A Randomized Trial of Enteral Glutamine for Treatment of Burn Injuries.

BACKGROUND: Glutamine is thought to have beneficial effects on the metabolic and stress response to severe injury. Clinical trials involving patients with burns and other critically ill patients have shown conflicting results regarding the benefits and risks of glutamine supplementation. METHODS: In a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, we assigned patients with deep second- or third-degree burns (affecting ≥10% to ≥20% of total body-surface area, depending on age) within 72 hours after hospital admission to receive 0.5 g per kilogram of body weight per day of enterally delivered glutamine or placebo. Trial agents were given every 4 hours through a feeding tube or three or four times a day by mouth until 7 days after the last skin grafting procedure, discharge from the acute care unit, or 3 months after admission, whichever came first. The primary outcome was the time to discharge alive from the hospital, with data censored at 90 days. We calculated subdistribution hazard ratios for discharge alive, which took into account death as a competing risk. RESULTS: A total of 1209 patients with severe burns (mean burn size, 33% of total body-surface area) underwent randomization, and 1200 were included in the analysis (596 patients in the glutamine group and 604 in the placebo group). The median time to discharge alive from the hospital was 40 days (interquartile range, 24 to 87) in the glutamine group and 38 days (interquartile range, 22 to 75) in the placebo group (subdistribution hazard ratio for discharge alive, 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80 to 1.04; P = 0.17). Mortality at 6 months was 17.2% in the glutamine group and 16.2% in the placebo group (hazard ratio for death, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.80 to 1.41). No substantial between-group differences in serious adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with severe burns, supplemental glutamine did not reduce the time to discharge alive from the hospital. (Funded by the U.S. Department of Defense and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research; RE-ENERGIZE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00985205.).

Augmented Reality-Assisted Design of Local Flaps: A New Practical and Educational Tool in the Field of Plastic Surgery.

ABSTRACT: Augmented reality (AR) is a new and promising technology that has been incorporated into several aspects of our everyday life, including surgery. Examples of its application throughout various fields of surgery, although most of them are in experimental stage, have already been demonstrated and published. In this article, we describe the utilization of AR to design effectively and accurately surgical flap markings just with the help of an AR-compatible mobile phone and a low-cost application. We believe that, due to its ease of use, AR will play a pivotal role to the education and the training in the field of plastic surgery and burns, and other surgical specialties alike.

Acute Management of Thermal Hand Burns in Adults: A 10-Year Review of the Literature.

INTRODUCTION: Advances in the evidence base of acute thermal hand burns help to guide the management of these common injuries. The aim of this literature review was to evaluate recent evidence in the field over 10 years. METHODS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols methodology was used as a guide for this literature review. PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Google Scholar were searched for English language articles related to hand burns published between 2009 and 2018 inclusive, and the Cochrane Library was reviewed. Exclusion criteria were as follows: participants younger than 18 years, scar or contracture management, rehabilitation, outcomes assessment, late reconstruction, and electrical or chemical burns. RESULTS: An initial search retrieved 6493 articles, which was narrowed to 403 full-text articles that were reviewed independently by 3 of the authors and categorized. Of 202 included articles, there were 8 randomized controlled trials and 2 systematic reviews. Six evidence-based guidelines were reviewed. Referral of hand burns to specialist centers, use of telemedicine, early excision and grafting, and immediate static splintage have been recommended. Enzymatic debridement results in earlier intervention, more accurate burn assessment, preservation of vital tissue, and fewer skin grafts, and ideally requires regional anesthesia. Guidance on escharotomy emphasizes indication, technique and adequate intervention, and potential for enzymatic debridement. Inclusion of topical negative pressure, dermal regenerative templates, acellular dermal matrices, and noncellular skin substitutes in management has helped improve scar and functional outcomes. DISCUSSION: The results of this literature review demonstrate that multiple national and international societies have published burns guidelines during the decade studied, with aspects directly relevant to hand burns, including the International Society for Burn Injuries guidelines. There are opportunities for evidence-based quality improvement across the field of hand burns in many centers. CONCLUSIONS: More than 200 articles globally in 10 years outline advances in the understanding of acute management of thermal hand burns. Incorporating the evidence base into practice may facilitate optimization of triage referral pathways and acute management for hand burns.

The prominent antihelix and helix--the myth of the 'overcorrected' ear in otoplasty.

BACKGROUND: Classic teaching of ear anatomy in the context of otoplasty states that if the antihelical fold is more prominent than the helical fold after surgery then the ear is "overcorrected." We set out to explore the role of the antihelix in normal ear anatomy, its relevance to aesthetic perceptions of the ear, and a snapshot of its incidence in nonoperated ears. METHODS: To readily identify junior staff in our department, their color photographs, names, and contact details are posted on every ward. Using digital methods, we cropped the left ear out of the source images, making them unidentifiable. Clinical and nonclinical staff in our unit were asked to choose their favorite and their least favorite ears based on their aesthetic appeal. Responses were tabulated and the 2 most popular ears were compared. RESULTS: The preferred ear did not conform to the traditional dogma because it had a prominent antihelix and was statistically significant when compared to other choices. We also noted that a prominent antihelix is common among the general population and among colleagues within the department, and hence "normal." Also interesting was that the helix of the ear chosen as the most aesthetic was also the ear where the helix was almost touching the side of the head. CONCLUSIONS: We found that when judging the aesthetic nature of the "virgin" ear, antihelical fold prominence did not appear to be a negative attribute. Indeed, we noted that a prominent antihelix was a common attribute, and we conclude that this was a normal variant without undue negative aesthetic stigma. A surgically corrected ear should not necessarily be regarded as a poor outcome simply on the basis of antihelical prominence. Furthermore, we postulate that patients who have a prominent antihelix might be part of a spectrum of individuals who might have had the subtype of prominent ears featuring a deep conchal bowl. Finally, although not tested directly, it appears that we do not have an idea of our own ear shape, as none of the participants was able to recognize their own ear from the photographs.

The discrete scar in prominent ear correction: a digital 3-dimensional analysis to determine the ideal incision for otoplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Various postauricular incision sites can be used for prominent ear correction depending on technique and surgeon preference. No study has previously looked at the most aesthetic (least visible) location for the postauricular scar. We investigated the visibility of various scar locations on the posterior ear from a third person perspective through a "Visibility Arc"-a formal assessment of the range of degrees where a particular scar is visible. The objective was to determine the least visible incision-that is, the scar with the shortest visibility arc. METHODS: Normal ears were marked with 3 different color markers to simulate postoperative scar position, namely, (1) black in auriculocephalic sulcus, (2) blue in the sulcus of the antihelical fold/groove, and (3) green between black and blue. Starting laterally from the right ear toward the left ear, each head was photographed across 180 degrees posteriorly, at 10-degree intervals to determine which colored line (corresponding to a particular scar location) was visible over what "visibility arc." RESULTS: Forty individual ears were analyzed. Scars located in the sulcus of the antihelical fold had the shortest average visible arc, which was a 70-degree arc. The auriculocephalic sulcus had the largest visibility arc, and was most obvious of all of the scar locations-a 100-degree arc. The scar location in between these 2 locations had an 80-degree arc. CONCLUSIONS: The least visible scar for pinnaplasty rests in the groove of the antihelix posteriorly, with scars slightly medial to this almost as discrete. The most visible scars when viewed from behind will be those in the "traditional" location of the auriculocephalic sulcus.

The Mersey Burns App: evolving a model of validation.

INTRODUCTION: 'Mersey Burns App' is a smartphone/tablet application that aids in the assessment of total burn surface area (TBSA) and calculation of fluid resuscitation protocols in burns. This paper presents two studies assessing the speed and accuracy of calculations using Mersey Burns (App) in comparison with a Lund and Browder chart (paper) when a burn is assessed by medical students and clinicians. METHODS: The first study compared the speed and accuracy of TBSA and resuscitation calculation for a photograph of a burn with App and paper using burns and plastics and emergency medicine trainees and consultants. Developing on some of the feedback and results of that study, a second study was then carried out using burns-naive medical students assessing a fully simulated burn with both modalities. Preference and ease of use of each modality were assessed anonymously. RESULTS: The clinician study showed a lower variance in TBSA and fluid calculations using the App (p<0.05). The student study showed no difference in mean TBSA estimations (p=0.7). Mean time to completion of calculations was faster and calculations were more likely to be correct with the App (p<0.001). Students favoured the App in the following categories: preference in emergency setting, confidence in output, accuracy, speed, ease of calculation, overall use and shading (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Mersey Burns App can facilitate quicker and more accurate calculations than Lund and Browder charts. Students also preferred the App. This suggests a useful role for the App in the care of patients with burns by inexperienced staff.

A cost-effective and simple electronic solution to communication with patients with tracheostomy in a burns and intensive care setting.

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: Ventilated patients in ITU (intensive treatment unit) tend to be challenging to communicate with, especially patients who are being weaned. These patients usually have tracheostomy in situ and use means such as writing or letter boards to communicate. The situation becomes complex in patient groups that have burn injuries with bulky dressings and restricted upper limb function. We demonstrate a low cost, easy to use, potentially disposable system that can display words on any television screen via patient input device for such patient groups. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The system consists of input device incorporated with Arduino microcontroller (an open-source electronics prototyping platform based on easy-to-use hardware and software intended for creating interactive environments) and 4 generously oversized control buttons. These are used to control the cursor movements (up, down, left, right) while a fifth has a "select" function. These are large enough to be pressed by an entire bandaged hand using gross upper limb movements only. A standard television is used to display menu containing the 26 letters of the alphabet and a flashing cursor. The patient selects the required letters/icon by moving the cursor and the words so created are displayed along the lower part of the screen for the carers to read. It is envisaged that anyone with basic craft skills should be able to construct this device. CONCLUSION: This device is a self-contained, cost-effective, simple, and open-source system that can be used effectively to bridge the communication gap with significant potential for patient care globally.

The postauricular fascia: classification, anatomy, and potential surgical applications.

In recent times, there has been evolving interest in the fascial structure of the ear, especially in relation to otoplasty techniques. Although the fascial tissues used in these procedures are referred to as "postauricular/retroauricular fascia," the sparse anatomical studies that exist use this terminology to describe what is the adjacent thicker and more fibrous structure of the superficial temporal area continuous with the mastoid region, rather than the tissue actually used in these procedures which is adherent to the posterior surface of the ear. There are clear clinical differences in the properties of these two structures, and this study set out to identify the anatomical nature of these differences, looking in detail at the anatomy and vascularity of the fascia directly posterior and adherent to the ear itself, highlighting its unique properties, and how it interfaces with the rest of the fascia. We provide a nomenclature to differentiate the fascia adherent to the posterior of the ear (the intrinsic postauricular fascia) from the more fibrous tissues continuous with the scalp fascia (the extrinsic postauricular fascia). Clinical applications for the fascia are suggested based on the vascularity and anatomy described, and our clinical experience.

Combined carbon dioxide laser with photodynamic therapy for nodular and superficial basal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) are often seen by general practitioners, plastic surgeons, and dermatologists in the outpatient setting. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) and CO2 laser when used as monotherapy have been successfully used to treat small BCC, with greatest success in the superficial histological subtype but have limitations compared to surgical excision due to a limited depth of penetration of PDT (2 mm absorption) limiting efficacy. We describe our experience of dual-modality treatment improving efficacy, cosmetic outcomes, and minimizing recurrence. METHODS: One hundred ten patients with a total of 177 lesions mainly on the head and neck were treated with combined therapy using an UltraPulse CO2 laser and PDT using methyl aminolevulinate (METVIX) at the same sitting, with repeat PDT 1 week later. We evaluated recurrences, cosmetic outcomes, patient satisfaction, and costs. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 67 years. The mean follow-up period was 32.2 months, with a range of 7.7 to 68.5 months. Eighty six lesions were followed up for more than 3 years. A total of 177 lesions were diagnosed and treated. Only biopsy-proven BCCs were included in this study. Histologically, 34 (19.2%) were superficial subtype, 50 (28.2%) nodular, 9 (5.08%) infiltrative, 7 (3.95%) morpheic, 3 (1.69%) mixed, and in 74 (41.8%) diagnosis was simply BCC. All lesions responded to treatment as assessed by clinical evaluation with regular follow-up. The total recurrence-free rate was 97.1%. In 88.1% lesions, a single cycle of treatment was required; 9.03% had 2 cycles and 0.56% underwent 3 cycles. In 3 of the patients, no data were available. Recurrences were noted in 5 (2.82%) cases. All recurrences were treated successfully, all but one using repeat laser-PDT. One patient underwent surgical excision. No significant complications were encountered, although mild hypopigmentation was occasionally seen and some discomfort is experienced with PDT. CONCLUSIONS: Combined CO2 laser and PDT have equivalent cure rates to surgery for BCCs--notably of the nodular subtype--these modalities acting synergistically. This strategy provides cure often with scarless outcomes as illustrated. Laser with PDT is most appropriate for patients who value excellent cosmetic outcomes and where avoidance of an invasive procedure is an important factor. In addition, this modality comes into its own for specific groups of patients, such as those on Warfarin or those with diffuse or multiple lesions.

Carbon dioxide laser for precise and bloodless contouring of soft tissue ahead of skin grafting-A case example of technique and benefits.

Scarring is a dynamic development as a result of the wound healing process. Post-burn scars are often hypertrophic in nature and thus exhibit a much thicker and firmer scar, often leading to contractures. Various strategies have been implemented by burns surgeons to endeavour to mitigate and improve such symptoms and appearances. Laser therapy in the control of hypertrophic scarring is of continual developing interest within this field. We demonstrate the advantageous, intra-operative use of a carbon dioxide laser for precise contouring of a burn scar prior to skin grafting in a 36 year-old female with hypertrophic scarring following a 65% total body surface area flash flame burn. This method provided a bloodless surgical field with no post-operative complications, good graft take and a favourable cosmetic outcome.

Clinical review: the critical care management of the burn patient.

Between 4 and 22% of burn patients presenting to the emergency department are admitted to critical care. Burn injury is characterised by a hypermetabolic response with physiologic, catabolic and immune effects. Burn care has seen renewed interest in colloid resuscitation, a change in transfusion practice and the development of anti-catabolic therapies. A literature search was conducted with priority given to review articles, meta-analyses and well-designed large trials; paediatric studies were included where adult studies were lacking with the aim to review the advances in adult intensive care burn management and place them in the general context of day-to-day practical burn management.

The evidence base for the acellular dermal matrix AlloDerm: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Many decellularized dermal matrices are available with various applications, all with slight differences. AlloDerm appears to have the greatest presence in the literature. The purpose of this systematic review is to provide an overview of the experience with AlloDerm, stratified by clinical indication. METHODS: A literature search was performed across Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Collaboration using the search terms "AlloDerm" and "acellular dermal matrix." Two independent authors applied a priori inclusion and exclusion criteria. Relevant articles were categorized by application, type of study, and evidence level. RESULTS: A total of 753 articles met the initial inclusion criteria, and 311 remained after discarding irrelevant articles: skin (25), head and neck (82), breast (34), trunk (66), pelvis (10), extremities (8), and basic science (86). Non-basic science study designs included 32 analytic articles (3 randomized controlled trials and 29 observational studies including 11 cohort studies, 1 cross-sectional study, and 17 case-controlled studies), 192 descriptive articles (106 case series, 51 case reports, 2 cross-sectional studies, and 33 qualitative studies), and 1 systematic review. More than 85% of articles had a level of evidence of 4 or 5. Articles showed outcomes that were 70% positive, 23% neutral, and 7% negative. CONCLUSIONS: AlloDerm has many clinical uses with promising results. Most evidence lies in descriptive and nonrandomized studies, but randomized trials are emerging. Cost and logistics of large trials with these products make large-scale trials challenging but necessary. Emphasis needs to shift to randomized controlled trials focusing on areas where most clinical benefit can be realized.

Application of topical negative pressure (vacuum-assisted closure) to split-thickness skin grafts: a structured evidence-based review.

INTRODUCTION: Significant controversy surrounds the effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy although it has been in use for decades. Although many clinicians favor this modality in relation to its practicality, ease of use especially in complex wounds, it has faced the same challenges as other dressings in relation to evidence base of efficacy in relation to a number of outcome measures. In view of the current financial pressures on health care systems worldwide, this structured review systematically challenges the evidence for perioperative application of topical negative pressure (TNP) to split-thickness skin grafts (STSGs) through evidence-based critical appraisal, and extrapolate the mechanisms of action on the mechanisms through which TNP may aid wound healing. Weighted evidence-based recommendations regarding the impact of TNP on split skin graft quality and quantity of take as outcomes. METHODS: Phase 1: Structured literature search. Phase 2: Retrieved articles were critically appraised for rigor and methodological validity by 3 independent authors, then stratified according to a validated "levels of evidence" framework. Graded "current best evidence" recommendations could therefore be proposed. RESULTS: Of the 220 studies retrieved in the initial search, 38 studies satisfied our quality of evidence criteria. Current best evidence supports 2 complementary trends explaining the mechanisms whereby STSG benefits from TNP. Active stimulation of epithelial mitosis: TNP creates mechanical stretch which stimulates multiple signaling pathways up-regulating growth- and mitosis-associated epithelial transcription factors. Topical negative pressure also promotes microcirculatory flow (graft and wound edge), stimulates angiogenesis and basement membrane integrity (grade C). Prevention of complications: significant reduction of graft lift-off by edema, exudates, subgraft hematoma, and reduction of shear when compared to traditional dressings (grade B). Topical negative pressure promotes significant qualitative improvement in the final STSG result studies (level 1B). The role of TNP in prevention of infection is, however, equivocal and further research is required. No evidence of harm from TNP application was reported. CONCLUSIONS: Topical negative pressure increases quantity and quality of split skin graft take compared to traditional bolster dressings. The advantages are increased in irregularly contoured, technically difficult wounds and suboptimal recipient wound beds where it seems to be the best modality currently available. Large-scale randomized clinical controlled trials remain scanty in all areas of wound dressing research including negative pressure therapy.

Review of Burn Resuscitation: Is Plasmalyte® a Comparable Alternative to Ringer's Lactate?

Ringer's lactate has been the most widely used fluid for burn resuscitation for decades. Plasmalyte® (PL), a newer balanced crystalloid, is gaining popularity for use in the critically ill, including patients with burns. This popularity is partly due to the fact that PL theoretically offers a favorable metabolic profile, but may also be attributed to its relatively lower cost. Patients who are critically ill with large burns receive enormous volumes of fluids, especially during the resuscitation period. The choice of balanced crystalloid solution used is likely to have an impact on the metabolic status of patients and their overall outcomes. The choice of fluid for burn resuscitation has been one of the most researched topics in burn care and various types of fluids have been superseded based on research findings. This narrative review examines the evidence guiding fluid management in burns and explores the data supporting the use of balanced crystalloid solutions, in particular PL for burn resuscitation. Our literature search revealed only one study that focused on a direct comparison between PL and standard Ringer's Lactate for burn resuscitation. Based on the limited literature on the use of PL in burns, it is difficult to draw meaningful conclusions. Further research, into the suitability of PL for use in burns, is needed before formulary changes are instituted widely.

Ten-Year Analysis of Bacterial Colonisation and Outcomes of Major Burn Patients with a Focus on Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

A retrospective descriptive study included patients admitted with severe burns over the course of 10 years (2008-2018). Across all patients, there were 39 different species of bacteria, with 23 species being Gram-negative and 16 being Gram-positive bacteria, with also five different species of fungi cultured. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most commonly isolated organism, with 57.45% of patients having a positive culture. There was a significant difference in the number of P. aeruginosa isolated from patients that acquired their burns at work, in a garden, inside a vehicle, in a garage or in a public place. In patients that were positive for P. aeruginosa, the number of operations was higher (2.4) and the length of stay was significantly increased (80.1 days). Patients that suffered from substance abuse demonstrated significantly higher numbers of isolated P. aeruginosa (14.8%). Patients that suffered from both mental health illness and substance abuse demonstrated significantly higher numbers of P. aeruginosa isolated (18.5%). In the P. aeruginosa-negative group, there were significantly fewer patients that had been involved in a clothing fire. Furthermore, in the P. aeruginosa-negative patient cohort, the mortality rate was significantly higher (p = 0.002). Since the incidence of P. aeruginosa was also associated with a decreased mortality rate, it may be that patients admitted to hospital for shorter periods of time were less likely to be colonised with P. aeruginosa. This study demonstrates novel factors that may increase the incidence of P. aeruginosa isolated from burn patients.

Delayed free flap salvage after venous thrombosis.

The incidence of free flap failure is reported at 4% to 5%,but pedicle thrombosis occurs in a higher percentage, with the difference resulting from successful salvage of failing flaps. Often, these failures are attributed to postoperative venous thrombosis with salvage reported at 42%. The venous engorgement of the flap and the resulting microvascular changes lead to a more rapid and less reversible no-reflow phenomenon established within 6 hours. However, this report shows successful free flap salvage with thrombolytic drugs after 6 hours, highlighting that the mechanisms of free flap failure are still poorly understood.

Recommendations for Influenza Vaccination in Burns Patients Based on a Systematic Review of the Evidence.

Severe burn injury is a serious systemic insult that can lead to life-threatening secondary infections. Immunosuppression, inhalation injury, and prolonged length of hospital stay are factors that predispose patients to severe respiratory tract infections. Furthermore, evidence shows that burns can put one at risk of infection long after the original injury. Currently in the United Kingdom, the annual National Flu Immunisation programme outlines guidance for groups who are deemed high risk and, therefore, eligible for the influenza vaccine. At present, no guidance exists for the administration of the influenza vaccine in burn-injured patients, despite knowledge of immunosuppression. The aim of this literature review is to examine the evidence for associations between burn injury and influenza and, where available, evaluate efficacy of influenza vaccines in this cohort. In addition, literature was searched for the effectiveness of the influenza vaccine in patients 65 years and above and in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), two domains common to patients with severe burns. Three papers were found to suggest increased susceptibility to influenza following burn injury; however, no papers studying the effectiveness of the influenza vaccine in this group were found. Several studies demonstrated improved outcomes in patients over 65 years and patients admitted to ICU. Following the evaluation of the evidence, this review advocates for the consideration of hospitalized burn patients for the influenza vaccine. We suggest the avoidance of vaccine administration in the acute burn phase. Further prospective clinical trials would be required to validate these findings.