The effect of an intervention program on the knowledge and attitudes among medical staff regarding adverse drug reaction reporting.

PURPOSE: Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are a growing important public health problem; however, underreporting of ADRs is very common. The aim of the current study was to explore the effect of an intervention program on the knowledge and attitudes among physicians and nurses regarding ADRs reporting. METHODS: A multicentre study consisted of three phases: filling out a questionnaire; an intervention program; filling out the same questionnaire again. The intervention program consisted of posters, lectures, and distant electronic learning. The questionnaire contained questions about personal/professional demographic variables, and statements regarding knowledge and attitudes regarding ADR reporting. RESULTS: The data revealed that the intervention program significantly elevated the "Objective knowledge" (P < 0.01) and "Practical knowledge" (P < 0.02) score as compared to the control group, while no significant differences were found regarding "Acquired knowledge" (P = 0.14). Seniority (P = 0.01) and experience in internal medicine (P = 0.05) were demonstrated as significant factors determining the knowledge of the staff. Obligation was the main motive for reporting in 80% of participants. After the intervention, no differences were found in the "Attitude related to the motive for reporting" or "Attitude related to the commitment to report", between the two groups. However, "Attitude related to the need to report" score significantly improved after the intervention (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: The intervention program increased knowledge and attitudes regarding ADRs reports. Seniority had the most effect on the influence of the intervention program. The data from this study encourages the necessity to hold ongoing intervention programs in order to improve ADRs reporting rate.

Prospective observational study of young adult ischemic stroke patients.

OBJECTIVE: Ischemic stroke (IS) in young patients may differ in etiology and prognosis from later-life IS, which is much more common. A number of single-center and population-based cohorts of affected individuals have been published, but information on the long-term prognosis of these patients is limited. METHODS: IS patients (≤55 years), discharged over a 10-year period, were evaluated and prospectively followed. Subgroups were evaluated for type of stroke, antecedent risk factors (RF), long-term outcomes, and occupational status over several years of follow-up. RESULTS: 178 IS individuals from 2001-2010 were divided into older (46-55, n = 118) and younger (18-45, n = 60) age groups. Traditional RF-hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia-were significantly associated with IS, and increased with age. The distribution and type of IS were similar in both groups, except for an increase in small vessel IS among the older subgroup (p = .003). Of the evaluable patients at 5.1 ± 2.5 years of follow-up (n = 138), a similar proportion of patients in both subgroups had a recurrent IS, but no significant differences were found in most disability indices. Approximately one third of patients suffered from moderate to severe disability, and were unable to return to their prior work. CONCLUSIONS: Younger and older IS patients are generally predisposed from the same traditional RF which progress with age. Long-term disabilities tend to worsen over time due to recurrent vascular events. These data emphasize the need for a strategy for early identification of the already well-known stroke RF in younger stroke patients.

Increasing adverse drug reaction reporting-How can we do better?

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are associated with morbidity and mortality worldwide. Although national systems for reporting ADRs exist there is a low reporting rate. The aim of the current study was to evaluate an intervention plan for improving ADRs reporting among medical professionals (physicians and nurses). A multicentre intervention study was conducted, in which one medical centre was randomly assigned to the intervention group and two medical centres to the control group. The study consisted of 3 phases: baseline data collection, intervention and follow-up of the reporting rate. The questionnaire that was filled in at base line and at the end of study, contained questions about personal/professional demographic variables, and statements regarding knowledge of and behaviour toward ADRs reporting. The intervention program consisted of posters, lectures, distant electronic learning and reminders. An increase in the number of ADRs reports was noted in the intervention group (74 times higher than in the control group) during the intervention period, which was gradually decreased with as the study progressed (adjusted O.R = 74.1, 95% CI = 21.11-260.1, p<0.001). The changes in the "knowledge related to behaviour" (p = 0.01) and in the "behaviour related to reporting" (p<0.001) score was significantly higher in the intervention group. Specialist physicians and nurses (p<0.001), fulfilling additional positions (p<0.001) and those working in other places (p = 0.05) demonstrated a high rate of report. Lectures were preferable as a method to encourage ADRs reporting. The most convenient reporting tools were telephone and online reporting. Thus, implementation and maintenance of a continuous intervention program, by a pharmacovigilance specialist staff member, will improve ADRs reporting rates.