2-Octyl-Cyanoacrylate Mesh Dressings for Total Joint Arthroplasty: Dressing Design Influences Risks of Wound Complications.

BACKGROUND: Recent liquid adhesive skin closure systems with a mesh patch and a 2-octyl cyanoacrylate liquid formula have shown promising results in total joint arthroplasty. Chemical accelerators are typically included to promote the rapid polymerization of 2-octyl cyanoacrylate. The goal of the study is to distinguish designs and wound complication differences between 2 similar systems. METHODS: An 18-week retrospective study was conducted from July to December 2023, including 207 total hip arthroplasty and 212 total knee arthroplasty cases from 4 attending surgeons at 1 institution that used 1 of 2 dressing designs. Both dressings had a 2-octyl cyanoacrylate liquid adhesive formula that applied topically to a polyester-based mesh overlaying the wound. Mesh A (used in 274 cases) included an accelerator, a quaternary ammonium salt, on the mesh patch, whereas Mesh B (used in 145 cases) included a similar accelerator within the adhesive applicator. RESULTS: Wound complications (3.2 versus 7.6%; X2 = 3.86; df = 1; P = .049), early periprosthetic joint infections (0 versus 2.8%; X2 = 7.63; df = 1; P = .006), and 90-day reoperations for wound complications (0.4 versus 3.4%; X2 = 6.39; df = 1; P = .011) were significantly lower in patients who received Mesh A versus B, respectively. There was no difference in superficial surgical site infections (0.7 versus 0%; X2 = 1.06; df = 1; P = .302) or allergy rates (3.3 versus 4.1%; X2 = 0.12; df = 1; P = .655) between Mesh A and B. CONCLUSIONS: We observed significantly different performance in wound complications, early postoperative periprosthetic joint infections, and 90-day reoperation between the 2 designs. Having the accelerator in the applicator rather than on the mesh patch may lead to premature polymerization before bonding appropriately with the mesh to create the desired wound closure and seal. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Scheduling and Vendor Consistency Improves Turnover Time Efficiency in Total Joint Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Maximizing operative room (OR) efficiency is important for hospital efficiency, patient care, and positive surgeon and staff morale. Reducing turnover time (TOT) has become a popular focus to improve OR efficiency. The present study evaluated if TOT is influenced by changing case type, implant vendor, and/or laterality. METHODS: In total, 444 turnovers from January to July 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. All turnovers were same-surgeon turnovers between primary arthroplasty cases in dedicated, overlapping rooms. Single linear regression models tested the predictability of TOT based on case type, vendor, and laterality. A multivariate multiple regression and 1-way Analyses of Variance analyzed variables against each other. Independent sample t-tests evaluated TOTs when all variables were the same or different. RESULTS: Changing versus keeping the same case type increased TOT by 2.4 minutes (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.7, 4.0; P = .004). Changing vendors increased TOT by 2.9 minutes (95% CI = 1.1, 4.7; P = .002). Laterality did not affect TOT, with a change of 0.9 minutes (95% CI = -0.6, 2.5; P = .229). Vendor (P = .030) independently predicted TOT when analyzed as a covariate with case type (P = .410). The TOT with same case type and vendor (mean 38.2 minutes; range, 22 to 62) was less than that of different case types and vendors (mean 41.4 minutes; range, 26 to 73) (P = .017). Mean TOT differed by 5.5 minutes when keeping all variables the same versus all different (P = .018). CONCLUSIONS: Maintaining a consistent case type, vendor, and laterality had a synergistic effect in reducing TOT in arthroplasty ORs with the same primary surgeon running 2 overlapping rooms. Changing vendor representatives was found to independently predict TOT increases, which is likely attributed to a disruption in workflow and collaboration of the multidisciplinary OR team. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Complications and Survivorship After Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: Is There a Difference by Surgical Approach?

