Tracheostomy Timing During Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care: Single Referral Center Retrospective Cohort.

OBJECTIVES: To describe associations between the timing of tracheostomy and patient characteristics or outcomes in the cardiac ICU (CICU). DESIGN: Single-institution retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Freestanding academic children's hospital. PATIENTS: CICU patients with tracheostomy placed between July 1, 2011, and July 1, 2020. INTERVENTIONS: We compared patient characteristics and outcomes between early and late tracheostomy based on the duration of positive pressure ventilation (PPV) before tracheostomy placement, fitting a receiver operating characteristic curve for current survival to define a cutoff. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Sixty-one patients underwent tracheostomy placement (0.5% of CICU admissions). Median age was 7.8 months. Eighteen patients (30%) had single ventricle physiology and 13 patients (21%) had pulmonary vein stenosis (PVS). Primary indications for tracheostomy were pulmonary/lower airway (41%), upper airway obstruction (UAO) (31%), cardiac (15%), neuromuscular (4%), or neurologic (4%). In-hospital mortality was 26% with 41% survival at the current follow-up (median 7.8 [interquartile range, IQR 2.6-30.0] mo). Late tracheostomy was defined as greater than or equal to 7 weeks of PPV which was equivalent to the median PPV duration pre-tracheostomy. Patients with late tracheostomy were more likely to be younger, have single ventricle physiology, and have greater respiratory severity. Patients with early tracheostomy were more likely to have UAO or genetic comorbidities. In multivariable analysis, late tracheostomy was associated with 4.2 times greater mortality (95% CI, 1.9-9.0). PVS was associated with higher mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 5.2; 95% CI, 2.5-10.9). UAO was associated with lower mortality (adjusted HR 0.2; 95% CI, 0.1-0.5). Late tracheostomy was also associated with greater cumulative opioid exposure. CONCLUSIONS: CICU patients who underwent tracheostomy had high in-hospital and longer-term mortality rates. Tracheostomy timing decisions are influenced by indication, disease, genetic comorbidities, illness severity, and age. Earlier tracheostomy was associated with lower sedative use and improved adjusted survival. Tracheostomy placement is a complex decision demanding individualized consideration of risk-benefit profiles and thoughtful family counseling.

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Candidacy Decisions: An Argument for a Process-Based Longitudinal Approach.

Are all children extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) candidates? Navigating ECMO decisions represents an enormous challenge in pediatric critical care. ECMO cannulation should not be a default option as it will not confer benefit for "all" critically ill children; however, "all" children deserve well-considered decisions surrounding their ECMO candidacy. The complexity of the decision demands a systematic, "well-reasoned" and "dynamic" approach. Due to clinical urgency, this standard cannot always be met prior to initiation of ECMO. We challenge the paradigm of "candidacy" as a singular decision that must be defined prior to ECMO initiation. Rather, the determination as to whether ECMO is in the patient's best interest is applicable regardless of cannulation status. The priority should be on collaborative, interdisciplinary decision-making processes aligned with principles of transparency, relevant reasoning, accountability, review, and appeal. To ensure a robust process, it should not be temporally constrained by cannulation status. We advocate that this approach will decrease both the risk of not initiating ECMO in a patient who will benefit and the risk of prolonged, nonbeneficial support. We conclude that to ensure fair decisions are made in a patient's best interest, organizations should develop procedurally fair processes for ECMO decision-making that are not tied to a particular time point and are revisited along the management trajectory.

Decision-Making, Ethics, and End-of-Life Care in Pediatric Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Comprehensive Narrative Review.

OBJECTIVES: Pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. We sought to summarize literature on communication and decision-making, end-of-life care, and ethical issues to identify recommended approaches and highlight knowledge gaps. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. STUDY SELECTION: We reviewed published articles (1972-2020) which examined three pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation domains: 1) decision-making or communication between clinicians and patients/families, 2) ethical issues, or 3) end-of-life care. DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers independently assessed eligibility using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses methodology. DATA SYNTHESIS: Of 2,581 publications screened, we identified one systematic review and 35 descriptive studies. No practical guides exist for communication and decision-making in pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Conversation principles and parent/clinician perspectives are described. Ethical issues related to consent, initiation, discontinuation, resource allocation, and research. No patient-level synthesis of ethical issues or end-of-life care in pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was identified. CONCLUSIONS: Despite numerous ethical issues reported surrounding pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, we found limited patient-level research and no practical guides for communicating with families or managing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation discontinuation.