Clinical Treatment Score post-5 years as a predictor of late distant recurrence in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The Clinical Treatment Score post-5 years (CTS5) integrates four clinicopathological variables to estimate the residual disease recurrence risk in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients who have been treated with five years of adjuvant endocrine therapy. This study aimed to determine the accuracy of the CTS5. METHODS: A systematic review was performed in accordance with the PRISMA statement. Studies relevant for inclusion in the current review were identified from The Cochrane Library, EBSCO, Ovid, PubMed, and Embase. RESULTS: Six papers reported on 30 354 postmenopausal patients (age range 42 to 91 years). The pooled hazard ratio (HR) of distant recurrence relative to the low-risk CTS5 category was 5.41 (95% c.i. 4.50 to 6.51; P < 0.05) for the high-risk CTS5 category and 2.32 (95% c.i. 1.90-2.84; P < 0.05) for the intermediate CTS5 category. Three papers reported on 10 425 premenopausal patients (age range 18 to 54 years). The pooled HR of distant recurrence relative to the low-risk CTS5 category was 5.42 (95% c.i. 2.26 to 13.01; P < 0.05) for the high-risk CTS5 category and 2.82 (95% c.i. 1.35 to 5.88; P < 0.05) for the intermediate CTS5 category. Relative to high-risk postmenopausal patients, the mean observed 10-year distant recurrence risk for the high CTS5 category was 13.83 per cent, which differs significantly from the CTS5 estimation of 10-year distant recurrence risk (20.3 per cent, 95% c.i. 17.2 to 24; P = 0.000). CONCLUSION: The CTS5 can predict late distant recurrence risk in pre- and postmenopausal hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients. CTS5 overestimates the risk for high-risk patients and thus, its use in these patients warrants caution.

A case report of transmission and disease caused by Mycobacterium caprae and Mycobacterium bovis in Lima, Peru.

BACKGROUND: The Tuberculosis (TB) burden in Peru is significant with respect to both disease morbidity and mortality. Furthermore the recent diversification of farming enterprise to include a wide range of animal species has necessitated the consideration of members of the Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Complex (MTBC) with the potential for zoonotic transmission. M. bovis and M. caprae, a lesser known member of the MTBC exhibit an exceptionally wide host spectrum in animals and are capable of causing disease in humans. M. bovis has a predictable resistance profile which includes resistance to pyrazinamide. Thus, failure to identify M. bovis as the causative agent in reported TB cases leads to higher levels of treatment failure and contributes to the transmission of drug-resistant TB. CASE PRESENTATION: Reported here are the clinical presentations, investigations and treatment histories of two patients identified from a population level genotyping study in Lima, Peru that were at the time of treatment thought to be M. tuberculosis patients but in retrospect were spectated using whole genome sequencing as M. caprae and M. Bovis. CONCLUSIONS: The cases reported here constitute convincing evidence that M. caprae and M. bovis are causative agents of TB infection in humans in Peru and underscore the importance of species-level MTBC member identification to effectively control and treat zoonotic TB. Furthermore these cases highlight the challenges of using clinical risk factors to identify cases of zoonotic TB in humans as their clinical presentation and transmission history is often difficult to distinguish from anthroponotic TB.

Optimal timing of surgery following breast cancer neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Administration of chemotherapy before breast surgery has the potential to reduce the risk of distant recurrence by targeting micrometastasis as well as allowing a more minimalistic approach to surgical intervention. We performed a systematic review to determine the optimum timing of surgery post breast cancer neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). METHODS: The primary outcome was to determine whether the timing of surgery post NACT impacted overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). We compared patient outcomes between those who had surgery within 8 weeks of completion of NACT to those that had surgery after 8 weeks. An outcome comparison between <4 weeks and 4-8 weeks was also performed. Secondary outcome included complete pathological response (pCR) post NACT. A meta-analysis was performed using the Mantel-Haenszel method. RESULTS: Five studies, including 8794 patients were eligible for inclusion. Patients that had surgery within 8 weeks of completion of NACT had a statistically significant improved OS(OR 0.47, 95% c. i 0.34-0.65) and DFS(OR 0.71 (95% c. i 0.52-0.98, P = 0.04). There were no survival advantages associated with having surgery less than 4 weeks post completion of NACT (OR 0.78, 95% c. i 0.46-1.33, P = 0.37). There was no difference in pCR rate between those that had surgery <4 weeks and 4-8 weeks (OR 1.01, 95% c. i 0.80-1.28, P = 0.93). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis shows that the optimum timing of surgery post completion of NACT is 4-8 weeks as it is associated with increased OS and DFS.