BACKGROUND: Revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) has traditionally been performed through the posterolateral approach (PA). Anterior approaches (AA) for rTHA are increasingly being utilized. The purpose of this study was to compare complications and survivorship from re-revision and reoperation after aseptic rTHA performed using an AA versus a PA. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent aseptic rTHA either through an AA (direct anterior approach [DAA], anterior-based muscle sparing [ABMS]) or PA from January 2017 to December 2021. There were 116 patients who underwent AA-rTHA (DAA 50, ABMS 66) or PA-rTHA (n = 105). Patient demographics, complications, and postoperative outcomes were collected. RESULTS: The most common indication in both groups was aseptic loosening (n = 26, 22.4% AA, n = 28, 26.7% PA). Acetabular revision alone was most common in the AA group (n = 33, 28.4%), while both components were most commonly revised in the PA groups (n = 47, 44.8%). In all the AA-rTHA group, the index total hip arthroplasty was performed through a PA in 51% of patients, while the PA-rTHA group had the index procedure performed via AA in 4.8%. There was no statistically significant difference in re-revision rate between the DAA, ABMS, or PA groups (9.55 versus 5.3% versus 11.4%, respectively, P = .11). The most common overall reason for re-revision was persistent instability, with no difference in incidence of postoperative hip dislocation (n = 4, 6.8% DAA, n = 3, 5.3%, n = 10, 9.5% PA; P = .31). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates no difference in complication or re-revision survivorship after aseptic rTHA performed through a DAA, ABMS approach, or PA, nor between anterior or posterior-based approaches. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Through an Anterior Approach: Survivorship and Risk Factors for Re-Revision.

BACKGROUND: The utilization of anterior-based approaches for total hip arthroplasty (THA) is increasing. Literature on the outcomes of revision THA (rTHA) through an anterior approach, however, is sparse. This study reports the survivorship and risk factors for re-revision in patients undergoing aseptic rTHA through an anterior approach. METHODS: This was a single-institution, retrospective cohort analysis of patients who underwent aseptic rTHA through an anterior approach (direct anterior, anterior-based muscle sparing) from January 2017 to December 2021, regardless of the original surgical approach. Exclusion criteria were age <18 years, conversion THA, and septic revisions. Patient demographics, complications, and postoperative outcomes were collected. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to measure survivorship while Cox regression analyses were used to identify risk factors for re-revision of THA. RESULTS: We identified 251 total anterior rTHAs, of which 155 were aseptic anterior revisions. There were 111 patients (111 rTHAs; 63 anterior-based muscle sparing and 48 direct anterior) who met criteria and had a mean follow-up of 4.2 years (range, 2.1 to 6.9). There were a total of 54 (49%) anterior-based index approaches and 57 (51%) posterior index approaches. The most common indications for rTHA were femoral loosening (n = 25, 22.5%), followed by instability (n = 16, 14.4%) and wear or osteolysis (n = 16, 14.4%). At 2 years, the survivorship from reoperation and re-revision was 89% (95% confidence interval: 84 to 95) and 91% (95% confidence interval: 86 to 96), respectively. Reoperation occurred in 14 patients (12.6%) at a mean time of 7.8 months (range, 0.5 to 28.6). Re-revision occurred in 12 patients (10.8%) at a mean time of 7.3 months (range, 0.5 to 28.6). Instability was the most common reason for re-revision (4.5%). Neither index approach type, revision approach type, nor any patient-specific risk factors were identified as predictors of re-revision or reoperation in multivariable regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates an acceptable rate of re-revision when aseptic rTHA is performed through an anterior approach, with the most common reason for aseptic re-revision being instability.

Is there a difference in the outcome of primary total knee arthroplasty performed using kinematic versus mechanical alignment?

RESPONSE/RECOMMENDATION: Kinematic alignment (KA) shows improved patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs) in early recovery but equivalence past mid-term follow-up. KA targets a native joint line obliquity and reapproximates pre-arthritic alignment, thus less soft-tissue adjustment may account for early differences. Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews fail to identify a durable clinically meaningful difference; Future non-commercial, non-biased, level-one studies are needed to elucidate long-term clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness.

Cost-effectiveness of closed-incision negative pressure therapy in primary total joint arthroplasty: a break-even analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Surgical site complications (SSCs) are the leading cause of unplanned emergency department visits and readmissions following total joint arthroplasty (TJA). The use of closed-incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) has shown promise in reducing SSC occurrence. However, no study has evaluated the cost-effectiveness of ciNPT in primary TJA. The purpose of this study was to calculate the break-even absolute risk reduction (ARR) of SSCs, the break-even treatment cost of SSCs, and the break-even cost-of-use for ciNPT, based on existing literature to assess the cost-effectiveness of ciNPT in primary TJA. METHOD: Relevant values for ARR, infection treatment cost and intervention cost were obtained via literature review. A break-even analysis was conducted to investigate the cost-effectiveness of ciNPT use in primary TJA, as well as to derive the ARR, infection treatment cost (Ct) and intervention protocol cost (Cp) values at which ciNPT use becomes cost-effective. RESULTS: The values derived from the literature review were as follows: Cp=$160.76 USD; Ct=$5348.78 USD; ARR=0.0375. The break-even ARR was calculated to be 3.0%, the break-even Cp was calculated to be $200.58 USD, and the break-even Ct was calculated to be $4286.93 USD. The ARR of ciNPT use was greater than the calculated break-even ARR. CONCLUSION: This analysis demonstrated that ciNPT use in primary TJA was cost-effective. By examining the difference between the calculated break-even Cp and the Cp reported in the literature, the cost saved per patient treated with ciNPT can be calculated to be $39.82 USD.

Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty is Associated with Thinner and Less Constrained Polyethylene Inserts.

INTRODUCTION: Accurate pre-resection assessment of gap measurements during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may reduce the need for thicker polyethylene inserts or those with higher constraint by allowing the surgeon to address potential imbalance through guiding bony resections and implant position. This study aimed to determine whether robotic assistance with pre-planning allowed for the use of thinner and less-constrained polyethylene inserts compared to conventional methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Records were retrospectively reviewed for 408 patients who underwent primary TKA. Patients were divided into cohorts based on the technique utilized-conventional, manual methods with a jig-based system (CM-TKA, 169 knees) versus robotic-assisted TKA (RA-TKA, 237 knees). Operative notes were reviewed for implant brand, thickness of the polyethylene insert, degree of constraint of the polyethylene insert, and whether robotic assistance was used to complete the operation. Statistical analysis was performed using Chi-square tests for categorical and t-tests for continuous variables. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics between the RA-TKA and CM-TKA groups. Statistically significant differences were observed between cohorts in mean polyethylene insert thickness (11.0mm ± 1.3mm vs. 11.7mm ± 1.7mm, p<0.0001), rate of use of the thinnest 10mm insert (43% vs. 34%, p=0.048), rate of "outlier" insert sizes ≥14mm (5% vs. 18%, p<0.0001), and rate of constrained insert use (4% vs. 18% of knees, p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: In a review of 408 consecutive TKA patients, use of robotic-assisted techniques allowed for the use of thinner polyethylene inserts, fewer "outlier" polyethylene sizes, and reduced need for constrained inserts compared to conventional, manual methods.

Over Half of All Medicare Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients Are Now Classified as an Outpatient-Three-Year Impact of the Removal From the Inpatient-Only List.

BACKGROUND: In 2018, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services removed total knee arthroplasty (TKA) from its inpatient-only list, triggering many unintended consequences. The purpose of this study was to determine how the impact of TKA removal affected the number of outpatient TKA patients, which patients were being labeled outpatient, and how outpatient classification affected discharge location and readmission rates. METHODS: Using a large administrative claims database, we reviewed a consecutive series of 216,365 primary TKA Medicare patients from 2015 to 2020. Patients who had an inpatient status (n = 63,356) were compared to patients who had an outpatient status (n = 38,510) from 2018 to 2020 based on demographics, comorbidities, discharge dispositions, and readmissions. RESULTS: In 2015, only 1.8% of TKA patients were designated as outpatients, but by 2020, 57.2% of Medicare TKA patients were classified as outpatients. A majority of patients (72%) who had an outpatient designation remained in the hospital for >24 hours (average length of stay was 2.7 days). Patients who had an outpatient status were discharged to skilled nursing facilities more frequently than patients who had an inpatient status (3.1 versus 2.0%, P < .001) with increased emergency visits (5.1 versus 3.9%, P < .001) and 90-day readmissions (2.2 versus 0.9%, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Over half of all Medicare TKA patients are being classified as outpatients 3 years following the policy to remove TKA from the inpatient-only list. Patients designated as outpatients had higher readmissions than those designated as inpatients. This policy should be re-evaluated in the context of failure to demonstrate safer discharge of Medicare patients who undergo TKA.

Collateral Ligament Tension and Balance Alone Does Not Ensure Improved Outcome After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: It is hypothesized that suboptimal soft tissue and collateral ligament balance is a cause of patient dissatisfaction following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This analysis examined the association between compartment pressures during TKA and patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs). METHODS: This single-institution, retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected compartment pressure data measured during TKA comprised 145 patients who underwent surgery between 2015 and 2021 and completed 1-year follow-up PROMs. The primary outcome included pressures, in pounds (lbs), of the medial and lateral compartments in extension (5°), mid-flexion (45°), and flexion (90°), and associated PROMs. The difference been the 1-year and preoperative PROMs was used to separate the top 25% from the bottom 75% performers. Pressures were compared using Student's T-tests and multivariate linear regressions, while controlling for preoperative deformity. A subgroup analysis of the most popular implant was performed. RESULTS: Higher medial compartment pressures were seen in our total cohort (Knee Society Score (KSS) mid-flexion 24 versus 18 lbs, P = .03, flexion 24 versus 17 lbs P = .01) and within our subgroup analysis (Short form- Mental (SF-M) extension 32 versus 21 lbs P = .01, KSS mid-flexion 27 versus 16 lbs P = .005, extension 31 versus 20 lbs P = .003). This trend persisted in the subgroup analysis when controlling for preoperative deformity (KSS extension +16.22 lbs P ≤ .001, mid-flexion +17.6 lbs. P = .001, and flexion +9.2 lbs, P = .005). CONCLUSION: Several groups demonstrated higher medial versus lateral pressures. However, this pattern was not consistent across PROMs, suggesting that compartment pressures at the time of TKA are an important factor but not the sole predictor of patient satisfaction.

Image-Free Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Results in Quicker Recovery but Equivalent One-Year Outcomes Compared to Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have addressed whether robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) significantly impacts functional outcomes. This study was conducted to determine whether image-free RA-TKA improves function compared to conventional total knee arthroplasty (C-TKA), performed without the utilization of robotics or navigation, using the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) and Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) as measures of meaningful clinical improvement. METHODS: A multicenter propensity score-matched retrospective study was conducted of RA-TKA using an image-free robotic system and C-TKA cases at an average follow-up of 14 months (range, 12 months to 20 months). Consecutive patients who underwent primary unilateral TKA and had a preoperative and postoperative Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Joint Replacement (KOOS-JR) were included. The primary outcomes were the MCID and PASS for KOOS-JR. 254 RA-TKA and 762 C-TKA patients were included, with no significant differences in sex, age, body mass index, or comorbidities. RESULTS: Preoperative KOOS-JR scores were similar in the RA-TKA and C-TKA cohorts. Significantly greater improvement in KOOS-JR scores were achieved at 4 to 6 weeks postoperatively with RA-TKA compared to C-TKA. While the mean 1-year postoperative KOOS-JR was significantly higher in the RA-TKA cohort, no significant differences were found in the Delta KOOS-JR scores between the cohorts, when comparing preoperative and 1-year postoperative. No significant differences existed in the rates of MCID or PASS being achieved. CONCLUSION: Image-free RA-TKA reduces pain and improves early functional recovery compared to C-TKA at 4 to 6 weeks, but functional outcomes at 1 year are equivalent based on the MCID and PASS for KOOS-JR.

Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty is Associated with Earlier Return of Postoperative Range of Motion.

INTRODUCTION: Postoperative range of motion (ROM) is an important measure for the functional outcome and overall success after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). While robotic knee systems have been shown to reduce pain and improve early function, the return of postoperative ROM specifically has not been adequately studied. The purpose of this study was to compare postoperative ROM in robotic and conventional TKA. We hypothesized that robotic TKA leads to an improvement in postoperative ROM. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 674 primary TKAs by a single surgeon between January 2018 and February 2023 was completed. Patients that did not have both a two-week follow up and eight-week follow up were excluded. Revision/conversion TKAs were excluded. The population was divided into two cohorts based on technique utilized: robotic versus conventional. Preoperative extension/flexion data, postoperative extension/flexion data at two-week and eight-week follow ups, and manipulation under anesthesia data were collected. ROM was defined as flexion minus extension. Chi-square tests were used to examine for differences between categorical variables and t-tests for continuous variables. RESULTS: A total of 307 robotic and 265 conventional knees were included. There were no differences in demographics, mean follow up, or preoperative ROM between groups. The robotic group had significantly more flexion (99.20° vs. 96.98°; p=0.034) and ROM (97.81° vs. 95.56°; p=0.047) at the two-week follow up. The loss in ROM at the two-week follow up from preoperative ROM was significantly less for the robotic group (-11.21° vs. -14.16°; p=0.031). There were no significant differences in extension at either follow up, in flexion at the eight-week follow up, or in ROM at the eight-week follow up. CONCLUSION: Robotic TKA leads to an improvement in postoperative flexion and ROM when compared to preoperative ROM at two-week follow up. These findings could partially explain the quicker recovery associated with robotic TKA.

Is the Direct Anterior Approach to THA Cost-effective? A Markov Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The use of the direct anterior approach, a muscle-sparing technique for THA, has increased over the years; however, this approach is associated with longer procedure times and a more expensive direct cost. Furthermore, studies have shown a higher revision rate in the early stages of the learning curve. Whether the clinical advantages of the direct anterior compared with the posterior approach-such as less soft tissue damage, decreased short-term postoperative pain, a lower dislocation rate, decreased length of stay in the hospital, and higher likelihood of being discharged home-outweigh the higher cost is still debatable. Determining the cost-effectiveness of the approach may inform its utility and justify its use at various stages of the learning curve. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We used a Markov modeling approach to ask: (1) Is the direct anterior approach more likely to be a cost-effective approach than the posterior approach over the long-term for more experienced or higher volume hip surgeons? (2) How many procedures does a surgeon need to perform for the direct anterior approach to be a cost-effective choice? METHODS: A Markov model was created with three health states (well-functioning THA, revision THA, and death) to compare the cost-effectiveness of the direct anterior approach with that of the posterior approach in five scenarios: surgeons who performed one to 15, 16 to 30, 31 to 50, 51 to 100, and more than 100 direct anterior THAs during a 6-year span. Procedure costs (not charges), dislocation costs, and fracture costs were derived from published reports, and model was run using two different cost differentials between the direct anterior and posterior approaches (USD 219 and USD 1800, respectively). The lower cost was calculated as the total cost differential minus pharmaceutical and implant costs to account for differences in implant use and physician preference regarding postoperative pain management. The USD 1800 cost differential incorporated pharmaceutical and implant costs. Probabilities were derived from systematic review of the evidence as well as from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Utilities were estimated from best available literature and disutilities associated with dislocation and fracture were incorporated into the model. Quality of life was expressed in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), which are calculated by multiplying the utility of a health state (ranging from 0 to 1) by the duration of time in that health state. The primary outcome measure was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, or the change in costs divided by the change in QALYs when the direct anterior approach was used for THA. USD 100,000 per quality-adjusted life years was used as a threshold for willingness to pay. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed for the scenario in which the direct anterior approach is cost-effective to further account for uncertainty in model inputs. RESULTS: At a cost differential of USD 219 (95% CI 175 to 263), the direct anterior approach was associated with lower cost and higher effectiveness compared with the posterior approach for surgeons with an experience level of more than 100 operations during a 6-year span. At a cost differential of USD 1800 (95% CI 1440 to 2160), the direct anterior approach remained a cost-effective strategy for surgeons who performed more than 100 operations. At both cost differentials, the direct anterior approach was not cost-effective for surgeons who performed fewer than 100 operations. One-way sensitivity analyses revealed the model to be the most sensitive to fluctuations in the utility of revision THA, probability of revision after the posterior approach THA, probability of dislocation after the posterior approach THA, fluctuations in the probability of dislocation after direct anterior THA, cost of direct anterior THA, and probability of intraoperative fracture with the direct anterior approach. At the cost differential of USD 219 and for surgeons with a surgical experience level of more than 100 direct anterior operations, the direct anterior approach was still the cost-effective strategy for the entire range of values. CONCLUSION: For high-volume hip surgeons, defined here as surgeons who perform more than 100 procedures during a 6-year span, the direct anterior approach may be a cost-effective strategy within the limitations imposed by our analysis. For lower volume hip surgeons, performing a more familiar approach appears to be more cost-effective.

No Benefit to Sensor-guided Balancing Compared With Freehand Balancing in TKA: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Soft tissue balancing in TKA has traditionally relied on surgeons' subjective tactile feedback. Although sensor-guided balancing devices have been proposed to provide more objective feedback, it is unclear whether their use improves patient outcomes. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We conducted a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing freehand balancing with the use of a sensor-guided balancing device and evaluated (1) knee ROM, (2) patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) (SF-12, WOMAC, and Knee Society Functional Scores [KSFS]), and (3) various surgical and hospital parameters (such as operative time, length of stay [LOS], and surgical complications) at a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. METHODS: A total of 152 patients scheduled for primary TKA were recruited and provided informed consent to participate in this this study. Of these, 22 patients were excluded preoperatively, intraoperatively, or postoperatively due to patient request, surgery cancellation, anatomical exclusion criteria determined during surgery, technical issues with the sensor device, or loss to follow-up. After the minimum 2-year follow-up was accounted for, there were 63 sensor-guided and 67 freehand patients, for a total of 130 patients undergoing primary TKA for osteoarthritis. The procedures were performed by one of three fellowship-trained arthroplasty surgeons (RPS, HJC, JAG) and were randomized to either soft tissue balancing via a freehand technique or with a sensor-guided balancing device at one institution from December 2017 to December 2018. There was no difference in the mean age (72 ± 8 years versus 70 ± 9 years, mean difference 2; p = 0.11), BMI (30 ± 6 kg/m 2 versus 29 ± 6 kg/m 2 , mean difference 1; p = 0.83), gender (79% women versus 70% women; p = 0.22), and American Society of Anesthesiology score (2 ± 1 versus 2 ± 1, mean difference 0; p = 0.92) between the sensor-guided and freehand groups, respectively. For both groups, soft tissue balancing was performed after all bony cuts were completed and trial components inserted, with the primary difference in technique being the ability to quantify the intercompartmental balance using the trial tibial insert embedded with a wireless sensor in the sensor-guided cohort. Implant manufacturers were not standardized. Primary outcomes were knee ROM and PROMs at 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years. Secondary outcomes included pain level evaluated by the VAS, opioid consumption, inpatient physical therapy performance, LOS, discharge disposition, surgical complications, and reoperations. RESULTS: There was no difference in the mean knee ROM at 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively between the sensor-guided cohort (113° ± 11°, 119° ± 13°, and 116° ± 12°, respectively) and the freehand cohort (116° ± 13° [p = 0.36], 117° ± 13° [p = 0.41], and 117° ± 12° [p = 0.87], respectively). There was no difference in SF-12 physical, SF-12 mental, WOMAC pain, WOMAC stiffness, WOMAC function, and KSFS scores between the cohorts at 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively. The mean operative time in the sensor-guided cohort was longer than that in the freehand cohort (107 ± 0.02 versus 84 ± 0.04 minutes, mean difference = 23 minutes; p = 0.008), but there were no differences in LOS, physical therapy performance, VAS pain scores, opioid consumption, discharge disposition, surgical complications, or percentages of patients in each group who underwent reoperation. CONCLUSION: This RCT demonstrated that at 2 years postoperatively, the use of a sensor-balancing device for soft tissue balancing in TKA did not confer any additional benefit in terms of knee ROM, PROMs, and clinical outcomes. Given the significantly increased operative time and costs associated with the use of a sensor-balancing device, we recommend against its routine use in clinical practice by experienced surgeons. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, therapeutic study.

Imageless robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty leads to similar 24-month WOMAC scores as compared to conventional total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) was introduced to improve limb alignment, component positioning, soft-tissue balance and to minimize surgical outliers. This study investigates perioperative outcomes, complications, and early patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of one imageless RA-TKA system compared to conventional method TKA (CM-TKA) at 24-month follow-up. METHODS: This multi-surgeon retrospective cohort analysis compared 111 imageless RA-TKA patients to 110 CM-TKA patients (n = 221). Basic demographic information, intraoperative and postoperative data, and PROMs, including the functional score of the Knee Society Score (KSS-FS), The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and the Short Form 12 Mental and Physical scores (SF-12M and P), were collected and recorded preoperatively, at 3-, 12- and 24-months postoperatively. Range of motion (ROM), estimated blood loss (EBL), surgical duration, and complications were also collected. RESULTS: There were no baseline patient demographic differences between groups. EBL (240 vs. 190 mL, p < 0.001) and surgical duration (123 vs. 107 min, p < 0.001) were significantly greater in RA-TKA. There were no significant differences in postoperative complications, ROM, length of stay (LOS), and PROMs between cohorts at 3-, 12-, 24-months postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Imageless RA-TKA is associated with greater EBL and surgical duration compared to CM-TKA. However, at 24-month follow-up, there were no significant differences in ROM, LOS, complications and PROMs between cohorts. Imageless robotic surgery leads to similar 24-month clinical outcomes as compared to CM-TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Randomized Controlled Trial of Incisional Negative Pressure Following High-Risk Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The direct anterior (DA) approach to total hip arthroplasty (THA) is associated with higher rates of surgical site complications (SSCs) compared to other approaches, particularly among high-risk patients. Closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) is effective in reducing SSCs and surgical site infections (SSIs) in other populations. We asked whether ciNPT could decrease SSCs in high-risk patients undergoing DA THA. METHODS: This prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) enrolled high-risk DA THA patients at 3 centers. Patients were offered enrollment if they had previously identified risk factors for SSC: Body mass index (BMI) >30 kg/m2, diabetes, active smoking, or before hip surgery. Patients were randomized after closure to either an occlusive (control) dressing or ciNPT dressing for 7 days. All 90-day SSCs were recorded. A priori power analysis demonstrated 116 patients were required to identify a 4.5x relative reduction in SSCs. Chi-square tests were used to evaluate probability of complications. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty two patients enrolled; 120 completed data collection. SSCs occurred in 18.3% (11/60) of control patients compared to 8.3% (5/60) of ciNPT patients (χ2 = 2.60, P = .107). SSCs included dehiscence to the subcutaneous level (13) and prolonged drainage (3). Nine control (15.0%) and 2 ciNPT (3.3%) patients met CDC criteria for superficial SSI (χ2 = 4.90, P = .027). Fifteen of 16 SSCs resolved with local wound care. One in the ciNPT group required reoperation for acute PJI. CONCLUSION: Among patients at risk of surgical site complications undergoing DA THA, we identified a significant reduction in superficial SSIs and a trend toward lower overall SSCs with ciNPT.

Registration of Bony Landmarks and Soft Tissue Laxity during Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty is Highly Reproducible.

INTRODUCTION: There is growing interest and enthusiasm for robotic total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Many robotic systems require registration of bony landmarks as well as a dynamic soft tissue evaluation to plan femoral and tibial resections. Variability in this user-driven registration can introduce error and undermine the purported precision and accuracy offered by robotics. The purpose of this study was to evaluate inter- and intrarater reliability in robotic registration with a new robotic system (ROSA®; Zimmer-Biomet, Warsaw, IN). METHODS: Two unpaired cadaveric knee specimens were exposed, and optical arrays were placed into the femur and tibia. Three separate evaluators conducted repeated trials of anatomic registration and assessment of soft tissue laxity, as well as coronal alignment, sagittal alignment, femoral size, and maximum opening in the medial and lateral compartments in both flexion and extension. Repeated trials were conducted using these specimens with and without preoperative imaging for landmarking (image-based and image-free workflows). An Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) was calculated for each observer and across observers to determine intra-and interrater reliability, respectively, in robotic registration. RESULTS: There was good to excellent reliability for all conditions, and all correlation coefficients were >0.767. On average, ICCs for intrarater reliability were excellent for Doctor 1 (0.952), Doctor 2 (0.975), and Doctor 3 (0.925). On average, the ICCs for interrater reliability were excellent for both the "Registration + Gap Assessment" condition (0.961) and the "Gap Assessment" condition (0.994). CONCLUSION: Our results show a high repeatability of registration of anatomic landmarks and gap assessment among observers using this robotic system for both image-based and image-free software.

Quantifying the Surgeon's Increased Burden of Postoperative Work for Modern Arthroplasty Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Arthroplasty payment traditionally includes 118 minutes for postoperative rounds and 69 minutes for postoperative office visits, amounting to 187 minutes and 7 work relative value units. Rapid recovery, ambulatory procedures, and bundled payments have altered the burden of care, with multiple studies showing an increase in physician work. Policy changes during the COVID-19 pandemic allow for precise documentation of patient touchpoints. We analyzed the duration of video, telephone, and text messaging to quantify modern arthroplasty work. METHODS: Consecutive primary hip, knee, and partial knee arthroplasties, performed 30 days before March 15, 2020 (date of practice closure), were included from a single institution, yielding 47 cases. We retrospectively quantified the duration of video telehealth documentation, telephone logs, and text messages over 90 days to calculate the postoperative work required in modern arthroplasty using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: An average of 9.4 touchpoints (2-14) by the surgeons occurred during the global period for this cohort, totaling 219 minutes (51-247 minutes). This included an average of 21 minutes of day-0 calls to family, 117 minutes for video visits, 52 minutes for phone calls, and 29 minutes for text messaging and wound photos. CONCLUSION: We found an undervaluation of 32 minutes of work. AAHKS leadership advocates for the fair payment of modern arthroplasty work. Cell phones have opened channels of contact that did not exist before, including phone accessibility, text messaging, and video calls. These data help defend against current payer efforts to cut work relative value units for arthroplasty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Femoral Neck Notching in Dual Mobility Implants: Is This a Reason for Concern?

