Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
2.
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med ; 29(1): 41, 2021 Feb 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33637112

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in the Netherlands, the demand for intensive care beds exceeded availability within days. Initially, patients were redistributed regionally by ground transport. When transport over longer distances became necessary, we initiated a new Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS) operation. We hypothesize that the transport of contagious COVID-19 patients is feasible and safe for patients and HEMS personnel. METHODS: In this retrospective, single-centre observational study, flight and monitor data were used to calculate the exposure time of the retrieval team to COVID-19 patients. All the crew members (n = 18) were instructed on the proper use of personal protective equipment (PPE), dressing and undressing routine using buddy check supervision and cleaning procedures. All the team members were monitored for possible COVID-19 symptoms, as advised by our National Institute for Health and Environment. One month after completing the aeromedical transport all crew members were asked to donate a blood sample which was examined for the presence of IgG antibodies to SARS-CoV-2. RESULTS: From March 24 to May 25, 2020 the HEMS team transported 67 ventilated critical care COVID-19 patients. The exposure time was 7451 min (124 h and 11 min). One HEMS member reported pneumonia 6 weeks before the start of the patient transport. He tested positive for IgG SARS-CoV-2 by serology testing. We speculate that he was infected before the start of the operation; irrefutable evidence is lacking to support this claim because we did not perform serology testing before this operation started. CONCLUSION: Occupational COVID-19 exposure during helicopter transport of ventilated critical care COVID-19 patients can be performed safely when proper PPE is applied.


Asunto(s)
Ambulancias Aéreas , Aeronaves , COVID-19/transmisión , Cuidados Críticos , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Personal de Salud , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa de Paciente a Profesional/prevención & control , Exposición Profesional/prevención & control , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos , Equipo de Protección Personal , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Administración de la Seguridad/organización & administración
3.
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med ; 29(1): 124, 2021 Aug 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34446076

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The extent to which Point-of-care of ultrasound (POCUS) is used in different European helicopter EMS (HEMS) is unknown. We aimed to study the availability, perception, and future aspects of POCUS in the European HEMS using an online survey. METHOD: A survey about the use of POCUS in HEMS was conducted by a multinational steering expert committee and was carried out from November 30, 2020 to December 30, 2020 via an online web portal. Invitations for participation were sent via email to the medical directors of the European HEMS organizations including two reminding notes. RESULTS: During the study period, 69 participants from 25 countries and 41 different HEMS providers took part in the survey. 96% (n = 66) completed the survey. POCUS was available in 75% (56% always when needed and 19% occasionally) of the responding HEMS organizations. 17% were planning to establish POCUS in the near future. Responders who provided POCUS used it in approximately 15% of the patients. Participants thought that POCUS is important in both trauma and non-trauma-patients (73%, n = 46). The extended focused assessment sonography for trauma (eFAST) protocol (77%) was the most common protocol used. A POCUS credentialing process including documented examinations was requested in less than one third of the HEMS organizations. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of the HEMS organizations in Europe are able to provide different POCUS protocols in their services. The most used POCUS protocols were eFAST, FATE and RUSH. Despite the enthusiasm for POCUS, comprehensive training and clear credentialing processes are not available in about two thirds of the European HEMS organizations. Due to several limitations of this survey further studies are needed to evaluate POCUS in HEMS.


Asunto(s)
Ambulancias Aéreas , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Aeronaves , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Sistemas de Atención de Punto
6.
Local Reg Anesth ; 9: 13-5, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26966388
7.
Int Emerg Nurs ; 25: 76, 2016 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26522732
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA