RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the Time-Sensitive ADHD Symptom Scale (TASS) to evaluate change of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms over the course of a day in adults. METHODS: Eighty adults with ADHD participated in 1 or 2 visits, 1 to 9 weeks apart. At each visit, participants completed the TASS followed by raters administering the ADHD Rating Scale (ADHD-RS). Additional TASS and ADHD-RS ratings were completed 2 to 6 hours after each visit via telephone. Internal consistency of TASS items was assessed by Cronbach's α. Convergent validity of TASS and ADHD-RS total mean item scores was assessed using Pearson's correlation coefficients. κ correlations were calculated to assess item-by-item reliability between TASS and ADHD-RS items. RESULTS: Internal consistency of TASS items was high, with an overall Cronbach's α coefficient of .93. The Pearson's correlation coefficient between the TASS and ADHD-RS was significant for all visits (r = 0.70, P < .0001). There was moderate agreement between individual items on the TASS and ADHD-RS, with significant κ coefficients for almost all items (P < .05). DISCUSSION: The TASS showed high internal consistency and concurrent validity with the clinician-administered ADHD-RS and is a valid and reliable scale for measuring change in ADHD symptoms over the course of a day in adults.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/diagnóstico , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica/normas , Adulto , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Psicometría , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To validate the attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) Self-Report Scale (ASRS) v1.1 Symptom Checklist versus the clinician-administered ADHD Rating Scale (ADHD-RS) in adolescents with ADHD. METHOD: A total of 88 adolescents with ADHD aged 13-17 years participated in the study. The study was completed in one or two visits, 1-9 weeks apart. At each visit, participants completed the ASRS v1.1 Symptom Checklist, after which raters administered the ADHD-RS. Internal consistency of the ASRS v1.1 Symptom Checklist was assessed by Cronbach's alpha (Cronbach's α). Concurrent validity between the scales was assessed using Pearson's correlation coefficients. Item-by-item reliability between the scales was assessed by the Kappa coefficient of agreement. RESULTS: The mean age of participants was 14.9±1.5 SD years. 76.1% (n=67) were male. 73.9% (n=65) were currently receiving medication for ADHD. Internal consistency of ASRS v1.1 Symptom Checklist items was high, with Cronbach's α coefficients of 0.93 at Visit 1 and 0.94 at Visit 2. Pearson's correlation coefficients between the ASRS v1.1 Symptom Checklist and ADHD-RS were highly significant at Visit 1 (r=0.72, p<0.0001) and Visit 2 (r=0.73, p<0.0001). There was moderate item-by-item agreement between individual items on the scales (% agreement: 35.2%-63.4%) with statistically significant kappa coefficients for 17 of the 18 items. CONCLUSION: The ASRS v1.1 Symptoms Checklist showed high internal consistency and high concurrent validity with the clinician-administered ADHD-RS in adolescents with ADHD. Results of this study suggest that the ASRS v1.1 Symptom Checklist is an internally consistent self-report scale for the assessment of adolescent ADHD and is moderately associated with a concurrently administered clinician measure of ADHD symptoms.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/diagnóstico , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Adolescente , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/fisiopatología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Psicometría/instrumentación , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , AutoinformeRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To validate the Time-Sensitive ADHD Symptom Scale (TASS) in the assessment of symptom change during the day in adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). METHODS: A total of 40 participants with ADHD aged 13 to 17 years completed 1 or 2 visits, 1 to 9 weeks apart. The TASS and the ADHD Rating Scale-IV (ADHD-RS-IV) were completed twice at each visit: at the time of the clinic visit (in-clinic assessment) and 2 to 6 hours afterwards (evening assessment). RESULTS: Internal consistency of the TASS was high, with Cronbach's alpha coefficients of 0.91 (in-clinic) and 0.90 (evening) for visit 1, and 0.88 (in-clinic) and 0.86 (evening) for visit 2. Pearson's correlation coefficients between the TASS and ADHD-RS-IV were significant at both visits (P < 0.0001). Stability analyses of the TASS found no significant effect between ratings performed at different visits (P = 0.936), but there was a significant effect of the assessment time within visits (P < 0.0001). There was not a significant visit by assessment time interaction (P = 0.924). CONCLUSIONS: The TASS showed high internal consistency and high concurrent validity with the ADHD-RS-IV. Results of this preliminary study indicate that the TASS is a valid and reliable self-report scale for adolescents with ADHD.