Top-Down Garbage Collector: a tool for selecting high-quality top-down proteomics mass spectra.

MOTIVATION: We present the first tool for unbiased quality control of top-down proteomics datasets. Our tool can select high-quality top-down proteomics spectra, serve as a gateway for building top-down spectral libraries and, ultimately, improve identification rates. RESULTS: We demonstrate that a twofold rate increase for two E. coli top-down proteomics datasets may be achievable. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: http://patternlabforproteomics.org/tdgc, freely available for academic use. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

DiagnoProt: a tool for discovery of new molecules by mass spectrometry.

MOTIVATION: Around 75% of all mass spectra remain unidentified by widely adopted proteomic strategies. We present DiagnoProt, an integrated computational environment that can efficiently cluster millions of spectra and use machine learning to shortlist high-quality unidentified mass spectra that are discriminative of different biological conditions. RESULTS: We exemplify the use of DiagnoProt by shortlisting 4366 high-quality unidentified tandem mass spectra that are discriminative of different types of the Aspergillus fungus. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: DiagnoProt, a demonstration video and a user tutorial are available at http://patternlabforproteomics.org/diagnoprot . CONTACT: andrerfsilva@gmail.com or paulo@pcarvalho.com. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Leveraging the partition selection bias to achieve a high-quality clustering of mass spectra.

In proteomics, the identification of peptides from mass spectral data can be mathematically described as the partitioning of mass spectra into clusters (i.e., groups of spectra derived from the same peptide). The way partitions are validated is just as important, having evolved side by side with the clustering algorithms themselves and given rise to many partition assessment measures. An assessment measure is said to have a selection bias if, and only if, the probability that a randomly chosen partition scoring a high value depends on the number of clusters in the partition. In the context of clustering mass spectra, this might mislead the validation process to favor clustering algorithms that generate too many (or few) spectral clusters, regardless of the underlying peptide sequence. A selection bias toward the number of peptides is desirable for proteomics as it estimates the number of peptides in a complex protein mixture. Here, we introduce an assessment measure that is purposely biased toward the number of peptide ion species. We also introduce a partition assessment framework for proteomics, called the Partition Assessment Tool, and demonstrate its importance by evaluating the performance of eight clustering algorithms on seven proteomics datasets while discussing the trade-offs involved. SIGNIFICANCE: Clustering algorithms are widely adopted in proteomics for undertaking several tasks such as speeding up search engines, generating consensus mass spectra, and to aid in the classification of proteomic profiles. Choosing which algorithm is most fit for the task at hand is not simple as each algorithm has advantages and disadvantages; furthermore, specifying clustering parameters is also a necessary and fundamental step. For example, deciding on whether to generate "pure clusters" or fewer clusters but accepting noise. With this as motivation, we verify the performance of several widely adopted algorithms on proteomic datasets and introduce a theoretical framework for drawing conclusions on which approach is suitable for the task at hand.

A quantitation module for isotope-labeled peptides integrated into PatternLab for proteomics.

We present a new module integrated into the widely adopted PatternLab for proteomics to enable analysis of isotope-labeled peptides produced using dimethyl or SILAC. The accurate quantitation of proteins lies within the heart of proteomics; dimethylation has shown to be reliable, inexpensive, and applicable to any sample type. We validate our algorithm using an M. tuberculosis dataset obtained from two biological conditions; we used three dimethyl labels, one serving as an internal control for labeling a mixture of samples from both biological conditions. This internal control certified the proper functioning of our software. Availability: http://patternlabforproteomics.org, freely available for academic use.