Identification of human fecal pollution sources in a coastal area: a case study at Oostende (Belgium).

From April to June 2001, a monitoring study at Oostende (Belgium) was conducted to obtain an insight into fecal pollution impairing water quality at this coastal area. Eight sampling sites were selected based on the historically low water quality at these sites compared to the remainder of the area. Indicator organisms such as fecal coliforms, Escherichia coli and fecal streptococci were monitored by plating. A real-time PCR assay for quantification of the human-specific HF183 Bacteroides 16S rRNA genetic marker was used to detect human fecal pollution at the sampling sites. Human fecal pollution was detected at all sampling sites. However, the frequency of detection ranged from 30-100% and the amount of human-specific Bacteroides markers recorded varied between the sampling sites. Concentrations of 10(7) human-specific Bacteroides markers per 1 to levels below the detection limit of the real-time PCR assay were recorded. Our results indicate that human fecal pollution is a re-occurring problem in certain areas. Of all the environmental parameters monitored during the study, only rainfall was strongly related to the detection of the indicator organisms and the human-specific Bacteroides marker.

Characterization of Escherichia coli isolates from different fecal sources by means of classification tree analysis of fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) profiles.

Microbial source tracking (MST) methods need to be rapid, inexpensive and accurate. Unfortunately, many MST methods provide a wealth of information that is difficult to interpret by the regulators who use this information to make decisions. This paper describes the use of classification tree analysis to interpret the results of a MST method based on fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) profiles of Escherichia coli isolates, and to present results in a format readily interpretable by water quality managers. Raw sewage E. coli isolates and animal E. coli isolates from cow, dog, gull, and horse were isolated and their FAME profiles collected. Correct classification rates determined with leaveone-out cross-validation resulted in an overall low correct classification rate of 61%. A higher overall correct classification rate of 85% was obtained when the animal isolates were pooled together and compared to the raw sewage isolates. Bootstrap aggregation or adaptive resampling and combining of the FAME profile data increased correct classification rates substantially. Other MST methods may be better suited to differentiate between different fecal sources but classification tree analysis has enabled us to distinguish raw sewage from animal E. coli isolates, which previously had not been possible with other multivariate methods such as principal component analysis and cluster analysis.

Detection and quantification of the human-specific HF183 Bacteroides 16S rRNA genetic marker with real-time PCR for assessment of human faecal pollution in freshwater.

The human-specific HF183 Bacteriodes 16S rRNA genetic marker can be used to detect human faecal pollution in water environments. However, there is currently no method to quantify the prevalence of this marker in environmental samples. We developed a real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay using SYBR Green I detection to quantify this marker in faecal and environmental samples. To decrease the amplicon length to a suitable size for real-time PCR detection, a new reverse primer was designed and validated on human and animal faecal samples. The use of the newly developed reverse primer in combination with the human-specific HF183 primer did not decrease the specificity of the real-time PCR assay but a melting curve analysis must always be included. This new assay was more sensitive than conventional PCR and highly reproducible with a coefficient of variation of less than 1% within an assay and 3% between assays. As the Bacteroides species that carries this human-specific marker has never been isolated, a bacteria real-time assay was used to determine the detection efficiency. The estimated detection efficiency in freshwater ranged from 78% to 91% of the true value with an average detection efficiency of 83+/-4% of the true value. Using a simple filtration method, the limit of quantification was 4.7+/-0.3x10(5) human-specific Bacteroides markers per litre of freshwater. The aerobic incubation of the human-specific Bacteroides marker in freshwater for up to 24 days at 4 and 12 degrees C, and up to 8 days at 28 degrees C, indicated that the marker persisted up to the end of the incubation period for all incubation temperatures.

Use of 16S-23S rRNA intergenic spacer region PCR and repetitive extragenic palindromic PCR analyses of Escherichia coli isolates to identify nonpoint fecal sources.

Despite efforts to minimize fecal input into waterways, this kind of pollution continues to be a problem due to an inability to reliably identify nonpoint sources. Our objective was to find candidate source-specific Escherichia coli fingerprints as potential genotypic markers for raw sewage, horses, dogs, gulls, and cows. We evaluated 16S-23S rRNA intergenic spacer region (ISR)-PCR and repetitive extragenic palindromic (rep)-PCR analyses of E. coli isolates as tools to identify nonpoint fecal sources. The BOXA1R primer was used for rep-PCR analysis. A total of 267 E. coli isolates from different fecal sources were typed with both techniques. E. coli was found to be highly diverse. Only two candidate source-specific E. coli fingerprints, one for cow and one for raw sewage, were identified out of 87 ISR fingerprints. Similarly, there was only one candidate source-specific E. coli fingerprint for horse out of 59 BOX fingerprints. Jackknife analysis resulted in an average rate of correct classification (ARCC) of 83% for BOX-PCR analysis and 67% for ISR-PCR analysis for the five source categories of this study. When nonhuman sources were pooled so that each isolate was classified as animal or human derived (raw sewage), ARCCs of 82% for BOX-PCR analysis and 72% for ISR-PCR analysis were obtained. Critical factors affecting the utility of these methods, namely sample size and fingerprint stability, were also assessed. Chao1 estimation showed that generally 32 isolates per fecal source individual were sufficient to characterize the richness of the E. coli population of that source. The results of a fingerprint stability experiment indicated that BOX and ISR fingerprints were stable in natural waters at 4, 12, and 28 degrees C for 150 days. In conclusion, 16S-23S rRNA ISR-PCR and rep-PCR analyses of E. coli isolates have the potential to identify nonpoint fecal sources. A fairly small number of isolates was needed to find candidate source-specific E. coli fingerprints that were stable under the simulated environmental conditions.