Treatment outcomes of early-stage endometrial cancer patients: A propensity score matching of vaginal brachytherapy versus pelvic radiotherapy.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to report the treatment outcomes of radiation therapy for early-stage endometrial cancer patients. In addition, this study intended to identify high-risk factors that require pelvic radiotherapy (PRT) in addition to vaginal brachytherapy (VBT) for intermediate-risk endometrial cancer patients. METHODS: Patients with early-stage endometrial cancer receiving postoperative VBT alone or with PRT were included. Propensity score matching was used to balance the two study groups. The primary endpoint was locoregional recurrence (LRR). Age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index and substantial lymphovascular space invasion were selected for subgroup analyses to identify the benefits of PRT over VBT alone. RESULTS: From 2005 to 2017, a total of 288 patients underwent analysis following propensity score matching. Of these, 144 received VBT and 144 received PRT. There was no significant difference in 5-year LRR between VBT and PRT for both intermediate (0% vs. 0%) and high-intermediate risk patients (3.5% VBT vs. 5.4% PRT; HR 0.54: 0.05-6.00; p = 0.616). The subgroup analyses revealed no significant factors favoring PRT over VBT. Patients with high comorbidities may have higher risks of non-cancer death after receiving PRT. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative VBT alone is sufficient for early-stage intermediate-risk endometrial cancer patients.

Benefits of prophylactic percutaneous gastrostomy in patients with nasopharyngeal cancer receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy: A multicenter analysis.

PURPOSE: Prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PPEG) is widely used for patients with head and neck cancer undergoing concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT). Nevertheless, the necessity of its use in patients with nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) is uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the benefits of PPEG on prevention of weight loss and treatment tolerance in patients with NPC receiving CCRT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective multicenter chart review of 904 patients, 378 in the PPEG group and 526 in the non-PPEG group, was conducted. Baseline characteristics, weight loss, and treatment tolerance were analyzed and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the mean baseline body mass index (BMI) between the groups. At the end of CCRT, no difference in weight loss was found between the 2 groups (non-PPEG group, 6.6%; PPEG group, 5.9%). Nonetheless, the subgroup analysis demonstrated that a baseline BMI < 18.5 kg/m2 (underweight) and non-intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) technique were independent factors associated with prevention of weight loss by PPEG. More patients in the PPEG group were able to complete planned cycles of chemotherapy (73.3% vs. 49.0%, P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Although the benefits of PPEG on prevention of weight loss were not observed for the entire cohort, we found a potentially protective effect of PPEG in some subgroups of patients. Additionally, PPEG significantly enhanced chemotherapy tolerance. Therefore, PPEG tube insertion should be strongly considered for patients with NPC receiving CCRT, particularly for underweight patients and those undergoing a non-IMRT technique.

3D Kinect Camera Scheme with Time-Series Deep-Learning Algorithms for Classification and Prediction of Lung Tumor Motility.

This paper proposes a time-series deep-learning 3D Kinect camera scheme to classify the respiratory phases with a lung tumor and predict the lung tumor displacement. Specifically, the proposed scheme is driven by two time-series deep-learning algorithmic models: the respiratory-phase classification model and the regression-based prediction model. To assess the performance of the proposed scheme, the classification and prediction models were tested with four categories of datasets: patient-based datasets with regular and irregular breathing patterns; and pseudopatient-based datasets with regular and irregular breathing patterns. In this study, 'pseudopatients' refer to a dynamic thorax phantom with a lung tumor programmed with varying breathing patterns and breaths per minute. The total accuracy of the respiratory-phase classification model was 100%, 100%, 100%, and 92.44% for the four dataset categories, with a corresponding mean squared error (MSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and coefficient of determination (R2) of 1.2-1.6%, 0.65-0.8%, and 0.97-0.98, respectively. The results demonstrate that the time-series deep-learning classification and regression-based prediction models can classify the respiratory phases and predict the lung tumor displacement with high accuracy. Essentially, the novelty of this research lies in the use of a low-cost 3D Kinect camera with time-series deep-learning algorithms in the medical field to efficiently classify the respiratory phase and predict the lung tumor displacement.

Optimal cumulative dose of cisplatin for concurrent chemoradiotherapy among patients with non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a multicenter analysis in Thailand.

