Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of a Pharmacist-Led Medication Therapy Management Program: Hypertension Management.

OBJECTIVES: Uncontrolled hypertension is a common cause of cardiovascular disease, which is the deadliest and costliest chronic disease in the United States. Pharmacists are an accessible community healthcare resource and are equipped with clinical skills to improve the management of hypertension through medication therapy management (MTM). Nevertheless, current reimbursement models do not incentivize pharmacists to provide clinical services. We aim to investigate the cost-effectiveness of a pharmacist-led comprehensive MTM clinic compared with no clinic for 10-year primary prevention of stroke and cardiovascular disease events in patients with hypertension. METHODS: We built a semi-Markov model to evaluate the clinical and economic consequences of an MTM clinic compared with no MTM clinic, from the payer perspective. The model was populated with data from a recently published controlled observational study investigating the effectiveness of an MTM clinic. Methodology was guided using recommendations from the Second Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine, including appropriate sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: Compared with no MTM clinic, the MTM clinic was cost-effective with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $38 798 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. The incremental net monetary benefit was $993 294 considering a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000 per QALY. Health-benefit benchmarks at $100 000 per QALY and $150 000 per QALY translate to a 95% and 170% increase from current reimbursement rates for MTM services. CONCLUSIONS: Our model shows current reimbursement rates for pharmacist-led MTM services may undervalue the benefit realized by US payers. New reimbursement models are needed to allow pharmacists to offer cost-effective clinical services.

Using patient preference to customize a patient's medication list.

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to identify medication-list components preferred by patients. Secondary objectives included identifying a patient-preferred medication-list template, measuring change in patient knowledge and responsibility after using a medication list tailored to patient preference and assessing patient utilization of a personalized medication list. DESIGN: 12-week prospective presurvey and postsurvey from January 2010 to March 2011. SETTING: Anticoagulation Clinic in Downers Grove, Illinois, with approximately 400 patients. PATIENTS: 53 English-speaking patients, 18 years of age or older, and taking eight or more medications. Cognitively and/or visually impaired patients were excluded. INTERVENTION: Consenting subjects completed the prequestionnaire. Patients were then asked to visually decide their preference between three examples of medication-list templates. Personalized medication lists were created from the preferences chosen in the questionnaire and mailed to each patient. The postinterview was conducted approximately 30 days following, and patients were retested on the knowledge and responsibility questions as well as five new utilization questions about the medication list received. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The primary objective was to identify medication-list components preferred by patients. Secondary objectives included: identifying the medication list template that patients preferred, measuring change in patient knowledge and responsibility after using the medication list tailored to patient preference, and assessing patient utilization. RESULTS: Forty-four patients preferred a more detailed medication list. Thirty subjects participated in the postquestionnaire, and 54% preferred the most complex medication list. There was no statistically significant change in knowledge or gain in patient responsibility. CONCLUSION: Patients preferred a more complex medication list as a reference to manage their home medications.

Pyrosequencing: a simple method for accurate genotyping.

Pharmacogenetic research benefits first-hand from the abundance of information provided by the completion of the Human Genome Project. With such a tremendous amount of data available comes an explosion of genotyping methods. Pyrosequencing is one of the most thorough yet simple methods to date used to analyze polymorphisms. It also has the ability to identify tri-allelic, indels, short-repeat polymorphisms, along with determining allele percentages for methylation or pooled sample assessment. In addition, there is a standardized control sequence that provides internal quality control. This method has led to rapid and efficient single-nucleotide polymorphism evaluation including many clinically relevant polymorphisms. The technique and methodology of Pyrosequencing is explained in this chapter.

Hoosier Oncology Group randomized phase II study of docetaxel, vinorelbine, and estramustine in combination in hormone-refractory prostate cancer with pharmacogenetic survival analysis.

PURPOSE: To determine the safety and efficacy of two docetaxel doublets in hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) patients and to examine the prognostic role of polymorphisms in host genes important to docetaxel metabolism and transport. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Sixty-four chemotherapy-naive patients with HRPC were randomized to docetaxel and vinorelbine (D, 20 mg/m2 i.v. days 1 and 8; V, 25 mg/m2 i.v. days 1 and 8) or docetaxel and estramustine phosphate (D, 60-70 mg/m2 i.v. day 1; E, 280 mg oral thrice daily days 1-5) administered q21d. Primary end point was clinically significant toxicity. A pharmacogenetic analysis of host genes was done in patients who received at least one cycle of docetaxel therapy. RESULTS: Grade 3/4 toxicity occurred in 15.6% of DV patients and in 28.6% DE patients. Neither arm exceeded the threshold of clinically significant toxicity. In the DV arm, objective response rate was 33%, prostate-specific antigen response rate was 20%, and median survival was 16.2 months. In the DE arm, objective response rate was 67%, prostate-specific antigen response rate was 43%, and median survival was 19.7 months. Pharmacogenetic analyses showed a significant association between survival beyond 15 months and the ABCG2 421 C > A (Q141K) polymorphism compared with the wild-type (C/C) genotype (66% versus 27%; P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: DV and DE doublets are active with a tolerable toxicity profile in patients with HRPC; however, efficacy does not seem superior to standard single-agent docetaxel. The ABCG2 421 C > A (Q141K) polymorphism may be an important predictor of response and survival in HRPC patients treated with docetaxel-based chemotherapy.

Pyrosequencing: a simple method for accurate genotyping.

Pharmacogenetic research benefits first-hand from the abundance of information provided by the completion of the Human Genome Project. With such a tremendous amount of data available comes an explosion of genotyping methods. Pyrosequencing(R) is one of the most thorough yet simple methods to date used to analyze polymorphisms. It also has the ability to identify tri-allelic, indels, short-repeat polymorphisms, along with determining allele percentages for methylation or pooled sample assessment. In addition, there is a standardized control sequence that provides internal quality control. This method has led to rapid and efficient single-nucleotide polymorphism evaluation including many clinically relevant polymorphisms. The technique and methodology of Pyrosequencing is explained.

Methotrexate (MTX) pathway gene polymorphisms and their effects on MTX toxicity in Caucasian and African American patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: Research has examined the association of folate-dependent gene polymorphisms with methotrexate (MTX) toxicity in racially homogenous patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We examined the influence of MTX transporter gene polymorphisms on MTX toxicity in 2 racial groups of patients with RA. METHODS: Using a retrospective cross-validation approach, the association of polymorphisms in 6 genes in the MTX cellular pathway with MTX toxicity was examined in training and validation cohorts. The genes analyzed were ATP-binding cassette transporter B1 (ABCB1), C1 (ABCC1), C2 (ABCC2), folylpolyglutamyl synthase (FPGS), methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR), and thymidylate synthase (TYMS). Both cohorts included Caucasian Americans and African Americans. Statistical analyses consisted of Fisher exact tests, multivariable logistic regression models, and survival analyses. RESULTS: Four of 25 variants displayed significant associations with MTX toxicity in the training cohort. The intronic single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) ABCC2 IVS 23+56 T --> C was associated with alopecia in Caucasians (p = 0.035). ABCB1 1236 C --> T was associated with overall toxicity (p = 0.013); ABCC2 1249 G --> A with gastrointestinal toxicity (p = 0.009); and ABCC2 1058 G --> A with hepatotoxicity (p = 0.04) in African Americans. These 4 SNP and the MTHFR 677 C --> T variant were assessed in the validation cohort. Of these, only the MTHFR 677 C --> T SNP was associated with alopecia, and only in African Americans (p = 0.032). The ABCC2 IVS 23+56 T --> C genotype influenced toxicity-related time to discontinuation or dose decrease in the Caucasian validation cohort (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: In addition to SNP in folate-dependent genes, MTX transporter gene SNP may be important markers of MTX toxicity in RA. Such pharmacogenetic associations are race-specific.