BACKGROUND: Dual mobility (DM) total hip arthroplasty (THA) implants have been advocated for patients at risk for impingement due to abnormal spinopelvic mobility. Impingement against cobalt-chromium acetabular bearings, however, can result in notching of titanium femoral stems. This study investigated the incidence of femoral stem notching associated with DM implants and sought to identify risk factors. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective study reviewed 256 modular and 32 monoblock DM components with minimum 1-year clinical and radiographic follow-up, including 112 revisions, 4 conversion THAs, and 172 primary THAs. Radiographs were inspected for evidence of femoral notching and to calculate acetabular inclination and anteversion. Revisions and dislocations were recorded. RESULTS: Ten cases of femoral notching were discovered (3.5%), all associated with modular cylindrospheric cobalt-chromium DM implants (P = .049). Notches were first observed radiographically at mean 1.3 years after surgery (range 0.5-2.7 years). Notch location was anterior (20%), superior (60%), or posterior (20%) on the prosthetic femoral neck. Notch depth ranged from 1.7% to 20% of the prosthetic neck diameter. Eight cases with notching had lumbar pathology that can affect spinopelvic mobility. None of these notches resulted in stem fracture, at mean 2.7-year follow-up (range 1-7.6 years). There were no dislocations or revisions in patients with notching. CONCLUSION: Femoral notching was identified in 3.5% of DM cases, slightly surpassing the dislocation rate in a cohort selected for risk of impingement and instability. Although these cases of notching have not resulted in catastrophic failures thus far, further study of clinical sequelae is warranted. Component position, spinopelvic mobility, and implant design may influence risk.

Operative Duration and Short-Term Postoperative Complications after Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Prolonged operative duration is an independent risk factor for postoperative complications in many orthopedic procedures ranging from shoulder arthroscopy to total hip and knee arthroplasties. It has not been well studied in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). The purpose of this study is to assess the effect of operative duration on complications after UKA. METHODS: Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program registry, we identified all primary unilateral UKAs from 2005 to 18. Patients were divided into three cohorts based on the operative duration: < 90 minutes, between 90 and 120 minutes, and >120 minutes. Baseline patient and operative demographics (age, gender, etc.) and thirty-day complications were compared using bivariate analysis. Multivariate analysis was used to assess the independent effect of operative duration on postoperative outcomes after adjusting for differences in baseline characteristics. RESULTS: We identified 11,806 patients who underwent primary UKA from 2005 to 18. There was no difference in the "any complication" rate between cohorts. However, operative duration >120 minutes was associated with a significantly higher likelihood of reoperation (odds ratio [OR] 2.02, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.15-3.57, P = .015), non-home discharge (OR: 2.14, CI: 1.65-2.77, P < .001), surgical site infection (OR: 1.76, CI: 1.03-3.01, P = .038), and blood transfusions (OR: 3.23, CI: 1.44-7.22, P = .004) when compared with operative duration <90 minutes. There was no difference in mortality rates. CONCLUSION: Increased operative duration greater than 2 hours in primary UKA is associated with an increased risk of non-home discharge, surgical site infection, reoperation, and blood transfusion.

Tibial cement mantle thickness is not affected by tourniquetless total knee arthroplasty when performed with tranexamic acid.

PURPOSE: Evidence exists that tourniquet use leads to increased cement penetration in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) due to decreased blood and fat in the bone during cementation. The use of tranexamic acid (TXA) has led to decreased blood loss and transfusion rates. The purpose of this study was to determine if the use of a tourniquet while utilising modern TXA protocols affects the tibial cement mantle penetration. METHODS: 140 patients who underwent primary TKA with and without a tourniquet (70 in each group) were retrospectively reviewed. All patients received a standard TXA protocol. The primary outcome measure was cumulative depth of cement mantle penetration of the tibial plateau on post-operative radiographs. Secondary outcome measures included post-operative change in haemoglobin and hematocrit levels, blood loss, and transfusion rates. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in age, sex, or pre-operative haemoglobin or hematocrit levels between groups. Tourniquet use resulted in significantly lower blood loss (100.0 mL versus 154.7 mL, p < 0.001), and significantly reduced drop in haemoglobin (1.8 g/dL vs 2.5 g/dL, p < 0.001) and hematocrit (5.7% vs 7.4%, p = 0.04) levels. However, depth of tibial cement mantle penetration did not differ between the tourniquet group (15.3 mm) and non-tourniquet group (15.0 mm, p value n.s.). No patient in either group required a blood transfusion. CONCLUSIONS: Tourniquet use in primary TKA results in decreased blood loss and less change in pre-operative vs post-operative haemoglobin and hematocrit levels. However, with the use of TXA, not using a tourniquet resulted in similar cement mantle penetration around the tibial component as with a tourniquet.