RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Recovery of hearts from donation after circulatory death donors has been performed either with direct procurement and perfusion (DPP) using the TransMedics Organ Care System or with normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) with subsequent cold storage. It remains unclear which of these 2 strategies yields optimal posttransplant outcomes. METHODS: All heart transplant recipients from donors after circulatory death donors at the Vanderbilt University Medical Center (Nashville, TN) were reviewed (February 2020 to January 2023). Recipients were stratified into an NRP or DPP cohort. All DPP recoveries were performed using the TransMedics Organ Care System. The key outcome was severe primary graft dysfunction at 24 hours, defined by the need for postoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. RESULTS: A total of 118 hearts were transplanted (NRP, 87; DPP, 31). Donors recovered using NRP were younger (25 years [interquartile range {IQR}, 21-31 years] vs 31 years [IQR, 24-37 years]; P = .008) and had shorter distance traveled (292 miles [158-516 miles] vs 449 miles [IQR, 248-635 miles]; P = .02). Recipient preoperative risk factors were similar between the groups. There was no difference in the incidence of severe primary graft dysfunction at 24 hours (NRP, 5.8%; and DPP, 12.9%; P = .24). However, ejection fraction at 7 days after transplantation was higher in the NRP group (65% [IQR, 60%-65%] vs 60% [IQR, 60%-68%]; P = .005). There was no difference in inotrope scores at 24 hours (P = 1.00) or 72 hours (P = .87) or in 30-day (NRP, 95% vs DPP, 97%; P = .75) and 1-year (NRP, 94% vs DPP, 86%; P = .19) survival. CONCLUSIONS: NRP and DPP strategies for recovery of cardiac allografts yield comparable early allograft outcomes. Future studies are needed to confirm these findings in larger prospective cohorts.
RESUMEN
Importance: The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) evaluates donor risk for acute transmission of HIV, hepatitis B, or hepatitis C based on US Public Health Services (PHS)-specific criteria. However, recent data regarding use and outcomes of those donors with PHS risk criteria among pediatric and adult heart transplant recipients are lacking. Objective: To compare use and outcomes of graft from donors with PHS risk criteria vs those with a standard-risk donor (SRD) in children vs adults in a contemporary cohort. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort was a nationwide analysis of heart transplants in the US that used data from the UNOS database. Participants were children (<18 years old) and adults (≥18 years old) who received a heart transplant from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2021. Exposures: UNOS-defined donor risk status. Main Outcomes and Measures: Trend analysis compared changes in PHS risk criteria use among children and adults. Patient survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves with log rank and Cox proportional hazards to compare PHS risk-criteria outcomes vs SRD-criteria outcomes in children and adult heart transplant recipients. Additional analysis was performed among adults who received a PHS-risk criteria graft that was previously declined for pediatric recipients. Results: Of 5115 pediatric transplant recipients (donor without PHS risk median [IQR] age, 5 [0-13] years and donor with PHS risk median [IQR] age, 8 [0-14] years) and 30â¯289 adult heart transplant recipients (donor without PHS risk median [IQR] age, 56 [46-63] years and donor with PHS risk median [IQR] age, 57 [47-63] years), PHS risk criteria comprised 8% in children vs 25% in adults. PHS criteria are being increasingly used over the past decade with the proportion of recipients transplanted with PHS risk-criteria donors being approximately 3 times greater among adult recipients than children recipients. Pediatric recipients of a PHS risk-criteria donor had greater pretransplant ventilatory support, whereas adult recipients of a PHS risk-criteria donor had greater pretransplant extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use. Patient survival was similar between pediatric recipients of PHS risk-criteria grafts vs SRD-criteria grafts and slightly higher among adult recipients of PHS risk-criteria grafts vs SRD-criteria grafts. The 1778 adult recipients who received a PHS criteria-risk donor that was previously declined for pediatric recipients had similar patient survival recipients compared with SRD-criteria donors (HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.81-1.03; P = .18). Conclusions and Relevance: In the current era, a 3-fold greater proportion of adult recipients receive a PHS risk-criteria graft compared with children despite similar posttransplant patient survival. The ongoing organ donor shortage underscores the need for consideration of PHS risk criteria where these donors remain underused.