The open-first strategy is acceptable for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm even in the endovascular era.

PURPOSE: To examine the surgical findings of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA) based on the open-first strategy in the last decade, and to analyze the predictors of in-hospital mortality for RAAA in the endovascular era. METHODS: The subjects of this retrospective study were 116 patients who underwent RAAA repair, for whom sufficient data were available [25% female, median age 76 (70-85) years]. Sixteen (13.8%) patients were managed with endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and 100 patients (86.2%) were managed with open surgical repair (OSR). RESULTS: Univariate analysis identified base excess (BE) (odds ratio [OR] 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79-0.96; p = 0.006), and preoperative cardiopulmonary arrest (CPA) [OR] 15.4; 95% [CI] 1.30-181; p = 0.030), BE (OR 0.88; 95% CI 0.79-0.96; p = 0.006), shock index (OR 2.44; 95% CI 1.01-5.94; p = 0.050), lactic acid (Lac) (OR 1.18; 95% CI 1.02-1.36; p = 0.026), and blood sugar (BS) > 215 (OR 3.46; 95% CI 1.10-10.9; p = 0.034) as positive predictors of hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study suggest that a first-line strategy of OSR for ruptured AAAs is acceptable. Poor preoperative conditions, including a high shock index, CPA, low BE, high Lac, and a BS level > 215 mg/dl, were identified as predictors of hospital mortality, rather than the procedures themselves.

Nationwide Analysis of Persistent Type II Endoleak and Late Outcomes of Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in Japan: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.

BACKGROUND: We reviewed the results of endovascular aneurysm repair in patients from the Japanese Committee for Stentgraft Management registry to determine the significance of persistent type II endoleak (p-T2EL) and the risk of late adverse events, including aneurysm sac enlargement. METHODS: The prospectively captured medical records of 17 099 patients <75 years of age who underwent endovascular aneurysm repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm from 2006 to 2015 were reviewed. Patients were divided into 2 groups (with or without p-T2EL) and compared to examine the correlation between p-T2EL and the occurrence of aneurysm sac enlargement after endovascular aneurysm repair. RESULTS: Of the patients, 4957 (29.0%) had p-T2EL and 12 142 (71.0%) had no p-T2EL (non-T2EL). Mean age was significantly higher (P<0.001), and there were fewer men (P<0.001) in the p-T2EL group. Among comorbidities, hypertension (P=0.019) and chronic kidney disease (P=0.040) were more prevalent and respiratory disorders were less prevalent (P<0.001) in the p-T2EL group. From each group, 4957 patients were matched according to propensity score to adjust for differences in patient characteristics. The cumulative incidence rates of abdominal aortic aneurysm-related mortality (p-T2EL: 52 of 4957 [1.0%] versus non-T2EL: 21 of 12 142 [0.2%]), rupture (p-T2EL: 38 of 4957 [0.8%] versus non-T2EL: 13 of 12 142 [0.1%]), sac enlargement (≥5 mm; p-T2EL: 1359 of 4957 [27.4%] versus non-T2EL: 332 of 12 142 [2.7%]), and reintervention (p-T2EL: 739 of 4957 [14.9%] versus non-T2EL: 91 of 12 142 [0.7%]) were significantly higher in the p-T2EL than the nonpT2EL group (P<0.001). Propensity score matching yielded higher estimated incremental risk, including abdominal aortic aneurysm-related mortality, rupture, sac enlargement (≥5 mm), and reintervention for p-T2EL (P<0.001). Cox regression analysis revealed older age (P=0.010), proximal neck diameter (P=0.003), and chronic kidney disease (P<0.001) as independent positive predictors and male sex as an independent negative predictor (P=0.015) of sac enlargement. CONCLUSIONS: The Japanese Committee for Stentgraft Management registry data show a correlation between p-T2EL and late adverse events, including aneurysm sac enlargement, reintervention, rupture, and abdominal aortic aneurysm-related mortality after endovascular aneurysm repair. Besides p-T2EL, older age, female sex, chronic kidney disease, and dilated proximal neck were associated with sac enlargement.

Case report: Vascular graft infection due to Aspergillus species presenting with recurrent vascular occlusion.

BACKGROUND: An aortic graft implantation is an effective therapeutic method for various aortic diseases. However, it is known that sometimes these implanted grafts can be the foci of infections. Here we report a rare case of graft infection that presented multiple embolisms of aortic branches and peripheral organs. CASE PRESENTATION: A 63-year-old Japanese woman with a history of aortic graft implantation presented with occlusions of large arteries in different loci and time points, with elevation of non-specific inflammatory markers. Thoracic contrast-computed tomography (CT) captured vegetation in the descending aortic graft and the [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ([18F]FDG PET/CT) showed accumulation of FDG in the same site, suggesting a graft infection. Despite all these suspicious findings, repeated blood culture examinations never detected any microorganisms. A diagnosis of Aspergillus graft infection was made based on an elevated serum ß-D glucan (ßDG) and a positive Aspergillus galactomannan (GM) antigen test. The patient subsequently had surgery with replacement of the descending aortic graft and anti-fungal drugs were instituted with significant improvement noted. CONCLUSION: In the present case, the patient's specific feature in the anatomical vascular construction, past operation, and basal fundamental diseases collaboratively contributed to the pathogenesis of the present infection. It is important to recognize the risk of graft infection and conduct imaging studies when indicative symptoms emerge. The negativity in blood culture studies often makes detection of pathogenic microbes extremely difficult. This case suggests that non-cultural tests such as bDG and GM can be useful for diagnosis and starting appropriate anti-fungal drugs in the early stages.

The blood sugar level can predict preoperative shock in patients with a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm even when the patient's condition appears stable.

PURPOSE: This observational retrospective study aimed to identify preoperative blood test data capable of predicting preoperative shock in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA). METHODS: A total of 104 patients who underwent surgery for rAAA between 2007 and 2018 were reviewed. Preoperative shock, defined as a shock index (heart rate/blood pressure) exceeding 1.5 or a maximum blood pressure < 80 mmHg, was observed in 44 patients (42%). RESULTS: Blood sugar (BS) (odds ratio [OR] 1.02; p < 0.001), C-reactive protein (CRP) (OR 0.57; p = 0.005), and hemoglobin (OR 0.60; p = 0.001) levels were identified as independent positive predictors of preoperative shock, and a BS level ≥ 300 mg/dl (OR 13.2; 95% CI 3.56-48.6; p < 0.001) was identified as a positive predictor of preoperative shock. The receiver operating characteristics curve analysis for BS showed that the area under the curve for the predicted probabilities was 0.84, and at a cut-off value of 215 mg/dl, the sensitivity of minimum BS for predicting preoperative shock was 86% with a specificity of 79%. CONCLUSIONS: The BS level is as an independent predictor of preoperative shock in patients with rAAA. Patients with preoperative BS levels ≥ 300 mg/dl have an extremely high risk of preoperative shock.

Does Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Repair Change Psoas Muscle Volume?

BACKGROUND: Because endovascular abdominal aortic repair (EVAR) lowers the lumbar arterial blood flow, we hypothesized that the volume of the psoas muscle decreases after surgery. When internal iliac artery (IIA) embolization is performed, the lumbar arterial blood flow further decreases; therefore, we also hypothesized that the decrease in the volume of the psoas muscle becomes more significant. This study was performed to assess the volume change in the psoas muscle after EVAR. METHODS: Fifty-three consecutive patients who underwent EVAR from January 2016 to December 2016 were included. The psoas muscle volume was measured by preoperative and postoperative computed tomography (CT). Postoperative CT scans were performed 6-12 months after EVAR. Axial CT images with a 2-mm slice thickness were used to measure the psoas muscle volume. Data were transferred to a 3-dimensional workstation, and the psoas muscle volume was measured. RESULTS: In the EVAR group, the volume of the psoas muscle decreased by an average of 5.8 mL (4.6%) from 114.8 ± 32.0 mL preoperatively to 109.0 ± 30.3 mL postoperatively (P < 0.01). There was a significant difference in the change in the psoas muscle volume between patients with and without IIA embolization (embolization group: preoperative 118.1 ± 31.0 mL, postoperative 107.5 ± 29.2 mL, mean volume change rate -8.8%; nonembolization group: preoperative 114.0 ± 32.3 mL, postoperative 109.4 ± 30.7 mL, mean volume change rate -3.6%; P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The psoas muscle volume is reduced with EVAR. Moreover, when the IIA is embolized, the psoas muscle volume is further reduced.

The Influence of 4 or more Patent Lumbar Arteries on Persistent Type II Endoleak and Sac Expansion after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to review our clinical results and determine how preoperative patent lumbar arteries (LAs) influence the occurrence of type II endoleaks or aneurysm sac enlargement after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and to identify the preoperative computed tomography findings of persistent type II endoleaks from patent LAs that indicate the need for preventive procedures during EVAR. METHODS: A total of 293 patients who underwent EVAR for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) between August 2007 and July 2013 were reviewed. Follow-up data were available for 194 patients (76% male, mean age 78 ± 6.8 years), and the mean follow-up time was 57 ± 23 months. RESULTS: The number of patent LAs was identified as a significant positive predictor of persistent type II endoleaks (hazard ratio [HR], 1.4; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.2-1.7; P < 0.001) and sac enlargement (≥5 mm) at the 2-year follow-up period (HR, 1.3; 95% CI: 1.1-1.8; P = 0.009) after EVAR, using Cox regression analysis. The receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC: 0.72) showed that a cutoff of 4 patent LAs resulted in a sensitivity of 87% and specificity of 48%. The rates of freedom from sac enlargement (≥5 mm) at 3 and 5 years after EVAR were significantly lower in patients with 4 or more patent LAs than in those with fewer (90% and 76% vs. 96% and 89%; P = 0.0008). CONCLUSIONS: The number of patent LAs is associated as a significant risk factor with the development of persistent type II endoleaks and sac enlargement after EVAR. Four or more patent LAs should be recognized as the group having an elevated risk of developing late sac enlargement after EVAR.

Acute type A aortic dissection repair in younger patients.

AIM: To evaluate the surgical outcomes and midterm results of patients under 50 years old with acute type A aortic dissection (AAAD). METHODS: The study population included 51 patients who underwent AAAD repair between 2003 and 2016. Of these 51 patients, 46 (90.1%) were males and 14 (27.5%) had connective tissue disorders. Twenty-five patients (49.0%) had a body mass index >25.0 kg/m2 and two patients were pregnant. Total arch replacement was performed in 39 patients (76.5%) and hemiarch replacement in 12 patients (23.5%). Twenty patients (39.2%) underwent concomitant surgeries, including root replacement, lower limb bypass, or coronary artery bypass grafting. RESULTS: There was one in-hospital death (2.0%). Median follow-up was 55 months and overall survival rates were 87.7% at 5 years and 81.9% at 10 years. Rates of freedom from reoperation were 60.2% at 5 years and 50.2% at 10 years. Eighteen patients (35.3%) required reoperation, due to progressive aortic dilatation, new dissection in the aortic root, infection, and hemolysis. A patent false lumen represented a significant risk factor for reoperation (P < 0.001). Four patients (7.8%) underwent reoperation within 3 months after the initial repair. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical outcomes after AAAD repair for young patients were satisfactory. A patent false lumen significantly increased the need for reoperation (P = 0.002), but did not affect long-term survival. Close follow-up is mandatory after the initial repair in young patients following AAAD.

[Hybrid Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair with Total Debranching of Supra-aortic Trunks].

The method of hybrid arch thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) to treat aneurysm with zone 0 landing has changed according to its invasiveness and complications. The real chimney technique allows supra-aortic bypass from ascending aorta without side clamp is the current choice of treatment. The comprehensive strategy to prevent stroke during hybrid arch TEVAR consisting of magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition with gradient-echo for evaluation of the atheromatous change and balloon protection of the left subclavian artery has contributed for the marked reduction of stroke. Our current strategy of hybrid arch TEVAR with zone 0 landing is discussed.

[Surgical and Endovascular Management for Acute Aortic Dissection Stanford Type B].

The most important decision for the patient's prognosis is whether we choose medical treatment or surgical therapy for the management of acute aortic dissection Stanford type B. Recent studies have reported outstanding initial success with entry closure by thoracic endovascular aortic repair( TEVAR) in the patients with Stanford type B aortic dissection. For acute aortic dissection Stanford type B with fatal complications, TEVAR is becoming the first-line therapy. Moreover, the efficacy of endovascular repair for the uncomplicated acute type B aortic dissection, in comparison with standard medical therapy, has been confirmed in some trials. In this report, we demonstrate a trend regarding surgical and endovascular treatment in addition to guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection (The Japanese Circulation Society 2011).

Prognosis after non-surgical therapy for acute type A aortic dissection.

BACKGROUND: Immediate surgery to save life is the recommended treatment for Stanford type A acute aortic dissection (AAAD). METHOD: The present study comprised 35 patients admitted with AAAD who were considered inappropriate candidates for surgery or declined surgery. The mean age was 84.5 ± 9.6 years. Eight patients who were considered inappropriate candidates for surgery due to severe stroke in 2 patients or hemodynamic instability in 6. Twenty-seven patients aged 88.0 ± 5.9 years who declined surgery, predominantly due to advanced age. RESULTS: The overall in-hospital mortality was 51.4%. Mortality among patients that declined surgery or were considered inappropriate candidates for surgery were 37% and 100%, respectively. Causes of death among patients that declined surgery were cardiac tamponade in 6 and aortic rupture in 4. Mid-term survival among patients who refuse surgery, including in-hospital death, were 51.6 ± 10% and 34.5 ± 10%, on the other hand, Mid-term survival in hospital survivors were 81.9 ± 9% and 54.8 ± 14%. The causes of death among the discharged patients were senility in three, malignant tumor in two, pneumonia, aortic rupture, and unknown cause in one each. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality from AAAD is 51.4%, including inappropriate candidates for surgery. When patients were evaluated as suitable candidates for surgical intervention but subsequently refused the surgical procedure, in-hospital mortality was 37%. Long-term survival of hospital survivor was acceptable. These data can be a benchmark for patient and patient's family to select medical therapy for AAAD in consideration with the patient's will.

Covering the intercostal artery branching of the Adamkiewicz artery during endovascular aortic repair increases the risk of spinal cord ischemia.

Objectives: This study aimed to determine the relationship between covering the intercostal artery branching of the Adamkiewicz artery (ICA-AKA) and spinal cord ischemia (SCI) during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Methods: Patients who underwent TEVAR from 2008 to 2022 were enrolled. Stent grafts covered the ICA-AKA in 108 patients (covered AKA group) and stent grafts didn't cover the ICA-AKA in 114 patients (uncovered AKA group). The characteristics of 58 patients from each group were matched based on propensity scores. Results: No significant differences in SCI rates were detected between the covered AKA (10%; 11/108) and uncovered AKA (3.5%; 4/114) groups (P = .061). Shaggy aorta (odds ratio [OR], 5.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.74-15.3, P = .003), iliac artery access (OR, 6.81; 95% CI, 2.22-20.9, P = .001), and procedural time (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00-1.02, P = .003) were risk factors for SCI in the entire cohort. Although covering the ICA-AKA (OR, 2.60; 95% CI, 0.86-7.88, P = .058) was not a significant risk factor, shaggy aorta (OR, 8.15; 95% CI, 2.07-32.1, P = .003), iliac artery access (OR, 9.09; 95% CI, 2.22-37.2, P = .002), and procedural time (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.01-1.02, P = .008) were risk factors for SCI in the covered AKA group. No significant risk factors were detected in the uncovered AKA group. Conclusions: Covering the ICA-AKA was not an independent risk for SCI in TEVAR. However, covering the ICA-AKA was indirectly associated with the risk of SCI in patients with shaggy aorta, iliac access, and procedural time.

[The surgical treatment using inverted graft insertion technique for left ventricular aneurysm combined with aortic stenosis; report of a case].

An 83-year-old female with congestive heart failure[ New York Heart Association(NYHA) classification III ] due to left ventricular aneurysm, aortic stenosis( AS) with an aortic valve area of 0.66 cm2 and moderate tricuspid regurgitation, underwent endoventricular circular patch plasty using inverted graft insertion technique, aortic valve replacement (AVR) and tricuspid annuloplasty (TAP) successfully. It is highly probable that moderate aortic stenosis and localized apical transmural infarction had been gradually getting worse and they coincidentally caused both progressed AS and ventricular aneurismal change in our case.

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair with collateral vessels from the femoral artery to Adamkiewicz's artery.

Identification of the Adamkiewicz's artery (AKA) prior to the operation is one of the spinal cord ischaemia preventive measures. A 75-year-old man presented with the rapid expansion of thoracic aortic aneurysm. Collateral vessels from the right common femoral artery to the AKA were observed on preoperative computed tomography angiography. The stent graft was successfully deployed through the contralateral side via a pararectal laparotomy to avoid collateral vessel injury supplying the AKA. This case highlights the significance of preoperative identification of collateral vessels to the AKA.

Differences of mid-term outcomes in debranching thoracic endovascular aortic repair between zone 0 and zone 1-2 landing.

OBJECTIVE: Debranching thoracic endovascular aortic repair (d-TEVAR) for zone 0 landing (Z0-TEVAR) remained challenging in aortic arch aneurysms. This study aimed to compare the mid-term outcomes between Z0-TEVAR and Z1/2-TEVAR to assess the appropriateness of Z0-TEVAR as the first-line therapy for aortic arch aneurysms in high-risk patients. METHODS: Medical records of 200 patients who underwent d-TEVAR from 2007 to 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Of these, 40 patients who underwent Z0-TEVAR (70% males; the median age of 82 years) and 160 Z1/2-TEVAR (78% males; the median age of 77 years) were compared. In each group, 39 patients were matched using propensity scores (PS) to adjust for differences in patient backgrounds. RESULTS: Freedom from all-cause mortality (p < 0.001), aorta-related mortality (p < 0.001), and stroke (p = 0.001) were significantly lower in Z0-TEVAR than in Z1/2-TEVAR. Freedom from reintervention was similar between the two groups (p = 0.326). Type A dissection post-TEVAR was observed in 3 (7.5%) of Z0-TEVAR, but none in Z1/2-TEVAR (p = 0.006). Pneumonia was also more frequent in Z0-TEVAR (n = 8, 30%) than Z1/2-TEVAR (n = 4, 2.5%) (p < 0.001). PS matching also yielded worse outcomes (all-cause mortality, p = 0.017; aorta-related mortality, p = 0.046; and stroke, p = 0.027) in Z0-TEVAR than Z1/2-TEVAR. CONCLUSIONS: Higher mid-term mortality and stroke rates after Z0-TEVAR were confirmed by PS matching. Z0-TEVAR would be an alternative for high-risk patients with arch aneurysms requiring zone 0 landing but not a reliable method.

Surgical outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair for retrograde Stanford type a dissection.

OBJECTIVES: The optimal indications and contraindications for thoracic endovascular aortic repair of retrograde Stanford type A acute aortic dissection (R-AAAD) are not well known. The goal of this study was to determine the outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair for R-AAAD at our institution and to discuss optimal indications. METHODS: The medical records of 359 patients admitted to our institution for R-AAAD between December 2016 and December 2022 were reviewed, and 83 patients were finally diagnosed with R-AAAD. We selected thoracic endovascular aortic repair as an alternative, considering the anatomy of aortic dissection and the risk to patients undergoing open surgery. RESULTS: Nineteen patients underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair for R-AAAD. No in-hospital deaths or neurologic complications occurred. A type Ia endoleak was detected in 1 patient. All other primary entries were successfully closed. All dissection-related complications, such as cardiac tamponade, malperfusion distal to the primary entry and abdominal aortic rupture, were resolved. One patient required open conversion for intimal injury at the proximal edge of the stent graft; all other ascending false lumens were completely thrombosed and contracted at discharge. During the follow-up period, no aortic-related deaths or aortic events proximal to the stent graft occurred. CONCLUSIONS: The indications for thoracic endovascular aortic repair were expanded to low-risk and emergency cases at our institution. The early- and midterm outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair for R-AAAD were acceptable. Further long-term follow-up is required.

Long-term outcomes of combined pulmonary endarterectomy and additional balloon pulmonary angioplasty for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.

BACKGROUND: The early and long-term outcomes after pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) have been established by several high-volume centers, but the impact of postoperative residual pulmonary hypertension affecting postoperative clinical parameters remains unclear. This study aims to investigate the institutional surgical results of PEA and to evaluate the efficacy of additional balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) for residual pulmonary hypertension. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 222 patients (57.7 ± 12.9 years old, 141 female) who underwent PEA for CTEPH at the National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center between 2000 and 2020. RESULTS: The preoperative mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) was 45.6 ± 9.7 mmHg and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) was 1062 ± 451 dyne*sec/cm-5. Postoperative mPAP (23.4 ± 11 mmHg, 204 patients, P < 0.001) and PVR (419 ± 291 dyne*sec/cm-5, 199 patients, P < 0.001) significantly improved after PEA. Since 2011, 62 patients (28%) underwent BPA after PEA for "catecholamine dependent" residual PH 1 month after PEA in 14, "scheduled" BPA with residual PH 1 year after PEA in 32, and 16 "symptomatic" patients without residual PH. Their mPAP had significantly improved by PEA (48.1 ± 7.7 to 32.0 ± 10.2 mmHg, P < 0.001), and further improved (33.8 ± 11.1 to 26.5 ± 9.1 mmHg, P < 0.001) after BPA. CONCLUSIONS: PEA provided immediate and substantial improvements in pulmonary hemodynamics and favorable long-term survival. In addition, postoperative BPA improved postoperative clinical parameters for eligible patients regardless of the presence of residual PH.

Role of initial medical treatment and effectiveness of thoracic endovascular aortic repair for acute type A aortic dissection with thrombosed false lumen.

OBJECTIVES: The optimal treatment for acute type A aortic dissection (AAAD) with thrombosed false lumen (T-FL) of the ascending aorta remains controversial. The goal of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes of initial medical treatment (IMT) and the effectiveness of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for AAAD with T-FL. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed 60 patients with AAAD with T-FL. Emergency aortic repair was performed in 33 patients, and IMT was selected in 27 uncomplicated patients with ascending aortic diameter < 50 mm and ascending T-FL thickness ≤ 10 mm. RESULTS: Among the 27 patients who received IMT, 14 had intramural haematomas at admission; however, new ulcer-like projections appeared in 7 (50%) during hospitalization. Before discharge, 12 (44%) were given medical treatment only, and 15 (56%) required delayed aortic repair including TEVAR in 8 and open repair in 7. The median interval from onset to delayed repair was 9 days, and significantly more patients received TEVAR compared to those receiving emergency repair (53% vs 21%; P = 0.043). Between the TEVAR (n = 15) and the open repair (n = 33) groups, 1 (7%) 30-day death occurred in the TEVAR group, whereas no in-hospital deaths occurred in the open repair group. During the median follow-up time of 24.8 months, no aorta-related death was observed, and there were no statistically significant differences in the rate of freedom from aortic events (TEVAR: 92.8%/3 years vs open repair: 88.4%/3 years; P = 0.871). CONCLUSIONS: Our management, using a combination of emergency aortic repair, IMT and delayed aortic repair for AAAD with T-FL, achieved favourable clinical outcomes. Among the selected Japanese patients, IMT with repeated multidetector computed tomography could detect a new intimal tear that could be closed by TEVAR in some cases. Using EVAR for this pathology resulted in acceptable early and midterm outcomes. Further investigations are required to validate the safety and efficacy of this management procedure.

Lower-profile stent graft reduces the risk of embolism during thoracic endovascular aortic repair in shaggy aorta.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to reveal the association between lower-profile stent graft (LPSG) and embolism during thoracic endovascular aortic repair for non-dissecting distal arch and descending thoracic aortic aneurysm. METHODS: This study reviewed data of 35 patients who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair with LPSG (27 males; age: 77 ± 9.2 years) and 312 who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair with conventional-sized stent graft (CSSG) (247 males; age: 77 ± 7.4 years) from 2009 to 2021. RESULTS: The rate of total embolic events was significantly lower in the LPSG group (0/35 [0%]) than the CSSG group (34/312 [11.2%]) (P = 0.035). Shaggy aorta (odds ratio: 5.220; P < 0.001) were identified as positive embolic event predictors. The rate of total embolic events in 68 patients with shaggy aorta (12 in LPSG/56 in CSSG) was significantly lower in the LPSG group (0/12 [0%]) than the CSSG group (19/56 [34%]) (P = 0.015). The rate of total embolic events in 279 patients with the non-shaggy aorta (23 in LPSG/256 in CSSG) reveals no difference between the 2 groups (0 [0%]/16 [6.3%]) (P = 0.377). CONCLUSIONS: LPSG usage could reduce embolism in thoracic endovascular aortic repair, and the difference was more pronounced in patients with the shaggy aorta. LPSG might be beneficial in preventing embolism in thoracic endovascular aortic repair for patients with a shaggy aorta.

Pelvic abscess following internal iliac artery embolization prior to endovascular aneurysm repair.

We describe a previously unreported case of abscess formation around the right internal iliac artery (IIA) after coil embolization prior to endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). A 75-year-old man was admitted for elective repair of a right common iliac aneurysm. The right IIA coil embolization and EVAR procedures were uncomplicated and assessment by postoperative computed tomography (CT) was satisfactory. The patient was readmitted 2 weeks after EVAR with right buttock pain and pyrexia. CT indicated an isolated abscess around the coil-embolized IIA. The patient was successfully treated with CT-guided percutaneous drainage.

Surgical repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm concomitant with iliac arterial disease using InterGard™ Quadrifurcated.

InterGard™ Quadrifurcated [InterVascular S.A. (MAQUET Cardiovascular), La Ciotat, France], a knitted quadrifurcated prosthetic graft, is useful to simplify the procedures for patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm concomitant with iliac arterial disease. From March 2008 to April 2010, 59 patients underwent abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in our department. InterGard™ Quadrifurcated was used in 22 patients (37.3%). All patients were male with a mean age of 72.1 ± 12.1 years (range from 45 to 90 years). Four were emergency cases. Nineteen patients had common iliac arterial lesions, and 19 patients had internal iliac arterial lesions. In addition to abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, reconstruction of bilateral internal iliac arteries was performed in 4 patients, reconstruction of unilateral internal iliac artery in 15 (right 6, left 9), and internal mesenteric artery in 13. There was one hospital death due to nonocclusive mesenteric infarction. There were two complications, which were intestinal perforation and intestinal obstruction. All of these three cases were emergency cases. Computed tomography scan 1 week after operation showed that all reconstructed grafts were patent. Although patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm concomitant with iliac arterial disease had many preoperative comorbidities, surgical results with InterGard™ Quadrifurcated were satisfactory. It is useful to simplify the procedures for these patients.