Urgent Follow-up after Outpatient Nonstress Tests and the Potential for Fetal Monitoring at Home.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to measure the proportion of patients needing urgent clinical follow-up after an abnormal outpatient nonstress test (NST). We further sought to capture the patient perspective on the acceptability of performing NSTs at home. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study was performed over a 2-year period to determine the frequency of abnormal NSTs in a hospital-based, antepartum testing unit in patients greater than or equal to 32 weeks' gestation. The proportion of patients who delivered within 24 hours of an abnormal NST was also determined. A cross-sectional, web-based patient survey was conducted to obtain insight into the patient's comfort level with potentially performing NSTs at home. RESULTS: The chart review yielded 665 patients who underwent 2,122 NSTs at greater than or equal to 32 weeks. Of the 2,122 NSTs, 111 were categorized as abnormal and required urgent clinical follow-up, or 5.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.3, 6.3%). Of the 665 patients, 13 delivered within 24 hours of an abnormal NST, or 2.0% (95% CI 1.0, 3.3%). In the web-based survey, the proportion of respondents who would feel comfortable or very comfortable conducting NSTs at home was 87/125, or 69.6% (95% CI 60.9, 77.1%). CONCLUSION: This study revealed that 5.2% of NSTs performed in a hospital-based antepartum testing unit were abnormal and required urgent clinical follow-up. Of the patients being followed in the antepartum testing unit, 2.0% delivered within 24 hours of an abnormal NST. The majority of the survey respondents indicated they would feel comfortable performing NSTs at home. The present study adds important information regarding the risks and benefits of NSTs at home. KEY POINTS: · Telehealth for NSTs offers advantages over in-person NSTs.. · The proportion of NSTs that need urgent follow-up was 5.2%.. · A majority of patients are interested in telehealth for NSTs.. · Guidelines are needed before adoption of telehealth for NSTs..

Distal Embolic Protection in Impella 5.0 Explantation: Loop and Snare Technique.

The left ventricular assist device Impella 5.0 (Abiomed Inc, Danvers, MA) has become widely accepted as a temporary mechanical circulatory support for patients in cardiogenic shock. The Impella 5.0 is placed through an anastomosed graft. When removing the device, blood clot formation has been noted in the anastomosed graft. The blood clot has been reported to dislodge and embolize distally, causing acute limb ischemia. Here, we present our simple, inexpensive, and effective "loop and snare" technique for safer device removal, preventing distal embolic complications. In our experience of 6 patients who had Impella 5.0 removal with this technique, the distal embolic complication was 0%.