Characterizing social communication among minimally verbal children with autism: An application of item response theory.

Minimally verbal children constitute a portion of the autism spectrum. The paucity of proper measurement tools that sensitively and accurately assess behaviors has been one limiting factor in the improved knowledge of these children. Short of creating and validating a new measurement tool for this subpopulation, this study took an alternative and more immediate approach: conduct a secondary data analysis and examine an existing social communication measure, the Early Social Communication Scales (ESCS), with item response theory. The final sample consisted of 453 minimally verbal children culled from four different completed studies. The IRT models analyzed the frequency of social communication gestures from the ESCS and returned an objective difficulty hierarchy regarding initiations of joint attention and behavior regulation gestures. The best-fitting and final model was a zero-inflated negative binomial model (ZINBM), which determined that joint attention gestures were, on average, more difficult than behavior regulation gestures. Joint attentional shows and gives were essentially absent in the children's repertoire, and behavior regulation reaches were the easiest gestures for this sample. The ZINBM separately modeled children with some gestures and children who did not present with any gestures and determined that behavior regulation reaches and gives were likely the first gestures a child will eventually exhibit among children with no gestures. Methodological contributions and potential future applications of IRT are discussed.

Parenting stress in caregiver-mediated interventions for toddlers with autism: An application of quantile regression mixed models.

Traditional longitudinal modeling approaches require normally distributed data and do not account for sample heterogeneity. Parenting stress, in particular, can be difficult to model across time without transforming the data as it is usually high for caregivers of children with ASD. This study used novel linear quantile mixed models (LQMMs) to model non-normal parent stress scores across two caregiver-mediated interventions involving toddlers with ASD. The sample included 86 caregiver-child dyads who were randomized to either a parent-only psychoeducational intervention or hands-on parent training in a naturalistic developmental intervention. Child and parent-related domains of the Parenting Stress Index (PSI) were the primary outcomes in this study. The PSI was collected at entry, 10-week exit, 3-month follow-up, and 6-month follow-up periods. Separate LQMMs were used to model five specific quantiles ( τ=0.1,0.25,0.5,0.75,and0.9) of the two PSI domains across the complete intervention timeline. These five quantiles effectively modeled the entire conditional distribution of parenting stress scores. The LQMMs indicated that child-related parenting stress decreased across all quantiles within both interventions, with no difference in the rate of parenting stress change between the intervention groups. For parent-related parenting stress, the effect of intervention depended on the group's stress level; some parents increased their perceived stress within the hands-on intervention at the 3-month follow-up. Overall, this study demonstrated that the use of LQMMs yielded additional information, beyond traditional longitudinal models, regarding the relationship between parenting stress within two caregiver-mediated intervention protocols. This study also discussed the methodological contributions and potential future applications of LQMMs. LAY SUMMARY: This study used a newer longitudinal modeling technique to examine how parenting stress changed across two caregiver-mediated interventions for toddlers with ASD. Results showed that certain parents in the JASPER condition might require additional support as they exit the study and enter into their first follow-up period. It was also determined that this new modeling technique could be a valuable tool to analyze highly variable data often present in ASD intervention studies.

Using the Clinical Global Impression scale to assess social communication change in minimally verbal children with autism spectrum disorder.

Assessing improvements in social communication behaviors in minimally verbal children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is often challenging. The Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI) is a 7-point scale that has been adapted so that clinicians can easily and quickly rate social communication behaviors. The current study evaluated the CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) subscale as a measure of social communication change in minimally verbal children with ASD. The sample included 54 minimally verbal school-age children with ASD enrolled in a social communication intervention trial. CGIs were rated by interventionists and the study coordinator at baseline and at Week 6 of intervention, and were compared to scores on the Communication Complexity Scale (CCS). Results indicated that CGI ratings corresponded with CCS scores at baseline and Week 6. Children who were rated as more severe on social communication at baseline demonstrated lower complexity of communication compared to those who were rated as less severe. Those who demonstrated fast response to intervention at Week 6 showed greater improvement in their joint attention than those who were slower responders. These results provide support for the utility and validity of the CGI-I as a measure of social communication change in minimally verbal children. This study tested the CGI, a clinician rating scale, with a group of children with ASD with limited language who received intervention to improve social interactions and communication. Children's CGI ratings were comparable to other assessments in measuring social communication. The CGI may be a useful tool for those interested in quickly and easily tracking changes in children's social communication over the course of treatment. LAY SUMMARY: This study tested the Clinical Global Impression (CGI), a clinician rating scale, with a group of children with ASD with limited language who received intervention to improve social interactions and communication. Children's CGI ratings were comparable to other assessments in measuring social communication. The CGI may be a useful tool for those interested in quickly and easily tracking changes in children's social communication over the course of treatment.