Potentially avoidable admissions to general internal medicine at an academic teaching hospital: an observational study.

BACKGROUND: Identifying potentially avoidable admissions to Canadian hospitals is an important health system goal. With general internal medicine (GIM) accounting for 40% of hospital admissions, we sought to develop a method to identify potentially avoidable admissions and characterize patient, provider and health system factors. METHODS: We conducted an observational study of GIM admissions at our institution from August 2019 to February 2020. We defined potentially avoidable admissions as admissions that could be managed in an appropriate and safe manner in the emergency department or ambulatory setting and asked staff physicians to screen admissions daily and flag candidates as potentially avoidable admissions. For each candidate, we prepared a case review and debriefed with members of the admitting team. We then reviewed each candidate with our research team, assigned an avoidability score (1 [low] to 4 [high]) and identified contributing factors for those with scores of 3 or more. RESULTS: We screened 601 total admissions and staff physicians flagged 117 (19.5%) of these as candidate potential avoidable admissions. Consensus review identified 67 candidates as potentially avoidable admissions (11.1%, 95% confidence interval 8.8%-13.9%); these patients were younger (mean age 65 yr v. 72 yr), had fewer comorbidities (Canadian Institute for Health Information Case Mix Group+ 0.42 v. 1.14), had lower resource-intensity weighting scores (0.72 v. 1.50) and shorter hospital lengths of stay (29 h v. 105 h) (p < 0.01). Common factors included diagnostic and therapeutic uncertainty, perceived need for short-term monitoring, government directive of a 4-hour limit for admission decision-making and subspecialist request to admit. INTERPRETATION: Our prospective method of screening, flagging and case review showed that 1 in 9 GIM admissions were potentially avoidable. Other institutions could consider adapting this methodology to ascertain their rate of potentially avoidable admissions and to understand contributing factors to inform improvement endeavours.

Integration of hospital with congregate care homes in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has highlighted the need to improve the safety of the environments where we care for older adults in Canada. After providing assistance during the first wave, many Ontario hospitals formally partnered with local congregate care homes in a "hub and spoke" model during second pandemic wave onward. The objective of this article is to describe the implementation and longitudinal outcomes of residents in one hub and spoke model composed of a hospital partnered with 18 congregate care homes including four long-term care and 14 retirement or other congregate care homes. Intervention: Homes were provided continuous seven-day per week access to hospital support, including infection prevention and control (IPAC), testing, vaccine delivery and clinical support as needed. Any COVID-19 exposure or transmission triggered a same-day meeting to implement initial control measures. A minimum of weekly on-site visits occurred for long-term care homes and biweekly for other congregate care homes, with up to daily on-site presence during outbreaks. Outcomes: Case detection among residents increased following implementation in context of increased testing, then decreased post-immunization until the Omicron wave when it peaked. After adjusting for the correlation within homes, COVID-related mortality decreased following implementation (OR=0.51, 95% CI, 0.30-0.88; p=0.01). In secondary analysis, homes without pre-existing IPAC programs had higher baseline COVID-related mortality rate (OR=19.19, 95% CI, 4.66-79.02; p<0.001) and saw a larger overall decrease during implementation (3.76% to 0.37%-0.98%) as compared to homes with pre-existing IPAC programs (0.21% to 0.57%-0.90%). Conclusion: The outcomes for older adults residing in congregate care homes improved steadily throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. While this finding is multifactorial, integration with a local hospital partner supported key interventions known to protect residents.