Comparison of the extraperitoneal and transperitoneal routes for permanent colostomy: a meta-analysis with RCTs and systematic review.

AIM: To assess the efficacy of extraperitoneal colostomy (EPC) in preventing stoma-related complications. BACKGROUND: Transperitoneal colostomy (TPC) is a widely used surgical approach. However, TPCs have been reported to have increased risks of stoma-related complications, such as parastomal hernias, stomal retraction, and stomal prolapse. The purpose of EPC is to reduce these complications. However, there is still a lack of evidence-based studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, MOOSE, PubMed, Google Scholar, Baidu Scholar, and the Cochrane Library were searched to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis with RCTs. The meta-analysis was performed with RevMan 5.4 software. RESULTS: This study included 5 eligible RCTs. Compared with the TPC group, the EPC group had lower incidence rates of parastomal hernias (RR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.04-0.52, P = 0.003, I2 = 0%) and stomatal prolapse (RR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.08-0.95, P = 0.04, I2 = 0%), but a higher rate of defecation sensation (RR, 3.51; 95% CI, 2.47-5.0, P < 0.00001, I2 = 37%). No statistically significant differences were observed in stoma retraction, colostomy construction time, stoma ischemia, or stoma necrosis. CONCLUSION: Extraperitoneal colostomies are associated with lower rates of postoperative complications than transperitoneal colostomies. A randomized controlled trial meta-analysis found that permanent colostomies after abdominoperineal resection resulted in better outcomes.

Nomograms for predicting cancer-specific and overall survival in patients with invasive extramammary Paget's disease.

Aim: To develop nomograms for predicting cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with invasive extramammary Paget's disease (iEMPD). Patients & methods: Retrospective data of 1955 patients with iEMPD were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Nomograms for predicting CSS and OS were established using competing risk regression and Cox regression, respectively, and were internally validated. Results: Five (age, surgery, tumor location, stage and concurrent malignancy) and eight (gender, age, race, marital status, surgery, tumor location, stage and lymph node metastasis) clinicopathological factors were utilized to construct nomograms for predicting CSS and OS, respectively. The concordance indices of the nomograms for predicting CSS and OS were 0.78 and 0.73, respectively. The validation of the nomograms showed good calibration and discrimination. The decision curve analyses confirmed the clinical utility of these nomograms. Conclusion: The nomograms can be a reliable tool for treatment design and prognostic evaluation of iEMPD.

Lay abstract Invasive extramammary Paget's disease (iEMPD) is a rare type of cutaneous malignancy with a heterogeneous prognosis. The prognostic factors remain poorly described, resulting in unclear risk stratification of the patients with iEMPD. The purpose of this study is to identify the prognostic factors associated with cancer-specific and overall survival rates in iEMPD and to develop accurate risk stratification models to guide the design of individualized treatment regimens. Clinicopathological data of 1955 patients pathologically diagnosed with iEMPD were retrospectively collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, and were utilized for analysis and construction of models for predicting the long-term survival in patients with iEMPD. Eventually, five (age, surgery, tumor location, stage and concurrent malignancy) and eight (gender, age, race, marital status, surgery, tumor location, stage and lymph node metastasis) factors were chosen to develop models for predicting cancer-specific and overall survival, respectively. The prediction accuracy and clinical utility of the established models were confirmed in subsequent evaluation. Because iEMPD is an extremely rare disease that a lot of clinical practitioners might not be familiar with, the availability of these quantifiable predictive models will provide convenience in daily practice.

Lateral lymph node dissection reduces local recurrence of locally advanced lower rectal cancer in the absence of preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The impact of lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) in locally advanced lower rectal cancer remains controversial. This study is to compare total mesorectal excision (TME) with or without LLND in lower rectal cancer cases of stage II/III. METHODS: The electronic databases were systematically searched that compared TME with or without LLND among patients with lower rectal cancer in clinical stage II/III. Subgroup analysis was performed considering neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). The hazard ratios (HR), relative risk (RR), and weighted mean difference (WMD) were pooled. RESULTS: Twelve studies of 4458 patients of this meta-analysis demonstrate, LLND alone significantly reduced the local recurrence rate of patients who did not receive nCRT (RR 0.71, P = 0.004), while the difference was not significant when combined with nCRT (RR 0.70, P = 0.36). The analysis shows TME with LLND was associated with significantly longer operation time (WMD 90.73 min, P < 0.001), more intraoperative blood loss (WMD 303.20 mL, P < 0.001), and postoperative complications (RR = 1.35, P =0.02). Whereas urinary dysfunction (RR 1.44, P = 0.38), sexual dysfunction (RR 1.41, P = 0.17), and postoperative mortality (RR = 1.52, P = 0.70), were similar between these two groups. Statistically, no significant differences were observed in OS (HR 0.93, P = 0.62), DFS (HR 0.99, P = 0.96), total recurrence (RR 0.98, P = 0.83), lateral recurrence (RR 0.49, P = 0.14), or distal recurrence (RR 0.95, P = 0.78) between these two groups regardless of whether nCRT was performed or not. CONCLUSIONS: The study shows LLND alone decreases the local recurrence without using nCRT irrespective of the survival advantage in locally advanced lower rectal cancer. The benefit of controlling local recurrence by LLND alone makes us reconsider the usage of nCRT with LLND. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The protocol for this meta-analysis was registered prospectively with PROSPERO ( CRD42020135575 ) on 16 May 2019.

The long-term survival benefits of high and low ligation of inferior mesenteric artery in colorectal cancer surgery: A review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The decision of ligation at the origin of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) or below the origin of the left colic artery (LCA) has remained a dilemma for surgeons in colorectal cancer surgery. The available studies are controversial. The objective of this meta-analysis is to compare the predictive significance of high versus low ligation in colorectal cancer surgery. METHODS: A literature search done using Medline, EMBASE, GoogleScholar, and references. A meta-analysis was performed to analyze the 5-year overall survival (OS) of the high and low ligation using hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). We further analyzed 2 subgroups considering the level of lymph nodes (LNs) extension. That is IMA positive (+ve) and negative (-ve) LNs. Survival differences were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 3119 patients in 5 cohorts were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled HR results showed significant OS benefit of high ligation than low ligation (HR; 0.77, 95% CI: 0.66-0.89) in the "IMA +ve" group with 33% decreased risk, while there is no statistical significance in the "IMA -ve" (HR 0.66, 95% CI: 0.30-1.46) and the "all cases" group (HR 0.69, 95% CI: 0.41-1.15). CONCLUSION: The pooled data showed high ligation of IMA has a better survival benefit for the patients with IMA positive LNs. It signifies high ligation should be recommended for the advanced cases or with the suspected high risk of IMA lymphatic metastasis. The limited number of articles demands future high-powered, well-designed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for the further reliable conclusion.