Relationships between vestibular issues, noise sensitivity, anxiety and prolonged recovery from mild traumatic brain injury among adults: a scoping review.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the extent of literature and findings on relationships between vestibular issues, noise sensitivity (NS), and anxiety. We were interested in how relationships among these factors impacted adults' recovery three months or more after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). METHODS: We conducted a scoping review to evaluate the extent of evidence linking relationships between vestibular issues, NS and anxiety with recovery after mTBI. Data relating to study characteristics and key findings were extracted and used to inform a critical narrative synthesis of findings. RESULTS: After screening and full-text review, we included two studies. Both studies considered the combination of vestibular issues, NS and anxiety and mTBI recovery. Vestibular issues, NS and anxiety were all significantly associated with one another and their presence was the strongest indicator that symptoms would extend beyond three-months after mTBI. CONCLUSION: Few studies have focused on the relationships that vestibular issues, NS and anxiety have with one another and recovery after mTBI. Given the apparent strong relationships between these factors and prolonged recovery, we highlight this as an area warranting further investigation.

Vestibular issues, noise sensitivity and anxiety all appear to impact on recovery from mild traumatic brain injury.There appear to be quite strong relationships between vestibular, noise sensitivity and anxiety symptoms following mild traumatic brain injury.More work exploring these key symptoms and how they impact recovery from mild traumatic brain injury using a wide range of study methods and approaches are needed to advance the field.

Valued living after mild traumatic brain injury: Characteristics and relationship with outcomes.

Psychological factors are strong predictors of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) recovery, consequently, psychological interventions can form part of an individual's rehabilitation. This may include enhancing valued living (VL), an approach that is effective in severe and mixed acquired brain injury samples. This study aimed to characterize VL in mTBI and explore its relationship with mTBI and mental health outcomes. 56 participants with a mTBI completed self-report measures before engaging in a psychological intervention. Pre-injury mental health and other demographic and injury-related variables, VL, post-concussion symptoms (PCS), functional disability, and stress, anxiety and depression were measured. A pre-injury mental health condition was significantly associated with VL. VL was uniquely associated with depression after mTBI (ß = -0.08, p = .05), however, there was no relationship with PCS, functional disability, stress or anxiety (p > .05). Following mTBI individuals with a pre-injury mental health condition or who experience heightened depressive symptoms may benefit from a values-based intervention as part of their rehabilitation. Future research, however, is needed to examine the role of VL in mTBI recovery.

Experiences of diagnosis and treatment for upper limb Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: a qualitative analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) most frequently affects the upper limb, with high associated disability. Delays to diagnosis and appropriate treatment can adversely impact prognosis and quality of life, but little is known about the healthcare experiences of people with CRPS. This study aimed to explore lived experiences of diagnosis and treatment for people with upper limb CRPS. METHODS: Participants were recruited through online support groups and multiple public and private healthcare settings in the Greater Wellington Region, New Zealand. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with participants who had experienced upper limb CRPS for more than three months and less than three years. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Thirteen participants (11 female, 2 male) aged between 43 and 68 years were interviewed. Duration of CRPS ranged from 7 months to 2.5 years. Five themes were identified. Participants initially engaged in healthcare out of a desire to return to being the person they were before having CRPS. Three interacting experiences epitomised the overall healthcare experience: (1) not knowing what is going on, (2) not being taken seriously, and (3) healthcare as adding another layer of load. Meanwhile, participants used multiple approaches in an attempt to not let CRPS stop them from continuing to live their lives. CONCLUSIONS: Participants in this study felt that credible information, validation, and simplification from healthcare providers and systems would support their process of navigating towards a meaningful life and self-concept in the presence of CRPS.

Difficulties capturing co-occurring traumatic brain injury among people with traumatic spinal cord injury: a population-based study.

STUDY DESIGN: This is a population-based prospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is common among people with traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI), but rates vary across studies associated with variable approaches to diagnosis. We aimed to determine if a published diagnostic algorithm could be consistently applied to capture co-occurring TBI among persons sustaining TSCI. SETTING: One of two spinal centres in New Zealand (NZ), the Burwood Spinal Unit (BSU) captures approximately 45% of NZ TSCI admissions. METHODS: Adults (age 16+) with TSCI admitted to the BSU between 1 January 2021 and 31 August 2021 (n = 51) were included. Clinical notes were audited prospectively to identify co-occurring TBI. RESULTS: We identified co-occurring TBI in 39% of TSCI cases with a small number of additional suspected TBI cases where TBI could not be confidently ruled in or out. Including all TBI cases, suspected or otherwise resulted in up to 55% of the sample having sustained co-occurring TBI. There were difficulties applying the published algorithm, associated with inconsistent documentation of TBI indicators from acute to rehabilitation contexts. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the feasibility of a TBI diagnostic algorithm for the TSCI population was low. Alternative approaches to screening for TBI among people sustaining TSCI are needed. Greater consistency in documenting TBI across the continuum of care will ensure TBI if present, is included in treatment planning.

Fear avoidance and return to work after mild traumatic brain injury.

OBJECTIVES: Fear avoidance is associated with symptom persistence after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). In this study, we investigated whether fear avoidance was associated with other outcomes such as return to work-related activity (RTW). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed associations between fear avoidance and RTW 6-9 months after mTBI, in two merged prospective mTBI cohorts. Adult participants aged 16 or over (n=175), presenting to outpatient services in New Zealand within 3 months of their injury, who were engaged in work-related activity at the time of injury, were included. Participants completed the Fear Avoidance Behavior after Traumatic Brain Injury (FAB-TBI) questionnaire at enrollment and 6 months later. Associations between FAB-TBI scores and RTW outcome were analyzed using multivariate approaches. RESULTS: Overall, 53% of participants had RTW by 6-9 months after mTBI. While early fear avoidance was weakly associated with RTW, persistent high fear avoidance between study assessments or increasing avoidance with time were associated with greater odds of still being off work 6-9 months after injury. CONCLUSIONS: Pervasive and increasing avoidance of symptom triggers after mTBI were associated with lower rates of RTW 6-9 months after mTBI. Further research is needed to better understand transition points along the recovery trajectory where fear avoidance behaviors fade or increase after mTBI.

Feasibility of Concussion Rehabilitation Approaches Tailored to Psychological Coping Styles: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of a clinical trial involving participants with concussion randomized to treatments designed to address fear avoidance or endurance coping, which are risk factors for disability. A secondary objective was to evaluate whether each treatment could affect selective change on targeted coping outcomes. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Outpatient concussion clinics. PARTICIPANTS: Adults (N=73, mean age=42.5y) who had persistent postconcussion symptoms and high avoidance or endurance behavior were enrolled at a mean of 12.9 weeks post injury. Ten participants did not complete treatment. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomized to an interdisciplinary rehabilitation program delivered via videoconferencing and tailored to avoidance coping (graded exposure therapy [GET]) or endurance coping (operant condition-based pacing strategies plus mindfulness training [Pacing+]). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Feasibility outcomes included screening efficiency, accrual, credibility, treatment fidelity, adherence, and retention. Avoidance was measured with the Fear Avoidance Behavior after Traumatic Brain Injury Questionnaire and endurance behavior with the Behavioral Response to Illness Questionnaire. RESULTS: Screening efficiency, or the proportion of clinic patients who were assessed for eligibility, was 44.5% (275 of 618). A total of 65.8% (73 of 111) of eligible patients were randomized (37 to GET, 36 to Pacing+), meeting accrual targets; 91.7% (55 of 60) of participants perceived treatment as credible. Therapists covered a mean of 96.8% of essential prescribed elements, indicating excellent fidelity. The majority (71.2%; 47 of 66) of participants consistently attended treatment sessions and completed between-session homework. Retention was strong, with 65 of 73 (89%) randomized participants completing the outcome assessment. GET was associated with greater posttreatment reductions in avoidance behavior compared with Pacing+ (Cohen's drepeated measures, 0.81), whereas the treatment approach-specific effect of Pacing+ on endurance behavior was less pronounced (Cohen's drepeated measures, 0.39). CONCLUSIONS: These findings support a future efficacy-focused clinical trial. GET has the potential to selectively reduce fear avoidance behavior after concussion, and, via this mechanism, to prevent or reduce disability.

Psychological flexibility moderates the influence of fear avoidance on outcomes after mild traumatic brain injury.

