Risks of anxiety disorders, depressive disorders, and sleep disorders in patients with dengue fever: A nationwide, population-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Dengue virus (DENV) infection, a common mosquito-borne disease, has been linked to several mental disorders like depression and anxiety. However, the temporal risk of these disorders after DENV infection is not well studied. METHODS: This population-based cohort study encompassed 45,334 recently lab-confirmed dengue patients in Taiwan spanning 2002 to 2015, matched at a 1:5 ratio with non-dengue individuals based on age, gender, and residence (n = 226,670). Employing subdistribution hazard regression analysis, we assessed the immediate (<3 months), intermediate (3-12 months), and prolonged (>12 months) risks of anxiety disorders, depressive disorders, and sleep disorders post DENV infection. Corrections for multiple comparisons were carried out using the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure. RESULTS: A significant increase in depressive disorder risk across all timeframes post-infection was observed (<3 months [aSHR 1.90, 95% CI 1.20-2.99], 3-12 months [aSHR 1.68, 95% CI 1.32-2.14], and >12 months [aSHR 1.14, 95% CI 1.03-1.25]). Sleep disorder risk was higher only during 3-12 months (aSHR 1.55, 95% CI 1.18-2.04). No elevated anxiety disorder risk was found. Subgroup analysis of hospitalized dengue patients showed increased risk of anxiety disorders within 3 months (aSHR 2.14, 95% CI 1.19-3.85) and persistent risk of depressive disorders across all periods. Hospitalized dengue patients also had elevated sleep disorder risk within the first year. CONCLUSION: Dengue patients exhibited significantly elevated risks of depressive disorders in both the short and long term. However, dengue's impact on sleep disorders and anxiety seems to be short-lived. Further research is essential to elucidate the underlying mechanisms.

Risk of severe dengue during secondary infection: A population-based cohort study in Taiwan.

BACKGROUND: Dengue poses a significant public health concern. Secondary dengue infections with different dengue virus (DENV) serotypes have been linked to an increased risk of severe dengue. This study aimed to assess the risk of severe dengue during secondary infection in Taiwan. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database to identify dengue cases with secondary dengue infection born after 1944 from 2014 to 2015. Ten matched patients with primary infection were selected as controls using propensity score matching for each secondary dengue infection case. The odds ratio (OR) for severe dengue in secondary versus primary infections was calculated using conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: This study included 357 cases with secondary dengue infection and 3570 matched controls. The risk of severe dengue was found to be 7.8% in individuals with secondary infection, compared to 3.8% in those with primary dengue infection. Secondary infection significantly increased the risk of severe dengue (OR 2.13, 95% CI: 1.40-3.25, P = 0.0004). Notably, a significant association between secondary infection and severe dengue was observed only when the interval between the first and secondary infection was greater than two years (OR 3.19, 95% CI 2.04-5.00, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Secondary dengue infection significantly increases the risk of severe disease in Taiwan, particularly when the interval between infections is over two years. Healthcare professionals should maintain heightened vigilance for individuals with a history of previous dengue infection, particularly if their initial diagnosis was more than two years prior.

Discrepancies in dengue burden estimates: a comparative analysis of reported cases and global burden of disease study, 2010-2019.

BACKGROUND: Dengue is a significant mosquito-borne disease. Several studies have utilized estimates from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study to assess the global, regional or national burden of dengue over time. However, our recent investigation suggests that GBD's estimates for dengue cases in Taiwan are unrealistically high. The current study extends the scope to compare reported dengue cases with GBD estimates across 30 high-burden countries and territories, aiming to assess the accuracy and interpretability of the GBD's dengue estimates. METHODS: Data for this study were sourced from the GBD 2019 study and various national and international databases documenting reported dengue cases. The analysis targeted the top 30 countries and territories with the highest 10-year average of reported cases from 2010 to 2019. Discrepancies were quantified by computing absolute differences and ratios between the 10-year average of reported cases and GBD estimates. Coefficients of variation (CV) and estimated annual percentage changes (EAPCs) were calculated to assess variations and trends in the two data sources. RESULTS: Significant discrepancies were noted between reported data and GBD estimates in the number of dengue cases, incidence rates, and EAPCs. GBD estimates were substantially higher than reported cases for many entities, with the most notable differences found in China (570.0-fold), India (303.0-fold), Bangladesh (115.4-fold), Taiwan (85.5-fold) and Indonesia (23.2-fold). Furthermore, the GBD's estimates did not accurately reflect the extensive yearly fluctuations in dengue outbreaks, particularly in non-endemic regions such as Taiwan, China and Argentina, as evidenced by high CVs. CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals substantial discrepancies between GBD estimates and reported dengue cases, underscoring the imperative for comprehensive analysis in areas with pronounced disparities. The failure of GBD estimates to represent the considerable annual fluctuations in dengue outbreaks highlights the critical need for improvement in disease burden estimation methodologies for dengue.