A transatlantic survey of nutrition practice in acute pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND: Many guidelines exist for the nutritional management of acute pancreatitis; however, little is known regarding current practice. We aimed to investigate feeding practices, including the use of parenteral/enteral nutrition. METHODS: The study design was a cross-sectional, descriptive survey. Electronic surveys were sent to dietitians in the UK, the Republic of Ireland and Canada. Of 253 dietitians surveyed, 204 saw patients with acute pancreatitis regularly or occasionally and were included in the analyses. RESULTS: Most dietitians (92.8%) considered early feeding to mean <48 h after presentation. Over half (54.2%) favoured early feeding in severe disease, less in obesity (42%) and more with pre-existing malnutrition (81.9%). There was a tendency to feed earlier in university hospitals (P = 0.015), especially in obesity (P = 0.011). There was a tendency towards enteral (versus parenteral) nutrition in university hospitals (P = 0.000). The majority preferred the jejunal route (64.2%), although this was lower in the UK (43.8%) than in Canada (77.8%) or Ireland (54.2%). Under one-quarter of UK dietitians (23.2%) reported the existence of a pancreatic multidisciplinary team in their institutions, although this was lower in Ireland and Canada. CONCLUSIONS: Despite guidelines, there are gaps in the nutritional management of acute pancreatitis, including a continued reliance on parenteral feeding.

Blind bedside insertion of small bowel feeding tubes.

BACKGROUND: The use of Naso-Jejunal (NJ) feeding is limited by difficulty in feeding tube placement. Patients have traditionally required transfer to Endoscopy or Radiology for insertion of small bowel feeding tubes, with clear resource implications. We hypothesised that the adoption of a simple bedside procedure would be effective and reduce cost. Clinical nutrition and nurse specialist personnel were trained in the 10/10/10 method of blind bedside NJ insertion. AIMS: The aims of this prospective study were to evaluate safety, efficaciousness and resource implications of bedside NJ tube insertion. METHODS: A total of 22 patients had 37 NJ tubes inserted in the study period (12 months). The majority were inserted by either a nurse specialist or clinical nutritionist. RESULTS: Out of the 37 insertions, 32 (86%) were in the correct position. Compared to Endoscopy insertion, this technique saved an estimated €8,353.60 for the duration of the study. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the bedside insertion of NJ tubes by clinical nutritionists and nurse specialists is safe, efficacious and highly cost effective.