Prevalence of body-focused repetitive behaviors in a diverse population sample - rates across age, gender, race and education.

BACKGROUND: Prevalence estimates for body-focused repetitive behaviors (BFRBs) such as trichotillomania differ greatly across studies owing to several confounding factors (e.g. different criteria). For the present study, we recruited a diverse online sample to provide estimates for nine subtypes of BFRBs and body-focused repetitive disorders (BFRDs). METHODS: The final sample comprised 1481 individuals from the general population. Several precautions were taken to recruit a diverse sample and to exclude participants with low reliability. We matched participants on gender, race, education and age range to allow unbiased interpretation. RESULTS: While almost all participants acknowledged at least one BFRB in their lifetime (97.1%), the rate for BFRDs was 24%. Nail biting (11.4%), dermatophagia (8.7%), skin picking (8.2%), and lip-cheek biting (7.9%) were the most frequent BFRDs. Whereas men showed more lifetime BFRBs, the rate of BFRDs was higher in women than in men. Rates of BFRDs were low in older participants, especially after the age of 40. Overall, BFRBs and BFRDs were more prevalent in White than in non-White individuals. Education did not show a strong association with BFRB/BFRDs. DISCUSSION: BFRBs are ubiquitous. More severe forms, BFRDs, manifest in approximately one out of four people. In view of the often-irreversible somatic sequelae (e.g. scars) BFRBs/BFRDs deserve greater diagnostic and therapeutic attention by clinicians working in both psychology/psychiatry and somatic medicine (especially dermatology and dentistry).

Same but different? Phenomenological differences among various types of body-focused repetitive behaviors.

BACKGROUND: Body-focused repetitive behaviors (BFRBs) are highly prevalent conditions at the border of psychiatry and dermatology. Using a newly developed scale, the Generic BFRB scale (GBS-36), we aimed to compare 4 prominent BFRBs in terms of phenomenology, age at onset, and other illness-related aspects. METHODS: A sample of 391 individuals with different forms of BFRBs completed the GBS-36, the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (depression), and the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF global item (quality of life). RESULTS: Most individuals showed multiple BFRBs (73.9%). Skin picking and nail biting were reported most frequently (nail biting: 68.3%; skin picking: 60.9%; trichotillomania: 52.4%; lip-cheek biting: 31.7%). Nail biting was most common in childhood; the other BFRBs began mainly in adolescence. Both trichotillomania and skin picking were associated with the greatest impairment and urge to perform the behavior. The 2 conditions also showed a higher association with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Overall symptom severity was correlated with earlier age of onset, number of concurrent BFRBs, and severity of depression as well as suicidality. CONCLUSIONS: BFRBs are a heterogeneous group of conditions, with trichotillomania and skin picking showing the largest similarities. Whether the observed differences reflect specific etiological factors awaits further testing.

Decoupling: adaptation of a treatment for body-focused repetitive behaviour to Tourette syndrome. A case report.

AIMS: Tourette syndrome (TS) is a neurological condition; its etiology is not yet fully understood. Cognitive behavioural therapy with habit reversal training is the recommended first-line treatment, but is not effective in all patients. This is the first report examining the usefulness of decoupling, a behavioural self-help treatment originally developed for patients with body-focused repetitive behaviours, in a patient with TS. METHOD: Patient P.Z. showed 10 motor and three vocal tics on the Adult Tic Questionnaire (ATQ) before treatment. He was taught decoupling by the first author. RESULTS: The application of decoupling led to a reduction of P.Z.'s eye tics, which was one of his first and most enduring and severe tics. It was not effective for other areas. Quality of life and depression improved, which P.Z. attributed to the improvement of his tics. CONCLUSION: Decoupling may be adopted as an alternative, when habit reversal training is not feasible. Future research, preferably using a controlled design with a large sample, may elucidate whether decoupling is only effective for tics relating to the eyes, the most common symptom in tic disorder/TS, or whether its effects extend to other symptoms.

The Generic BFRB Scale-8 (GBS-8): a transdiagnostic scale to measure the severity of body-focused repetitive behaviours.

BACKGROUND: Body-focused repetitive behaviours (BFRBs) such as skin picking and hair pulling are frequent but under-diagnosed and under-treated psychological conditions. As of now, most studies use symptom-specific BFRB scales. However, a transdiagnostic scale is needed in view of the high co-morbidity of different BFRBs. AIMS: We aimed to assess the reliability as well as concurrent and divergent validity of a newly developed transdiagnostic BFRB scale. METHOD: For the first time, we administered the 8-item Generic BFRB Scale (GBS-8) as well as the Repetitive Body Focused Behavior Scale (RBFBS), modified for adults, in 279 individuals with BFRBs. The GBS-8 builds upon the Skin Picking Scale-Revised (SPS-R), but has been adapted to capture different BFRBs concurrently. A total of 170 participants (61%) were re-assessed after 6 weeks to determine the test-retest reliability of the scale. RESULTS: Similar to the SPS-R, factor analysis yielded two dimensions termed symptom severity and impairment. The test-retest reliability of the scale was satisfactory (r = .72, p<.001). Concurrent validity (r = .74) with the RBFBS was good (correlational indexes for concurrent validity were significantly higher than that for discriminant validity). DISCUSSION: The GBS-8 appears to be a reliable and valid global measure of BFRBs. We recommend usage of the scale in combination with specific BFRB scales to facilitate comparability across studies on obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders.

Is Self-Help Dangerous? Examination of Adverse Effects of a Psychological Internet-Based Self-Help Intervention for Body-Focused Repetitive Behavior (Free From BFRB).

Despite the proven effectiveness of psychotherapy for psychiatric disorders, adverse events or unwanted effects may occur. Unwanted effects, however, are rarely assessed. In self-help interventions, which usually are not supported by a therapist, such effects have received even less attention even though special caution is needed regarding unwanted effects such as those related to misapplication. For the present study, we present the newly developed Positive and Negative Effects of Psychotherapy Scale for Internet-Based Intervention (PANEPS-I) and examine possible unwanted effects of an internet-based self-help intervention in individuals with body-focused repetitive behaviors (BFRBs), aggregating three different techniques: habit reversal training (HRT), decoupling (DC), and decoupling in sensu (DC-is). Some HRT users have expressed concern that the suppression of the problematic behavior could lead to rebound effects, but this has not been examined rigorously. Following baseline assessment, 141 participants with at least one BFRB were randomly assigned to two intervention groups that differed only with respect to the delivery mode (video, manual); the content was the same. After 6 weeks, a post-assessment was conducted. Unwanted effects were assessed using the PANEPS-I. A total of 70% of the participants (both treatment groups combined) reported at least one positive effect of the intervention. Negative effects were reported by 14-92% of participants, depending on the effect. The highest agreement rates were found for "no positive goal orientation" (52.5%), "did not address personal problems" (48.8%), "time/performance pressure" (20.9%), shame (16.3%), and concerns about data privacy (14.3%). Participants in the manual intervention group reported unethical procedures (e.g., data privacy concerns) more often (Cohen's d = .44) than those in the video intervention group. Responders reported more positive effects and nonresponders more malpractice (|d| = .80, .54, respectively). HRT users (self-report) showed no significant differences compared to nonusers regarding negative effects. Stepwise hierarchical regression analyses indicated a dose-response relationship for reported positive effects and malpractice. Side effects may occur in any kind of intervention. Usage of HRT did not lead to more reported negative effects compared to nonusage. To improve the quality and effectiveness and ensure the safety of the user, especially those using digital self-help interventions, it is important to regularly assess unintended effects since there is no supervision of the patient in unguided self-help interventions.

Efficacy of an Internet-based intervention with self-applied exposure therapy in virtual reality for people with panic disorder: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Due to several treatment barriers, many individuals with panic disorder do not receive evidence-based treatment. One promising option to narrow this treatment gap is Internet-based psychotherapy, which has been shown particularly effective in guided formats. Still, there remains room for improvement to make these digital therapies more accessible, cost-efficient, and aligned with best practices for in-person interventions (e.g., exposure). The smartphone app "Invirto - Treatment for Anxiety" offers digitally guided, evidence-based treatment of panic disorders including virtual reality (VR) for exposure therapy. The aim present study is to investigate the efficacy, safety, and acceptance of Invirto in comparison to a care-as-usual (CAU) control group. METHODS: We plan to conduct a randomized controlled trial with two conditions (intervention vs. CAU), three assessment times via online surveys (t0: baseline; t1: 3 months after baseline; t2: follow-up assessment 6 months after baseline), and a total of 128 participants with a clinical diagnosis of panic disorder (symptoms must be experienced ≥ 1 year). Recruitment will take place via email, phone, and the study website. The primary outcome will be the change in anxiety symptoms as measured by Beck's Anxiety Inventory from t0 to t1. Secondary outcomes will be the change in anxiety symptoms (measured by the Panic and Agoraphobia Scale, PAS; Questionnaire on panic-related Anxieties, Cognitions and Avoidance, ACA), depressive symptoms (measured by the Beck-Depression-Inventory, BDI-II), treatment satisfaction (measured by the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire, CSQ-8; Treatment Adherence Perception Questionnaire, TAPQ-adapt; Positive and Negative Effects of Psychotherapy Scale, PANEPS-I), psychological flexibility (measured by the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II, AAQ-II), and dissociation during VR exposure (measured by an adapted version of the Peritraumatic Dissociative Experiences Questionnaire, PDEQ-adapt). Participants in the intervention group will receive access to the intervention (Invirto) right after t0, while the CAU group will receive access to Invirto after t1. We expect a larger change in both the primary and secondary outcomes from t0 to t1 in the intervention group in comparison to the CAU group. DISCUSSION: This study is one of the first to evaluate an Internet-based intervention for people with panic disorder that includes self-application of VR exposure therapy. The findings are expected to extend the body of knowledge about effective Internet-based treatment options for people with panic disorder. The empirical and clinical implications and the limitations of the study are discussed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: DRKS00027585 ( www.drks.de/drks_web/ ), date of registration: 13 January 2022.

Self-Help Habit Replacement in Individuals With Body-Focused Repetitive Behaviors: A Proof-of-Concept Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Body-focused repetitive behaviors (BFRBs; eg, skin picking) encompass a set of conditions at the interface of dermatology and psychiatry/psychology. The disorder is prevalent but currently underdiagnosed and undertreated. Objective: To compare a new self-help intervention, habit replacement, against a wait-list control condition for the treatment of BFRBs. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial was conducted online in 2022. Participants were a population-based nonclinical sample with BFRBs and were recruited via social media. Initially, 481 individuals entered the assessment; 213 were excluded blind to results. A final sample of 268 participants were randomized. The intervention period was 6 weeks. Interventions: Participants were randomized to a self-help intervention, habit replacement, or a wait-list control condition (each n = 134). Main Outcomes and Measures: The Generic BFRB Scale-45 (GBS-45, self-report) represented the primary outcome. Results: Individuals in the 2 conditions (n = 268; 241 [89.9%] women; mean [SD] age, 36.8 [11.1] years; skin picking, 68.3%; trichotillomania, 28.4%; nail biting, 36.6%; lip-cheek biting, 26.1%; other, 20.1%) did not differ on any baseline characteristics. The experimental group significantly improved on the primary outcome (GBS-45) for both the per-protocol (technique was used at least once weekly, ηp2 = 0.068, P = .001) and the intention-to-treat analyses relative to the wait-list control group (expectation-maximization algorithm; ηp2 = 0.019, P = .02). The interaction of group and time yielded statistical trends in favor of the experimental condition only on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and quality of life. For the Clinical Global Impressions scale, more individuals in the habit replacement group reported improvement (52.8% vs 19.6%; P < .001). User satisfaction in the habit replacement group was high. Moderation analyses that included all baseline variables showed that those who exhibited nail biting particularly benefited from the new technique. Conclusions and Relevance: The present proof-of-concept randomized clinical trial tentatively demonstrates that habit replacement is a feasible and effective self-help strategy against BFRBs, especially for nail biting. Study limitations include the lack of external assessment and verified diagnoses. In addition, the study is missing follow-up data. Self-help habit replacement shows promise in reducing BFRBs but not concomitant symptoms. Trial Registration: German Clinical Trials Register Identifier: DRKS00030511.

