Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Crit Care ; 8(4): R234-42, 2004 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15312223

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Both C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) are accepted sepsis markers. However, there is still some debate concerning the correlation between their serum concentrations and sepsis severity. We hypothesised that PCT and CRP concentrations are different in patients with infection or with no infection at a similar severity of organ dysfunction or of systemic inflammatory response. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and fifty adult intensive care unit patients were observed consecutively over a period of 10 days. PCT, CRP and infection parameters were compared among the following groups: no systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) (n = 15), SIRS (n = 15), sepsis/SS (n = 71) (including sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock [n = 34, n = 22 and n = 15]), and trauma patients (n = 49, no infection). RESULTS: PCT and CRP concentrations were higher in patients in whom infection was diagnosed at comparable levels of organ dysfunction (infected patients, regression of median [ng/ml] PCT = -0.848 + 1.526 sequential organ failure assessment [SOFA] score, median [mg/l] CRP = 105.58 + 0.72 SOFA score; non-infected patients, PCT = 0.27 + 0.02 SOFA score, P < 0.0001; CRP = 84.53 - 0.19 SOFA score, P < 0.005), although correlation with the SOFA score was weak (R = 0.254, P < 0.001 for PCT, and R = 0.292, P < 0.001 for CRP). CRP levels were near their maximum already during lower SOFA scores, whereas maximum PCT concentrations were found at higher score levels (SOFA score > 12).PCT and CRP concentrations were 1.58 ng/ml and 150 mg/l in patients with sepsis, 0.38 ng/ml and 51 mg/l in the SIRS patients (P < 0.05, Mann-Whitney U-test), and 0.14 ng/ml and 72 mg/l in the patients with no SIRS (P < 0.05). The kinetics of both parameters were also different, and PCT concentrations reacted more quickly than CRP. CONCLUSIONS: PCT and CRP levels are related to the severity of organ dysfunction, but concentrations are still higher during infection. Different sensitivities and kinetics indicate a different clinical use for both parameters.


Asunto(s)
Proteína C-Reactiva/análisis , Calcitonina/sangre , Precursores de Proteínas/sangre , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Síndrome de Respuesta Inflamatoria Sistémica/sangre , Adulto , Anciano , Biomarcadores/sangre , Péptido Relacionado con Gen de Calcitonina , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Insuficiencia Multiorgánica/sangre , Insuficiencia Multiorgánica/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Multiorgánica/patología , Estudios Prospectivos , Curva ROC , Sepsis/sangre , Sepsis/diagnóstico , Sepsis/patología , Síndrome de Respuesta Inflamatoria Sistémica/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Respuesta Inflamatoria Sistémica/patología
2.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 23(12): 1456-60, 2010 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20958228

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate L-arginine (L-Arg) supplementation in pregnant women with chronic hypertension and its effects on blood pressure (BP) and maternal and neonatal complications. METHODS: We enrolled 80 women affected by mild chronic hypertension referred to the High Risk Clinic of the Mother-Infant Department of the University of Modena and Reggio Emilia. Each woman after obtaining oral consent was randomized to receive oral L-Arg versus placebo and thereafter submitted to 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring. The primary outcome was BP change after 10-12 weeks of treatment. Secondary outcomes were as follows: percentage of women on antihypertensive treatment at delivery, maternal, and fetal outcome. RESULTS: The BP changes after 10-12 weeks of treatment did not differ between groups. A lower percentage of women received antihypertensive drugs in the L-Arg group than the placebo group. The incidence of superimposed preeclampsia indicated delivery before the 34th weeks and certain neonatal complications tended to be higher in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: L-Arg supplementation in pregnant women with mild chronic hypertension does not significantly affect overall BP but is associated with less need for antihypertensive medications and a trend toward fewer maternal and neonatal complications. The results of the study were limited by the small sample size and by the exclusion of women with severe chronic hypertension. In our policy, these patients needed many hypertensive drugs and were normally managed by the cardiologist. Nevertheless, considering the promising results on maternal and fetal outcome, we believe that further studies should be performed to confirm such data and to clarify the role of L-Arg as a protective supplement in high-risk pregnancy.


Asunto(s)
Arginina/administración & dosificación , Hipertensión/complicaciones , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Complicaciones Cardiovasculares del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Peso al Nacer , Presión Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Enfermedad Crónica , Suplementos Dietéticos , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Enfermedades del Recién Nacido/epidemiología , Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal/normas , Placebos , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología , Embarazo de Alto Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA