Pediatric hidradenitis suppurativa publication trends: 2012 to 2022.

There is a paucity of bibliometric data on pediatric-focused hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) publications. To better characterize research trends in pediatric HS and gaps in literature, we systematically searched PubMed between 2012 and 2022 for publications on pediatric HS and collected data on study design, topic, country, and level of evidence. Of 109 articles that met inclusion criteria, less than half (44/109, 40.4%) were high level of evidence studies; the most common study types were case reports/series (41/109, 37.6%) and cross-sectional studies (25/109, 22.9%), and the most common study topics were HS treatments (44/109, 40.4%), comorbidities (20/109, 18.3%), and clinical presentation (14/109, 12.8%). Although there has been expansion of the pediatric HS literature in recent years, our study highlights the need for larger prospective studies and trials to improve our ability to optimally manage pediatric HS patients and identify predictors of disease progression and treatment response.

Patient Perspectives on Hidradenitis Suppurativa and Infertility: A Survey Study.

BACKGROUND: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is an inflammatory skin condition which predominantly affects women of childbearing age in the USA. There is a lack of research on the association between HS and fertility. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to understand the perspectives of females with HS regarding the impact of their disease on reproductive health, the impact of fertility treatments on HS, and the impact of HS treatments on fertility. METHODS: An anonymous, online survey was disseminated through HS support groups from June to July 2022. Respondents aged 18-50 who were assigned female sex at birth were eligible for participation. Comparative statistics were performed using t tests/χ2 tests to assess associations between respondents' demographics and survey responses. RESULTS: Among the 312 respondents (80.8% White, mean age 35.7 ± 7.4 [range 18-50]), two-thirds of respondents (66.6%, 207/311) had been pregnant before and 79.5% (248/312) had ever tried to conceive. 41.5% (103/248) had unsuccessfully tried to conceive for 12 months or more. Of the 59 respondents who had never attempted to conceive, 39% reported that HS had impacted this decision. Amongst respondents who experienced fertility challenges but did not pursue fertility treatments, top barriers to fertility treatments include concerns about financial support/insurance coverage (47.5%, 29/61) and fertility treatments worsening HS (21.3%, 13/61). Most respondents who used fertility treatments reported either no change (73.7%, 28/38 or 77.8%, 14/18) or improvement (15.8%, 6/38 or 11.1%, 2/18) in their HS symptoms with oral or injectable medications. Respondents were most concerned about the effects of oral antibiotics (44.9%, 140/312), followed by hormonal medications (38.8%, 121/312) and biologics (35.9%, 112/312) on fertility. CONCLUSION: Females with HS reported high rates of infertility compared to the general population. The majority reported no change in HS symptoms with fertility treatments, and clinicians can use this finding to help counsel patients during family planning discussions. Further research in the field of HS and fertility is needed.

Hormonal Treatments in Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is an inflammatory skin condition characterized by recurrent abscesses, nodules, and sinus tracts. Hormones are thought to play an important role in HS pathophysiology, but there is a lack of an updated review on hormonal treatments in HS.  Objective: Perform a systematic review of the literature on hormonal treatments in patients with HS.  Methods: In April 2022, MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched for articles on hormonal treatments in HS. Non-English, duplicate, and irrelevant results were excluded. Data extraction was performed by two reviewers.  Results: From 1952 to 2022, 30 articles (634 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Anti-androgen treatments discussed include finasteride (n=8), spironolactone (n=7), cyproterone acetate (CPA) (n=5), flutamide (n=1), leuprolide (n=1), and buserelin acetate (n=1). Metabolic treatments reported include metformin (n=8) and liraglutide (n=2). Three articles on hormonal contraceptives and 2 articles on testosterone were included. Of the articles which reported response rates, 62.8% (27/43) of patients improved with finasteride, 53.3% (32/60) with CPA mono/combination therapy, 50.5% (51/101) with spironolactone, and 46.0% (74/161) with metformin. Improvement in HS was also noted in case reports of patients treated with buserelin acetate, leuprolide, flutamide, and liraglutide.    Conclusions: Hormonal treatments for HS, especially finasteride, spironolactone, and metformin, are efficacious and safe; but large-scale randomized controlled trials are needed to determine the patient populations which would benefit from these therapies. Masson R, Shih T, Jeong C, et al. Hormonal treatments in hidradenitis suppurativa: a systematic review. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(8):785-794. doi:10.36849/JDD.7325.

Efficacy of procedural treatments for pediatric hidradenitis suppurativa: A systematic review.

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a painful, inflammatory skin disease that has historically been understudied in the pediatric population. Procedural interventions, such as surgical excisions, skin grafts, and lasers, are important for comprehensive HS disease management. However, there is a lack of data on procedural treatments for HS in pediatric patients. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review of the literature on the efficacy and safety of procedural treatments for HS in pediatric patients. In April 2022, MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched for articles on the efficacy of procedural treatments for HS in patients <18 years of age. Two independent reviewers extracted data from relevant studies. From 1974 to 2021, 23 articles with 81 patients were identified. Patients' Hurley stages included stage I (9.1%, 1/11), II (36.4%, 4/11), and III (54.5%, 6/11). The most extensively studied procedural interventions include negative pressure wound therapy (n = 30), surgical excision with skin graft/flap (n = 19), and endoscopic electrode or laser treatment (n = 11). In all, promising response rates for procedural management strategies were observed in the literature but the findings were largely based on case reports/series. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), especially those geared toward minimally invasive procedural treatments, are needed to help guide clinicians on the most efficacious treatment modalities for pediatric patients with HS.

Efficacy of medical treatments for pediatric hidradenitis suppurativa: A systematic review.

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, inflammatory skin condition that has been insufficiently studied in the pediatric population. Timely and effective medical treatments may improve quality of life, mitigate disease burden, and prevent the need for invasive procedural interventions such as surgical excisions. However, there is a paucity of research on the efficacy of medical management strategies for HS in children and adolescents. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review of the literature on the efficacy and safety of medical treatments for HS in patients <18 years of age. In April 2022, MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched for articles on the efficacy of medical treatments for HS in the pediatric population. Between 1984 and 2022, 35 articles (101 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Most patients had Hurley Stage II disease (46.7%, 35/75) followed by Stage I (36%, 27/75), and Stage III (17.3%, 13/75). 100% (23/23) of patients responded to antibiotics, 100% (8/8) to finasteride, 93.9% (31/33) to biologics, 80% (4/5) to oral retinoids, and 50% (6/12) to metformin. Overall, this study demonstrates that medical treatment regimens can improve HS symptoms in pediatric patients, but the extent of improvement is unclear, and the results were largely based on case reports or case series. Prospective studies are warranted to better understand the efficacy and safety of medical treatments for pediatric HS. Clinical trials of HS therapies need to be inclusive of pediatric patients to help define the optimal timing of treatment initiation and guide patient selection.

Hyperhidrosis treatments in hidradenitis suppurativa: A systematic review.

Hyperhidrosis impairs quality of life (QOL) in hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) patients and may exacerbate HS. However, there is limited literature on whether hyperhidrosis treatments improve HS disease. To systematically review literature on efficacy and tolerability of hyperhidrosis treatments in HS patients. In May 2021, MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were systematically searched by two reviewers per PRISMA guidelines for articles on hyperhidrosis and HS. Sixteen articles met inclusion criteria (2 randomized controlled trials [RCTs], one case-control study, three cross-sectional studies, 10 case-studies/series), encompassing 252 HS patients across studies. They examined botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) (n = 6) and B (BTX-B) (n = 1), suction-curettage (n = 1), diode laser (n = 1), and microwave-based energy device (MED) (n = 3). Overall, BTX treatments improve HS severity, QOL, hyperhidrosis, and were well-tolerated. Suction-curettage did not improve disease. One HS patient tolerated diode laser well, with improvement in sweating and HS. One RCT studying MED was discontinued due to adverse events. Two studies reported MED-induced HS. BTX was overall helpful in HS patients, including in patients without concomitant hyperhidrosis. However, more prospective studies are needed to examine its utility in HS. There is potential harm of MEDs in HS. Most studies examining hyperhidrosis treatments in HS patients are low level of evidence. Larger RCTs should examine the efficacy and tolerability of hyperhidrosis treatments in HS.

Infliximab in hidradenitis suppurativa: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory often recalcitrant to treatment. There is a lack of an updated systematic data review for infliximab use in HS. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of literature on infliximab in HS. This study was performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and was pre-registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021283596). In 9/2021, MEDLINE and EMBASE were systematically searched for articles on infliximab in HS. Non-English, duplicate, and studies with <5 HS patients were excluded. Study quality was assessed utilizing Cochrane Risk of Bias for prospective trials and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort studies. Random effects meta-analytical model, Cochran's Q statistic, and I squared index were performed. Nineteen articles (314 patients) met inclusion criteria (six prospective, 13 retrospective studies). All patients with HS severity data available (n = 299) had moderate-to-severe disease. Outcome measures used for meta-analysis of the pooled response rate were largely based on clinician reported outcomes (16 studies). One utilized both clinician and patient assessment. Two utilized patient-reported response alone. The pooled response rate of HS patients to infliximab was 83% (95% CI, 0.71-0.91). The most common adverse events (AEs) included non-serious infections (13.2%) and infusion reaction (2.9%). The rate of serious AEs was 2.9%. Study limitations include the small number of prospective studies and heterogeneity between studies. Overall, infliximab is an effective treatment for moderate-to-severe HS. Efficacy of infliximab in HS should be compared to other biologics in larger, randomized controlled trials.

Midterm Results of the Supera Stent for the Treatment of Femoropopliteal Occlusive Disease.

BACKGROUND: The Supera (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA) stent is an interwoven nitinol, shape-memory stent with high strength and flexibility characteristics which are purported to increase resistance to kinking and compression. The purpose of this study was to review single-center outcomes of the use of this stent in the femoropopliteal segment. METHODS: We performed a single-center, retrospective analysis of patients who underwent Supera stent placement for femoropopliteal occlusive disease from 2016-2019. Data was collected on patient demographics and procedural details. Follow-up imaging data, including duplex imaging and ankle-brachial indices, and clinical data were abstracted from encounter notes. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients with 72 unique Supera stent placements were identified. Mean age was 76 and 69% were male. 56% of patients had severe calcification and 11% had moderate calcification. 48% of lesions were Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus Document C or D lesions. Primary patency rates at 12, 24, and 36 months were 85%, 82%, and 75%, respectively. Primary patency was not affected significantly by lesion length, degree of calcification, number of outflow vessels, concomitant interventions, or stent size. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate sustained primary patency with the Supera stent over a 3-year interval in treatment of patients with femoropopliteal occlusive disease, including in the setting of severely calcified vessels.

Multiple Primary Melanomas Occurring Around the Same Time: A Review of Terminology and Implications.

Multiple primary melanomas (MPMs) have been reported to occur in 2-10% of melanoma patients. This study conducted a review of the literature to elucidate the definitions of terminology used to describe MPMs that were diagnosed in close temporal proximity as well as explore common risk factors. Terminology found in the literature included “concurrent”, “simultaneous” and “synchronous” with varying definitions that ranged from 0-6 months between diagnoses of the first and subsequent melanomas. Eight cases are described in chronological order, and the incidence of MPMs diagnosed around the same time were reported as 22-39%. Nevus spilus was identified as a potential risk factor for MPMs. This study highlights that MPMs are not uncommon, and clinicians should remain aware that MPMs can be diagnosed at or around the same time, warranting thorough skin exams. J Drugs Dermatol. 2020;19(5): doi:10.36849/JDD.2020.4953.

No-shows to hidradenitis suppurativa clinic visits: Patient perspectives.

Background: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a debilitating chronic inflammatory skin condition that typically requires consistent care. Contributory factors to why patients with HS miss their clinic appointments have not been investigated. Objectives: This article seeks to characterise reasons that HS patients do not keep their appointments and identify strategies to minimise no-show rates and improve delivery of care to HS patients. Methods: An anonymous survey was distributed to online HS support groups. Results: Of the 254 respondents, 18.9% reported ever missing an appointment for HS. Common reasons for missing an appointment include: patient was experiencing an HS flare (72.9%), prior poor experience with a healthcare provider (54.2%) or healthcare staff member (37.5%), embarrassment of condition (41.7%), and distrust that the appointment would help with management of HS (39.6%). Respondents who were non-White, who were disabled, or who had lower socioeconomic status were more likely to have missed an appointment (p < 0.05). Conclusions: This study highlights areas where dermatologists may help improve appointment attendance, including encouraging patients to seek care during flares and striving to optimise the patient experience.

Perspectives of Emergency Medicine Physicians on Hidradenitis Suppurativa Care.

Introduction: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic skin condition that often requires acute care during periods of flares, with many patients visiting the emergency department over 5 times before receiving a proper diagnosis. However, little is known about emergency medicine (EM) providers' experiences and knowledge of HS management. Methods: In this study, an anonymous survey was distributed to EM providers to identify knowledge and practice gaps in HS care. Results: The results showed that most respondents lacked confidence in HS diagnosis and management, especially in knowing available treatment options and managing patients with moderate to severe HS. Attendings were more confident than non-attendings in diagnosing and managing HS, and providers who saw more HS patients per month were more confident in referring patients to appropriate specialists. Over 80% of respondents referred HS patients to dermatology, which is an important initial step in HS management. Conclusion: The study highlights the importance of educating EM providers in HS recognition, timely referral to dermatology, and initial management to improve quality of life among patients and mitigate disease progression.

Low Rates of Psychosocial Screening and Lifestyle Counseling in Hidradenitis Suppurativa Patients in the USA.

Introduction: Although hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is associated with psychosocial comorbidities such as depression as well as modifiable comorbidities such as obesity, rates of psychosocial screening and lifestyle counseling in the USA have not been characterized. Methods: This cross-sectional study utilized publicly available data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) between 2008 and 2018 to identify visits with a diagnosis of HS (ICD-9 code 705.83, ICD-10 code L73.2). T tests and multivariate logistic regressions analyzed trends in rates of screening and counseling while controlling for race, sex, and age. Survey weights are applied to each visit to represent a national sample. Results: Depression screening was completed in only 2% of reported visits. No visits reported screening for alcohol misuse, substance abuse, or domestic violence. There were low rates of counseling for weight reduction (7.8%), diet and nutrition (3.3%), exercise (2.4%), smoking (1.0%), and substance abuse (0.7%). Black patients and individuals with public health insurance received less screening and counseling overall. Conclusion: Rates of psychosocial screening and counseling on lifestyle modifications are low in ambulatory clinic visits for HS patients, and there are disparities based on race and insurance status. Implementing strategies to incorporate routine psychosocial screening and lifestyle counseling into visits may improve HS patient outcomes.

COVID-19 Infection in Hidradenitis Suppurativa Patients: A Retrospective Study.