BACKGROUND: Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with high cumulative doses (CDs) of cisplatin has been considered the standard of care for non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). However, given most patients' inability to tolerate high CDs due to cisplatin-related toxicities, the optimal CD of cisplatin during CRT remains undetermined. METHODS: Patients with non-metastatic NPC who received CRT with cisplatin between 2007 and 2017 were identified through the Thai head and neck cancer multicenter database and then categorized according to cisplatin CD (mg/m2) received. All complications and cisplatin-related toxicities during CRT were recorded. RESULTS: We identified 779 non-metastatic NPC patients receiving low (≤150; n = 97), intermediate (151-250; n = 411), and high (> 250; n = 271) CDs of cisplatin. Low CD patients had significantly lower mean actual radiation dose (p < 0.001) and more radiotherapy delay (p = 0.010), while intermediate CD patients had the least hospitalization (p < 0.001). Overall, 39.3% of the patients experienced cisplatin-related toxicity, which was associated with poor overall survival (OS) (p = 0.001). Acute kidney injury was observed in 7% in all patients, which was highest among low CD patients (15.5%; p = 0.002). Intermediate CD patients had significantly longer median OS than the low and high groups (64 vs. 49.8 vs. 53.2, respectively; p = 0.015). Univariate, but not multivariate, analysis showed that CD of cisplatin was significantly associated with OS. CONCLUSION: CD of cisplatin during CRT was not an independent prognostic factor for OS. An intermediate CD induced minimal toxicity without compromising survival and should be considered the optimal CD. Nonetheless, a randomized phase 3 study evaluating the optimal CD of cisplatin is warranted.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (CCRT-AC) is currently recommended as the standard treatment for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (NAC-CCRT) is an alternative strategy for decreasing tumor size and controlling micrometastases before main treatment. The aim of this study was to investigate and compare survival outcomes between LA-NPC patients treated with CCRT-AC and those treated with NAC-CCRT. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included consecutive histologically confirmed LA-NPC patients that were treated with NAC-CCRT or CCRT-AC at Siriraj Hospital during the March 2010 to October 2014 study period. CCRT in both protocols consisted of 3-week cycles of cisplatin 100 mg/m2 with concurrent radiotherapy. Either NAC or AC consisted of 3-week cycles of cisplatin on day 1 and fluorouracil/leucovorin on days 1-4 for a maximum three cycles. The primary endpoint was 5-year overall survival (OS). Flexible parametric survival analysis was used, because the proportional hazards assumption of Cox regression was violated. RESULTS: Of the 266 LA-NPC patients that received treatment during the study period, 79 received NAC-CCRT and 187 received CCRT-AC. Median follow-up was 37 months. Significantly more patients with advanced clinical stage (stage IVA-IVB) received NAC-CCRT (86% in NAC-CCRT vs. 29% in CCRT-AC; p < 0.001). Compared to CCRT-AC in crude analysis, 3-year and 5-year OS of NAC-CCRT were 72% vs. 86% and 62% vs. 75% respectively (p = 0.059). Interestingly, the 3-year and 5-year post-estimation adjusted OS was 84% and 74% for NAC-CCRT and 81% and 70% for CCRT-AC, respectively (HR: 0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.45-1.56; p = 0.571). Also, adjusted analysis of distant-metastasis survival, NAC-CCRT showed HR was 0.79 (95% CI:0.37-1.72, p = 0.557). Conversely, adjusted analysis of locoregional relapse (LLR)-free survival revealed NAC-CCRT to have a significantly higher risk of LRR (HR: 2.18, 95% CI: 0.98-4.87; p = 0.057). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggested that prognosis in the NAC-CCRT treated patients was not superior to that of the CCRT-AC treated individuals. In patients that receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy, locoregional relapse should be of concern. High-risk distant metastasis patients (N3 stage) that could achieve survival advantage from NAC-CCRT is an interesting and important topic for further study.

Randomized control trial of benzydamine HCl versus sodium bicarbonate for prophylaxis of concurrent chemoradiation-induced oral mucositis.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy of benzydamine HCl with sodium bicarbonate in the prevention of concurrent chemoradiation-induced oral mucositis in head and neck cancer patients. METHODS: Sixty locally advanced head and neck cancer patients treated with high-dose radiotherapy concurrently with platinum-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned to receive either benzydamine HCl or sodium bicarbonate from the first day of treatment to 2 weeks after the completion of treatment. The total score for mucositis, based on the Oral Mucositis Assessment Scale (OMAS), was used for the assessment, conducted weekly during the treatment period and at the fourth week of the follow-up. Pain score, all prescribed medications, and tube feeding needs were also recorded and compared. RESULTS: The median of total OMAS score was statistically significant lower in patients who received benzydamine HCl during concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT) than in those who received sodium bicarbonate, (p value < 0.001). There was no difference in median pain score, (p value = 0.52). Nineteen percent of patients in sodium bicarbonate arm needed oral antifungal agents whereas none in the benzydamine HCl arm required such medications, (p value = 0.06). Tube feeding needs and the compliance of CCRT were not different between the two study arms. CONCLUSIONS: For patients undergoing high-dose radiotherapy concurrently with platinum-based chemotherapy, using benzydamine HCl mouthwash as a preventive approach was superior to basic oral care using sodium bicarbonate mouthwash in terms of reducing the severity of oral mucositis and encouraging trend for the less need of oral antifungal drugs.

Development and Internal Validation of a Prediction Model for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Using BMI and Inflammatory Response for Deciding Sequence of Chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (CRT-AC) and induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (IC-CRT) are among the best treatments in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). This study aimed to develop a model for deciding the sequence of chemotherapy in NPC. METHODS: Data were separated into two cohorts. The CRT-AC cohort had 295 patients, while the IC-CRT cohort had 112. The predictors were standard factors with BMI and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) to predict overall survival (OS). A flexible parametric survival model was used. RESULTS: A total of 132 (44.7%) and 72 patients (64.3%) died in the CRT-AC and IC-CRT cohorts, respectively. The predictors in the final models were age, sex, T, N, NLR, and BMI. The models of OS for CRT-AC and IC-CRT had concordance indices of 0.689 and 0.712, respectively, with good calibration curves. When changing the burden of disease along with NLR and BMI, we found that CRT-AC was not significantly different OS from IC-CRT when low NLR (<3) and high burden of disease (T3N3). By contrast, CRT-AC was remarkably more effective when there were high levels of NLR (≥3) and BMI (≥25) with any burden of disease (anyT anyN). CONCLUSION: With additional BMI and NLR in model, it could be easier to decide between CRT-AC and IC-CRT in countries with limited health care resources.

Real-world evidence of cisplatin versus carboplatin in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy: A multicenter analysis.

BACKGROUND: Though concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with cisplatin remains a standard of care for patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC), carboplatin has alternatively been used without sufficient supportive evidences. Thus, we evaluated an efficacy and tolerability of carboplatin CCRT compared with cisplatin in LA-NPC patients. METHODS: Patients with LA-NPC treated with CCRT were identified through the Thai multicenter head and neck cancer database. Patient tolerability and survival were analyzed and compared between regimens. Survivals were calculated by using the Kaplan-Meier method, and compared by the log-rank test. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 135 of 980 patients (13.8%) were treated with carboplatin. Patients treated with carboplatin were significantly associated with older age (p < 0.001), smoking (p = 0.003), more comorbidity (p = 0.014), kidney disease (p = 0.016), and lower baseline creatinine clearance (p < 0.001). Intensity-modulated radiation therapy was used significantly more in the cisplatin group than carboplatin group (p < 0.001). Patients who received carboplatin were associated with delay (p = 0.049) and hospitalization (p = 0.006), whereas cisplatin CCRT had more dose reduction (p = 0.001). Patients treated with cisplatin had CCRT interruption from grade 3-4 mucositis (p = 0.019) more than carboplatin, whereas carboplatin had more grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia (p < 0.001). The 5-year overall survival (OS) of patients treated with cisplatin and carboplatin was 59% and 49%, respectively (p = 0.128). Cisplatin or carboplatin CCRT was not a significant predictor for OS and locoregional recurrence-free survival in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Carboplatin CCRT provided acceptable efficacy and tolerability profiles in real-world practice. Carboplatin should be considered as an alternative regimen, particularly in cisplatin-ineligible patients with LA-NPC treated with CCRT.

Added survival benefit of whole brain radiotherapy in brain metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: Development and external validation of an individual prediction model.

Background: The heterogeneous survival benefit of whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) in brain metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was prospectively evidenced in the Quality of Life after Treatment for Brain Metastases (QUARTZ) trial, resulting in inconsistent guideline recommendations and diverse clinical practices for giving WBRT. The objective of this study was to develop and externally validate an individual prediction model to demonstrate the added survival benefit of WBRT to assist decision making when giving WBRT is undetermined. Methods: For model development, we collected 479 brain metastatic NSCLC patients unfit for surgery or stereotactic radiotherapy techniques at Siriraj Hospital. Potential predictors were age, sex, performance status, histology, genetic mutation, neurological symptoms, extracranial disease, previous systemic treatment, measurable lesions, further systemic treatment, and WBRT. Cox proportional hazard regression was used for survival analysis. We used multiple imputations to handle missing data and a backward selection method for predictor selection. Bootstrapping was used for internal validation, while model performance was assessed with discrimination (c-index) and calibration prediction accuracy. The final model was transformed into a nomogram and a web-based calculator. An independent cohort from Sawanpracharak Hospital was used for external validation. Results: In total, 452 patients in the development cohort died. The median survival time was 4.4 (95% CI, 3.8-4.9) months, with 5.1 months for patients who received WBRT and 2.3 months for those treated with optimal supportive care (OSC). The final model contained favorable predictors: female sex, KPS > 70, receiving additional systemic treatment, and WBRT. Having active extracranial disease, experiencing neurological symptoms, and receiving previous systemic treatment were adverse predictors. After optimism correction, the apparent c-index dropped from 0.71 (95% CI, 0.69-0.74) to 0.70 (95% CI, 0.69-0.73). The predicted and observed values agreed well in all risk groups. Our model performed well in the external validation cohort, with a c-index of 0.66 (95% CI, 0.59-0.73) and an acceptable calibration. Conclusions: This model (https://siriraj-brainmetscore.netlify.app/) predicted the added survival benefit of WBRT for individual brain metastatic NSCLC patients, with satisfactory performance in the development and validation cohorts. The results certify its value in aiding treatment decision-making when the administration of WBRT is unclear.

Evaluation and external validation of minor lymphatic pelvic pathway for distant metastases in cervical cancer patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

To evaluate and validate the minor lymphatic pathway for distant metastases in cervical cancer. This is a retrospective cohort of cervical cancer patients underwent curative concurrent chemoradiotherapy. We used original dataset from 1 university hospital and validation dataset from 3 university hospitals. Lymphadenopathy status in CT imaging was reviewed by radiologist in either the obturator and external iliac nodes (major pathway) or the internal iliac and presacral nodes (minor pathway). We then used Cox regression to adjust for all potential confounders, including paraaortic nodes, T stage, histology, age, total treatment time, total number of nodes, total short axis of nodes. 397 and 384 patients were in the original and validation datasets (median follow-up period, 59.5 month's). The minor pathway was independent prognostic factor in multivariable analysis [HR=2.64; 95%CI=1.07-6.55; P = 0.036] and [HR=14.84; 95%CI=3.15-70.01; P= 0.001] in original and validation datasets, respectively. Whereas, the major pathway was statistically non-significant. Further validation showed that the minor pathway had the highest HR for distant metastases with both the EMBRACE (HR=6.05; 95% CI=1.30-28.08; P = 0.022) and the FIGO 2018 (HR=7.43; 95% CI=2.94-18.78; P<0.001) in the original dataset. A similar result was found with the validation dataset: EMBRACE, HR=30.91; 95% CI=2.78-343.62; P = 0.005; and FIGO 2018, HR=42.41; 95% CI=8.83-203.60; P<0.001.This is the first clinical study to validate that the minor lymphatic pathway was predominantly associated with distant metastases in cervical cancer. This finding should be validated in larger cohort to further integrate in standard staging for prediction of distant metastases.

Development and validation of a prognostic prediction model including the minor lymphatic pathway for distant metastases in cervical cancer patients.

To develop and validate a prognostic model, including the minor lymphatic pathway (internal iliac and presacral nodes). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. PARTICIPANTS: Locally advanced cervical cancer underwent concurrent chemoradiotherapy. SAMPLE SIZE: 397 and 384 patients in the development and validation data set. PREDICTORS: Our new nodal staging system with the minor lymphatic pathway. OUTCOME: Distant metastases. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Cox regression; net reclassification improvement (NRI) and decision curve analysis (DCA). Our new nodal system was the strongest predictor. The predictors in the final model were new nodal system, tumor stage, adenocarcinoma, initial hemoglobin, tumor size and age. The nodal system and the pretreatment model had concordance indices of 0.661 and 0.708, respectively, with good calibration curves. Compared to the OUTBACK eligibility criteria, the nodal system showed NRI for both cases (22%) and controls (16%). The pretreatment model showed NRI for cases (31%) and controls (18%). DCA in both models showed threshold probability of 15% and 12%, respectively, when compared with 24% in OUTBACK eligibility criteria. Our new nodal staging system and the pretreatment model could differentiate between high-risk and low-risk patients, thus facilitating decisions to provide more aggressive treatment to prevent distant metastases.

