The combination of octreotide and midodrine is not superior to albumin in preventing recurrence of ascites after large-volume paracentesis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Large-volume paracentesis (LVP) is the treatment of choice for patients with cirrhosis and refractory ascites. However, LVP can lead to postparacentesis circulatory dysfunction (PCD), which is associated with faster ascites recurrence and renal failure. PCD results from vasodilatation, which reduces effective blood volume, and is prevented by intravenous administration of albumin. Vasoconstrictors could be used instead of albumin and, with longer use, prevent PCD and delay ascites recurrence. METHODS: We performed a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to compare albumin with the vasoconstrictor combination of octreotide and midodrine in patients with refractory ascites who underwent LVP. Patients in the albumin group received a single intravenous dose of albumin at the time of LVP plus placebos for midodrine and octreotide (n = 13). Patients in the vasoconstrictor group received saline solution (as a placebo for albumin), 10 mg of oral midodrine (3 times/day), and a monthly 20-mg intramuscular injection of long-acting octreotide (n = 12). Patients were followed up until recurrence of ascites. RESULTS: The median times to recurrence of ascites were 10 days in the albumin group and 8 days in the vasoconstrictor group (P = .318). There were no significant differences in PCD between the albumin group (18%) and the vasoconstrictor group (25%, P = .574). When ascites recurred, serum levels of creatinine were higher in the vasoconstrictor group (1.2 vs 0.9 mg/dL in the albumin group; P = .051). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of midodrine and octreotide after LVP is not superior to albumin in delaying recurrence of ascites or preventing PCD in patients with cirrhosis. Outcomes appear to be worse in patients given octreotide and midodrine. ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00108355.

Sildenafil has no effect on portal pressure but lowers arterial pressure in patients with compensated cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The reduction of portal pressure in patients with early compensated cirrhosis may be more responsive to drugs increasing intrahepatic vasodilatation than those reducing portal venous inflow. The phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE-V) inhibitor sildenafil can potentially reduce portal pressure by decreasing intrahepatic resistance, but its systemic vasodilatory effects may be deleterious. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of sildenafil on systemic and portal hemodynamics in an open-label pilot study. METHODS: Twelve patients with compensated cirrhosis and baseline hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) >5 mm Hg received 25 mg of oral sildenafil. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and HVPG were repeated after 30 and 60 minutes in 9/12 patients at 90 minutes (after an additional 25 mg of sildenafil). HVPG tracings were read by 3 blinded observers. RESULTS: All 12 patients were Child A with median MAP of 92 mm Hg (interquartile range, 83-94) and HVPG 10.4 mm Hg (interquartile range, 6.6-13.0). While MAP decreased significantly at all time points, sildenafil had no effect on HVPG. CONCLUSIONS: As shown with other vasodilators in compensated cirrhotic patients, sildenafil at therapeutic doses for erectile dysfunction reduces MAP without reducing portal pressure. The search should continue for specific intrahepatic vasodilators.