of smoking cessation in patient-provider decisions to start PrEP.


Asunto(s)
Profilaxis Pre-Exposición , Tabaquismo , Femenino , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Comorbilidad , Estudios de Cohortes , Demografía
6.
Nicotine Tob Res ; 24(2): 178-185, 2022 02 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34477205

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Improvement in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is associated with better health behavior such as better medication adherence and greater use of nutrition and weight loss programs. However, it is not known if reducing PTSD severity is associated with smoking cessation, a poor health behavior common in patients with PTSD. AIMS AND METHODS: Veterans Health Affairs (VHA) medical record data (2008-2015) were used to identify patients with PTSD diagnosed in specialty care. Clinically meaningful PTSD improvement was defined as ≥20 point PTSD Checklist (PCL) decrease from the first PCL ≥50 and the last available PCL within 12 months and at least 8 weeks later. The association between clinically meaningful PTSD improvement and smoking cessation within 2 years after baseline among 449 smokers was estimated in Cox proportional hazard models. Entropy balancing controlled for confounding. RESULTS: On average, patients were 39.4 (SD = 12.9) years of age, 86.6% were male and 71.5% were white. We observed clinically meaningful PTSD improvement in 19.8% of participants. Overall, 19.4% quit smoking in year 1 and 16.6% in year 2. More patients with versus without clinically meaningful PTSD improvement stopped smoking (n = 36, cumulative incidence = 40.5% vs. 111, cumulative incidence = 30.8%, respectively). After controlling for confounding, patients with versus without clinically meaningful PTSD improvement were more likely to stop smoking within 2 years (hazard ratio = 1.57; 95% confidence interval: 1.04-2.36). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with clinically meaningful PTSD improvement were significantly more likely to stop smoking. Further research should determine if targeted interventions are needed or whether improvement in PTSD symptoms is sufficient to enable smoking cessation. IMPLICATIONS: Patients with PTSD are more likely to develop chronic health conditions such as heart disease and diabetes. Poor health behaviors, including smoking, partly explain the risk for chronic disease in this patient population. Our results demonstrate that clinically meaningful PTSD improvement is followed by greater likelihood of smoking cessation. Thus, PTSD treatment may enable healthier behaviors and reduce risk for smoking-related disease.


Asunto(s)
Cese del Hábito de Fumar , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático , Veteranos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Fumar/epidemiología , Fumar/terapia , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/complicaciones , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/diagnóstico , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/terapia
7.
Curr Treat Options Oncol ; 23(3): 348-358, 2022 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35254595

RESUMEN

OPINION STATEMENT: Preventing depression in cancer patients on long-term opioid therapy should begin with depression screening before opioid initiation and repeated screening during treatment. In weighing the high morbidity of depression and opioid use disorder in patients with chronic cancer pain against a dearth of evidence-based therapies studied in this population, patients and clinicians are left to choose among imperfect but necessary treatment options. When possible, we advise engaging psychiatric and pain/palliative specialists through collaborative care models and recommending mindfulness and psychotherapy to all patients with significant depression alongside cancer pain. Medications for depression should be reserved for moderate to severe symptoms. We recommend escitalopram/citalopram or sertraline among selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), or the serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) duloxetine, venlafaxine, or desvenlafaxine if patients have a significant component of neuropathic pain or fibromyalgia. Tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) (consider nortriptyline or desipramine, which have better anticholinergic profiles) should be considered for patients who do not respond to or tolerate SSRI/SNRIs. Existing evidence is inadequate to definitively recommend methylphenidate or novel agents, such as ketamine or psilocybin, as adjunctive treatments for cancer-related depression and pain. Physicians who treat patients with cancer pain should utilize universal precautions to limit the risk of non-medical opioid use (non-medical opioid use). Patients should be screened for non-medical opioid use behaviors at initial consultation and at regular intervals during treatment using a non-judgmental approach that reduces stigma. Co-management with an addiction specialist may be indicated for patients at high risk of non-medical opioid use and opioid use disorder. Buprenorphine and methadone are indicated for the treatment of opioid use disorder, and while they have not been systematically studied for treatment of opioid use disorder in patients with cancer pain, they do provide analgesia for cancer pain. While an interdisciplinary team approach to manage psychological stress may be beneficial, this may not be possible for patients treated outside of comprehensive cancer centers.


Asunto(s)
Dolor en Cáncer , Neoplasias , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Inhibidores de Captación de Serotonina y Norepinefrina , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Dolor en Cáncer/diagnóstico , Dolor en Cáncer/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor en Cáncer/etiología , Depresión , Humanos , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Manejo del Dolor , Prescripciones , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Captación de Serotonina y Norepinefrina/uso terapéutico
8.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 22(1): 328, 2022 Mar 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35277169

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Adult well visits declined during COVID-19, but literature is inconsistent in regard to whether childhood well visits declined. We determined if the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with a change in well visits among infants, children, adolescents and adults before, compared to during the COVID-19 pandemic, including through the emergence of the Delta variant. METHODS: De-identified electronic health care data came from a multi-state Midwest health care system. Eligible patients (n = 798,571) had ≥ 1 well visit between 7/1/2018 and 6/30/2021. Trends in well visits per month for children (< 1, 1-4, 5-11, 12-17 years) and adults (18-39, 40-64, ≥ 65 years) over 3-years were assessed using Joinpoint regression models and monthly percent change (MPC). RESULTS: Well visits remained stable for infants (< 1 year of age) (MPC = -0.1; 95% CI = -0.3, 0.1). For children 1-4 years and all adults, visits were stable prior to 2020, decreased from 1/2020 to 4/2020 (MPC range -20 to -40), increased from 4/2020-7/2020 (MPC range 30 to 72), and remained stable after 7/2020. Children 5-17 had seasonal variation in visits where low points occurred in Jan/Feb 2019 and high points in Aug 2019 (start of school year); however, the low point in 2020 occurred in April 2020 and the seasonal variation normalized after this. CONCLUSIONS: In a large Mid-western health care system, infant well visits did not decline at the onset (3/1/2020) of the COVID-19 pandemic. Although well visits for all other ages decreased to a low point in 4/2020, a rapid return to pre-pandemic utilization rates occurred by 7/2020. The brief decrease in preventive care may have had little impact on health.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Adolescente , Adulto , COVID-19/epidemiología , Niño , Humanos , Lactante , Pandemias , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2
9.
Mo Med ; 119(3): 229-236, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36035570

RESUMEN

Synopsis Patients with non-cancer pain reported increased pain and pain interference during the first months of the COVID-19 pandemic. We determined if pain, prescription opioid use, and comorbidities were associated with perceived COVID-19-related stress as the pandemic peaked. Analysis of survey data revealed that depression/anxiety, pain severity, and pain interference were most strongly and consistently associated with greater stress due to COVID-19 related changes in lifestyle, worsening of emotional/mental health and worsening pain. Identifying specific stressful experiences that most impacted patients with non-cancer pain may help target public health and treatment interventions. Background: During the first months of the COVID-19 pandemic, patients with chronic pain reported increased pain severity and interference. This study measured the association between pain, prescription opioid use, and comorbidities with perceived COVID-19-related stress as the pandemic peaked in the United States. Methods: From 9/2020 to 3/2021, the first 149 subjects from a prospective cohort study of non-cancer pain, completed a survey which contained the Complementary and Integrative Research (CAIR) Pandemic Impact Questionnaire (C-PIQ). Respondents also reported whether the pandemic has contributed to their pain or opioid use. Bivariate comparisons explored patient characteristics with each CAIR domain. Results: Respondents mean age was 54.6 (±11.3) years, 69.8% were female, 64.6% were White. Respondent characteristics were not associated with reading/watching/thinking about the pandemic or with worry about health. Depression/anxiety (p=0.003), using any prescription opioid in the prior three months (p=0.009), higher morphine milligram equivalent used (p=0.005), higher pain severity (p=0.011), and higher pain interference (p=0.0004) were all positively and significantly associated with moderate to severe stress due to COVID-19 related lifestyle changes. Depression/anxiety, pain severity, and pain interference were positively associated with COVID-19-related worsening emotional/mental health. Depression/anxiety were significantly (p<0.0001) associated with reporting that the pandemic made their pain worse. Conclusion: Depression, anxiety, pain severity, and pain interference were most strongly and consistently associated with COVID-19 changes in way of life, worsening of emotional/mental health, and worsening pain. Identifying specific stressful experiences that most impacted patients with noncancer pain may inform public health and treatment interventions.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Dolor Crónico , Analgésicos Opioides , Depresión , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , Estudios Prospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Estados Unidos
10.
Br J Psychiatry ; 218(5): 252-253, 2021 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32605685