Cutoff point of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio for predicting survival in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

ABSTRACT: Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was reported as an independent prognostic factor in many studies, but its cutoff point was not yet concluded. We set forth to prove and validate cutoff point of NLR as a poor prognostic factor for overall survival (OS) in nonmetastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients.Retrospective cohort of nonmetastatic NPC adult patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy with curative aim at Siriraj hospital during 2007 to 2014 was enrolled. NLR was defined as absolute neutrophil count divided by absolute lymphocyte count. OS was the primary outcome. We explored our cutoff value by maximum concordance index (C-index) method, and we validated our cutoff and previously reported cutoff values by categorizing patients as NLR ≤ 3 or >3. Internal validation was done by bootstrapping method.Four hundred sixty-three patients were included. The median follow-up time was 70.8 months. By the end of June 2019, 211 patients had died. In univariable analysis of OS by Cox model, an NLR value of 3 showed the highest C-index (0.548) with an HR of 1.43 (95% CI: 1.08-1.89). After adjustment for body mass index, overall staging, age, gender, and histology in multivariable analysis, an NLR >3 was still an independent prognostic factor of poor OS (HR = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.01-1.79). After internal validation, the resampling method shows no overfitting condition and corrected C-index was 0.547 for univariable analysis.A cutoff point of NLR of 3 from routine blood test was found to be an independent poor prognostic factor among patients with nonmetastatic NPC. This prognostic factor could be included in clinical prediction model of NPC and this further prediction model would select high risk patients for intensive treatment.

Can Radiation Therapy Quality Assurance Improve Nasopharyngeal Cancer Outcomes in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Reporting the First Phase of a Prospective International Atomic Energy Agency Study.

PURPOSE: Most new nasopharyngeal cancer cases occur in low-income and middle-income countries, and these patients experience poorer overall survival than that of new nasopharyngeal cancer cases in high-income countries. The goal of this research project is to determine whether the introduction of a radiation therapy quality assurance program can ultimately improve outcomes for nasopharyngeal cancer patients in lower-income and middle-income countries. This study reports the results of the first phase of the International Atomic Energy Agency Coordinated Research Project (325-E3-TM-47712). METHODS AND MATERIALS: This prospective study has 2 phases. Phase 1 is a survey of radiation therapy resources, patient characteristics and treatment, and results of radiation therapy quality assurance performed by the expert panel. An educational workshop reviewing phase 1 results for each center was completed before accrual of patients for phase 2. The ultimate aim of the study is to compare the first and second cohort of patients to see if quality assurance can result in fewer major protocol deviations and a 15% improvement in patients' 3-year progression-free survival. RESULTS: Of 14 participating centers, 13 (93%) had computed tomography simulators and linear accelerators (LINAC) with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) capacity, median 3 LINAC (range, 1-13), and median 10 radiation oncologists (range, 5-51). The annual number of nasopharyngeal cancer cases irradiated was median 54 (range, 10-627). Five of 14 centers (36%) had no local radiation therapy quality assurance. For the current phase 1 study, 134 patients were evaluated, 82.1% had MRI staging, 99.3% had metastatic workup, 65.6% undifferentiated histology, 51% stage 3 and 49% stage 4. Radiation therapy quality assurance revealed 81 (60.4%) of 134 patients had major protocol violations in gross tumor volume and high dose planning target volume contours and/or dosimetry, 28.4% patients had borderline plans, 15 (11.2%) acceptable, and only 6 (4.2%) had inevitable compromise due to tumor extent. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first International Atomic Energy Agency study to address the fundamental issue of treatment quality rather than altered treatment regimens. The high rate of unacceptable radiation therapy plans is a major concern, and we hope phase 2 will show a significant reduction and improved patient outcomes.