Habit Reversal Training and Variants of Decoupling for Use in Body-Focused Repetitive Behaviors. A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: Behavioral interventions hold promise in improving body-focused repetitive behaviors (BFRBs), such as hair pulling and skin picking. The effect of combining different treatment techniques is currently unknown. Methods: In the framework of a randomized controlled crossover trial, 334 individuals with at least one BFRB were allocated either to a waitlist control or to three experimental conditions (1:1:1:1). Participants in the experimental condition received self-help manuals teaching habit reversal training (HRT), decoupling (DC) and decoupling in sensu (DC-is) during a six-week period. Treatment conditions differed only in the order of manual presentation. We examined whether applying more than one technique would lead either to add-on or interference effects. Results: The three treatment conditions were significantly superior to the waitlist control group in the improvement of BFRBs according to intention-to-treat analyses at a medium effect size (all p ≤ 0.002, d = 0.52 - 0.54). The condition displaying DC first significantly reduced depressive symptoms (p = 0.003, d = 0.47) and improved quality of life (p = 0.011, d = 0.39) compared to the waitlist control. Those using more techniques concurrently showed the strongest decline in BFRB symptoms, even after controlling for days practiced. Participants rated all manuals favorably, with standard DC and HRT yielding greatest acceptability. Discussion: Results tentatively suggest the concurrent application of different behavioral treatments for BFRBs leads to add-on effects. Results were superior when DC was practiced first, with positive effects extending to depressive symptoms and quality of life. Integrating the three techniques into one self-help manual or video along with other treatment procedures (e.g., stimulus control techniques) is recommended.

Adaptation of movement decoupling for compulsive joint cracking: A case report.

Compulsive joint cracking is a body-focused repetitive behavior (BFRB), which often results in negative social feedback due to its characteristic sound. While behavioral techniques are recommended in BFRBs, no published studies or case reports exist specifically for compulsive joint cracking. The authors report the case of DZ, who engaged in severe joint cracking of his knuckles and, at times, his back. The individual was assessed with an adapted version of the Generic BFRB Scale (GBS). DZ was instructed on how to perform decoupling, a technique that has shown efficacy in other BFRBs. He was also advised to use "fidget devices" that mimic aspects of the dysfunctional behavior in a less conspicuous way. Scores on the GBS were reduced by almost 50%, which corresponded with DZ's subjective appraisal of feeling more in control. Randomized controlled trials are needed to assess the (differential) efficacy these techniques to ameliorate compulsive joint cracking.

A Head-to-Head Comparison of Three Self-Help Techniques to Reduce Body-Focused Repetitive Behaviors.

Body-focused repetitive behaviors (BFRBs) include skin picking, trichotillomania, nail biting and cavitadaxia/lip-cheek biting, among other behaviors. For the first time, we compared three different self-help techniques aimed at reducing BFRBs. We explored the acceptance and preliminary efficacy of the approaches and whether the techniques exerted differential effects depending on BFRB-type.A total of 113 participants with at least one BFRB were randomly allocated to either habit reversal training (HRT; active elements: awareness and competing response training), decoupling (DC) or decoupling in sensu (DC-is). Reassessment was conducted 4 weeks later. The Generic Body-Focused Repetitive Behavior Scale (GBS) served as the primary outcome. The completion rate was best for DC-is (68.6%) as compared to HRT (57.1%) and DC (53.5%). A total of 34.8% of completers in the DC group showed an improvement of at least 35% on the GBS compared to 10.0% in the HRT and 23.3% in the DC-is group. In accordance with previous work, moderator analyses showed that improvement under DC is best for non-skin-pickers. A dose-effect relationship emerged, particularly for HRT. Subjective appraisal ratings were more favorable for DC-is and HRT than for DC. With respect to completion rate, subjective appraisal and symptom improvement, DC-is yielded consistently satisfactory results, whereas HRT showed good subjective but rather poor objective improvement. Those who performed DC, especially non-skin-pickers, showed good improvement but overall completion and subjective efficacy were low. Future studies should investigate whether the three techniques exert add-on effects when combined and whether demonstration via new media (e.g., video) will augment comprehensibility and thus efficacy of the techniques.

Recovery from pathological skin picking and dermatodaxia using a revised decoupling protocol.

OBJECTIVE: Pathological skin picking (PSP) is characterized by repetitive scratching, biting, and picking of the skin. The disorder is subsumed under the section "obsessive-compulsive and related disorders" in the DSM-5. A related body-focused repetitive disorder, which has received less empirical attention so far, is dermatophagia or dermatodaxia (eating or biting/gnawing of the skin). Habit reversal training (HRT) is regarded as the treatment of choice demonstrating improvement at a medium effect size relative to control conditions. METHODS: The present case report describes a 50-year-old man with a lifetime history of PSP and dermatodaxia of the fingertips who stopped excessive nail-biting approximately 10 years ago using a treatment method known as decoupling. Yet, his PSP and dermatodaxia remained treatment-refractory after treatment with both decoupling (conventional protocol) and HRT. RESULTS: Using a revised protocol of decoupling, the man was able to fully stop PSP and dermatodaxia; only the tendency to fidget nervously with his hands remained. The case report describes the revised protocol. Scores on the Skin Picking Scale Revised (SPS-R) dropped from 15 to 0. DISCUSSION: The revised decoupling protocol is an easy to use technique that holds promise in this underdiagnosed and undertreated condition. Yet, rigorous randomized controlled studies are needed to ascertain its efficacy.

Imaginal retraining decreases craving for high-calorie food in overweight and obese women: A randomized controlled trial.

Overweight and obesity are epidemic conditions. Obesity is associated with somatic and psychological sequelae, including serious life-shortening disorders (e.g., diabetes). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a newly developed imaginal variant of approach bias modification (i.e., imaginal retraining) for the reduction of craving for high-calorie food. In a randomized controlled trial, 384 women with a body mass index above 25 were allocated to a wait-list control group or to two variants of imaginal retraining (ratio: 1; 0.5; 0.5). The two intervention groups were sent a manual on imaginal retraining. One group was explicitly encouraged and instructed to use electronic reminders (RER); the standard retraining group (RS) was not encouraged to use electronic reminders. Assessments were 6 weeks apart and were carried out online. Craving for high-calorie food represented the primary outcome (based on the Visual Analog Scale, VAS). Secondary outcomes included the Food Cravings Questionnaire (FCQ-T-R). The study was registered as DRKS00017220. Women in the RER group utilized the retraining technique more often than those in the RS condition, and utilization frequency in turn was associated with improvement on craving and eating behavior scales. Both intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses showed a favorable effect of the RER group, which achieved significance on the primary outcome, as well as on several other outcomes relative to controls at a small to medium effect size. For those participants who measured their weight before and after the assessment using a scale, weight loss in the RER group was significantly greater compared to the control group. Both retraining groups (RER: 39.4%; RS: 31.1%) reduced their subjective amount of eating relative to controls (24.2%). Approximately two-thirds of the sample (68.3%) performed the exercises at least once during the study period. The present results show that, when used regularly, imaginal retraining may reduce craving for high-calorie food in overweight and obese women. Of note, there was also evidence suggestive of weight reduction, although no diet or lifestyle change was recommended in the manual. Because a large subgroup neither read the manual nor performed the exercises, we recommend that future imaginal retraining be conveyed via short video clips.