OBJECTIVES: Psychological factors contribute to poorer long-term outcomes following mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI); however, the exact psychological mechanisms that underly this relationship are not well understood. This study examined the relationship between psychological flexibility, fear avoidance, and outcomes over the first 6 months after mTBI. METHOD: Adults with mTBI-completed measures of psychological flexibility, fear avoidance, post-concussion symptoms, and functional status at baseline (<3 months post-injury; N = 152), and 3-month (N = 133) and 6-month follow-up (N = 102). A conceptually derived moderation-mediation analysis was used to test the mediating effect of fear avoidance on post-concussion symptoms and functional outcomes, and the moderating effects of psychological flexibility on fear avoidance. RESULTS: Fear avoidance had a significant indirect effect on the relationship between post-concussion symptoms and functional status across all three time points. Psychological flexibility was found to significantly moderate these effects. Only low levels of psychological flexibility had a significant influence on the mediating effects of high fear avoidance on functional status at 6-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Psychological flexibility may influence mTBI recovery by exerting an influence on fear avoidance. These initial findings provide a potential theoretical explanation of how fear avoidance can become maladaptive with time after mTBI.

Associations between comorbidity and quality of life outcomes after total joint replacement.

PURPOSE: We examined associations between self-reported and clinician-assessed comorbidity and quality of life (QOL) outcomes after hip and knee replacement. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional, questionnaire-based national survey. Participants aged 45 years or older (n = 409) were recruited from the New Zealand Joint Registry six months after a total hip (THR), total knee (TKR) or unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR). The main outcome QOL was measured using an 8-item short form of the World Health Organisation Quality of Life (WHOQOL-Bref) questionnaire six months following joint replacement surgery. The WHOQOL is a generic and non-health condition specific measure of QOL. RESULTS: Participants were on average 68 years of age, with more men (54%) than women (46%). Number of coexisting conditions and body mass index were correlated with age, pain and function scores, and QOL (p < 0.01), but not with each other. Linear regression analyses showed that comorbidities such as number of comorbid conditions and BMI had moderate associations with QOL outcomes. CONCLUSION: This study showed that general QOL outcomes following hip and knee joint replacement, while generally high, were associated with comorbidity burden and BMI. Future prospective research examining change in QOL before and following surgery would help to advance understandings of the various factors that contribute to patient satisfaction with their joint replacement.

Do concussion clinicians use clinical practice guidelines?

OBJECTIVE: Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) synthesize research evidence for health professionals and improve consistency of clinical care. However, it is unclear if concussion clinicians use them in their practice. We aimed to describe which CPGs New Zealand clinicians used and facilitators and barriers to uptake of these resources. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used snowballing recruitment methods to survey New Zealand concussion clinicians. Descriptive statistics and qualitative description were used to evaluate survey responses. RESULTS: Ninety-six clinicians took part in the survey. A majority (70%) indicated they were aware of and had used at least one concussion CPG. Facilitators and barriers to using CPGs related to clinician experience, nature of the CPG, the work context, characteristics of clients and whether strategies were provided to encourage their use. CONCLUSIONS: Participants viewed concussion CPGs as helpful tools for informing clinical practice. That less experienced clinicians were less likely to use concussion CPGs than more experienced clinicians suggests there is an opportunity to develop strategies to improve the uptake of CPGs among newer clinicians. This and other areas of further research include how well CPGs capture relevant cultural factors and the role of case complexity in clinicians' willingness to use concussion CPGs.

Psychological flexibility in mild traumatic brain injury: an evaluation of measures.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: In this study, we examined the psychometric properties of measures of psychological flexibility in a mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) sample. METHOD AND PROCEDURES: Adults who sustained a mTBI (n = 112) completed the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire - Acquired Brain Injury reactive avoidance subscale (AAQ-ABI (RA). Exploratory factor analysis and Rasch analysis were conducted to evaluate the facture structure, dimensionality, and differential item functioning. Construct validity was determined by correlating the AAQ-ABI (RA) with the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-Revised (AAQ-II) and Fear Avoidance after Traumatic Brain Injury (FAB-TBI). MAIN OUTCOME AND RESULTS: The AAQ-ABI (RA) was found to have strong internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.87). Consistent with previous findings, the AAQ-ABI (RA) had one distinct factor. Fit to the unidimensional Rasch model was adequate (χ2 (18) = 22.5, p = .21) with no evidence of differential item functioning across person factors examined. The AAQ-ABI (RA) also had expected relationships with theoretically relevant constructs. CONCLUSIONS: The AAQ-ABI (RA) appears to be a psychometrically sound measure of psychological flexibility in mTBI.

Development of a Programme Theory for Early Intervention Vocational Rehabilitation: A Realist Literature Review.

Purpose Little is currently known about how early intervention vocational rehabilitation (EIVR) works for people with newly acquired neurological conditions such as traumatic brain injury, acquired brain injury and spinal cord injury. This study aims, from a realist framework, to identify relevant literature and develop an initial programme theory to understand how EIVR might work for people experiencing acquired neurological disability. Realist reviews are ideally placed to address the identified knowledge gap as they assist in gaining a deeper understanding of how the intervention works, for whom it works best, and the contexts that promote the activation of desired outcomes. Methods We used a seven-step iterative process to synthesise literature using a realist approach. The steps included: development of initial programme theory, literature search, article selection, extracting and data organising, synthesis of evidence and programme theory refinement. We performed a literature search using the following databases: Cinahl, Embase, EMcare, Medline, PsychInfo and Scopus. Articles were selected if they contributed to the knowledge describing what is EIVR and how it works in newly acquired neurological conditions. Data were extracted and synthesised to develop a programme theory for EIVR. Results Following screening of 448 references, 37 documents were eligible for data extraction. We developed a refined programme theory of EIVR consisting of three contexts (prioritisation of exploring work options, return to work discussed as an option, and workplace support), nine mechanisms (ensuring rehabilitation teams' culture, fostering hope, exploring options, optimising self-efficacy, maintaining worker identity, staying connected, setting goals, engaging employer, and flexing roles) and three outcomes (confidence in ability to work, psychological adjustment, and engagement in solution focussed options). Conclusions This appears to be the first paper to explore how EIVR works, for whom and in what situations. We have produced a programme theory that may provide an initial understanding of EIVR following acquired neurological conditions.

Rasch analysis of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 in a mild traumatic brain injury sample.

In this study we examined the psychometric properties of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0 12-item version) in a mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI) sample.Materials and Methods: Treatment-seeking adults (n = 131) with MTBI recruited from outpatient clinics in Vancouver Canada, were assessed 1- and 3-months following clinic intake. Dimensionality, reliability, and differential item functioning of the WHODAS 2.0 were examined with Rasch analysis. Associations between change in WHODAS 2.0 scores and symptom, work and perceived improvement outcomes were examined.Results: Adequate fit to the Rasch model was achieved for 1-month follow-up assessment WHODAS 2.0 scores without altering the response format or item content [X2 (24, n = 130) = 21.2, p = .6]. The best model fit for 3-month follow-up assessment scores was achieved when two items (problems with dressing and washing) were combined [X2 (22, n = 115) = 20.9, p = .5]. Associations were evident between changes in WHODAS total Rasch scores and other outcome indicators such as return to productivity and percieved improvement.Conclusions: The WHODAS 2.0 (12-item version) is a psychometrically sound measure of functional outcome for adults seeking treatment following MTBI. Our table of ordinal to interval score conversions is recommended for future research examining MTBI outcomes.

Psychometric Characteristics of the Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) in People Undergoing Weight Loss Surgery.

The Illness Perception Questionnaire-Revised (IPQ-R) has been used extensively across many health conditions to measure patient illness and treatment perceptions. The constructs have an association with treatment adaptation and adherence which, in turn, are considered core factors involved in bariatric surgery outcome. This study examines the factorial validity and internal reliability of a modified (IPQ-R) in bariatric surgery candidates. After wording modifications, participants (N = 310) completed the IPQ-R as part of standard pre-surgery assessments. After removal of two items, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) supported the original 7-factor solution of the Beliefs scale, with good to marginal subscale internal consistency. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA), with two items removed only partially supported the original 5-factor Causal Attributions scale. Internal consistency was unacceptably low for two subscales. Further research is needed to generate new items which better fit the IPQ-R to this population before research can explore the relevance of illness perceptions.

Untangling chronic pain and post-concussion symptoms: the significance of depression.

OBJECTIVES: Post-concussion-like symptoms (PCS) are common in patients without a history of brain injury, such as those with chronic pain (CP). This exploratory study examined neuro-cognitive and psychological functioning in patients with PCS following mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) or CP, to assess unique and overlapping phenomenology. METHODS: In this case-control study, participants (n = 102) with chronic symptoms after mTBI (n = 45) were matched with mTBI recovered (n = 31) and CP groups (n = 26), on age, gender, ethnicity and education. Psychological status, cognitive functioning, health symptoms, beliefs and behaviours were examined. RESULTS: Participants who had not recovered from an mTBI and participants with CP did not differ in terms of PCS symptoms, quality of life, distress or illness behaviours, however, the CP group endorsed fewer subjective cognitive problems, more negative expectations about recovery and more distress (p < 0.05). On cognitive testing participants who had not recovered from an mTBI demonstrated greater difficulties with attention (p < 0.01) although differences disappeared when depression was controlled in the analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Unique patterns associated with each condition were evident though caution is required in attributing PCS and cognitive symptoms to a brain injury in people with mTBI presenting with chronic pain and/or depression. Psychological constructs such as illness and recovery beliefs appear to be important to consider in the development of treatment interventions.

Evaluating quality of life outcomes following joint replacement: psychometric evaluation of a short form of the WHOQOL-Bref.

PURPOSE: Reducing participant burden is important in health research and clinical assessment. We examined the psychometric properties of the EUROHIS-QOL 8-item index, a short version of the 26-item World Health Organisation Quality of Life questionnaire (WHOQOL-Bref), in a sample of people receiving joint replacement surgery. METHODS: Participants (n = 1008) completed the WHOQOL-Bref at either 6, 12, 24 or 60 months after hip or knee replacement. The factor structure, differential item functioning (DIF) and unidimensionality of the EUROHIS-QOL 8-item index were examined using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses and Rasch analyses. Convergent validity was examined using correlations with the parent measure and other patient-reported outcome measures (Oxford scores, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index). Discriminant validity was assessed between groups reporting high versus low pain and function, and by joint replaced. RESULTS: The measure demonstrated high internal consistency (α = 0.86), adequate convergent (r = 0.47-0.82, p < 0.001) and discriminant validity (p < 0.001). Factor and Rasch analyses supported a unidimensional structure. However, there were also indications of multidimensionality, with support for a two-factor model focusing on general health and function, and psychosocial aspects of QOL. There was minimal evidence of DIF, with just one item evaluating energy level showing DIF for age. CONCLUSIONS: The EUROHIS-QOL 8-item index demonstrated adequate properties as a unidimensional scale and as a two-factor scale evaluating general health and function, and psychosocial aspects of quality of life. It is low on clinical and participant burden, showed minimal ceiling effects and showed good concurrent and discriminant validity.

Posttraumatic stress symptoms in police staff 12-18 months after the Canterbury earthquakes.

Understanding posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms in police first-responders is an underdeveloped field. Using a cross-sectional survey, this study investigated demographic and occupational characteristics, coping resources and processes, along with first-responder roles and consequences 18 months following a disaster. Hierarchical linear regression (N = 576) showed that greater symptom levels were significantly positively associated with negative emotional coping (ß = .31), a communications role (ß = .08) and distress following exposure to resource losses (ß = .14), grotesque scenes (ß = .21), personal harm (ß = .14), and concern for significant others (ß = .17). Optimism alone was negatively associated (ß = -.15), with the overall model being a modest fit (adjusted R(2) = .39). The findings highlight variables for further study in police.

The contribution of psychological factors to recovery after mild traumatic brain injury: is cluster analysis a useful approach?

OBJECTIVES: Outcomes after mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI) vary, with slow or incomplete recovery for a significant minority. This study examines whether groups of cases with shared psychological factors but with different injury outcomes could be identified using cluster analysis. METHOD: This is a prospective observational study following 147 adults presenting to a hospital-based emergency department or concussion services in Christchurch, New Zealand. This study examined associations between baseline demographic, clinical, psychological variables (distress, injury beliefs and symptom burden) and outcome 6 months later. A two-step approach to cluster analysis was applied (Ward's method to identify clusters, K-means to refine results). RESULTS: Three meaningful clusters emerged (high-adapters, medium-adapters, low-adapters). Baseline cluster-group membership was significantly associated with outcomes over time. High-adapters appeared recovered by 6-weeks and medium-adapters revealed improvements by 6-months. The low-adapters continued to endorse many symptoms, negative recovery expectations and distress, being significantly at risk for poor outcome more than 6-months after injury (OR (good outcome) = 0.12; CI = 0.03-0.53; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Cluster analysis supported the notion that groups could be identified early post-injury based on psychological factors, with group membership associated with differing outcomes over time. Implications for clinical care providers regarding therapy targets and cases that may benefit from different intensities of intervention are discussed.

Graded Exposure Therapy for Fear Avoidance Behaviour After Concussion (GET FAB): protocol for a multisite Canadian randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Persistent symptoms after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) negatively affect daily functioning and quality of life. Fear avoidance behaviour, a coping style in which people avoid or escape from activities or situations that they expect will exacerbate their symptoms, maybe a particularly potent and modifiable risk factor for chronic disability after mTBI. This study will evaluate the efficacy of graded exposure therapy (GET) for reducing persistent symptoms following mTBI, with two primary aims: (1) To determine whether GET is more effective than usual care; (2) to identify for whom GET is the most effective treatment option, by evaluating whether baseline fear avoidance moderates differences between GET and an active comparator (prescribed aerobic exercise). Our findings will guide evidence-based care after mTBI and enable better matching of mTBI patients to treatments. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a multisite randomised controlled trial with three arms. Participants (n=220) will be recruited from concussion clinics and emergency departments in three Canadian provinces and randomly assigned (1:2:2 ratio) to receive enhanced usual care, GET or prescribed aerobic exercise. The outcome assessment will occur remotely 14-18 weeks following baseline assessment, after completing the 12-week treatment phase. The primary outcome will be symptom severity (Rivermead Post-concussion Symptoms Questionnaire). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Informed consent will be obtained from all participants. All study procedures were approved by the local research ethics boards (University of British Columbia Clinical Research Ethics Board, University of Calgary Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board, University Health Network Research Ethics Board-Panel D). Operational approvals were obtained for Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute and Provincial Health Services Authority. If GET proves effective, we will disseminate the GET treatment manual and present instructional workshops for clinicians. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT05365776.

Examination of outcome after mild traumatic brain injury: the contribution of injury beliefs and Leventhal's common sense model.

Associations between components of Leventhal's common sense model of health behaviour (injury beliefs, coping, distress) and outcome after mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI) were examined. Participants (n = 147) were recruited within three months following MTBI and assessed six months later, completing study questionnaires at both visits (Illness Perceptions Questionnaire Revised, Brief COPE, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale). Outcome measures included the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire and Rivermead Head Injury Follow-Up Questionnaire. Univariate and multivariate (logistic regression) analyses examined associations between injury beliefs, coping and distress at baseline, and later outcome. Participants endorsing stronger injury identity beliefs (p < .01), expectations of lasting severe consequences (p < .01), and distress (p < .01) at time one, had greater odds of poor outcome at time two. Coping styles were also associated with later outcome although variability in findings limited interpretability. Associations between psychological variables and outcome were examined and 76.5% of cases were correctly classified by the model. Consistent with Leventhal's model, participant beliefs about their injury and recovery had significant associations with outcome over time. Coping also appeared to have important associations with outcome but more research is required to examine these. Current reassurance-based interventions may be improved by targeting variables such as injury beliefs, coping and adjustment soon after injury.

A more "normal" life: residents', family, staff, and managers' experience of active support at a residential facility for people with physical and intellectual impairments.

BACKGROUND: Active support (AS) has gained popularity as an approach for assisting people with intellectual disability to engage more fully in everyday activities. Although research has identified changes in the extent that residents are engaged in meaningful activities, the experience of stakeholders such as residents, staff, and family in AS is underexplored. METHOD: A general inductive approach was used to analyse focus group and interview transcripts of residents (n = 4), staff (n = 13), and family (n = 2) about their experience of involvement in an AS pilot project at one residential care facility in New Zealand. RESULTS: Three superordinate themes common to all stakeholders' experiences emerged: "living normal lives," "caring means doing with," and "engaging with risk." CONCLUSION: Transitioning to AS had been enriching but at times challenging for all stakeholders. Valuing resident autonomy and preparedness for greater exposure to risk are significant considerations in the implementation of AS.