Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Ann Pharmacother ; 48(3): 387-94, 2014 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24259657

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To review the place in therapy of vandetanib for medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC). DATA SOURCES: Literature searches were performed in Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Google Scholar using the search terms ZD6474 OR vandetanib OR Caprelsa combined with medullary thyroid carcinoma. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Two phase 2 trials and 1 phase 3 trial were identified. DATA SYNTHESIS: Vandetanib is approved for the treatment of unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic MTC in patients with symptomatic or progressive disease. In the phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, vandetanib 300 mg daily (n = 231) was compared with placebo (n = 100). Vandetanib-treated patients experienced a significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.46; 95% CI = 0.31-0.69; P < .001). No difference in overall survival (OS) was seen at the time of publication. Most adverse effects were grade 1 or 2 and managed by dose interruptions or reductions. The most common grade 3/4 adverse effects were diarrhea, hypertension, QT prolongation, fatigue, and rash. Because of the potential for QT prolongation, torsades de pointes, and sudden death, vandetanib is restricted via a Risk Evaluations and Mitigation Strategy program. CONCLUSIONS: Vandetanib prolongs PFS but has not been shown to improve OS. Vandetanib can be considered for patients with unresectable locoregional disease. It is a first-line option for patients with unresectable symptomatic distant metastases as well as an option for advanced disseminated symptomatic metastatic disease. Vandetanib is expected to be an important addition to the formulary of health plans that provide prescription drug benefits.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma Medular/tratamiento farmacológico , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Quinazolinas/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/tratamiento farmacológico , Antineoplásicos/economía , Antineoplásicos/farmacología , Carcinoma Medular/patología , Carcinoma Neuroendocrino , Ensayos Clínicos Fase II como Asunto , Ensayos Clínicos Fase III como Asunto , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Etiquetado de Medicamentos , Humanos , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Piperidinas/economía , Piperidinas/farmacología , Quinazolinas/economía , Quinazolinas/farmacología , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/patología
2.
Haematologica ; 98(2): 172-8, 2013 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22983579

RESUMEN

In Europe, the combination of plerixafor + granulocyte colony-stimulating factor is approved for the mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells for autologous transplantation in patients with lymphoma and myeloma whose cells mobilize poorly. The purpose of this study was to further assess the safety and efficacy of plerixafor + granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for front-line mobilization in European patients with lymphoma or myeloma. In this multicenter, open label, single-arm study, patients received granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (10 µg/kg/day) subcutaneously for 4 days; on the evening of day 4 they were given plerixafor (0.24 mg/kg) subcutaneously. Patients underwent apheresis on day 5 after a morning dose of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. The primary study objective was to confirm the safety of mobilization with plerixafor. Secondary objectives included assessment of efficacy (apheresis yield, time to engraftment). The combination of plerixafor + granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was used to mobilize hematopoietic stem cells in 118 patients (90 with myeloma, 25 with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, 3 with Hodgkin's disease). Treatment-emergent plerixafor-related adverse events were reported in 24 patients. Most adverse events occurred within 1 hour after injection, were grade 1 or 2 in severity and included gastrointestinal disorders or injection-site reactions. The minimum cell yield (≥ 2 × 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg) was harvested in 98% of patients with myeloma and in 80% of those with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in a median of one apheresis. The optimum cell dose (≥ 5 × 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma or ≥ 6 × 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg for myeloma) was harvested in 89% of myeloma patients and 48% of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients. In this prospective, multicenter European study, mobilization with plerixafor + granulocyte colony-stimulating factor allowed the majority of patients with myeloma or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma to undergo transplantation with minimal toxicity, providing further data supporting the safety and efficacy of plerixafor + granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for front-line mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma or myeloma.


Asunto(s)
Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos/administración & dosificación , Movilización de Célula Madre Hematopoyética , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/efectos de los fármacos , Compuestos Heterocíclicos/administración & dosificación , Linfoma no Hodgkin/terapia , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Bencilaminas , Ciclamas , Femenino , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos/efectos adversos , Compuestos Heterocíclicos/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA