Optimizing EEG Source Reconstruction with Concurrent fMRI-Derived Spatial Priors.

Reconstructing EEG sources involves a complex pipeline, with the inverse problem being the most challenging. Multiple inversion algorithms are being continuously developed, aiming to tackle the non-uniqueness of this problem, which has been shown to be partially circumvented by including prior information in the inverse models. Despite a few efforts, there are still current and persistent controversies regarding the inversion algorithm of choice and the optimal set of spatial priors to be included in the inversion models. The use of simultaneous EEG-fMRI data is one approach to tackle this problem. The spatial resolution of fMRI makes fMRI derived spatial priors very convenient for EEG reconstruction, however, only task activation maps and resting-state networks (RSNs) have been explored so far, overlooking the recent, but already accepted, notion that brain networks exhibit dynamic functional connectivity fluctuations. The lack of a systematic comparison between different source reconstruction algorithms, considering potentially more brain-informative priors such as fMRI, motivates the search for better reconstruction models. Using simultaneous EEG-fMRI data, here we compared four different inversion algorithms (minimum norm, MN; low resolution electromagnetic tomography, LORETA; empirical Bayes beamformer, EBB; and multiple sparse priors, MSP) under a Bayesian framework (as implemented in SPM), each with three different sets of priors consisting of: (1) those specific to the algorithm; (2) those specific to the algorithm plus fMRI task activation maps and RSNs; and (3) those specific to the algorithm plus fMRI task activation maps and RSNs and network modules of task-related dFC states estimated from the dFC fluctuations. The quality of the reconstructed EEG sources was quantified in terms of model-based metrics, namely the expectation of the posterior probability P(model|data) and variance explained of the inversion models, and the overlap/proportion of brain regions known to be involved in the visual perception tasks that the participants were submitted to, and RSN templates, with/within EEG source components. Model-based metrics suggested that model parsimony is preferred, with the combination MSP and priors specific to this algorithm exhibiting the best performance. However, optimal overlap/proportion values were found using EBB and priors specific to this algorithm and fMRI task activation maps and RSNs or MSP and considering all the priors (algorithm priors, fMRI task activation maps and RSNs and dFC state modules), respectively, indicating that fMRI spatial priors, including dFC state modules, might contain useful information to recover EEG source components reflecting neuronal activity of interest. Our main results show that providing fMRI spatial derived priors that reflect the dynamics of the brain might be useful to map neuronal activity more accurately from EEG-fMRI. Furthermore, this work paves the way towards a more informative selection of the optimal EEG source reconstruction approach, which may be critical in future studies.

A systematic review of microstructural abnormalities in multiple sclerosis detected with NODDI and DTI models of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.

Multiple sclerosis (MS), namely the phenotype of the relapsing-remitting form, is the most common white matter disease and is mostly characterized by demyelination and inflammation, which lead to neurodegeneration and cognitive decline. Its diagnosis and monitoring are performed through conventional structural MRI, in which T2-hyperintense lesions can be identified, but this technique lacks sensitivity and specificity, mainly in detecting damage to normal appearing tissues. Models of diffusion-weighted MRI such as diffusion-tensor imaging (DTI) and neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) allow to uncover microstructural abnormalities that occur in MS, mainly in normal appearing tissues such as the normal appearing white matter (NAWM), which allows to overcome limitations of conventional MRI. DTI is the standard method used for modelling this kind of data, but it has limitations, which can be tackled by using more complex diffusion models, such as NODDI, which provides additional information on morphological properties of tissues. Although there are several studies in MS using both diffusion models, there is no formal assessment that summarizes the findings of both methods in lesioned and normal appearing tissues, and whether one is more advantageous than the other. Hence, this systematic review aims to identify what microstructural abnormalities are seen in lesions and/or NAWM in relapsing-remitting MS while using two different approaches to modelling diffusion data, namely DTI and NODDI, and if one of them is more appropriate than the other or if they are complementary to each other. The search was performed using PubMed, which was last searched on November 2022, and aimed at finding studies that either utilized both DTI and NODDI in the same dataset, or only one of the methods. Eleven articles were included in this review, which included cohorts with a relatively low sample size (total number of patients = 254, total number of healthy controls = 240), and patients with a moderate disease duration, all with relapsing-remitting MS. Overall, studies found decreased fractional anisotropy (FA), neurite density index (NDI) and orientation dispersion index (ODI), and increased mean, axial and radial diffusivities (MD, AD and RD, respectively) in lesions, when compared to contralateral NAWM and healthy controls' white matter. Compared to healthy controls' white matter, NAWM showed lower FA and NDI and higher MD, AD, RD, and ODI. Results from the included articles confirm that there is active demyelination and inflammation in both lesions and NAWM, as well as loss in neurites, and that structural damage is not confined to focal lesions, which is in concordance with histological findings and results from other imaging techniques. Furthermore, NODDI is suggested to have higher sensitivity and specificity, as seen by inspecting imaging results, compared to DTI, while still being clinically feasible. The use of biomarkers derived from such advanced diffusion models in clinical practice could imply a better understanding of treatment efficacy and disease progression, without relying on the manifestation of clinical symptoms, such as relapses.

Task-based functional MRI challenges in clinical neuroscience: Choice of the best head motion correction approach in multiple sclerosis.

Introduction: Functional MRI (fMRI) is commonly used for understanding brain organization and connectivity abnormalities in neurological conditions, and in particular in multiple sclerosis (MS). However, head motion degrades fMRI data quality and influences all image-derived metrics. Persistent controversies regarding the best correction strategy motivates a systematic comparison, including methods such as scrubbing and volume interpolation, to find optimal correction models, particularly in studies with clinical populations prone to characterize by high motion. Moreover, strategies for correction of motion effects gain more relevance in task-based designs, which are less explored compared to resting-state, have usually lower sample sizes, and may have a crucial role in describing the functioning of the brain and highlighting specific connectivity changes. Methods: We acquired fMRI data from 17 early MS patients and 14 matched healthy controls (HC) during performance of a visual task, characterized motion in both groups, and quantitatively compared the most used and easy to implement methods for correction of motion effects. We compared task-activation metrics obtained from: (i) models containing 6 or 24 motion parameters (MPs) as nuisance regressors; (ii) models containing nuisance regressors for 6 or 24 MPs and motion outliers (scrubbing) detected with Framewise Displacement or Derivative or root mean square VARiance over voxelS; and (iii) models with 6 or 24 MPs and motion outliers corrected through volume interpolation. To our knowledge, volume interpolation has not been systematically compared with scrubbing, nor investigated in task fMRI clinical studies in MS. Results: No differences in motion were found between groups, suggesting that recently diagnosed MS patients may not present problematic motion. In general, models with 6 MPs perform better than models with 24 MPs, suggesting the 6 MPs as the best trade-off between correction of motion effects and preservation of valuable information. Parsimonious models with 6 MPs and volume interpolation were the best combination for correcting motion in both groups, surpassing the scrubbing methods. A joint analysis regardless of the group further highlighted the value of volume interpolation. Discussion: Volume interpolation of motion outliers is an easy to implement technique, which may be an alternative to other methods and may improve the accuracy of fMRI analyses, crucially in clinical studies in MS and other neurological populations.