Added value of metastatic cervical lymph node group V in nodal staging of nasopharyngeal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Prognostic significance of posterior cervical lymph node metastasis in nasopharyngeal cancer is largely unknown. This study aims to determine the added prognostic significance of cervical lymph node group V to the standard American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system (eighth edition AJCC) of nasopharyngeal patients with cancer treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in terms of overall survival (OS), distant metastatic-free survival (DMFS), and disease-free survival (DFS). METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective cohort of 199 consecutively diagnosed nasopharyngeal patients with cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy (RT) or concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in the era of IMRT in a large university hospital in endemic area of Southeast Asia. Pre-treatment imaging studies were thoroughly re-evaluated and re-staged by a board-certified radiologist using radiographic criteria for cervical lymph node metastasis. T and N classifications were reclassified according to the eighth AJCC staging system. Group V (Va and Vb) cervical node was evaluated for its added prognostic significance. Cox's proportional hazard model was used to retrieve hazard ratio (HR), 95% confidence interval and P value for N classification. Harrell's C-statistic (concordance index) was used for test of discrimination and internal validation was calculated by bootstrap method. RESULTS: This study demonstrated greater separation of OS with HR of 6.75 (95%CI 1.94-23.51, P = .003) by using group Vb only as N3 compared to HR of 4.70 (95%CI 1.37-16.13, P = .014) by using current standard N3 disease (groups IV and Vb). Similarly, N2 with presence of Va shows worsened DFS with HR of 8.70 (95%CI 1.08-69.67, P = .042) compared to N2 without Va with HR of 5.93 (95%CI 0.76-46.00, P = .089). After incorporating cervical group V into nodal staging, the HR and 95%CI among each group was better separated than the eighth AJCC staging system but without significant improvement in C-index. CONCLUSION: Cervical lymph node group V is a potentially added prognostic factor to standard TNM staging.

Posterior cervical lymph node metastasis as the valuable prognostic factor for stage IVA/IVB nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemo-radiotherapy.

INTRODUCTION/AIM: To evaluate the prognostic properties of retropharyngeal lymph node (RP), posterior cervical lymph node (PCN), and supraclavicular lymph node (SPC), in stage IVA/IVB nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients in setting of induction chemotherapy. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study including 43 patients with stage IVA/IVB NPC (7th AJCC) treated with induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemo-radiotherapy. We analyzed prognosis with the multivariate Cox regression model and p-value from the Wald's test, using the backward elimination method (by likelihood ratio test and percent change of coefficient factors). RESULT: Overall, 24 patients (55.8%) were in stage IVA and 19 (44.2%) in stage IVB. After a median follow-up time of 30 months, the 2-year overall survival (OS) was 79.1%, while the 2-year progression free survival (PFS) and distant metastasis free survival (DMFS) were 59.8% and 69.1%, respectively. In multivariate analysis for predicting DMFS, SPC involvement was not statistically significant (HR 3.39; 95% CI 0.76-15.07; p=0.1), whereas RP involvement was statistically significant (HR 5.81; 95% CI 1.08-31.16; p=0.04). Moreover, and more importantly, PCN involvement was the only nodal factor to predict all of DMFS, PFS, and OS (respectively HR 5.57, 95% CI 1.12-27.71, p=0.036; HR 16.05, 95% CI 1.93-133.65, p=0.01; and HR 28.02, 95% CI 2.74-286.22, p=0.005). DISCUSSION: PCN involvement is the only independent prognostic factor of stage IVA/IVB NPC patients treated by induction chemotherapy that predicts DMFS and turns this effect to PFS and OS. PCN involvement is a highly accurate predictor for failure of conventional chemo-radiotherapy. Therefore, patients with PCN involvement should be defined at high-risk, as to be investigated for a new staging system.

Long term outcomes of patients with endometrial carcinoma treated with radiation - Siriraj Hospital experience.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate treatment outcomes of patients with stage I-III endometrial cancer treated with postoperative radiation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 166 endometrial cancer patients, undergoing surgery and postoperative radiotherapy at Siriraj Hospital from 2005-2008 was performed. Pathology was reviewed. Results of treatment were reported with 5-year loco-regional recurrence free survival (LRRFS), 5-year overall survival (OS), patterns of failure and toxicity, and according to stage and risk groups. RESULTS: Median follow up time was 62.8 months. Pathological changes were found in 36.3% of the patients after central reviews, leading to 19% changes in risk groups. Most of the patients (83.7%) received pelvic radiation (PRT) and vaginal brachytherapy (VBT). Five-year LRRFS and OS of all patients were 94.9% and 85.5%, respectively. There was no recurrence or death in low and low-intermediate risk groups. For the high-intermediate risk group, 5-year LRRFS and OS were 96.2% and 90.8%, respectively, and for the high risk group 90.5% and 71%. Late grade 3 and 5 gastrointestinal toxicity was found in 3% and 1.2% of patients, respectively. All of them received PRT 5,000 cGy in 25 fractions. CONCLUSIONS: Low and intermediate risk patients had good results with surgery and adjuvant radiation therapy. For high risk patients, postoperative radiation therapy alone appeared to be inadequate as the most common pattern of failure was distant metastasis.