Central venous catheter-related blood stream infections in patients receiving intravenous iloprost for pulmonary hypertension.

Catheter-related blood stream infection (CR-BSI) in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) receiving intravenous iloprost via an indwelling central line has previously not been fully described. Recent studies have suggested a link between the pH of prostanoid infusions and the rate and nature of CR-BSI. We have investigated CR-BSI in patients receiving intravenous iloprost at our unit. Databases and hospital records were interrogated for all patients receiving intravenous iloprost between September 2007 and June 2012. Fifty-nine patients received intravenous iloprost via an indwelling central catheter with a total of 23,072 treatment days. There were 15 episodes of CR-BSI, identified using a systematic screening protocol, involving 11 patients giving an overall CR-BSI rate of 0.65/1,000 treatment days. CR-BSI rate for Gram-positive organisms was 0.26/1,000 treatment-days and for Gram-negative organisms was 0.39/1,000 treatment-days. The pH of iloprost in typical dosing regimens was comparable to the pH used in standard-diluent treprostinil and dissimilar to alkaline epoprostenol infusions. The proportion of Gram-negative CR-BSI was similar to that reported for standard-diluent treprostinil. CRP was normal on admission in 33 % of cases of confirmed CR-BSI and remained normal in 13 % of cases. CR-BSI rates with intravenous iloprost are comparable to those observed for other prostanoids. The high proportion of Gram-negative organisms observed and the neutral pH of iloprost infusions support the previously hypothesised link between pH and antimicrobial activity. Although usually elevated during a CR-BSI, CRP may be normal in early infection and a normal result cannot completely exclude infection.

ASPIRE registry: assessing the Spectrum of Pulmonary hypertension Identified at a REferral centre.

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a heterogeneous condition. To date, no registry data exists reflecting the spectrum of disease across the five diagnostic groups encountered in a specialist referral centre. Data was retrieved for consecutive, treatment-naïve cases diagnosed between 2001 and 2010 using a catheter-based approach. 1,344 patients were enrolled, with a mean follow-up of 2.9 yrs. The 3-yr survival was 68% for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), 73% for PH associated with left heart disease, 44% for PH associated with lung disease (PH-lung), 71% for chronic thromboembolic PH (CTEPH) and 59% for miscellaneous PH. Compared with PAH, survival was inferior in PH-lung and superior in CTEPH (p<0.05). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that diagnostic group independently predicted survival. Within PAH, Eisenmenger's survival was superior to idiopathic PAH, which was superior to PAH associated with systemic sclerosis (p<0.005). Within PH-lung, 3-yr survival in sleep disorders/alveolar hypoventilation (90%) was superior to PH-lung with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (41%) and interstitial lung disease (16%) (p<0.05). In CTEPH, long-term survival was best in patients with surgically accessible disease undergoing pulmonary endarterectomy. In this large registry of consecutive, treatment-naïve patients identified at a specialist PH centre, outcomes and characteristics differed between and within PH groups. The current system of classification of PH has prognostic value even when adjusted for age and disease severity, emphasising the importance of systematic evaluation and precise classification.