Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Pediatr Orthop ; 44(9): e838-e845, 2024 Oct 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38898555

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To the best of our knowledge, there is no study comparing the inter and intraobserver reliability of current classifications for postseptic hip sequelae in children. The current study aims to assess the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of four current classifications and identify hips that could not be classified in each classification system. METHODS: The hip radiographs of 148 consecutive children with sequelae of sepsis of the hip from 2 centers were assessed after a minimum of 2 years of follow-up after sepsis. All hips (affected and normal sides) were classified according to the 4 original descriptions of the authors of the respective classifications. If a hip did not fall into any subtype of the classification, the rater was asked to mark it as nonclassifiable and state the reason for being unable to classify the hip in the respective classification. The intraclass correlation coefficient was computed to assess the reproducibility of each classification. RESULTS: Interrater reliability and intrarater reliability were moderate (0.57 to 0.72) while including all hips. The reliability was poor (0.35 to 0.49) in all 4 classifications, with an evaluation of only affected 180 hips. A few sequelae of infection, including caput valgus (n = 7), acetabular dysplasia (4), joint space narrowing (2), and bony ankylosis (1), were not included in any of the 4 current existing classification systems. CONCLUSION: The reliability of all current classifications of sequelae of septic arthritis of the hip is moderate. A proportion of sequelae do not find a place in all current classifications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.


Asunto(s)
Artritis Infecciosa , Articulación de la Cadera , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Radiografía , Humanos , Artritis Infecciosa/diagnóstico por imagen , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Articulación de la Cadera/diagnóstico por imagen , Articulación de la Cadera/patología , Masculino , Femenino , Niño , Preescolar , Lactante , Radiografía/métodos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Adolescente , Estudios Retrospectivos
2.
J Clin Orthop Trauma ; 23: 101671, 2021 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34790561

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) injuries are often associated with meniscus tears. These meniscus tears in long term may affect the functional outcomes after ACL reconstruction. The present study aims to identify the incidence and relative association of meniscus injuries in complete and partial ACL injuries. METHODS: This was a retrospective study. Patients were divided into 2 groups; group I: partial ACL tear and group 2: complete ACL tear. Both groups were assessed for meniscal tears; either isolated medial/lateral or combined and odds ratio was measured between two groups. RESULTS: A total of 43 and 219 patients were enrolled in group I and II respectively. The mean age (years) in group I and II were 25.32 ± 7.12 and 28.64 ± 10.84 respectively. There were a total of 5 and 28 females in group I and II respectively. Mean pre-injury Tegner score in group I and II was 7.02 ± 2.87 and 6.82 ± 3.14 respectively. Mean time from injury to surgery (months) in group I and II was 8.04 ± 6.43 and 7.62 ± 4.83 respectively. In group 1 There were a total of 6 with lateral meniscus tears, 9 with medial meniscus tears And 3 with combined meniscal tears in group 1 while in group 2, 47 had lateral meniscal tears, 71 had medial meniscal tears and 71 had combined tears. Group II patients had stronger association for isolated meniscal tears compared to group I, with an odds ratio of 5.05(p < 0.05). Combined meniscal tears had non-significant relation in two groups (p = 0.58). CONCLUSION: Partial ACL injuries present with less risk of acquiring isolated meniscus tears, compared to complete ACL injuries.

3.
J Clin Orthop Trauma ; 23: 101638, 2021 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34745874

RESUMEN

Wound irrigation is described as the flow of a solution through an exposed fracture surface to reduce the microbial colonization, to remove apparent foreign particles and wound exudates. . While recent literature and various in-vitro and in-vivo trials have cleared some clouds of doubt from the mind, it still remains a topic of debate. Normal saline remains the standard irrigation solution as it is non tissue toxic and has the same tonicity as body fluids. The quantity and duration of washing though is not standardized and is the surgeon's choice. This adds to the dilemma in the minds of the surgeon, with the timing of the debridement and the duration of wound irrigation depending on the surgeon's discretion. Future studies should aim to regulate the duration of the wound irrigation besides guiding about the ideal fluid volume to be used for the irrigation. Further, secondary end-points like the duration of hospital stay, rate of infections and use of hospital resources, should be computed to know about the adequacy of the wound debridement and irrigation. Antimicrobial solutions can kill microorganisms in the wound but are toxic to the host tissues as well, which limits their use. In addition, pulsatile (high pressure) lavage has not been seen to increase overall effectiveness. Recent research trials have found cumulative use of innovative solutions like phenols and EDTA along with enzymes to be encouraging though large randomized controlled trials are lacking.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA