Snakes and ladders: An integrative literature review of refugee doctors' workforce integration needs.

INTRODUCTION: Healthcare systems worldwide are facing a workforce crisis; meanwhile, refugee doctors throughout the world face difficulties in accessing work. The aims of this review were to explore the integration needs of refugee doctors into host healthcare systems from the refugee perspective, synthesise the literature to construct a theory of refugee doctor integration needs and explore how these needs are met or challenged on the pathway to full integration. METHODS: In this integrative literature review, 11 databases and eight grey literature sources were searched by combining terms for refugee doctor and social integration and limiting to research published in or after 2003. Data were extracted, and quality scoring was completed independently by two researchers. This study utilised template analysis to perform a qualitative synthesis of the data. The multidimensional template included a pre-defined template based on a theoretical framework and a concurrent fully inductive template. RESULTS: Twenty-two papers were included, incorporating the views of 339 doctors from 30 different home countries and 10 different host countries. The resultant theory included 'foundations' (rights and responsibilities) and three pillars. The 'learning' pillar included required knowledge and skills acquisition. The 'being' pillar encompassed necessary identity work. The 'connecting' pillar comprised social connections, which impacted all other domains. The random and non-linear path to integration faced by refugee doctors was also presented as a serious game. DISCUSSION: This study produced a theory exploring refugee doctors' integration needs and how these are met or challenged. Medical educators developing courses for refugee doctors should attend not only to knowledge and skills acquisition but also social connections, identity work and rights and responsibilities. The theory highlights the central importance of social connections. Medical educators can therefore have a transformative impact on refugee doctors' integration. This may also contribute to society by helping to alleviate the workforce crisis.

From corners to community: exploring medical students' sense of belonging through co-creation in clinical learning.

BACKGROUND: Belonging is critical for the development and wellbeing of medical students. Belonging, particularly within a 'relational being' paradigm, presents a significant challenge for students, especially within clinical learning environments. Co-creation is a learning relationship in which students are actively involved in the education process. It is inherently relational and promotes belonging within higher education environments. Little is known about utilising co-creation in the curriculum, within medical education. The aim of this study was to explore medical students' experience of co-creation of learning resources within the clinical learning environment. METHODS: Following ethical approval, medical students were invited to become co-creators of a learning bulletin resource, within the paediatric acute receiving unit, at a paediatric teaching hospital. Interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) was used to enable an in-depth exploration of how medical students experienced co-creation within the clinical learning environment. Medical students participated in semi-structured interviews about their experience, which were transcribed verbatim and analysed using IPA. The analysis integrated individual lived experiences into an analytic summary. RESULTS: Nine medical students participated. Three group experiential themes were identified: identity maturation; learning community and workplace integration. The support found within this co-created learning community, along with maturation of their identity, allowed the participants to experience a challenge to their existing worldview. This shift in perspective resulted in them responding and behaving in the workplace in new ways, which enabled them to belong as themselves in the clinical learning environment. These findings were situated within the developmental concept of self-authorship, as well as contributing to a new understanding of how co-creation promoted social integration. CONCLUSIONS: Co-creation enabled students to learn in a meaningful way. The relational power of co-creation, can be harnessed to deliver participatory learning experiences, within our increasingly complex healthcare environment, to support the learning, development and integration of doctors of the future.

The impact of simulation-based mastery learning, booster session timing and clinical exposure on confidence in intercostal drain insertion: a survey of internal medicine trainees in Scotland.

BACKGROUND: Intercostal chest drain (ICD) insertion is a skill that medical trainees lack confidence in performing. This study explores the impact of a national programme of Simulation-Based Mastery Learning (SBML) on procedural confidence, including the impact of time intervals between booster sessions and interim clinical experience. METHODS: Internal Medicine Trainees in Scotland were surveyed about confidence and clinical experience with ICD insertion before and immediately after SBML and booster session. Data were matched and analysed using paired sample t-tests. Short interval and long interval groups were compared using Student's unpaired t-test. The impact of interim clinical experience was assessed using Analysis of Variance. RESULTS: Mean confidence in ICD insertion rose following SBML, fell between initial and booster session, and increased again following booster session (P = < 0.001). 33 of 74 trainees had successfully inserted an ICD between sessions. Fall in confidence was unaffected by the time interval between training sessions, but was mitigated by interim clinical experience. CONCLUSIONS: SBML boosts trainee confidence in ICD insertion. However, there is evidence of confidence decay, possibly due to a lack of clinical experience between sessions. More research is needed to explore barriers to transfer of skills from simulated to real-world environments.

Transfer of training from an internal medicine boot camp to the workplace: enhancing and hindering factors.

BACKGROUND: The transfer of training to the workplace is the aim of training interventions. Three primary factors influence transfer: trainee characteristics, training design and work environment influences. Within medical education, the work environment factors influencing transfer of training remain underexplored. Burke and Hutchins' review of training transfer outlined five work environment influences: opportunity to perform, supervisor/peer support, strategic link, transfer climate and accountability. This study aimed to explore the ways in which work environment factors influence the transfer of training for medical trainees. METHODS: Internal Medicine Training in Scotland includes a three-day boot camp involving simulation-based mastery learning of procedural skills, immersive simulation scenarios and communication workshops. Following ethical approval, trainees were invited to take part in interviews at least three months after following their boot camp. Interviews were semi-structured, anonymised, transcribed verbatim and analysed using template analysis. Member checking interviews were performed to verify findings. RESULTS: A total of 26 trainees took part in interviews between January 2020 and January 2021. Trainees reported a lack of opportunities to perform procedures in the workplace and challenges relating to the transfer climate, including a lack of appropriate equipment and resistance to change in the workplace. Trainees described a strong sense of personal responsibility to transfer and they felt empowered to change practice in response to the challenges faced. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights barriers to transfer of training within the clinical workplace including procedural opportunities, a transfer climate with challenging equipment availability and, at times, an unsupportive workplace culture. Trainees are driven by their own sense of personal responsibility; medical educators and healthcare leaders must harness this enthusiasm and take heed of the barriers to assist in the development of strategies to overcome them.

Exploring transformative learning when developing medical students' non-technical skills.

CONTEXT: Non-technical skills (NTS) training should be incorporated into medical students' education and simulation-based approaches are often utilised to facilitate this. Such experiences have the potential to foster transformative learning by facilitating a reassessment of one's prior assumptions and a significant shift in one's outlook, referred to as the process of perspective transformation. The aim of this research was to explore how NTS training might facilitate transformative learning in final-year medical students. METHODS: Following ethical approval, medical student volunteers from four medical schools (Aberdeen, Dundee, Edinburgh and Glasgow) participated in simulation sessions, were debriefed with an emphasis on NTS using a behavioural marker system and then took part in focus groups. Focus group discussions were semi-structured and questions were based on the phases of perspective transformation identified by Jack Mezirow. Focus group discussions were audiorecorded, transcribed verbatim, anonymised and analysed using template analysis. RESULTS: A total of 33 medical students took part in five focus groups. There was evidence of the following stages of perspective transformation: Phase 2 (self-examination with emotional disturbance, including fear, anxiety, guilt, shame and frustration); Phase 3 (critical assessment of assumptions, including the undervaluing of NTS, recognising that technical skills alone are insufficient, and recognising that it is possible to improve one's NTS); Phase 5 (exploring options for new roles, relationships and actions), and Phase 6 (planning a course of action for future simulations, as a medical student and as a doctor). CONCLUSIONS: This study deepens our understanding of how exposure to NTS training in simulation-based education influences the learning of medical students and shows that such exposure can result in the cognitive phases of transformative learning. It provides us with valuable insights into medical students' perspectives on their learning of NTS at a pivotal stage in training and represents an interesting way of assessing the educational impact of such sessions.

Systematic review of clinical debriefing tools: attributes and evidence for use.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Clinical debriefing (CD) following a clinical event has been found to confer benefits for staff and has potential to improve patient outcomes. Use of a structured tool to facilitate CD may provide a more standardised approach and help overcome barriers to CD; however, we presently know little about the tools available. This systematic review aimed to identify tools for CD in order to explore their attributes and evidence for use. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted in line with PRISMA standards. Five databases were searched. Data were extracted using an electronic form and analysed using critical qualitative synthesis. This was guided by two frameworks: the '5 Es' (defining attributes of CD: educated/experienced facilitator, environment, education, evaluation and emotions) and the modified Kirkpatrick's levels. Tool utility was determined by a scoring system based on these frameworks. RESULTS: Twenty-one studies were included in the systematic review. All the tools were designed for use in an acute care setting. Criteria for debriefing were related to major or adverse clinical events or on staff request. Most tools contained guidance on facilitator role, physical environment and made suggestions relating to psychological safety. All tools addressed points for education and evaluation, although few described a process for implementing change. Staff emotions were variably addressed. Many tools reported evidence for use; however, this was generally low-level, with only one tool demonstrating improved patient outcomes. CONCLUSION: Recommendations for practice based on the findings are made. Future research should aim to further examine outcomes evidence of these tools in order to optimise the potential of CD tools for individuals, teams, healthcare systems and patients.

Safety on the ground: using critical incident technique to explore the factors influencing medical registrars' provision of safe care.