Introduction: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is associated with comorbidities that are risk factors for severe COVID-19 infection. We evaluated demographics and COVID-19 outcomes in HS patients. Methods: HS patients with COVID-19 (HS+/COVID+) and a randomized age-, race-, and sex-matched control population of patients without HS with COVID-19 (HS-/COVID+) were selected through a retrospective chart review. Data were collected on demographics, medications, comorbidities, vaccination status, and COVID-19 treatment/outcomes. Fisher's exact test was used to analyze the relationship between risk factors and COVID-19 outcomes. A p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: There were 58 HS+/COVID+ patients, primarily African American (83%, n = 48) and female (88%, n = 51). Compared to HS+/COVID+ patients, HS-/COVID+ patients were significantly more likely to have cardiovascular disease (51% vs. 24%; p = 0.0029) and be pregnant (23% vs. 4%; p = 0.0093). HS+/COVID+ and HS-/COVID+ patients did not vary significantly in vaccination rate at time of COVID-19 diagnosis (6% vs. 5%; p = 0.78). HS-/COVID+ patients were significantly more likely to have COVID-19 complications (35% vs. 7%; p = 0.001) and receive COVID-19 treatment (37% vs. 7%; p = 0.0001) when compared to HS+/COVID+ patients. Conclusion: Our findings support the growing evidence that having HS itself may not be a risk factor for severe COVID-19 outcomes.

Expert consensus on priority research gaps in dietary and lifestyle factors in hidradenitis suppurativa: a Delphi consensus study.

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a debilitating systemic inflammatory disease with limited treatment options. Although management through dietary and lifestyle changes is a primary interest of the HS patient community, there is lack of consensus regarding recommendations due to the paucity of evidence. To establish the priority research gaps on this topic, we performed and moderated a Delphi consensus study by integrating expert opinions and the relevant literature. Based on a literature review, research questions on dietary and lifestyle interventions in HS were constructed. HS dietary and lifestyle research questions were sent to an expert panel, consisting of 22 international members, including dermatologists, dietitians, pharmacists, and endocrinologists. Voting on the research questions was conducted using a modified Delphi technique. The primary outcome measure was whether participants could reach consensus on the priority of each research question in the HS dietary and lifestyle factors. After three rounds of surveys investigating the relationships between HS and various diet and lifestyle factors, "BMI", "Obesity", and "Smoking", reached consensus as high priority research questions. Low research priorities per consensus included "effects of iron supplements", "effects of magnesium supplements", "alcohol consumption" and "limiting Brewer's yeast intake. Smoking and obesity were identified as important research questions, concurrent to the literature indicating their association with more significant impact on disease activity. By shedding light on high priority research questions, our study provides a roadmap for further research on dietary and lifestyle modifications in HS and will help determine evidence-based lifestyle and dietary recommendations for patients with HS.

Wound drainage measurements: a narrative review.

Drainage from chronic wounds can significantly negatively impact a patient's quality of life. Change in severity of wound drainage is an important measure of treatment efficacy for wounds. This study reviews existing tools used to assess wound drainage. Qualitative drainage tools are overall less burdensome, and however, differences in user interpretation may reduce inter-rater reliability. Quantitative drainage tools enable more reliable comparisons of drainage severity and treatment response between patients but sometimes require equipment to administer, increasing responder burden. Gaps in the current wound drainage measurement landscape are highlighted. Many of the existing scales have not been validated in robust studies. There is also a lack of validated global drainage measurement tools for patients with chronic inflammatory skin disorders with drainage, such as hidradenitis suppurativa or pyoderma gangrenosum. Development of a succinct drainage measurement tool for inflammatory skin diseases where drainage is a prominent symptom will improve monitoring of meaningful treatment response.

Unique Treatment for Alopecia Areata Combining Epinephrine With an Intralesional Steroid.

Alopecia areata (AA) is an autoimmune disorder characterized by well-demarcated patches of hair loss with preservation of the hair follicle (HF). It generally is a nonscarring alopecia that can be extensive and refractory to treatment. We propose modification to an already widely used first-line treatment by diluting intralesional triamcinolone acetonide (ILTA) to 2.5 mg/mL in 1% lidocaine and epinephrine 1:100,000 in place of normal saline (NS). Our 2 cases of severe AA are among many in our practice that responded with seemingly permanent hair regrowth using this novel combination regimen. We hypothesize that local vasoconstriction due to epinephrine potentiates the ILTA and that epinephrine also may play an independent role.

Improving hidradenitis suppurativa patient education using written action plan: a randomized controlled trial.

The waxing-and-waning nature of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), complex treatment plans, along with variable responsiveness to therapy, can create management challenges for patients. In this pilot cross-over randomized controlled trial, we aim to evaluate the effectiveness a HS-written action plan (HSWAP) on patient disease understanding and confidence in recognizing flares and adjusting management. Participants were randomized into a pre-crossover control group that received a verbal consultation (VC)-only, and an intervention group which received the VC + HSWAP. The pre-crossover control group then crossed over (post-crossover control) to also receive the VC + HSWAP (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04600375). Patient comprehension of their disease and management steps was high after both a thorough VC and HSWAPs. However, the majority of patients prefer receiving both a VC and a HSWAP. After the addition of the HSWAP, pre-crossover control group patients' understanding and confidence of their disease and management plan increased across all surveyed questions.

Allergen Composition, Marketing Claims, and Affordability of Pediatric Sunscreens.

BACKGROUND: Childhood sun exposure is associated with development of future skin cancers. Sunscreens are an important tool to prevent harmful ultraviolet rays. OBJECTIVES: The aims of the study are to evaluate sunscreens targeted to children and to analyze cost, marketing claims, ingredients, and allergens to help consumers select products. METHODS: The top 50 pediatric sunscreens across retailers were analyzed for their cost, marketing claims, ingredients, vehicles, and containers. Ingredients were compared with the American Contact Dermatology Society 2020 Core Allergen List. RESULTS: The mean price was $6.20 per ounce (range, $0.25-$39.98). The mean sun protection factor was 48.5 (range, 30-100; SD, 48.5). There was a mean of 17.5 ingredients and a mean of 1.1 allergens in products. On average, products marketed as "sensitive skin" were not only significantly more expensive ($8.90 vs $3.50 per ounce, P = 0.01) but also were significantly more likely to not contain any allergens (36.0%, n = 18 vs 12%, n = 6; P = 0.05). Products with mineral-only UV blockers were significantly less likely to have any allergen when compared with products that had chemical UV blockers (5.6%, n = 1 vs 94.4%, n = 17; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The current market of pediatric sunscreens varies significantly in price, marketing claims, and active ingredients. Products marked as suitable for sensitive skin had significantly fewer allergens, but a majority of these products still had at least one allergen. Many sunscreens contain contact allergens, which is an important selection consideration.

Biologic use in hidradenitis suppurativa: patient perspectives and barriers.

INTRODUCTION: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is an inflammatory dermatosis for which the treatment paradigm is rapidly expanding. We aimed to identify HS patient perspectives and barriers on biologics. METHODS: An anonymous survey was distributed between 10/2021 and 1/2022 through HS support groups. Data regarding demographics and perspectives on biologics were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 196 respondents, 92% were female (180/196) and 75% were white (147/196). 89.3% had Hurley stage 2/3 HS (102/195). The primary healthcare provider (HCP) for HS in 65% (128/196) of patients was a dermatologist, with 12% (23/196) seen at an HS specialty clinic. Most respondents never tried a biologic medicine (62%, 118/192). The top barriers to biologics were fear of side effects (61%, 109/179), high cost/lack of insurance coverage (46%, 83/179), frequency of weekly injections (32%, 58/179). Respondents reporting their main HCP as a non-dermatologist (4.11 vs 3.0, p < .0001) and not seen at a HS specialty clinic (3.5 vs 2.7, 0.039) were significantly more likely to agree 'I do not know enough about how biologics work to help my HS'. CONCLUSION: Our results highlight the importance of specialty care in the education and implementation of biologics. Patients may benefit from comprehensive discussion prior to starting biologics.