RESUMEN
A 40-year-old woman underwent periocular plasma skin regeneration, a cosmetic treatment for periorbital rejuvenation. She subsequently developed bilateral thermal keratitis, manifesting as blurred vision, irritation, and redness, with a vision decrease to 20/60 and 20/50 in her OD and OS, respectively. Examination demonstrated bilateral large, irregular corneal epithelial defects and edema, necessitating treatment with amniotic membrane grafts, bandage contact lenses, and hypertonic saline. One year posttreatment, her visual acuity improved to 20/20 and 20/25, albeit with ongoing symptomatic dryness and bilateral anterior stromal haze. This case, as only the second reported instance of ocular damage from periocular plasma skin regeneration, underscores the need for heightened awareness of potential ocular complications following plasma skin regeneration and reinforces the importance of protective measures during periocular procedures.
Asunto(s)
Quemaduras Oculares , Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Quemaduras Oculares/inducido químicamente , Quemaduras Oculares/diagnóstico , Queratitis/diagnóstico , Queratitis/etiología , Queratitis/fisiopatología , Gases em Plasma/uso terapéutico , Regeneración/fisiología , Técnicas Cosméticas/efectos adversos , Agudeza VisualRESUMEN
PURPOSE: This study aims to address the infrequent but serious complication of globe injuries in blepharoplasty. METHODS: A case series of 3 patients with globe injuries postblepharoplasty is presented, along with a systematic literature review that revealed 13 previously reported cases. Quantitative and comparative analysis is described. RESULTS: Injuries ranged from deep thermal burns to full-thickness corneal or scleral lacerations, with one instance of traumatic cataract. The median time from surgery to symptom onset was 1 day, with a concerning median delay of 7 days to presentation to an ophthalmologist. Visual outcomes were generally poor, with nearly all patients experiencing permanent visual morbidity. The systematic review revealed 3 cases of endophthalmitis following perforating scleral injuries. Comparative analysis showed no significant differences in visual outcomes between penetrating and perforating injuries. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study emphasize the need for increased vigilance for globe injuries that require prompt ophthalmological evaluation following blepharoplasty, especially considering the observed delay in presentation and the extent of visual morbidity. The study advocates for improved practitioner training in recognizing and managing these complications and underscores the importance of patient education regarding the potential risks and the necessity of timely postoperative care.
Asunto(s)
Blefaroplastia , Lesiones Oculares Penetrantes , Humanos , Blefaroplastia/métodos , Blefaroplastia/efectos adversos , Lesiones de la Cornea/etiología , Lesiones de la Cornea/diagnóstico , Lesiones de la Cornea/cirugía , Lesiones Oculares Penetrantes/cirugía , Lesiones Oculares Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Lesiones Oculares Penetrantes/etiología , Esclerótica/lesiones , Esclerótica/cirugía , Agudeza VisualRESUMEN
PURPOSE: This study evaluates the efficacy of teprotumumab in reducing eyelid retraction in thyroid eye disease (TED) patients. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients with active or chronic moderate-to-severe TED who completed at least 4 cycles of teprotumumab. Patients with upper and/or lower eyelid retraction, defined as margin-to-reflex distance (MRD) 1 and/or MRD2 of more than 5 mm, in one or OU were included. The main outcome measure was a change in MRD1 and MRD2 after treatment. Changes in MRD1 and MRD2 were each analyzed for correlation (r) with changes in exophthalmolmetry. Student t test was performed for each comparison, and p values <0.05 were considered significant. RESULTS: The study included 91 patients, predominantly female (87%), with an average age of 52.02 ± 14.6 years. The mean baseline proptosis measurement was 21.8 ± 2.9 OD and 21.7 ± 3.3 OS. The average MRD1 was 5.5 ± 1.5 OD and 5.4 ± 1.7 OS, and the average MRD2 was 6.1 ± 1.1 OD and 6.2 ± 1.1 OS. The follow-up duration post-treatment was 37.5 ± 31.7 weeks. At first follow-up post-treatment, the mean change in proptosis, MRD1, and MRD2 were -2.6 ± 2.0 OD, -2.5 ± 2.1 OS, -0.8.5 ± 1.4 OD, -0.8 ± 1.0 OS, and -0.7 ± 0.9 OD, -0.8 ± 1.0 OS, respectively. Correlation analysis showed that proptosis reduction was positively correlated with MRD1 and MRD2 reduction at the first post-treatment follow-up (MRD1: r = 0.23, p value < 0.01; MRD2: r = 0.17, p = 0.03]. CONCLUSION: Teprotumumab treatment improves upper and lower eyelid retraction. The improvement in MRD correlated positively with proptosis reduction, indicating the influence of globe position on eyelid position.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: This study evaluates and compares the accuracy of responses from 2 artificial intelligence platforms to patients' oculoplastics-related questions. METHODS: Questions directed toward oculoplastic surgeons were collected, rephrased, and input independently into ChatGPT-3.5 and BARD chatbots, using the prompt: "As an oculoplastic surgeon, how can I respond to my patient's question?." Responses were independently evaluated by 4 experienced oculoplastic specialists as comprehensive, correct but inadequate, mixed correct and incorrect/outdated data, and completely incorrect. Additionally, the empathy level, length, and automated readability index of the responses were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 112 patient questions underwent evaluation. The rates of comprehensive, correct but inadequate, mixed, and completely incorrect answers for ChatGPT were 71.4%, 12.9%, 10.5%, and 5.1%, respectively, compared with 53.1%, 18.3%, 18.1%, and 10.5%, respectively, for BARD. ChatGPT showed more empathy (48.9%) than BARD (13.2%). All graders found that ChatGPT outperformed BARD in question categories of postoperative healing, medical eye conditions, and medications. Categorizing questions by anatomy, ChatGPT excelled in answering lacrimal questions (83.8%), while BARD performed best in the eyelid group (60.4%). ChatGPT's answers were longer and potentially more challenging to comprehend than BARD's. CONCLUSION: This study emphasizes the promising role of artificial intelligence-powered chatbots in oculoplastic patient education and support. With continued development, these chatbots may potentially assist physicians and offer patients accurate information, ultimately contributing to improved patient care while alleviating surgeon burnout. However, it is crucial to highlight that artificial intelligence may be good at answering questions, but physician oversight remains essential to ensure the highest standard of care and address complex medical cases.
Asunto(s)
Inteligencia Artificial , Humanos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Oftalmológicos/métodos , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
Purpose: To describe an immunocompetent patient with cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis after dexamethasone implant injection and review previously documented cases. Methods: A review of case reports and literature was performed. Results: A 75-year-old man presented with acute decreased vision in the left eye. He had a vitrectomy and membrane peeling for an epiretinal membrane with recurrent cystoid macular edema and was receiving intravitreal dexamethasone implant injections at an outside hospital. The visual acuity in the left eye was hand motions, and an examination found patchy retinal whitening with hemorrhages. Aqueous polymerase chain reaction was positive for CMV. The laboratory evaluation was negative for immunodeficiencies. He was treated successfully with intravitreal and oral antivirals; however, his vision remained poor at most recent follow-up. A literature review found 8 previous cases of CMV retinitis after dexamethasone implant injection, although most had underlying immune dysregulation. Conclusions: CMV retinitis after intravitreal dexamethasone implant injection is rare. Awareness of this complication is essential because of the risk for devastating blindness.