BACKGROUND: Avoidable patient harm in hospitals is common, and doctors in training can provide underused but crucial insights into the influencers of patient safety as those working 'on the ground' within the system. This study aimed to explore the factors that influence safe care from the perspective of medical registrars, to identify targets for safety-related improvements. METHODS: This study used enhanced critical incident technique (CIT), a qualitative methodology that results in a focused understanding of significant factors influencing an activity, to identify practical solutions. We interviewed 12 out of 17 consenting medical registrars in Scotland, asking them to recount their observations during clinical experiences where something happened that positively or negatively impacted on patient safety. Data were analysed manually using a modified content analysis with credibility checks as per enhanced CIT, with data exhaustiveness reached after six registrars. RESULTS: A total of 221 critical incidents impacting patient safety were identified. These were inductively placed into 24 categories within 4 overarching categories: Individual skills, encompassing individual behavioural and technical skills; Collaboration, regarding how communication, trust, support and flexibility shape interprofessional collaboration; Organisation, concerning organisational systems and staffing and Training environment, relating to culture, civility, having a voice and learning at work. Practical targets for safety-related interventions were identified, such as clear policies for patient care ownership or educational interventions to foster civility. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a rigorous and focused understanding of the factors influencing patient safety in hospitals, using the 'insider' perspective of the medical registrar. Safety goes beyond the individual and is reliant on safe system design, interprofessional collaboration and a culture of support, learning and respect. Organisations should also promote flexibility within clinical practice when patient needs do not conform to standardised care pathways. We suggest targeted interventions within educational and organisational priorities to improve safety in hospitals.

Reclaiming identities: exploring the influence of simulation on refugee doctors' workforce integration.

BACKGROUND: Healthcare professionals are a precious resource, however, if they fail to integrate into the workforce, they are likely to relocate. Refugee doctors face workforce integration challenges including differences in language and culture, educational background, reduced confidence, and sense of identity. It has been proposed that simulation programmes may have the power to influence workforce integration. This study aimed to explore how an immersive simulation programme influenced workforce integration for refugee doctors joining a new healthcare system. METHODS: Doctors were referred to a six-day immersive simulation programme by a refugee doctor charity. Following the simulation programme, they were invited to participate in the study. Semi-structured interviews, based on the 'pillars' conceptual model of workforce integration, were undertaken. Data were analysed using template analysis, with the workforce integration conceptual model forming the initial coding template. Themes and sub-themes were modified according to the data, and new codes were constructed. Data were presented as an elaborated pillars model, exploring the relationship between simulation and workforce integration. RESULTS: Fourteen doctors participated. The 'learning pillar' comprised communication, culture, clinical skills and knowledge, healthcare systems and assessment, with a new sub-theme of role expectations. The 'connecting pillar' comprised bonds and bridges, which were strengthened by the simulation programme. The 'being pillar' encompassed the reclaiming of the doctor's identity and the formation of a new social identity as an international medical graduate. Simulation opportunities sometimes provided 'building blocks' for the pillars, but at other times opportunities were missed. There was also an example of the simulation programme threatening one of the integration pillars. CONCLUSIONS: Opportunities provided within simulation programmes may help refugee doctors form social connections and aid learning in a variety of domains. Learning, social connections, and skills application in simulation may help doctors to reclaim their professional identities, and forge new identities as international medical graduates. Fundamentally, simulation experiences allow newcomers to understand what is expected of them. These processes are key to successful workforce integration. The simulation community should be curious about the potential of simulation experiences to influence integration, whilst also considering the possibility of unintentional 'othering' between faculty and participants.

"Ego massaging that helps": a framework analysis study of internal medicine trainees' interprofessional collaboration approaches.

INTRODUCTION: Patient care depends on collaborative practice. Debate remains as to the best approach to providing education for collaboration, with educational interventions often far removed from the realities of the clinical workplace. Understanding the approaches used for collaboration in clinical practice could inform practical strategies for training. For internal medicine trainees, this involves collaboration with other professions but also with other specialties. This study aimed to explore the approaches that internal medicine trainees use for interprofessional collaboration and the ways that these approaches vary when internal medicine trainees interact with different healthcare provider groups. METHODS: Following ethical approval and participant consent, interprofessional communication workshops between August 2020 and March 2021 were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Workshops involved groups of internal medicine trainees discussing collaboration challenges and the approaches they use in clinical practice. This framework analysis study used the interprofessional collaboration framework described by Bainbridge and Regehr (building social capital, perspective taking and negotiating priorities and resources), and cross-referenced the categorised data with the healthcare groups that trainees collaborate with, to look for patterns in the data. RESULTS: Seventeen workshops, involving 100 trainees, were included. Trainees described relationship building, perspective taking and negotiating priorities and resources. Relationship building was a modification to the original framework domain of building social capital. Themes of power and civility transcended domains with evidence of using hierarchy as leverage when negotiating and employing civility as a tactical approach throughout. DISCUSSION: This bi-dimensional analysis highlights patterns of perspective taking when collaborating with other specialties and professions, and the approaches to negotiation of courting favour and coercion when interacting with other specialties. This study provides evidence of the strategies currently utilised by internal medicine trainees, with different healthcare groups, and presents a modified framework which could inform the development of training for collaboration.

The development of a marker system for Pharmacists' Behavioural Skills.

OBJECTIVES: Pharmacists increasingly require complex behavioural skills to fulfil enhanced roles within healthcare teams. Behavioural marker systems are used to assess behavioural (or non-technical) skills during immersive simulation. This study aimed to develop a marker system for pharmacists' behavioural skills in patient-focussed care scenarios, and to investigate its content validity. METHODS: Literature describing existing marker systems and the requisite behavioural skills of pharmacists were presented to two expert panels, alongside video examples of pharmacists in patient-focussed care simulations. The expert panels used this information to develop a new behavioural marker system. A third expert panel assessed the content validity, and the item- and scale-content validity indices were calculated. KEY FINDINGS: The resulting tool contains four categories, each with three or four skill elements: situation awareness (gathering information; recognising and understanding information; anticipating, preparing and planning), decision-making and prioritisation (identifying options; prioritising; dealing with uncertainty; implementing or reviewing decisions), collaborative working (involving the patient; information sharing; leadership or followership), self-awareness (role awareness; speaking up; escalating care; coping with stress). The scale-content validity index was 0.95 (ideal) and the only item below the acceptable cut-off was 'leadership or followership' (0.7). CONCLUSIONS: This tool is the first marker system designed to assess the behavioural skills of pharmacists in patient-focussed care scenarios. There is evidence of good content validity. It is hoped that once validated, the Pharmacists' Behavioural Skills marker system will enable pharmacy educators to provide individualised and meaningful feedback on simulation participants' behavioural skills.

'Us versus them': A social identity perspective of internal medicine trainees.

INTRODUCTION: Silos and group boundaries in the clinical workplace can result in interprofessional conflict which can be a source of anxiety for doctors in training. The social identity perspective (SIP) incorporates theories of social identity and self-categorisation, and may provide a useful lens to understand the socialisation and identity development of doctors. This study aimed to determine if and how the SIP may provide insight into intergroup relations as experienced by internal medicine (IM) trainees in Scotland. METHODS: Interprofessional communication workshops hosted as part of an IM boot camp between August 2020 and March 2021 were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Subsequent individual interviews with consenting trainees further explored social identity and intergroup relations. Data analysis employed template analysis and deductive independent coding with the SIP informing the initial coding template and new codes added inductively. RESULTS: Seventeen workshops, involving 100 trainees, and ten subsequent individual interviews were included. Trainees related to the social identity of an IM doctor and to stereotypes within the workplace. They described intergroup tensions resulting from a perception of differing priorities. They experienced outgroup derogation and the impact of role modelling those in their social group during their identity development. DISCUSSION: The SIP provides a useful lens to understand the social phenomena at play for IM trainees. It confirms the expectation of conflict between specialties and negative perceptions of outgroups. There is a need to consider the hidden curriculum of socialisation in the workplace during training and the influence of the learning environment on identity development.

Validity of the Medi-StuNTS behavioural marker system: assessing the non-technical skills of medical students during immersive simulation.

Background: The Medical Students' Non-Technical Skills (Medi-StuNTS) behavioural marker system (BMS) is the first BMS to be developed specifically for medical students to facilitate training in non-technical skills (NTS) within immersive simulated acute care scenarios. In order to begin implementing the tool in practice, validity evidence must be sought. We aimed to assess the validity of the Medi-StuNTS system with reference to Messick's contemporary validity framework. Methods: Two raters marked video-recorded performances of acute care simulation scenarios using the Medi-StuNTS system. Three groups were marked: third-year and fourth-year medical students (novices), final-year medical students (intermediates) and core medical trainees (experts). The scores were used to make assessments of relationships to the variable of clinical experience through expert-novice comparisons, inter-rater reliability, observability, exploratory factor analysis, inter-rater disagreements and differential item functioning. Results: A significant difference was found between the three groups (p<0.005), with experts scoring significantly better than intermediates (p<0.005) and intermediates scoring significantly better than novices (p=0.001). There was a strong positive correlation between the two raters' scores (r=0.79), and an inter-rater disagreement of more than one point in less than one-fifth of cases. Across all scenarios, 99.7% of skill categories and 84% of skill elements were observable. Factor analysis demonstrated appropriate grouping of skill elements. Inconsistencies in test performance across learner groups were shown specifically in the skill categories of situation awareness and decision making and prioritisation. Conclusion: We have demonstrated evidence for several aspects of validity of the Medi-StuNTS system when assessing medical students' NTS during immersive simulation. We can now begin to introduce this system into simulation-based education to maximise NTS training in this group.