Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 42
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Palliat Care ; 38(3): 268-275, 2023 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37450327

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The COVID-19 public health emergency (PHE) has important implications for health care service delivery. Little is understood about how the PHE impacted community-based hospice providers and service delivery to hospice-eligible beneficiaries. The aim of this study was to describe hospice response to the PHE and correlated impacts on beneficiary receipt of hospice support services delivered to hospice-eligible beneficiaries participating in the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Medicare Care Choices Model (MCCM), a national model testing the provision of certain hospice-like supportive services with concurrent usual care among seriously ill, community-residing Medicare beneficiaries that have not elected to receive hospice care. METHODS: We employed descriptive analysis using concurrent qualitative and quantitative data sources, consisting of provider surveys, beneficiary-level encounter data submitted by hospices, and Medicare administrative claims describing beneficiary service utilization. The sample included both hospice providers (N = 82) and beneficiaries (N = 2294) voluntarily participating in MCCM. RESULTS: Nearly all participating MCCM hospices adopted operational changes to address their staff and beneficiaries' safety during the COVID-19 PHE. We report changes to service delivery, including declines in total encounters as well as service modality, and the types of services provided. CONCLUSIONS: While the analyses reported indicate that seriously ill Medicare beneficiaries participating in MCCM were directly impacted by the PHE, we are still unclear whether changes in the service modality and encounters by provider type and the decline in average service counts per beneficiary are driven more by hospices or by beneficiary decisions to minimize exposure. Future research should attempt to disentangle these factors.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Cuidados Paliativos al Final de la Vida , Hospitales para Enfermos Terminales , Anciano , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Medicare , Atención a la Salud
2.
Am J Manag Care ; 27(4): e101-e104, 2021 04 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33877776

RESUMEN

In public health insurance programs, federal and state regulators use network adequacy standards to ensure that health plans provide enrollees with adequate access to care. These standards are based on provider availability, anticipated enrollment, and patterns of care delivery. We anticipate that the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic will have 3 main effects on provider networks and their regulation: enrollment changes, changes to the provider landscape, and changes to care delivery. Regulators will need to ensure that plans adjust their network size should there be increased enrollment or increased utilization caused by forgone care. Regulators will also require updated monitoring data and plan network data that reflect postpandemic provider availability. Telehealth will have a larger role in care delivery than in the prepandemic period, and regulators will need to adapt network standards to accommodate in-person and virtual care delivery.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Planificación en Salud , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/normas , Cobertura del Seguro/normas , Seguro de Salud/normas , Sector Público , Intercambios de Seguro Médico , Humanos , Cobertura del Seguro/legislación & jurisprudencia , Cobertura del Seguro/organización & administración , Seguro de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Seguro de Salud/organización & administración , Medicaid/legislación & jurisprudencia , Medicare/legislación & jurisprudencia , Estados Unidos
3.
J Gen Intern Med ; 25(9): 900-5, 2010 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20229139

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Routine numeric screening for pain is widely recommended, but its association with overall quality of pain care is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To assess adherence to measures of pain management quality and identify associated patient and provider factors. DESIGN: A cross-sectional visit-based study. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and forty adult VA outpatient primary care clinic patients reporting a numeric rating scale (NRS) of moderate to severe pain (four or more on a zero to ten scale). Seventy-seven providers completed a baseline survey regarding general pain management attitudes and a post-visit survey regarding management of 112 participating patients. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: We used chart review to determine adherence to four validated process quality indicators (QIs) including noting pain presence, pain character, and pain control, and intensifying pharmacological intervention. The average NRS was 6.7. Seventy-three percent of charts noted the presence of pain, 13.9% the character, 23.6% the degree of control, and 15.3% increased pain medication prescription. Charts were more likely to include documentation of pain presence if providers agreed that "patients want me to ask about pain" and "pain can have negative consequences on patient's functioning". Charts were more likely to document character of pain if providers agreed that "patients are able to rate their pain". Patients with musculoskeletal pain were less likely to have chart documentation of character of pain. CONCLUSIONS: Despite routine pain screening in VA, providers seldom documented elements considered important to evaluation and treatment of pain. Improving pain care may require attention to all aspects of pain management, not just screening.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Hospitales de Veteranos , Dimensión del Dolor , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Servicio Ambulatorio en Hospital , Satisfacción del Paciente , Relaciones Médico-Paciente
4.
Pain Med ; 11(9): 1365-72, 2010 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20807347

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pain is a common, often undertreated problem among patients with palliative needs. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate clinician factors associated with intention to address diverse aspects of pain. DESIGN: Clinicians reviewed a clinical vignette describing a frail elderly patient with advanced hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer, depression, and pain not on analgesic therapy. Clinicians were surveyed about their intentions for treatment. PARTICIPANTS: All 280 primary care and specialist clinicians working in 19 hospital and community-based primary care, oncology, and cardiology clinics at eight geographically dispersed sites in two large VA hospital systems. MAIN MEASURES: Endpoints were clinician intention to deliver guideline-concordant care: prescribe opioids/antidepressants, assess existential wellbeing, and offer mental health referral. Demographic and behavioral measures were evaluated in association with endpoints. KEY RESULTS: Of 208 (74%) responding practitioners, 189 were responsible for prescribing decisions. Of those, 86, 77, 75, and 69 were "very"/"somewhat likely" to prescribe opioids, antidepressants, refer to a mental health specialist, or assess existential wellbeing, respectively. Factors associated with greater intent to prescribe an opioid or antidepressant included female gender, being an attending physician, being a primary care clinician, and greater confidence in pain management skills. Greater trust in the validity of pain ratings was associated with intent to prescribe an antidepressant and assess existential wellbeing. Prescribing opioids was less likely if perceived as an administrative burden. Assessing existential wellbeing was less likely if time constraints were perceived a barrier to evaluating pain. Female gender was the only factor associated with intent to refer to a mental health specialist. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest useful targets for improving pain management include bolstering clinician confidence in pain management and their trust in pain ratings.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Médicos/psicología , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Adulto , Anciano , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Recolección de Datos , Depresión/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
5.
Pain Manag Nurs ; 11(2): 92-8, 2010 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20510839

RESUMEN

Fear of engendering addiction is frequently reported as both a provider and a patient barrier to effective pain management. In this study, a clinical scenario ascertained nursing staff members' usual practice in addressing addiction fears for patients with concerns about the addictive potential of pain medication. One hundred forty-five Veterans Health Administration nursing staff members from eight ambulatory care sites were queried to identify variables associated with proclivity to address patient fears about addiction risks in a population where pain is prevalent and the risk for substance abuse is high. Regarding addressing addiction concerns, 66% of nursing staff were very likely, 16% somewhat likely, 9% unsure, 6% somewhat unlikely, and 2% very unlikely to take action. Health technicians were less likely to address addiction concerns than registered or licensed vocational nurses (odds ratio [OR] 0.116; p=.004). Nursing staff with more years' experience (OR 1.070; p=.005) and higher levels of self-efficacy/confidence (OR 1.380; p=.001) were more likely to engage in discussions related to addiction risks. Targeted efforts to improve pain management activities should focus on retaining experienced nursing staff in initial assessment positions and improving the skills and confidence of less experienced and less skilled staff.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Actitud Frente a la Salud , Personal de Enfermería/psicología , Dolor/psicología , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias , Adulto , Anciano , Competencia Clínica , Miedo , Femenino , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Los Angeles , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Rol de la Enfermera/psicología , Investigación Metodológica en Enfermería , Personal de Enfermería/educación , Personal de Enfermería/organización & administración , Dolor/complicaciones , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Pautas de la Práctica en Enfermería/organización & administración , Factores de Riesgo , Autoeficacia , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/etiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/prevención & control , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs
6.
J Card Fail ; 15(1): 24-30, 2009 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19181290

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Progress has been made in addressing pain in specific diseases such as cancer, but less attention has focused on understanding pain in nonmalignant states, including heart failure (HF). METHODS AND RESULTS: From March 2006 to June 2007, 672 veterans were surveyed and scores for the Brief Pain Inventory, pain distress, clinically significant pain levels (moderate to severe pain), and pain locations were compared using univariate and multivariate models. Fifteen percent of the final sample had HF (95/634). In our study, the HF patients were older (P < .000), reported lower levels of general health (P = .018), had more co-morbidities (P < .000), were more likely to have a history of cancer (P = .035), and suffered more chest pain and fewer headaches (P = .026, P = .03, respectively) than their non-HF cohorts. When controlling for age, co-morbidity and cancer disorders, HF and non-HF patients did not differ in pain severity, interference, distress or locations. Of the patients currently experiencing pain, 67.3% of HF patients and 68.4% of non-HF patients rated their pain as moderate or severe (pain >or=4 on a 0 to 10 scale). CONCLUSIONS: Although HF has not been identified as a painful condition, this study suggests the burden of pain is significant for both HF and non-HF ambulatory care patients.


Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Dolor/etiología , Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis de Varianza , California/epidemiología , Enfermedad Crónica , Comorbilidad , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/complicaciones , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/epidemiología , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Dolor/diagnóstico , Dimensión del Dolor , Cuidados Paliativos , Proyectos Piloto , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
7.
Med Care ; 47(7): 774-81, 2009 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19536007

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Previous research suggests that disparities in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) survival can be explained in part by disparities in the receipt of cancer treatment. Few studies, however, have considered race and sex disparities in the timing and appropriateness of treatment across stages of diagnosis. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship of sex and race with the receipt of timely and clinically appropriate NSCLC treatment for each stage of diagnosis. METHOD: Surveillance Epidemiology and End Result data linked to Medicare claims for beneficiaries diagnosed with NSCLC between 1995 and 1999 were used to evaluate the relationship between race and sex with timely and appropriate NSCLC treatment while controlling for other demographic characteristics, comorbidities, socioeconomic status, and provider supply (N = 22,145). RESULTS: Overall adjusted rates of timely and appropriate treatment are 37.2%, 58.1%, and 29.2% for Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with stage I or II, III, and IV NSCLC, respectively. Among stage I or II patients, women were 25% less likely to receive timely surgical resection relative to men, and blacks were 66% less likely to receive timely and appropriate treatment than whites. Black men were least likely to receive resection (22.2% compared with 43.7% for white men). Blacks were 34% less likely to receive timely surgery, chemotherapy, or radiation for stage III disease and were 51% less likely to receive chemotherapy in a timely fashion for stage IV disease relative to whites. CONCLUSION: Significant variations in appropriate timely treatment were found within and across stages of diagnosis, confirming that sex and race differences in NSCLC treatment exist.


Asunto(s)
Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/terapia , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos , Negro o Afroamericano/etnología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/diagnóstico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/etnología , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Formulario de Reclamación de Seguro/estadística & datos numéricos , Modelos Logísticos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/etnología , Masculino , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Hombres , Análisis Multivariante , Selección de Paciente , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Programa de VERF , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Factores Sexuales , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Población Blanca/etnología , Mujeres
8.
J Gen Intern Med ; 24(5): 620-5, 2009 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19308333

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Depression and anxiety frequently co-occur with pain and may affect treatment outcomes. Early identification of these co-occurring psychiatric conditions during routine pain screening may be critical for optimal treatment. OBJECTIVE: To determine aspects of pain related to psychological distress, and, among distressed patients, to determine whether pain factors are related to provider identification of distress. DESIGN: Cross-sectional interview of primary care patients and their providers participating in a Veteran's Administration HELP-Vets study. SUBJECTS: A total of 528 predominately male Veterans MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We measured self-reported pain, including a 0-10 numeric rating scale and interference items from the Brief Pain Inventory. To evaluate distress, brief indicators of depression, anxiety and PTSD were combined. A substantial number of patients had psychological distress (41%), which was even higher (62%) among patients with moderate-severe current pain. Only 29% of those with distress reported talking to their provider about emotional problems during their visit. In multivariate analyses, other pain factors related to distress included interference with enjoyment of life and relationships with others, pain in multiple locations and joint pains. Prior diagnoses of depression and anxiety were also related to current distress. Only prior diagnosis and patient reported headaches and sleep interference because of pain were related to provider identification of distress. CONCLUSIONS: VA patients with moderate-severe pain are at high risk for psychological distress, which often goes unrecognized. Providers need to be more vigilant to mental health problems in patients experiencing high pain levels. Targeted screening for co-occurring conditions is warranted.


Asunto(s)
Ansiedad/complicaciones , Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Depresión/complicaciones , Depresión/diagnóstico , Dolor/complicaciones , Dolor/diagnóstico , Anciano , Ansiedad/psicología , Estudios Transversales , Depresión/psicología , Diagnóstico Precoz , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor/psicología , Estrés Psicológico/complicaciones , Estrés Psicológico/diagnóstico , Estrés Psicológico/psicología
9.
Ann Intern Med ; 148(2): 147-59, 2008 Jan 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18195339

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Many persons and their families are burdened by serious chronic illness in late life. How to best support quality of life is an important consideration for care. PURPOSE: To assess evidence about interventions to improve palliative and end-of-life care. DATA SOURCES: English-language citations (January 1990 to November 2005) from MEDLINE, the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, the National Consensus Project for Quality Palliative Care bibliography, and November 2005 to January 2007 updates from expert reviews and literature surveillance. STUDY SELECTION: Systematic reviews that addressed "end of life," including terminal illness (for example, advanced cancer) and chronic, eventually fatal illness with ambiguous prognosis (for example, advanced dementia), and intervention studies (randomized and nonrandomized designs) that addressed pain, dyspnea, depression, advance care planning, continuity, and caregiving. DATA EXTRACTION: Single reviewers screened 24,423 titles to find 6381 relevant abstracts and reviewed 1274 articles in detail to identify 33 high-quality systematic reviews and 89 relevant intervention studies. They synthesized the evidence by using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) classification. DATA SYNTHESIS: Strong evidence supports treating cancer pain with opioids, nonsteroidals, radionuclides, and radiotherapy; dyspnea from chronic lung disease with short-term opioids; and cancer-associated depression with psychotherapy, tricyclics, and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Strong evidence supports multi component interventions to improve continuity in heart failure. Moderate evidence supports advance care planning led by skilled facilitators who engage key decision makers and interventions to alleviate caregiver burden. Weak evidence addresses cancer-related dyspnea management, and no evidence addresses noncancer pain, symptomatic dyspnea management in advanced heart failure, or short-acting antidepressants in terminal illness. No direct evidence addresses improving continuity for patients with dementia. Evidence was weak for improving caregiver burdens in cancer and was absent for heart failure. LIMITATIONS: Variable literature indexing for advanced chronic illness and end of life limited the comprehensiveness of searches, and heterogeneity was too great to do meta-analysis. CONCLUSION: Strong to moderate evidence supports interventions to improve important aspects of end-of-life care. Future research should quantify these effects and address the generalizability of insights across the conditions and settings of the last part of life. Many critical issues lack high-quality evidence.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Paliativos/normas , Planificación Anticipada de Atención/normas , Cuidadores/psicología , Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente/normas , Depresión/terapia , Disnea/terapia , Humanos , Manejo del Dolor , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/normas , Derivación y Consulta , Apoyo Social
11.
Am J Public Health ; 98(7): 1280-7, 2008 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17971555

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: We tested the relationship between urban or rural residence as defined by rural-urban commuting area codes and risk of mortality in a sample of Medicare beneficiaries with lung cancer. METHODS: We used Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data linked with Medicare claims to build proportional hazards models. The models tested hypothesized relationships between individual and community characteristics and overall survival for a cohort of Medicare beneficiaries 65 years and older who were diagnosed with lung cancer between 1995 and 1999 (N=26073). RESULTS: We found no evidence that lung cancer patients in rural areas have poorer survival than those in urban areas. Rather, individual (Medicaid coverage) and regional (lower census tract-level median income) socioeconomic factors and a smaller supply of subspecialists per 10000 individuals 65 years and older were positively associated with a higher risk of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Although urban versus rural residence did not directly influence survival, rural residents were more likely to live in poorer areas with a smaller supply of health care providers. Therefore, we still need to be aware of rural beneficiaries' potential disadvantage when it comes to receiving needed care in a timely fashion.


Asunto(s)
Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/rehabilitación , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Población Rural/estadística & datos numéricos , Sobrevivientes/estadística & datos numéricos , Población Urbana/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Masculino , Análisis Multivariante , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
12.
Womens Health Issues ; 18(3): 199-209, 2008.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18457755

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Gender and age differences in medical care are well documented. We examined age and gender differences in Medicare expenditures for lung cancer decedents in the last year of life (LYOL) through a cross-sectional study of Medicare administrative and claims data. METHODS: Participants were aged Medicare beneficiaries (>or=68) with lung cancer, who were covered by Parts A and B for 36 months before death (1996-1999; n = 13,120). Regression techniques were used to estimate age and gender differences in mean Medicare utilization and expenditures in the LYOL overall and by type of service, conditional on use: inpatient, outpatient, physician, skilled nursing facility (SNF), home health, and hospice, controlling for demographic, clinical, geographic, and supply characteristics. RESULTS: Women were more likely than men to use inpatient, SNF, home health, and hospice services. Women's average expenditures were approximately dollars 1,900 greater than men's, with differences attributed to higher average expenditures for SNF, home health, and hospice. Older cohorts used fewer inpatient and outpatient services and used more SNF and hospice services in their LYOL. Average Medicare expenditures were significantly lower in older cohorts (dollars 8,487 less for those age >or=85 at death than for those 68-74). Adjusting for age explains most of the gender differences in average Medicare expenditures. Remaining gender differences vary across age cohorts, with larger gender differences in social-supportive service expenditures among those 68-74 and 75-84 and outpatient and physician services among those 75-84 and >or=85. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that gender disparities in expenditures are generally small at the end of life for lung cancer decedents, particularly among the older cohorts. As expected, the bigger observed differences are by age although the direction of the association is not consistent across types of service. Higher expenditures for women on social-supportive services may reflect fewer informal supports for older women compared with men.


Asunto(s)
Gastos en Salud/normas , Neoplasias Pulmonares/economía , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Medicare/economía , Cuidado Terminal/economía , Enfermo Terminal/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Cuidados Paliativos al Final de la Vida/economía , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Masculino , Medicaid/economía , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Casas de Salud/economía , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Mecanismo de Reembolso/economía , Distribución por Sexo , Apoyo Social , Cuidado Terminal/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos
13.
Health Serv Res ; 42(5): 1848-70, 2007 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17850523

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To identify psychometrically sound measures of outcomes in end-of-life care and to characterize their use in intervention studies. DATA SOURCES: English language articles from 1990 to November 2005 describing measures with published psychometric data and intervention studies of end-of-life care. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review of end-of-life care literature. EXTRACTION METHODS: Two reviewers organized identified measures into 10 major domains. Eight reviewers extracted and characterized measures from intervention studies. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Of 24,423 citations, we extracted 200 articles that described 261 measures, accepting 99 measures. In addition to 35 measures recommended in a prior systematic review, we identified an additional 64 measures of the end-of-life experience. The most robust measures were in the areas of symptoms, quality of life, and satisfaction; significant gaps existed in continuity of care, advance care planning, spirituality, and caregiver well-being. We also reviewed 84 intervention studies in which 135 patient-centered outcomes were assessed by 97 separate measures. Of these, 80 were used only once and only eight measures were used in more than two studies. CONCLUSIONS: In general, most measures have not undergone rigorous development and testing. Measure development in end-of-life care should focus on areas with identified gaps, and testing should be done to facilitate comparability across the care settings, populations, and clinical conditions. Intervention research should use robust measures that adhere to these standards.


Asunto(s)
Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Cuidado Terminal/normas , Humanos , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Estados Unidos
14.
J Womens Health (Larchmt) ; 16(2): 214-27, 2007 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17388738

RESUMEN

PURPOSE AND METHODS: We examined age and gender differences in Medicare expenditures for colorectal cancer decedents in the last year of life (LYOL) through a cross-sectional study of Medicare administrative and claims data. Participants were aged Medicare beneficiaries (68+ years) with colorectal cancer, who were covered by Parts A and B for 36 months before death (1996-1999, n = 6657). We estimated differences in mean Medicare utilization and expenditures in the LYOL overall and by type of service (inpatient, outpatient, physician, skilled nursing facility [SNF], home health, and hospice). RESULTS: Women were more likely than men to use inpatient services, SNF services, home health, and hospice in the LYOL. Average expenditures for women were $1600 higher than for men, which were attributed to higher average expenditures on home health and hospice services. Among decedents aged 68-74 who used inpatient care, inpatient expenditures were higher for women than men. Older cohorts were less likely to use inpatient and outpatient services and more likely to use SNF services. Average Medicare expenditures were significantly lower in older cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the gender differences in average Medicare expenditures were explained by gender differences in age and the lower average expenditures on older decedents with colorectal cancer. Remaining gender differences varied across age cohorts and were largest among those aged 68-74. Higher expenditures for women on each of the social supportive services (SNF, home health, and hospice), even among those who used a particular type of service, may reflect a lack of informal supports for older women compared with men.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/economía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/terapia , Gastos en Salud/normas , Medicare/economía , Cuidado Terminal/economía , Enfermo Terminal/estadística & datos numéricos , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Femenino , Cuidados Paliativos al Final de la Vida/economía , Humanos , Masculino , Medicaid/economía , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Casas de Salud/economía , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Mecanismo de Reembolso/economía , Distribución por Sexo , Apoyo Social , Cuidado Terminal/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
15.
Ann Intern Med ; 142(7): 532-46, 2005 Apr 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15809465

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In response to the increase in obesity, pharmacologic treatments for weight loss have become more numerous and more commonly used. PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy and safety of weight loss medications approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and other medications that have been used for weight loss. DATA SOURCES: Electronic databases, experts in the field, and unpublished information. STUDY SELECTION: Up-to-date meta-analyses of sibutramine, phentermine, and diethylpropion were identified. The authors assessed in detail 50 studies of orlistat, 13 studies of fluoxetine, 5 studies of bupropion, 9 studies of topiramate, and 1 study each of sertraline and zonisamide. Meta-analysis was performed for all medications except sertraline, zonisamide, and fluoxetine, which are summarized narratively. DATA EXTRACTION: The authors abstracted information about study design, intervention, co-interventions, population, outcomes, and methodologic quality, as well as weight loss and adverse events from controlled trials of medication. DATA SYNTHESIS: All pooled weight loss values are reported relative to placebo. A meta-analysis of sibutramine reported a mean difference in weight loss of 4.45 kg (95% CI, 3.62 to 5.29 kg) at 12 months. In the meta-analysis of orlistat, the estimate of the mean weight loss for orlistat-treated patients was 2.89 kg (CI, 2.27 to 3.51 kg) at 12 months. A recent meta-analysis of phentermine and diethylpropion reported pooled mean differences in weight loss at 6 months of 3.6 kg (CI, 0.6 to 6.0 kg) for phentermine-treated patients and 3.0 kg (CI, -1.6 to 11.5 kg) for diethylpropion-treated patients. Weight loss in fluoxetine studies ranged from 14.5 kg of weight lost to 0.4 kg of weight gained at 12 or more months. For bupropion, 2.77 kg (CI, 1.1 to 4.5 kg) of weight was lost at 6 to 12 months. Weight loss due to topiramate at 6 months was 6.5% (CI, 4.8% to 8.3%) of pretreatment weight. With one exception, long-term studies of health outcomes were lacking. Significant side effects that varied by drug were reported. LIMITATIONS: Publication bias may exist despite a comprehensive search and despite the lack of statistical evidence for the existence of bias. Evidence of heterogeneity was observed for all meta-analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Sibutramine, orlistat, phentermine, probably diethylpropion, bupropion, probably fluoxetine, and topiramate promote modest weight loss when given along with recommendations for diet. Sibutramine and orlistat are the 2 most-studied drugs.


Asunto(s)
Fármacos Antiobesidad/uso terapéutico , Obesidad/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Fármacos Antiobesidad/efectos adversos , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Pérdida de Peso
16.
Ann Intern Med ; 142(7): 547-59, 2005 Apr 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15809466

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Controversy exists regarding the effectiveness of surgery for weight loss and the resulting improvement in health-related outcomes. PURPOSE: To perform a meta-analysis of effectiveness and adverse events associated with surgical treatment of obesity. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, and systematic reviews. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized, controlled trials; observational studies; and case series reporting on surgical treatment of obesity. DATA EXTRACTION: Information about study design, procedure, population, comorbid conditions, and adverse events. DATA SYNTHESIS: The authors assessed 147 studies. Of these, 89 contributed to the weight loss analysis, 134 contributed to the mortality analysis, and 128 contributed to the complications analysis. The authors identified 1 large, matched cohort analysis that reported greater weight loss with surgery than with medical treatment in individuals with an average body mass index (BMI) of 40 kg/m2 or greater. Surgery resulted in a weight loss of 20 to 30 kg, which was maintained for up to 10 years and was accompanied by improvements in some comorbid conditions. For BMIs of 35 to 39 kg/m2, data from case series strongly support superiority of surgery but cannot be considered conclusive. Gastric bypass procedures result in more weight loss than gastroplasty. Bariatric procedures in current use (gastric bypass, laparoscopic adjustable gastric band, vertical banded gastroplasty, and biliopancreatic diversion and switch) have been performed with an overall mortality rate of less than 1%. Adverse events occur in about 20% of cases. A laparoscopic approach results in fewer wound complications than an open approach. LIMITATIONS: Only a few controlled trials were available for analysis. Heterogeneity was seen among studies, and publication bias is possible. CONCLUSIONS: Surgery is more effective than nonsurgical treatment for weight loss and control of some comorbid conditions in patients with a BMI of 40 kg/m2 or greater. More data are needed to determine the efficacy of surgery relative to nonsurgical therapy for less severely obese people. Procedures differ in efficacy and incidence of complications.


Asunto(s)
Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Derivación Gástrica/efectos adversos , Gastroplastia/efectos adversos , Gastroplastia/métodos , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Pérdida de Peso
17.
J Am Med Dir Assoc ; 7(9): 562-7, 2006 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17095421

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of immunization rates on the likelihood of influenza-like illness (ILI) clusters in nursing facilities. DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional study. SETTING: Nursing facilities in a single for-profit chain (N = 301). PARTICIPANTS: Nursing home residents and staff in each facility. MEASUREMENTS: Resident and staff influenza immunization rates during the 2004-2005 influenza season, indicator of ILI cluster in facility defined as 3+ ILI cases reported within 72 hours in close proximity within the facility, hospitalization and mortality rates for facilities reporting ILI clusters, indicator of confirmatory laboratory testing for ILI cases in facility. RESULTS: Staff (median = 38%) and resident (median = 85%) rates of immunization did not independently predict the likelihood of an outbreak but jointly were strong predictors. For example, facilities having greater than 55% of staff and greater than 89% of residents immunized were almost 60% less likely to have an ILI cluster (odds ratio [OR]: 0.410; 95% CI: 0.19, 0.89) compared to all others. Facilities with higher proportions of Medicaid-funded residents were less likely to have an outbreak. Each 1% increase in the proportion of residents with Medicaid was associated with a 2.5% decrease in the risk of a cluster (OR: 0.975; 95% CI: 0.956, 0.995). Bed size and staff size did not significantly influence the likelihood of an outbreak. Among facilities with outbreaks, higher vaccination rates did not predict lower rates of hospitalizations or deaths. Approximately two thirds of all ILI clusters had laboratory testing to confirm the diagnosis of influenza. Three quarters of the facilities in which outbreaks occurred and for which confirmatory tests were performed (50/67, 74.6%) had 1+ cases positively identified as influenza. CONCLUSION: Both staff and residents must have high rates of vaccination to substantially alter the rate and impact of influenza outbreaks in nursing facilities.


Asunto(s)
Brotes de Enfermedades , Personal de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Gripe Humana , Casas de Salud , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Análisis por Conglomerados , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Estudios Transversales , Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control , Brotes de Enfermedades/estadística & datos numéricos , Capacidad de Camas en Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Vacunas contra la Influenza , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Modelos Logísticos , Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis Multivariante , Casas de Salud/organización & administración , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/prevención & control , Salud Laboral , Admisión y Programación de Personal/estadística & datos numéricos , Vigilancia de la Población , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
18.
Clin Geriatr Med ; 21(1): 255-72, xi, 2005 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15639050

RESUMEN

Current arrangements for health care in the United States do not adequately address the needs of a growing population that has serious, eventually fatal chronic illness. New programs and policies are necessary to encourage coordination of care; better match services to the needs of patients; better provide education and incentives; and better support formal and informal caregivers. Models of end-of-life care, such as MediCaring, are described along with a research and policy agenda that focuses on modifying the health care system and building on new innovations.


Asunto(s)
Política de Salud , Cuidado Terminal , Anciano , Enfermedad Crónica , Anciano Frágil , Estado de Salud , Servicios de Atención a Domicilio Provisto por Hospital , Cuidados Paliativos al Final de la Vida , Humanos , Medicare , Cuidados Paliativos , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos
19.
Ann Intern Med ; 140(4): 269-77, 2004 Feb 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14970150

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hospice providers contend that enrollment reduces the cost of the Medicare programs, but estimates of effects are dated, methodologically limited, and focused on persons with cancer. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effects of hospice care on Medicare program payments during the last year of life from 1996 to 1999 within cohorts defined by age and diagnosis. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Deceased Medicare enrollees. PARTICIPANTS: Elderly Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries who received 36 months of continuous Part A and B coverage before death during 1996 to 1999 (n = 245 326). Age- and condition-specific (cancer or noncancer and principal condition) cohorts were defined. MEASUREMENTS: Medicare expenditures in the last year of life, as a total figure and by service type. The cost effects of hospice were estimated by using linear regression within the cohorts for hospice enrollees compared with nonenrollees after adjustment for propensity to use hospice, gender, race, enrollment in Medicaid, urban setting, duration of illness, comorbid conditions, low use of Medicare, nursing home residence, and year of death. RESULTS: Adjusted mean expenditures were 4.0% higher overall among hospice enrollees than among nonenrollees. Adjusted mean expenditures were 1% lower for hospice enrollees with cancer than for patients with cancer who did not use hospice. Savings were highest (7% to 17%) among enrollees with lung cancer and other very aggressive types of cancer diagnosed in the last year of life. Expenditures for hospice enrollees without cancer were 11% higher than for nonenrollees, ranging from 20% to 44% for patients with dementia and 0% to 16% for those with chronic heart failure or failure of most other organ systems. Hospice-related savings decreased and relative costs increased with age. CONCLUSION: Hospice enrollment correlates with reduced Medicare expenditures among younger decedents with cancer but increased expenditures among decedents without cancer and those older than 84 years of age. Future studies should assess the effects of hospice on quality and on expenditures from all payment sources.


Asunto(s)
Gastos en Salud , Cuidados Paliativos al Final de la Vida/economía , Cuidados Paliativos al Final de la Vida/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicare/economía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Ahorro de Costo , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
20.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 50(6): 1079-85, 2002 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12110069

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To study a cohort of participants in home- and community-based services (HCBS) in Michigan to evaluate the relationship between (1) caregiver attitudes and participant characteristics and (2) the risk of hospitalization. SETTING: HCBS programs funded by Medicaid or state/local funds in Michigan. PARTICIPANTS: Five hundred twenty-seven individuals eligible for HCBS in Michigan were studied. These HCBS participants were randomly selected clients of all agencies providing publicly funded HCBS in Michigan from November 1996 to October 1997. MEASUREMENTS: Data for this study were collected using the Minimum Data Set for Home Care. Assessments were collected longitudinally, and the baseline (initial admission assessment) and 90-day follow-up assessments were used. Key measures were caregiver attitudes (distress, dissatisfaction, and decreased caregiving ability) and HCBS participant characteristics (cognition, functioning, diseases, symptoms, nutritional status, medications, and disease stability). Multinomial logistic regression was used to evaluate how these characteristics were associated with the competing risks of hospitalization and death within 90 days of admission to HCBS. RESULTS: We found a strong association between caregiver dissatisfaction (caregiver dissatisfied with the level of care the home care participant was currently receiving) and an increased likelihood of hospitalization. HCBS participant cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pain, and flare-up of a chronic condition were also associated with increased hospitalization. Poor food intake and prior hospitalization were associated with hospitalization and death. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that, within a cohort of people receiving HCBS who are chronically ill, highly disabled, and at high risk for hospitalization and death, interventions addressing caregiver dissatisfaction, pain control, and medical monitoring should be evaluated for their potential to decrease hospitalization.


Asunto(s)
Cuidadores/psicología , Evaluación Geriátrica , Hospitalización , Anciano , Actitud Frente a la Salud , Servicios de Salud Comunitaria , Femenino , Atención Domiciliaria de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Michigan , Factores de Riesgo , Estrés Psicológico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA