Exhaled breath profiles in the monitoring of loss of control and clinical recovery in asthma.

BACKGROUND: Asthma is a chronic inflammatory airway disease, associated with episodes of exacerbations. Therapy with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) targets airway inflammation, which aims to maintain and restore asthma control. Clinical features are only modestly associated with airways inflammation. Therefore, we hypothesized that exhaled volatile metabolites identify longitudinal changes between clinically stable episodes and loss of asthma control. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether exhaled volatile organic compounds (VOCs) as measured by gas-chromatography/mass-spectrometry (GC/MS) and electronic nose (eNose) technology discriminate between clinically stable and unstable episodes of asthma. METHODS: Twenty-three patients with (partly) controlled mild to moderate persistent asthma using ICS were included in this prospective steroid withdrawal study. Exhaled metabolites were measured at baseline, during loss of control and after recovery. Standardized sampling of exhaled air was performed, after which samples were analysed by GC/MS and eNose. Univariate analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), followed by multivariate principal component analysis (PCA) was used to reduce data dimensionality. Next paired t tests were utilized to analyse within-subject breath profile differences at the different time-points. Finally, associations between exhaled metabolites and sputum inflammation markers were examined. RESULTS: Breath profiles by eNose showed 95% (21/22) correct classification for baseline vs loss of control and 86% (19/22) for loss of control vs recovery. Breath profiles using GC/MS showed accuracies of 68% (14/22) and 77% (17/22) for baseline vs loss of control and loss of control vs recovery, respectively. Significant associations between exhaled metabolites captured by GC/MS and sputum eosinophils were found (Pearson r≥.46, P<.01). CONCLUSIONS & CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Loss of asthma control can be discriminated from clinically stable episodes by longitudinal monitoring of exhaled metabolites measured by GC/MS and particularly eNose. Part of the uncovered biomarkers was associated with sputum eosinophils. These findings provide proof of principle for monitoring and identification of loss of asthma control by breathomics.

Loss of asthma control and activation of coagulation and fibrinolysis.

BACKGROUND: Epidemiologic studies have shown that patients with severe asthma have increased risk of pulmonary embolism, in particular patients with frequent asthma exacerbations. Therefore, we hypothesized that asthma exacerbations are associated with increased haemostatic activity. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether induced loss of asthma control is associated with changes in coagulation and fibrinolytic parameters in peripheral blood. METHODS: We performed a prospective, inhaled steroid withdrawal study in 23 patients with moderate to moderately severe asthma, consisting of a baseline visit and a visit after loss of asthma control. During the visits, we measured asthma control questionnaire (ACQ), atopy, lung function, inflammatory markers (eosinophils and neutrophils), and haemostatic parameters in plasma. RESULTS: Complete cessation of inhaled corticosteroids led to a loss of asthma control in 22 of 23 patients. We found increased asthma symptoms (ACQ 0.9 vs. 2.9, P < 0.01), significantly reduced lung function (forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) 3.51L vs. 3.13L, P < 0.01) and increased levels of eosinophils in plasma (0.26 × 10(E9)/L vs. 0.16 × 10(E9)/L, P = 0.03) in patients after loss of asthma control. However, we observed no significant changes in the coagulation and fibrinolysis parameters. CONCLUSION: Loss of asthma control after cessation of inhaled corticosteroids does not lead to increased haemostatic activation in patients with moderate to moderately severe asthma. This suggests that more severe inflammation or additional risk factors are required for activation of coagulation or reduction of fibrinolysis in asthma.

The influence of corticosteroids on hemostasis in healthy subjects.

BACKGROUND: Corticosteroids have been associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism in patients treated for inflammatory diseases. It is unclear whether the thrombotic risk is induced by the inflammation of the underlying inflammatory diseases or whether corticosteroids are prothrombotic as well. Considering the widespread use of corticosteroids in clinical practise, it is critical to know whether corticosteroids enhance coagulation. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether a 10-day prednisolone burst therapy activates hemostasis in healthy individuals. METHODS: Healthy subjects received either 0.5 mg kg(-1) day(-1) of oral prednisolone or placebo. Venous blood was collected at baseline, day 1 and day 10 and tested for thrombin-antithrombin complexes (TATc), D-dimer, plasmin-alpha2-antiplasmin complexes (PAPc), plasminogen-activator inhibitor type-1 (PAI-1), von Willebrand factor (VWF) and thrombin generation (peak thrombin, velocity index and endogenous thrombin potential [ETP]). RESULTS: Fifteen subjects received prednisolone and 16 placebo (median age 29 vs. 22 years, female subjects 33% vs. 56%, respectively). Peak thrombin and velocity index were higher in the placebo group at baseline. After 10 days of treatment, peak thrombin, velocity index, PAI-1 and VWF increased in the oral prednisolone group as compared with the placebo group (15.8 [SD 16.3] vs. -0.1 [SD 16.1], 41.2 [SD 41.3] vs. -2.3 [SD 42.7], 18.0 [IQR 8.0-37.0] vs. 0.5 [IQR -18.5-13.0], 4.0 [IQR -1.0-12.0] vs. 0.0 [IQR -2.5-1.5], respectively). No changes were observed for TATc, ETP, PAPc and D-dimer. CONCLUSIONS: Oral prednisolone induces a procoagulant state in healthy subjects, suggesting that corticosteroid treatment may increase the thromboembolic risk in patients with inflammatory diseases.