Annexin A1 in plasma from patients with bronchial asthma: its association with lung function.

BACKGROUND: Annexin-A1 (ANXA1) is a glucocorticoid-induced protein with multiple actions in the regulation of inflammatory cell activation. The anti-inflammatory protein ANXA1 and its N-formyl peptide receptor 2 (FPR2) have protective effects on organ fibrosis. However, the exact role of ANXA1 in asthma remains to be determined. The aim of this study was to identify the role of ANXA1 in bronchial asthma. METHODS: In mice sensitized and challenged with ovalbumin (OVA-OVA mice) and mice sensitized with saline and challenged with air (control mice), we investigated the potential links between ANXA1 levels and bronchial asthma using ELISA, immunoblotting, and immunohistochemical staining. Moreover, we also determined ANXA1 levels in blood from 50 asthmatic patients (stable and exacerbated states). RESULTS: ANXA1 protein levels in lung tissue and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid were significantly higher in OVA-OVA mice compared with control mice. FPR2 protein levels in lung tissue were significantly higher in OVA-OVA mice compared with control mice. Plasma ANXA1 levels were increased in asthmatic patients compared with healthy controls. Plasma ANXA1 levels were significantly lower in exacerbated patients compared with stable patients with bronchial asthma (p < 0.05). The plasma ANXA1 levels in controlled asthmatic patients were correlated with forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) (r = - 0.191, p = 0.033) and FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC) (r = -0.202, p = 0.024). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that ANXA1 may be a potential marker and therapeutic target for asthma.

Circulating angiopoietin-1 and -2 in patients with stable and exacerbated asthma.

BACKGROUND: Angiopoietin (Ang)-1 and -2 are involved in the pathogenesis of asthma and have been identified as markers of asthma severity. OBJECTIVE: To determine the relation between circulating angiopoietins and clinical variables of patients with asthma. METHODS: Fifty patients with bronchial asthma and 25 healthy controls were enrolled. Ang1 and Ang2 plasma levels were analyzed in patients with stable and exacerbated asthma. RESULTS: Plasma Ang1 levels were 28.4 ± 4.01 pg/mg in patients with bronchial asthma and 21.2 ± 5.21 pg/mg in healthy controls. Plasma Ang2 levels were 23.96 ± 1.38 pg/mg in patients with bronchial asthma compared with 36.8 ± 4.46 pg/mg in healthy controls (P = .010). The ratio of Ang2 to Ang1 was lower in patients with asthma than in control subjects. Plasma Ang1 concentrations were correlated with the ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) to forced vital capacity (FVC), and plasma Ang2 levels were correlated with FEV1 percentage of predicted, FEV1/FVC, and total immunoglobulin E values. The ratio of Ang2 to Ang1 was correlated with FEV1 percentage of predicted and FEV1/FVC. Although plasma Ang1 levels tended to be lower in the exacerbated state than in the stable state in patients with asthma, Ang2 levels were higher in the exacerbated state than in the stable state in patients with asthma (P = .001). Plasma Ang2 levels were correlated with initial eosinophil proportions and initial neutrophil proportions. Plasma Ang2 levels and the ratio of Ang2 to Ang1 were correlated with blood eosinophil proportions in the exacerbated state. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that circulating angiopoietins could be a useful marker of asthma exacerbation.

Association of nasal inflammation and lower airway responsiveness in schoolchildren based on an epidemiological survey.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We sought to increase our understanding of the rhinitis-asthma relationship and improve strategies for the treatment of patients with these diseases. The aim of this study was to identify a connection between upper airway inflammation and lower airway responsiveness. METHODS: We counted eosinophils on nasal smears, and performed spirometry, allergic skin tests, and methacholine challenge tests in 308 schoolchildren plus a questionnaire on respiratory symptoms. The methacholine concentration causing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (PC20 < 25 mg/mL) was used as the threshold of bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR). RESULTS: In total, 26% of subjects had positive nasal eosinophils on a smear, and 46.2% of subjects had BHR at < 25 mg/mL methacholine PC20. Nasal symptoms were higher in subjects with than without nasal eosinophils (p = 0.012). Asthma symptoms did not differ between subjects with and without nasal eosinophils. Nasal eosinophils were higher in subjects with atopy than those without (p = 0.006), and there was no difference in PC20 methacholine according to atopy (15.5 ± 1.07 vs. 17.5 ± 0.62; p > 0.05). No difference in BHR was detected when comparing subjects with and without nasal eosinophils. There were significant differences in the PC20 between subjects with greater than 50% nasal eosinophils and without nasal eosinophils (11.01 ± 2.92 mg/mL vs. 17.38 ± 0.61 mg/mL; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrated that nasal eosinophilic inflammation might contribute to lower airway responsiveness in schoolchildren, based on an epidemiological survey.