RESUMEN

Almeida-Meza et al found an inverse correlation between cognitive reserve (associated with educational level, complexity of occupations and leisure activities) and dementia incidence. We suggest clarifying studies using their data-set and consider what can be done to modify socioeconomic inequalities that affect cognitive reserve or to slow early dementia.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos del Conocimiento , Reserva Cognitiva , Demencia , Cognición , Demencia/epidemiología , Escolaridad , Humanos
11.
Prev Med ; 146: 106466, 2021 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33636196

RESUMEN

The CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain cautioned against high dose prescribing but did not provide guidance on type of opioid for new pain episodes. We determined if new prescriptions for Schedule II opioids vs. tramadol decreased in the 18 months after vs. before the CDC guideline and if this decrease was associated with physician specialty. New opioid prescriptions, provider type and covariates were measured using a nationally distributed, Optum® de-identified Electronic Health Record (EHR) data base. Eligible patients were free of cancer and HIV and started a new prescription for Schedule II opioids (i.e. codeine, hydrocodone, oxycodone) or Schedule IV (tramadol) in the 18 months before (n = 141,219) or 18 months after (n = 138,216) guideline publication. Fully adjusted multilevel multinomial models estimated the association between provider type (anesthesiology/pain medicine, surgical specialty, emergency, hospital, primary care, other specialty and unknown) before and after adjusting for covariates. New oxycodone prescriptions were most common among surgical and anesthesia/pain management, and new tramadol prescriptions were most common in primary care. The greatest decreases in odds of a Schedule II opioid vs. tramadol were observed in emergency care (oxycodone vs. tramadol OR = 0.82; 95%CI:0.76-0.88) and primary care (hydrocodone vs. tramadol OR = 0.85; 95%CI:0.81-0.89). Surgical specialists were least likely to start opioid therapy with tramadol. In the 18 months after vs. before the CDC guideline, emergency care and primary care providers increased tramadol prescribing. Guidelines tailored to specialists that frequently begin opioid therapy with oxycodone may enhance safe opioid prescribing.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides , Tramadol , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Codeína , Prescripciones de Medicamentos , Humanos , Hidrocodona , Oxicodona , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Estados Unidos
12.
J Clin Psychol Med Settings ; 28(2): 221-228, 2021 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32048114

RESUMEN

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a serious mental health disorder that may not be adequately detected or treated in primary care (PC). The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical characteristics and health care utilization of PTSD patients diagnosed in PC versus in specialty mental health care (MHC) across five large, civilian, not-for-profit healthcare systems. Electronic claims and medical record data on patients treated during 2014 were analyzed. Treatment was considered in terms of initiation and dose (i.e., psychotherapy sessions; pharmacotherapy-prescription psychotropics). Of 5256 patients aged 15-88 with a diagnosis of PTSD, 84.4% were diagnosed by a MHC provider. Patients diagnosed by MHC providers had 4 times the rate of and more enduring psychotherapy than those diagnosed by PC providers. Receipt of psychotropics varied by provider type, with generally higher prescription fill levels for patients in MHC. Strategies to better align patient needs with access and treatment modality in PC settings are needed.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático , Veteranos , Atención a la Salud , Humanos , Salud Mental , Atención Primaria de Salud , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/diagnóstico , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/terapia , Estados Unidos
13.
J Gerontol Nurs ; 47(11): 22-30, 2021 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34704864

RESUMEN

The purpose of the current study was to investigate whether older adults who are more impulsive also tend to engage in more health behaviors associated with increased risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD). We analyzed data from the Health and Retirement Study. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the likelihood of medication adherence, alcohol consumption, and exercise among older adults with hypertension. Adjusted regression results revealed higher impulsive decision making was associated with greater likelihood of obesity (odds ratio [OR] = 2.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.00, 8.92]), lower likelihood of medication adherence (OR = 0.37, 95% CI [0.15, 0.92]), and regular drinking (OR = 0.36, 95% CI [0.15, 0.87]). Higher impulsive decision making was associated with lower likelihood of regular exercise only in unadjusted models. Older adults with hypertension who had higher impulsive decision making engaged in health behaviors associated with increased risk for CVD. Health care providers should consider the range of strategies offered through behavioral economics to improve health in these at-risk populations. [Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 47(11), 22-30.].


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Hipertensión , Anciano , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Toma de Decisiones , Ejercicio Físico , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Humanos , Factores de Riesgo
14.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 29(6): 623-634, 2020 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32363681

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Emerging evidence suggests metformin compared with sulfonylurea is associated with an 8% to 10% lower risk for dementia. Guidelines recommend metformin as initial diabetes treatment, but there is still the question of treatment timing. Thus, the risk of dementia associated with initiating metformin compared with not initiating or delaying treatment was examined. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study (1996 to 2015) was conducted with electronic health records from Veteran Health Affairs (VHA; n = 112 845) and Kaiser Permanente Washington (KPW; n = 14 333) healthcare systems. Patients were aged ≥50 years, had a hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) between 6.5 and <9.5 mg/dL, and did not have dementia or fills for antidiabetic medications before cohort entry. Initiators started metformin monotherapy and noninitiators used no antidiabetic medications in the 6 months after the first qualifying HbA1c. The primary outcome was incident dementia. Propensity scores and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) controlled for confounding in Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 6.2 years in VHA and 6.8 years in KPW, there were 7547 new dementia cases in VHA and 1090 in KPW. After IPTW, there was no association between initiation of metformin (vs no initial treatment) and incident dementia in VHA (HR = 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.95-1.13) or KPW (HR = 0.81; 95% CI: 0.51-1.28). Results did not differ by age, baseline HbA1c, or race. CONCLUSIONS: Results do not support initiating metformin earlier to prevent cognitive decline and, thus, may dampen enthusiasm for metformin as a potential antidementia drug. Randomized clinical trials could help clarify the relationship between metformin and cognitive decline.


Asunto(s)
Demencia/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipoglucemiantes/administración & dosificación , Metformina/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Biomarcadores/sangre , Demencia/diagnóstico , Demencia/prevención & control , Diabetes Mellitus/sangre , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Hemoglobina Glucada/metabolismo , Humanos , Hipoglucemiantes/efectos adversos , Incidencia , Masculino , Metformina/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Salud de los Veteranos
15.
BMC Psychiatry ; 20(1): 40, 2020 01 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32005200

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD) and bipolar disorder (BD) have particularly high rates of chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) and are also more likely to receive prescription opioids for their pain. However, there have been no known studies published to date that have examined opioid treatment patterns among individuals with schizophrenia. METHODS: Using electronic medical record data across 13 Mental Health Research Network sites, individuals with diagnoses of MDD (N = 65,750), BD (N = 38,117) or schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (N = 12,916) were identified and matched on age, sex and Medicare status to controls with no documented mental illness. CNCP diagnoses and prescription opioid medication dispensings were extracted for the matched samples. Multivariate analyses were conducted to evaluate (1) the odds of receiving a pain-related diagnosis and (2) the odds of receiving opioids, by separate mental illness diagnosis category compared with matched controls, controlling for age, sex, Medicare status, race/ethnicity, income, medical comorbidities, healthcare utilization and chronic pain diagnoses. RESULTS: Multivariable models indicated that having a MDD (OR = 1.90; 95% CI = 1.85-1.95) or BD (OR = 1.71; 95% CI = 1.66-1.77) diagnosis was associated with increased odds of a CNCP diagnosis after controlling for age, sex, race, income, medical comorbidities and healthcare utilization. By contrast, having a schizophrenia diagnosis was associated with decreased odds of receiving a chronic pain diagnosis (OR = 0.86; 95% CI = 0.82-0.90). Having a MDD (OR = 2.59; 95% CI = 2.44-2.75) or BD (OR = 2.12; 95% CI = 1.97-2.28) diagnosis was associated with increased odds of receiving chronic opioid medications, even after controlling for age, sex, race, income, medical comorbidities, healthcare utilization and chronic pain diagnosis; having a schizophrenia diagnosis was not associated with receiving chronic opioid medications. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with serious mental illness, who are most at risk for developing opioid-related problems, continue to be prescribed opioids more often than their peers without mental illness. Mental health clinicians may be particularly well-suited to lead pain assessment and management efforts for these patients. Future research is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of involving mental health clinicians in these efforts.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides , Dolor Crónico , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Medicamentos bajo Prescripción , Adulto , Anciano , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Dolor Crónico/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Crónico/epidemiología , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/diagnóstico , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare , Trastornos Mentales/complicaciones , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
16.
Fam Pract ; 37(3): 348-354, 2020 07 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31746992

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Depression is associated with receipt of opioids in non-cancer pain. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the receipt of opioid therapy modifies the relationship of depression and use of multiple non-opioid pain treatments. METHODS: Patients (n = 320) with chronic low back pain (CLBP) were recruited from family medicine clinics and completed questionnaires that measured use of home remedies, physical treatments requiring a provider and non-opioid medication treatments. A binary variable defined use (yes/no) of all three non-opioid treatment categories. Depression (yes/no) was measured with the PHQ-2. The use of opioids (yes/no) was determined by medical record abstraction. Unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression models, stratified on opioid use, estimated the association between depression and use of all three non-opioid treatments. RESULTS: Participants were mostly female (71.3%), non-white (57.5%) and 69.4% were aged 18 to 59 years. In adjusted analyses stratified by opioid use, depression was not significantly associated with using three non-opioid treatments (OR = 2.20; 95% CI = 0.80-6.07) among non-opioid users; but among opioid users, depression was significantly associated with using three non-opioid treatments (OR = 3.21; 95% CI: 1.14-8.99). These odds ratios were not significantly different between opioid users and non-users (P = 0.609). CONCLUSION: There is modest evidence to conclude that patients with CLBP and comorbid depression, compared with those without depression, were more likely to try both opioid and non-opioid pain treatments. Non-response to other pain treatments may partly explain why depression is associated with greater prescription opioid use.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Dolor Crónico/tratamiento farmacológico , Depresión/epidemiología , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Dolor Crónico/epidemiología , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Manejo del Dolor , Atención Primaria de Salud , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
17.
Ann Fam Med ; 17(4): 352-362, 2019 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31285213

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: African American patients are more likely to experience cognitive decline after type 2 diabetes mellitus onset than white patients. Metformin use has been associated with a lower risk of dementia compared with sulfonylureas. Evidence for whether this association differs by race is sparse. METHODS: Veterans Health Administration (VHA) medical record data were obtained for 73,761 African American and white patients aged ≥50 years who used the VHA from fiscal years 2000 to 2015. Patients were free of dementia and diabetes medications during fiscal years 2000 and 2001 and subsequently initiated metformin or sulfonylurea monotherapy. For race and age subgroups, Cox proportional hazards models using propensity scores and inverse probability of treatment weighting to control for confounding were computed to measure the association between metformin vs sulfonylurea initiation and incident dementia. RESULTS: After controlling for confounding, among patients aged ≥50 years, metformin vs sulfonylurea use was associated with a significantly lower risk of dementia in African American patients (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.73; 95% CI, 0.6-0.89) but not white patients (HR = 0.96; 95% CI, 0.9-1.03). The strongest magnitude of association between metformin and dementia was observed among African American patients aged 50 to 64 years (HR = 0.6; 95% CI, 0.45-0.81). Among those aged 65 to 74 years, metformin was significantly associated with lower risk of dementia in both races. Metformin was not associated with dementia in patients aged ≥75 years. CONCLUSIONS: Metformin vs sulfonylurea initiation was associated with a substantially lower risk of dementia among younger African American patients. These results may point to a novel approach for reducing the risk of dementia in African Americans with type 2 diabetes mellitus.


Asunto(s)
Demencia/etnología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/etnología , Hipoglucemiantes/administración & dosificación , Metformina/administración & dosificación , Compuestos de Sulfonilurea/administración & dosificación , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Comorbilidad , Demencia/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Hipoglucemiantes/efectos adversos , Masculino , Metformina/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Compuestos de Sulfonilurea/efectos adversos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricos , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos
18.
Pain Med ; 20(11): 2129-2133, 2019 11 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31009534

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Comorbid psychiatric and pain-related conditions are common in patients with fibromyalgia. Most studies in this area have used data from patients in specialty care and may not represent the characteristics of fibromyalgia in primary care patients. We sought to fill gaps in the literature by determining if the association between psychiatric diagnoses, conditions associated with chronic pain, and fibromyalgia differed by gender in a primary care patient population. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING AND SUBJECTS: Medical record data obtained from 38,976 patients, ≥18 years of age with a primary care encounter between July 1, 2008, to June 30, 2016. METHODS: International Classification of Diseases-9 codes were used to define fibromyalgia, psychiatric diagnoses, and conditions associated with chronic pain. Unadjusted associations between patient demographics, comorbid conditions, and fibromyalgia were computed using binary logistic regression for the entire cohort and separately by gender. RESULTS: Overall, 4.6% of the sample had a fibromyalgia diagnosis, of whom 76.1% were women. Comorbid conditions were more prevalent among patients with vs without fibromyalgia. Depression and arthritis were more strongly related to fibromyalgia among women (odds ratio [OR] = 2.80, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.50-3.13; and OR = 5.19, 95% CI = 4.62-5.84) compared with men (OR = 2.16, 95% CI = 1.71-2.71; and (OR = 3.91, 95% CI = 3.22-4.75). The relationship of fibromyalgia and other diagnoses did not significantly differ by gender. CONCLUSIONS: Except for depression and arthritis, the burden of comorbid conditions in patients with fibromyalgia is similar in women and men treated in primary care. Fibromyalgia comorbidities in primary care are similar to those found in specialty care.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico/epidemiología , Dolor Crónico/psicología , Fibromialgia/epidemiología , Fibromialgia/psicología , Atención Primaria de Salud , Adulto , Artritis/epidemiología , Dolor Crónico/diagnóstico , Estudios de Cohortes , Comorbilidad , Trastorno Depresivo/epidemiología , Femenino , Fibromialgia/diagnóstico , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Atención al Paciente , Trastornos Somatomorfos/epidemiología
19.
Br J Psychiatry ; 212(2): 103-111, 2018 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29436331

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Depression contributes to persistent opioid analgesic use (OAU). Treating depression may increase opioid cessation. Aims To determine if adherence to antidepressant medications (ADMs) v. non-adherence was associated with opioid cessation in patients with a new depression episode after >90 days of OAU. METHOD: Patients with non-cancer, non-HIV pain (n = 2821), with a new episode of depression following >90 days of OAU, were eligible if they received ≥1 ADM prescription from 2002 to 2012. ADM adherence was defined as >80% of days covered. Opioid cessation was defined as ≥182 days without a prescription refill. Confounding was controlled by inverse probability of treatment weighting. RESULTS: In weighted data, the incidence rate of opioid cessation was significantly (P = 0.007) greater in patients who adhered v. did not adhered to taking antidepressants (57.2/1000 v. 45.0/1000 person-years). ADM adherence was significantly associated with opioid cessation (odds ratio (OR) = 1.24, 95% CI 1.05-1.46). CONCLUSIONS: ADM adherence, compared with non-adherence, is associated with opioid cessation in non-cancer pain. Opioid taper and cessation may be more successful when depression is treated to remission. Declaration of interest None.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Antidepresivos/administración & dosificación , Trastorno Depresivo/tratamiento farmacológico , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Comorbilidad , Trastorno Depresivo/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA