Detection of chromosomal instability in paired breast surgery and ductal lavage specimens by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization.

PURPOSE: Ductal lavage is a new modality for collecting exfoliated breast cells with the goal of detecting early neoplasia. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the correlation between cancer-associated abnormalities in breast lesions and exfoliated breast cells collected by ductal lavage. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We performed histopathologic, cytologic, and molecular cytogenetic analyses on 39 paired cases of surgically excised breast lesions and ductal lavage specimens collected immediately before surgery. RESULTS: Abnormal cytology was detected in 7 of 15 (47%) of the evaluable lavages collected from malignant cases, versus 4 of 19 (21%) of the evaluable lavages harvested from benign cases for a sensitivity and specificity of 47 and 79%, respectively. Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of all evaluable lavages revealed numeric changes on chromosomes 1, 8, 11, and/or 17 in 10 of 14 (71%) specimens from malignant cases versus 2 of 18 (11%) from benign cases for a sensitivity and specificity of 71 and 89%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that cytologic and genetic abnormalities associated with breast cancer progression can be detected in ductal lavage cells collected from women with in situ and invasive breast cancer and suggests that fluorescence in situ hybridization may have superior sensitivity and specificity compared with conventional cytology.

A fluorescence in situ hybridization-based assay for improved detection of lung cancer cells in bronchial washing specimens.

BACKGROUND: Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is a powerful tool for detecting chromosome and locus-specific changes in tumor cells. We developed a FISH-based assay to detect genetic changes in bronchial washing specimens of lung carcinoma patients. METHODS: The assay uses a mixture of fluorescently labeled probes to the centromeric region of chromosome 1 and to the 5p15, 8q24 (site of the c-myc gene), and 7p12 (site of the EGFR gene) loci to assess cells in bronchial washing specimens for chromosomal abnormalities indicative of lung carcinoma. The FISH assay was performed on 74 specimens that had been assessed previously for evidence of malignancy by routine cytology with Pap staining. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients had histologically confirmed lung carcinoma and 26 patients had a clinical diagnosis that was negative for lung carcinoma. FISH analysis was performed without knowledge of the patient's clinical information. The finding of six or more epithelial cells with gains of two or more chromosome regions was considered a positive FISH result (i.e., evidence of malignancy). The sensitivity of FISH for the detection of lung carcinoma was 82% in this set of specimens compared with a 54% sensitivity by design for cytology (FISH vs. cytology, P = 0.007). FISH detected 15 of 18 specimens that were falsely negative by cytology. The specificities of FISH and cytology were 82% and 100%, respectively, and were not significantly different (P = 0.993). CONCLUSIONS: The data indicate a potential utility of the FISH assay as an adjunct to bronchial washing cytology in routine clinical practice.

A comparison of BTA stat, hemoglobin dipstick, telomerase and Vysis UroVysion assays for the detection of urothelial carcinoma in urine.

PURPOSE: We determine the sensitivity and specificity of various assays for the detection of urothelial carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 280 voided urine specimens from 265 patients were obtained immediately before cystoscopy for BTA stat, (Bard Diagnostic, Redmond, Washington) hemoglobin dipstick, (Bayer, Elkhart, Indiana) telomerase and UroVysion (Vysis, a wholly owned subsidiary of Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, Illinois) analysis. RESULTS: Of the 265 patients 75 had biopsy proven urothelial carcinoma, and the sensitivity of the assays was determined from these patients. From most sensitive to least sensitive, the overall sensitivity of UroVysion (73 cases), BTA stat (72), hemoglobin dipstick (73) and telomerase (70) was 81%, 78%, 74%, and 46%, respectively. Each of the first 3 tests was statistically significantly more sensitive than the telomerase assay (p <0.05). However, the differences in overall sensitivity of UroVysion, BTA stat and hemoglobin dipstick were not statistically significant. The specificity of the tests was calculated for 80 of the 265 patients in this study who had no history of urothelial carcinoma and negative cystoscopy findings despite common urological complaints. From most specific to least specific, the specificity of UroVysion, telomerase, BTA stat and hemoglobin dipstick was 96%, 91%, 74% and 51%, respectively. UroVysion and telomerase were statistically significantly (p <0.01) more specific than the BTA stat and hemoglobin dipstick assays, and all of the assays were more specific than hemoglobin dipstick testing (p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study reveals that UroVysion is the most sensitive and specific assay among those tested for the detection of urothelial carcinoma. Telomerase testing had good specificity but poor sensitivity. The BTA stat and hemoglobin dipstick tests had good sensitivity but relatively poor specificity. UroVysion is a promising new assay for the detection of urothelial carcinoma in urine specimens. However, further studies are needed to explore the role of the various assays in the treatment of patients with superficial urothelial carcinoma.