Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Dig Dis Sci ; 67(8): 4059-4069, 2022 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34406584

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The benefit of surveillance colonoscopy in older adults is not well described. AIMS: To quantify the detection of colorectal cancer (CRC) and advanced polyps during surveillance colonoscopy in older adults with a history of colon polyps. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review (MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase) for all published studies through May 2020 in adults age > 70 undergoing surveillance colonoscopy. The main outcome was CRC and advanced polyps detection. We performed meta-analysis to pool results by age (>70 vs. 50-70). RESULTS: The search identified 6239 studies, of which 569 underwent full-text review and 64 data abstraction, of which 19 were included. The risk of detecting CRC (N = 11) was higher in those >70 compared to 50-70 (risk ratio 1.5 (95% CI 1.1-2.2); risk difference 0.8% (95% CI -0.2%-1.8%)). Similarly, the risk of detecting advanced polyps (N = 8) was higher in those >70 compared to 50-70 (risk ratio 1.3 (95% CI 1.2-1.3), risk difference 2.7% (95% CI 1.3%-4.0%)). Most studies did not stratify results by baseline polyp risk. CONCLUSIONS: The detection of CRC and advanced polyps during surveillance colonoscopy in older individuals was higher than in younger controls; however, the absolute risk increase for both was small. These differences must be weighed against competing medical problems and limited life expectancy in older adults when making decisions about surveillance colonoscopy. More primary data on the risks of CRC and advanced polyps accounting for number of past colonoscopies, prior polyp risk, and duration of time since last polyp are needed.


Asunto(s)
Pólipos del Colon , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Anciano , Pólipos del Colon/diagnóstico , Pólipos del Colon/epidemiología , Colonoscopía/métodos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Humanos , Oportunidad Relativa
2.
PLoS One ; 16(7): e0254896, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34293002

RESUMEN

IMPORTANCE: When caregivers cannot attend the clinic visit for the person they provide care for, patients are the predominant source of clinic visit information; however, poor patient recall inhibits the quality of information shared, resulting in poor caregiver preparedness and contributing to caregiver morbidity. Technological solutions exist to sharing clinic visit information, but their effectiveness is unclear. OBJECTIVES: To assess if and how technology is being used to connect informal caregivers to patient clinic visit information when they cannot otherwise attend, and its impact on caregiver and patient outcomes. EVIDENCE REVIEW: MEDLINE, Cochrane, Scopus, and CINAHL were searched through 5/3/2020 with no language restrictions or limits. ClinicalTrials.gov and other reference lists were included in the search. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and nonrandomized trials that involved using a technological medium e.g., video or the electronic health record, to communicate visit information to a non-attending caregiver were included. Data were collected and screened using a standardized data collection form. Cochrane's Risk of Bias 2.0 and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale were used for RCTs and nonrandomized trials, respectively. All data were abstracted by two independent reviewers, with disagreements resolved by a third reviewer. FINDINGS: Of 2115 studies identified in the search, four met criteria for inclusion. Two studies were randomized controlled trials and two were nonrandomized trials. All four studies found positive effects of their intervention on caregiver outcomes of interest, and three out of four studies found statistically significant improvements in key outcomes for caregivers receiving visit information. Improved outcomes included caregiver happiness, caregiver activation, caregiver preparedness, and caregiver confidence in managing patient health. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Our review suggests that using technology to give a caregiver access to clinical visit information could be beneficial to various caregiver outcomes. There is an urgent need to address the lack of research in this area.


Asunto(s)
Cuidadores , Comunicación , Calidad de Vida , Familia , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
3.
Rheum Dis Clin North Am ; 45(3): 453-464, 2019 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31277755

RESUMEN

There are more than 10,000 articles in the literature published since 1999 that appear in a search of hyperuricemia and hypouricemia for vascular events. Systematic reviews were reviewed for this time frame, numbering approximately 300 articles in addition to more than 400 reports of randomized clinical trials published since 2017. In summary, the epidemiologic associations of hyperuricemia and hypouricemia with vascular disease are confounded by comorbid conditions. The interventional data are suggestive of a relationship of gout and vascular disease and to a lesser extent hyperuricemia and hypertension; however, more interventional studies are necessary to confirm these relationships.


Asunto(s)
Gota , Hiperuricemia , Enfermedades Vasculares , Correlación de Datos , Gota/sangre , Gota/epidemiología , Gota/fisiopatología , Humanos , Hiperuricemia/epidemiología , Hiperuricemia/etiología , Factores de Riesgo , Enfermedades Vasculares/epidemiología , Enfermedades Vasculares/prevención & control
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA