Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 48(10): 521-4, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23324248

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Studies on decompressive craniectomy (DCE) after a malignant middle cerebral artery (MCA) stroke in selected population show an increased probability of survival without increasing the number of very severely disabled. Cerebral infarct volume (CIV) as a triage criterion for performing surgery has not been discussed in literature. The aim of this study was to investigate the value of CIV and initial National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHHS) and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores as possible triage criteria in the surgical treatment of patients with "malignant" MCA stroke. MATERIAL AND METHODS: According to the study protocol, 28 patients with a malignant MCA stroke were included and analyzed prospectively. The patients were randomly divided either into the DCE plus best medical treatment (BMT) group or BMT alone group. CIV and NIHHS and GCS scores were measured at time of enrollment in every case. Clinical outcome was evaluated 1 year after the treatment. RESULTS: Six patients survived: 5 in the DCE group (none of them was older than 60 years) and 1 in the BMT group (P=0.03/0.06). Among survivors, none had a cerebral infarct volume of more than 390 cm(3) (P=0.05). All survivors in the DCE group had favorable outcomes. There was no significant difference in the NIHSS and GCS scores between the groups and survivors/nonsurvivors (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Decompressive surgery in the selected patients is likely to increase the probability of survival with a favorable outcome without increasing the number of severely disabled survivors. Patients with CIV of more than 390 cm(3) may be bad candidates for DCE, and the prognosis is likely to be bad regardless the treatment strategy. The initial NIHHS and GCS scores did not prove any prognostic value in outcome.


Asunto(s)
Craniectomía Descompresiva , Infarto de la Arteria Cerebral Media/fisiopatología , Infarto de la Arteria Cerebral Media/cirugía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Escala de Coma de Glasgow , Humanos , Infarto de la Arteria Cerebral Media/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
JAMA Neurol ; 78(2): 208-216, 2021 02 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33044488

RESUMEN

Importance: In patients with space-occupying hemispheric infarction, surgical decompression reduces the risk of death and increases the chance of a favorable outcome. Uncertainties, however, still remain about the benefit of this treatment for specific patient groups. Objective: To assess whether surgical decompression for space-occupying hemispheric infarction is associated with a reduced risk of death and an increased chance of favorable outcomes, as well as whether this association is modified by patient characteristics. Data Sources: MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Stroke Trials Registry were searched from database inception to October 9, 2019, for English-language articles that reported on the results of randomized clinical trials of surgical decompression vs conservative treatment in patients with space-occupying hemispheric infarction. Study Selection: Published and unpublished randomized clinical trials comparing surgical decompression with medical treatment alone were selected. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Patient-level data were extracted from the trial databases according to a predefined protocol and statistical analysis plan. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline and the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias were used. One-stage, mixed-effect logistic regression modeling was used for all analyses. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was a favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score ≤3) at 1 year after stroke. Secondary outcomes included death, reasonable (mRS score ≤4) and excellent (mRS score ≤2) outcomes at 6 months and 1 year, and an ordinal shift analysis across all levels of the mRS. Variables for subgroup analyses were age, sex, presence of aphasia, stroke severity, time to randomization, and involved vascular territories. Results: Data from 488 patients from 7 trials from 6 countries were available for analysis. The risk of bias was considered low to moderate for 6 studies. Surgical decompression was associated with a decreased chance of death (adjusted odds ratio, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.10-0.24) and increased chance of a favorable outcome (adjusted odds ratio, 2.95; 95% CI, 1.55-5.60), without evidence of heterogeneity of treatment effect across any of the prespecified subgroups. Too few patients were treated later than 48 hours after stroke onset to allow reliable conclusions in this subgroup, and the reported proportions of elderly patients reaching a favorable outcome differed considerably among studies. Conclusions and Relevance: The results suggest that the benefit of surgical decompression for space-occupying hemispheric infarction is consistent across a wide range of patients. The benefit of surgery after day 2 and in elderly patients remains uncertain.


Asunto(s)
Infarto Cerebral/diagnóstico , Infarto Cerebral/cirugía , Descompresión Quirúrgica/métodos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/métodos , Infarto Cerebral/mortalidad , Humanos , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendencias
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA