RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We developed objective measurements of preoperative and residual tumor volume, and debulking rate, to evaluate their prognostic value for neuroendocrine liver metastasis (NELM). METHODS: Seventy-three patients who underwent surgery for NELM were analyzed retrospectively. Indices of preoperative and postoperative residual tumor volume (pre-volume index [VI] and post-VI) were calculated as the sum of the cubes of individual tumor diameters on preoperative and postoperative imaging, respectively. The debulking rate (%) was calculated as 100 - 100 × post-VI/pre-VI. The classification and regression trees method was used to classify pre-VI and post-VI. RESULTS: Overall survival (OS) was discriminated by preoperative tumor volume (5-year OS rates, 87.8% for low pre-VI and 60.1% for high pre-VI; P = .037) and residual tumor volume (5-year OS rates, 88.1% for low post-VI and 24.8% for high post-VI; P < .001). In contrast, debulking rates of 100%, ≥90%, and <90% did not discriminate OS (5-year OS rates, 88.0%, 61.9%, and 58.9%, respectively, not significant). In multivariate analysis, residual tumor volume (high post-VI, hazard ratio, 6.40; 95% confidence interval, 1.45-32.3) was an independent prognostic factor for OS. CONCLUSIONS: Objective measurement of tumor volume demonstrates that residual tumor volume is prognostic after surgery for NELM.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We classified the extent of mesenteric mass (MM) involvement that predicts challenging mesenteric lymph node dissection (mLND) by minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for ileal neuroendocrine tumors (i-NETs). METHODS: Patients who underwent surgery for i-NETs were retrospectively reviewed. MM involvement was classified as region-0: no MM; region-1: >2 cm from the origins of the ileocolic artery/vein; region-2: ≤2 cm from the origins; and region-3: more proximal superior mesenteric artery/vein. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the predictive value of MM regions for gross positive mesenteric margin (mR2) and/or conversion among the MIS cohort. The open surgery cohort was used as a reference for mR2 rates. RESULTS: Of 108 patients, 83 patients (77%) underwent MIS. MMs in region-2 and region-3 were independent risk factors for mR2 and/or conversion (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 4.25 [1.17-16.4] and 8.51 × 107 [11.0-], respectively, against regions-0 and 1]. mR2 rates of MIS and open surgery cohorts per region did not differ significantly (4% and 7% for regions-0 and 1; 17% and 25% for region-2; and 100% and 83% for region-3). CONCLUSIONS: The novel stratification of MM regions was predictive of challenging mLND by MIS. Surgeons should have a low threshold for conversion for MMs in proximal regions.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Íleon/patología , Neoplasias del Íleon/cirugía , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Ganglios Linfáticos/cirugía , Mesenterio/patología , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/patología , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/cirugía , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Masculino , Márgenes de Escisión , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/métodos , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We assessed treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with advanced gastrointestinal (GI) neuroendocrine tumors (NET) at four large tertiary referral centers in the U.S. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients aged ≥18 years at advanced GI NET diagnosis, treated between July 2011 and December 2014. Index date was the histologically confirmed diagnosis date of locally advanced/metastatic GI NET. Data included baseline characteristics, treatment patterns, progression, death, and GI NET-related health care resource utilization from index date through last contact or death. Time-to-event analyses, including treatment discontinuation, progression, and overall survival (OS), were performed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: We identified 273 patients; 156 (57%) had primary ileum NET, and 174 (64%) had functional NET. First-line treatments included somatostatin analog (SSA) alone (89%) or in combination (2%), liver-directed therapy (LDT; 8%), and cytotoxic chemotherapy or interferon (2%). One hundred fifty-five patients continued with second-line therapy, including SSA alone (17%) or in combination (75%, with 3% combined with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy), LDT (4%), and other treatments (3%). Median time (months) to first-line discontinuation was 154.0 for SSAs and 3.8 for cytotoxic chemotherapy. Overall median time to investigator-assessed progression following treatment initiation was 30.3 months. Median OS (months) following first-line initiation was 151.8 for all patients and 178.9 for first-line SSA. CONCLUSION: Our study illustrates the common use of SSAs in both first-line and subsequent treatment of patients with GI NETs, as well as the relatively long survival durations and multiple additional treatments received by patients with this condition. Treatment pattern assessment at later times, following approval of newer treatments, is warranted. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This study, assessing treatment patterns over a period of up to 30 years, showed that SSAs, LDT, cytotoxic chemotherapy, and interferon are common treatments for advanced GI NETs. SSAs alone or in combination with other treatments were the most frequent therapy in first and subsequent lines. Patients in this study remained on SSAs long-term, with median treatment duration of 12.8 years in first line. Treatment patterns should be assessed beyond this study's time period, given recent U.S. Food and Drug Administration approvals for additional treatments for GI NET, which will likely be incorporated in the continuum of care of patients.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/terapia , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Quimioradioterapia/métodos , Quimioradioterapia/estadística & datos numéricos , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Embolización Terapéutica/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/patología , Humanos , Interferón-alfa/uso terapéutico , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Registros Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/mortalidad , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/patología , Péptidos Cíclicos/uso terapéutico , Radiofármacos/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Somatostatina/análogos & derivados , Somatostatina/uso terapéutico , Centros de Atención Terciaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Using data from four tertiary referral centers in the U.S., we assessed real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of patients with advanced lung neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). SUBJECTS, MATERIALS, AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of adult patients with locally advanced/metastatic (typical/atypical) lung NETs treated between July 2011 and December 2014. Index date was histologically confirmed typical/atypical carcinoid tumor diagnosis date. Data included baseline characteristics, treatment patterns, progression, death, and lung NET-related health care resource use from index date through last contact/death. Time to treatment discontinuation and first progression, time from first to second progression, and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: We identified 83 patients; 19 (23%) had functional NET. First-line treatments included somatostatin analogs (SSAs) alone (56%) or in combination with other therapies (6%), cytotoxic chemotherapy (20%), external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) (9%), liver-directed therapy (LDT) (4%), and everolimus/other (5%). Sixty patients had second-line therapy including SSA alone (18%) or in combination (40%), cytotoxic chemotherapy (17%), everolimus (12%), LDT (7%), EBRT (3%), and other treatments (3%). Median time (months) to first-line discontinuation were as follows: SSAs, 43.3; cytotoxic chemotherapy, 3.6. Overall median time (months) to investigator-assessed progression following treatment initiation was 12.4. Median OS (months) following treatment initiation was 66.4 for all patients and 81.5 for patients receiving SSAs. CONCLUSION: SSAs, alone and in combination, are common treatments for advanced lung NETs. Patients have additional treatment options and relatively long survival compared with patients with other advanced cancers. Treatment pattern assessment following approval of newer treatments is needed. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Somatostatin analogs (SSAs), cytotoxic chemotherapy, EBRT, liver-directed therapy, and targeted therapies are common treatments for locally advanced/metastatic (typical/atypical) lung neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). SSAs alone or in combination with other treatment modalities were the most common first- and second-line therapy, followed by cytotoxic chemotherapy. Patients continued treatment with SSAs long-term with median treatment duration of 43 months. Median overall survival was 66 months following initiation of first-line therapy for all patients. Treatment pattern assessment beyond the time period of this study is needed given recent U.S. Food and Drug Administration approvals for additional treatments for lung NETs that will likely be incorporated in the treatment landscape.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Tumor Carcinoide/terapia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Tumor Carcinoide/mortalidad , Tumor Carcinoide/patología , Quimioradioterapia/métodos , Quimioradioterapia/estadística & datos numéricos , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Embolización Terapéutica/estadística & datos numéricos , Everolimus/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Masculino , Registros Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Radiofármacos/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Somatostatina/análogos & derivados , Somatostatina/uso terapéutico , Centros de Atención Terciaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Ileal neuroendocrine tumors (i-NETs) frequently metastasize to mesenteric lymph nodes and the liver. Regional lymphadenopathy is associated with desmoplasia of the mesentery forming a large mesenteric mass (LMM). Although the latest American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM staging (8th edition) defined LMM >2 cm as N2, the prognostic impact of LMM is ill-defined. We evaluated whether LMM is prognostic for patients with i-NETs. METHODS: This single-institution, retrospective cohort study included 106 patients who underwent resection of i-NETs between 2007 and 2018. Overall survival (OS) and liver progression-free survival (LPFS) were compared between patients with and without LMM. RESULTS: LMM was present in 66 patients (62%) and was not associated with the presence or absence of liver metastasis (P = .969) or the extent of liver involvement (P = .938). OS and LPFS differed significantly between patients with and without LMM (5-year OS rates of 64.8% and 92.9%, respectively, P = .011; 3-year LPFS rates of 45.3% and 67.5%, respectively, P = .025). In multivariate analysis, LMM was an independent prognostic factor for both OS (hazard ratio: 4.69, 95% confidence interval: 1.63-17.6) and LPFS (1.99, 1.08-3.88). CONCLUSION: LMM >2 cm is prognostic for OS and LPFS and represents aggressive tumor biology.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Íleon/mortalidad , Neoplasias del Íleon/patología , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Mesenterio/patología , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/mortalidad , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/patología , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias del Íleon/cirugía , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Metástasis Linfática , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/cirugía , Pronóstico , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Lung neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) have few known predictors of survival. We investigated associations of sociodemographic, clinicopathologic, and treatment factors with overall survival (OS) and lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) for incident lung NET cases (typical or atypical histology) in the California Cancer Registry (CCR) from 1992 to 2019. OS was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by sociodemographic and disease factors univariately with the log-rank test. We used sequential Cox proportional hazards regression for multivariable OS analysis. LCSS was estimated using Fine-Gray competing risks regression. There were 6038 lung NET diagnoses (5569 typical, 469 atypical carcinoid); most were women (70%) and non-Hispanic White (73%). In our multivariable model, sociodemographic factors were independently associated with OS, with better survival for women (hazard ratio (HR) 0.62, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57-0.68, P < 0.001), married (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.70-0.84, P < 0.001), and residents of high socioeconomic status (SES) neighborhoods (HRQ5vsQ1 0.73, 95% CI 0.62-0.85, P < 0.001). Compared to cases with private insurance, OS was worse for cases with Medicare (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.10-1.40, P < 0.001) or Medicaid/other public insurance (HR 1.45, 95% CI 1.24-1.68, P < 0.001). In our univariate model, non-Hispanic Black Californians had worse OS than other racial/ethnic groups, but differences attenuated after adjusting for stage at diagnosis. In our LCSS models, we found similar associations between sex and marital status on survival, but no differences in outcomes by SES or insurance. By race/ethnicity, American Indian cases had worse LCSS. In summary, beyond disease-related and treatment variables, sociodemographic factors were independently associated with survival in lung NETs.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Neuroendocrino , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Tumores Neuroendocrinos , Anciano , Humanos , Femenino , Estados Unidos , Masculino , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/epidemiología , Factores Sociodemográficos , Medicare , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , California/epidemiología , PulmónRESUMEN
CONTEXT: Children with cancer and their families have complex needs related to symptoms, decision-making, care planning, and psychosocial impact extending across the illness trajectory, which for some includes end of life. Whether specialty pediatric palliative care (SPPC) is associated with improved outcomes for children with cancer and their families is unknown. OBJECTIVE: We conducted a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines to investigate outcomes associated with SPPC in pediatric oncology with a focus on intervention delivery, collaboration, and alignment with National Quality Forum domains. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and CINAHL databases from inception until April 2020 and reviewed references manually. Eligible articles were published in English, involved pediatric patients aged 0-18 years with cancer, and contained original data regarding patient and family illness and end-of-life experiences, including symptom management, communication, decision-making, quality of life, satisfaction, and healthcare utilization. RESULTS: We screened 6682 article abstracts and 82 full-text articles; 32 studies met inclusion criteria, representing 15,635 unique children with cancer and 342 parents. Generally, children with cancer who received SPPC had improved symptom burden, pain control, and quality of life with decreased intensive procedures, increased completion of advance care planning and resuscitation status documentation, and fewer end-of-life intensive care stays with higher likelihood of dying at home. Family impact included satisfaction with SPPC and perception of improved communication. CONCLUSION: SPPC may improve illness experiences for children with cancer and their families. Multisite studies utilizing comparative effectiveness approaches and validated metrics may support further advancement of the field.
Asunto(s)
Enfermería de Cuidados Paliativos al Final de la Vida , Neoplasias , Cuidado Terminal , Niño , Humanos , Neoplasias/terapia , Cuidados Paliativos , Calidad de VidaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Cisplatin is a platinum-based chemotherapeutic drug that secondarily induces toxicity in inner ear sensory epithelia, contributing to auditory and vestibular dysfunction. We describe the creation of a drug reservoir device (DRD) to combat this ototoxicity for the duration of chemotherapy. As ototoxic side effects of chemotherapy may limit an oncologist's ability to prescribe first-line agents such as cisplatin, mitigating such devastating effects through prolonged topical therapy would be tremendously valuable. STUDY DESIGN: We investigated (1) the ability of an electrospun polylactic acid DRD to provide prolonged delivery of the posited otoprotectant metformin and (2) the development of an in vitro model utilizing Sh-Sy5y human neuroblastoma cells to assess the efficacy of metformin in reducing cisplatin-induced toxicity. SETTING: Neurophysiology laboratory. METHODS: Basic science experiments were performed to assess DRD properties and metformin's effects on cisplatin toxicity in culture. RESULTS: We found that DRDs with increasing polylactic acid concentrations exhibited metformin release for up to 8 weeks. In modeling elution across the round window in vitro, continued elution of metformin was observed for at least 6 weeks, as quantified by spectrophotometry. Unfortunately, metformin did not exhibit protective efficacy in this model using Sh-Sy5y cells. CONCLUSION: While metformin was not found to be protective in Sh-Sy5y cells, these results suggest that an electrospun DRD can provide a tailorable drug delivery system providing medication for the duration of chemotherapy treatment. This represents a novel drug delivery system and efficacy screening assay with broad clinical applications in personalized delivery of inner ear therapies.