Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 12 de 12
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Circulation ; 2024 Jun 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38940005

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Current estimates of atrial fibrillation (AF)-associated mortality rely on claims- or clinical-derived diagnoses of AF, limit AF to a binary entity, or are confounded by comorbidities. The objective of the present study is to assess the association between device-recognized AF and mortality among patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices capable of sensitive and continuous atrial arrhythmia detection. Secondary outcomes include relative mortality among cohorts with no AF, paroxysmal AF, persistent AF, and permanent AF. METHODS: Using the deidentified Optum Clinformatics US claims database (2015 to 2020) linked to the Medtronic CareLink database, we identified individuals with a cardiac implantable electronic device who transmitted data ≥6 months after implantation. AF burden was assessed during the first 6 months after implantation (baseline period). Subsequent mortality, assessed from claims data, was compared between patients with and those without AF, with adjustment for age, geographic region, insurance type, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and implantation year. RESULTS: Of 21 391 patients (age, 72.9±10.9 years; 56.3% male) analyzed, 7798 (36.5%) had device-recognized AF. During a mean of 22.4±12.9 months (median, 20.1 [12.8-29.7] months) of follow-up, the overall incidence of mortality was 13.5%. Patients with AF had higher adjusted all-cause mortality than patients without AF (hazard ratio, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.20-1.39]; P<0.001). Among those with AF, patients with nonparoxysmal AF had the greatest risk of mortality (persistent AF versus paroxysmal AF: hazard ratio, 1.36 [95% CI, 1.18-1.58]; P<.001; permanent AF versus paroxysmal AF: hazard ratio, 1.23 [95% CI, 1.14-1.34]; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: After adjustment for potential confounding factors, presence of AF was associated with higher mortality than no AF in our cohort of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices. Among those with AF, nonparoxysmal AF was associated with the greatest risk of mortality.

2.
JACC Clin Electrophysiol ; 10(4): 718-730, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38430088

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Integrating patient-specific cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED)-detected atrial fibrillation (AF) burden with measures of health care cost and utilization allows for an accurate assessment of the AF-related impact on health care use. OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to assess the incremental cost of device-recognized AF vs no AF; compare relative costs of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (pAF), persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF), and permanent atrial fibrillation (PermAF) AF; and evaluate rates and sources of health care utilization between cohorts. METHODS: Using the de-identified Optum Clinformatics U.S. claims database (2015-2020) linked with the Medtronic CareLink database, CIED patients were identified who transmitted data ≥6 months postimplantation. Annualized per-patient costs in follow-up were analyzed from insurance claims and adjusted to 2020 U.S. dollars. Costs and rates of health care utilization were compared between patients with no AF and those with device-recognized pAF, PeAF, and PermAF. Analyses were adjusted for geographical region, insurance type, CHA2DS2-VASc score, and implantation year. RESULTS: Of 21,391 patients (mean age 72.9 ± 10.9 years; 56.3% male) analyzed, 7,798 (36.5%) had device-recognized AF. The incremental annualized increased cost in those with AF was $12,789 ± $161,749 per patient, driven by increased rates of health care encounters, adverse clinical events associated with AF, and AF-specific interventions. Among those with AF, PeAF was associated with the highest cost, driven by increased rates of inpatient and outpatient hospitalization encounters, heart failure hospitalizations, and AF-specific interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Presence of device-recognized AF was associated with increased health care cost. Among those with AF, patients with PeAF had the highest health care costs. Mechanisms for cost differentials include both disease-specific consequences and physician-directed interventions.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Humanos , Fibrilación Atrial/economía , Fibrilación Atrial/terapia , Masculino , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos , Desfibriladores Implantables/economía , Desfibriladores Implantables/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Costo de Enfermedad , Anciano de 80 o más Años
3.
JACC Clin Electrophysiol ; 10(5): 916-926, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38520434

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Past clinical trials have shown the benefit of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) for reducing sudden cardiac death in at-risk patients. However, heart failure management and ICD technology have changed since these trials were first published. An updated assessment of ICD mortality benefit is needed. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare mortality rates between patients with a primary prevention (PP) indication for an ICD who did or did not receive an ICD using a contemporary, real-world data set. METHODS: Data was obtained from a large electronic health record data set covering patients in the United States from 2012 through 2020 who had a PP indication for an ICD and survived at least 1-year postindication. RESULTS: A total of 25,296 patients were identified as having a PP indication for ICD implantation, of which 2,118 (8.4%) were treated with an ICD within a year. Treated patients were younger than nontreated patients (age 63.4 years vs 66.1 years) with a smaller proportion of women (25.0% vs 36.7%). After 4-to-1 propensity matching, treated patients had similar clinical characteristics to nontreated patients. A Cox proportional hazard model estimated a 24.3% lower risk of all-cause mortality in patients when treated vs not treated with an ICD (HR: 0.757; 95% CI: 0.678-0.835; P <0.001). There was no detectable difference in ICD benefit between patients with ischemic and nonischemic heart disease (P = 0.50). CONCLUSIONS: ICD treatment of patients with a PP indication is associated with improved mortality even in the context of evolving adjunctive HF treatment, consistent with earlier landmark trials.


Asunto(s)
Muerte Súbita Cardíaca , Desfibriladores Implantables , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Prevención Primaria , Humanos , Desfibriladores Implantables/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Masculino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/prevención & control , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos
4.
Heart Rhythm ; 19(9): 1405-1411, 2022 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35716857

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Impaired quality of life due to atrial fibrillation (AF), which often includes decreased activity level, is an indication for ablation. However, the impact of ablation for AF on activity is poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of ablation on activity minutes per day using continuous accelerometer data from cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). METHODS: Using the Optum® Health Record dataset (2007-2019) linked with the Medtronic CareLink® database, we identified patients who had a CIED with AF detection and accelerometer capabilities. Patients with a device that transmitted heart rhythm and activity data ≥3 months before and ≥12 months after ablation were included in analysis. The associations between ablation and activity minutes were assessed for each CIED type. RESULTS: Of 4297 eligible patients who underwent AF ablation, 409 (9.5%) (65% male; age 67.3 ± 9.8 years; 64% paroxysmal AF) were included in analysis. The average AF burden and activity minutes per day preablation were 30.9% ± 37.4% and 175 ± 99 minutes, respectively. After ablation, relative AF burden decreased by 75.1% ± 53.2% (P <.001). There was no change in activity minutes per day after ablation in the entire cohort (average change -0.10 ± 36.2 minutes; P = .96). There were also no clinically significant changes in activity minutes postablation in subgroups based on CIED, season of ablation, quartile of AF burden change, and quartile of age at the time of ablation. CONCLUSION: There were no clinically significant changes in activity minutes per day in patients with CIEDs after ablation for AF.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Ablación por Catéter , Anciano , Ablación por Catéter/efectos adversos , Electrónica , Femenino , Corazón , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Calidad de Vida , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Am Heart J Plus ; 16: 100139, 2022 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38559281

RESUMEN

Background: Guideline-directed device therapies (GDDT) improve outcomes for eligible patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Utilization rates of device therapies in HFrEF after the 2012 ACCF/AHA/HRS Focused Update for Device-based Therapies of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities have not been well studied. Objective: Characterize the use of GDDT in newly indicated HFrEF patients from 2012 to 2019 using aggregated electronic health record (EHR) data. Methods: Computable phenotyping algorithms for implantable cardioverter defibrillator/cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator (ICD/CRT-D) indications from the GuideLine Indications Detected in EHR for Heart Failure program (GLIDE-HF) used diagnoses, procedures, measures, prescriptions, and the output of natural language processed provider notes from de-identified Optum® EHR data. Patients had a diagnosis of HF, dilated cardiomyopathy, or prior infarct, and were included if they had HFrEF with >1 year of records prior to a new Class 1 or Class 2a indication for an ICD or cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator (CRT-D) from 2012 to 2019. Results: Records showed 137,476 HFrEF patients were newly indicated for an ICD or CRT-D. GDDT was used in 14,892 of 36,358 (41.0%) CRT-D indicated patients and in 14,904 of 101,118 (14.7%) ICD-indicated patients. While GDDT use was low, 95.7% had echocardiography and 92.1% had prescriptions for beta-blockers or angiotensin-converting enzyme/angiotensin-receptor blockers medications. Conclusions: In this modern cohort of HF patients, a large proportion of eligible patients did not receive ICDs or CRT-Ds, while frequently receiving other indicated cardiovascular interventions and treatments.

6.
Int J Med Inform ; 138: 104138, 2020 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32298971

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) have been shown to reduce sudden cardiac death in appropriately selected patients, but they remain underutilized among indicated patients. OBJECTIVE: To develop a new approach to identifying guideline indications among patients implanted with ICDs by creating algorithms that extract data from electronic health records (EHR). METHODS: Published guidelines providing recommendations for ICD use were distilled into categories of diagnoses, measures, procedures, and terminologies. Criteria for each indication category were translated into clinical algorithms using administrative codes, search terms, and other required data. Cardiologists with guideline-development expertise reviewed these algorithms. After developing applications using a subset of data, phenotypes were evaluated against a curated Optum® de-identified EHR dataset, including 94,441 patients with ≥1 procedure codes for ICD implantation or follow-ups from 47 US provider networks. RESULTS: Guideline-concordant indications were identified in 83.7 % of 49,560 patients with new ICD implants. The percentage of ICD patients with guideline-concordant indications ranged from 69.4%-88.1% for patients whose initial EHR records were 0-6 days to >365 days prior to implant, respectively. Many guideline criteria used data which could only be derived from unstructured provider notes and required significant algorithm development. CONCLUSIONS: Defibrillator implant indications were detected in >80 % of patients receiving ICDs using rule-based algorithms in a curated EHR dataset. Computable phenotypes may enable researchers to analyze EHRs in more reproducible ways, by identifying guideline indications in patients with specific therapies such as ICDs, and, by extension, identifying patients who meet indications yet do not yet have indicated therapies.


Asunto(s)
Desfibriladores Implantables/normas , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Fenotipo , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Selección de Paciente
7.
Med Care Res Rev ; 77(1): 46-59, 2020 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29749302

RESUMEN

Hennepin Health, a Medicaid accountable care organization, began serving early expansion enrollees (very low-income childless adults) in 2012. It uses an integrated care model to address social and behavioral needs. We compared health care utilization in Hennepin Health with other Medicaid managed care in the same area from 2012 to 2014, controlling for demographics, chronic conditions, and enrollment patterns. Homelessness and substance use were higher in Hennepin Health. Overall adjusted results showed Hennepin Health had 52% more emergency department visits and 11% more primary care visits than comparators. Over time, modeling a 6-month exposure to Hennepin Health, emergency department and primary care visits decreased and dental visits increased; hospitalizations decreased nonsignificantly but increased among comparators. Subgroup analysis of high utilizers showed lower hospitalizations in Hennepin Health. Integrated, accountable care under Medicaid expansion showed some desirable trends and subgroup benefits, but overall did not reduce acute health care utilization versus other managed care.


Asunto(s)
Organizaciones Responsables por la Atención/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Organizaciones Responsables por la Atención/tendencias , Adulto , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Medicaid/economía , Medicaid/tendencias , Persona de Mediana Edad , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/legislación & jurisprudencia , Pobreza , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos
8.
Health Serv Res ; 53(3): 1992-2004, 2018 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28670682

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To design and test the validity of a method to identify homelessness among Medicaid enrollees using mailing address data. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Enrollment and claims data on Medicaid expansion enrollees in Hennepin and Ramsey counties who also provided self-reported information on their current housing situation in a psychosocial needs assessment. STUDY DESIGN: Construction of address-based indicators and comparison with self-report data. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Among 1,677 enrollees, 427 (25 percent) self-reported homelessness, of whom 328 (77 percent) had at least one positive address indicator. Depending on the type of addresses included in the indicator, sensitivity to detect self-reported homelessness ranged from 30 to 76 percent and specificity from 79 to 97 percent. CONCLUSIONS: An address-based indicator can identify a large proportion of Medicaid enrollees who are experiencing homelessness. This approach may be of interest to researchers, states, and health systems attempting to identify homeless populations.


Asunto(s)
Personas con Mala Vivienda/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicaid/organización & administración , Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios Postales/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros , Minnesota , Estados Unidos , Población Urbana
9.
Fam Syst Health ; 34(1): 58-63, 2016 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26963779

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The health status and psychosocial needs of the Medicaid expansion population have been estimated but not measured. This population includes childless adults predicted to have high rates of mental illness, especially among the homeless. Given limitations in access to mental health services, it is unclear how prepared the U.S. health care system is to care for the needs of the expansion population. METHOD: Using enrollment and claims data from the Minnesota Department of Human Services, this study presents prevalence rates of mental illness diagnoses and measures of unstable housing in Minnesota's childless-adult early Medicaid expansion population. Rates are compared with prior predictions of serious psychological distress and mental illness constructed from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) using χ2 and t tests. RESULTS: Diagnoses of mental illness in Minnesota's childless-adult early Medicaid expansion population were more than 15% higher than prevalence measures of mental illness/distress for the current Medicaid population. Diagnosis rates fell within confidence intervals of estimates of mental illness for Minnesota's Medicaid expansion population. Almost 1 in 3 enrollees had a marker of unstable housing; of this group, half had mental illness and/or distress. DISCUSSION: Findings support predictions of the high burden of mental illness and unstable housing among the Medicaid expansion population. Minnesota offers lessons to other regions working to care for such populations: (a) the use of flexible financing structures to build integrated care systems and (b) passage of legislation to allow data sharing among mental health, social services, and medical care.


Asunto(s)
Medicaid/tendencias , Trastornos Mentales/diagnóstico , Servicios de Salud Mental/tendencias , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Vivienda/normas , Vivienda/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Salud Mental/provisión & distribución , Persona de Mediana Edad , Minnesota , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/estadística & datos numéricos , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/tendencias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
10.
Clin Infect Dis ; 38 Suppl 3: S175-80, 2004 Apr 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15095187

RESUMEN

Shigella is a common cause of diarrhea in the United States, and accurate surveillance is needed to determine the burden of illness that they cause. Active surveillance for culture-confirmed Shigella infection was done as part of the Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network (FoodNet). A total of 4317 cases of shigellosis were reported during 1996-1999 in the original FoodNet surveillance areas. The average annual incidence was 7.4 cases/100,000 population. The incidence was similar during 1996-1998, but it declined in 1999 to 5.0 cases/100,000 population. State-to-state variability was seen in the incidence of shigellosis. Higher incidence was observed in California and Georgia. Shigella sonnei accounted for 70% of the infections, followed by Shigella flexneri (24%). Compared with other age groups, the incidence was highest among children aged 1-4 years of (36.3 cases/100,000 population). Marked demographic differences were observed between infections with S. sonnei and S. flexneri.


Asunto(s)
Disentería Bacilar/epidemiología , Shigella flexneri , Shigella sonnei , California/epidemiología , Disentería Bacilar/clasificación , Disentería Bacilar/microbiología , Enfermedades Transmitidas por los Alimentos/epidemiología , Georgia/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Servicios de Información , Vigilancia de la Población , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
11.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 23(12): 1098-104, 2004 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15626945

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Transmission of enteric pathogens at venues where the public contacts farm animals is a growing problem, particularly among children. In 2000 and again in 2001, enteric illness outbreaks caused by multiple pathogens occurred at a farm day camp for children in Minnesota. METHODS: Camp attendees were interviewed about illness history and potential exposures each year. Stool samples from children and calves at the camp were tested for enteric pathogens. RESULTS: Eighty-four illnesses were documented among camp attendees in the 2 outbreaks; laboratory-confirmed infections included Cryptosporidium parvum (17 cases), Escherichia coli O157:H7 (4), non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC) (7) and Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium and Campylobacter jejuni (1 each). Kindergarten-fourth grade children provided 1-on-1 care for a bottle-fed calf. Sixty of 83 calves tested carried at least 1 pathogen, including Giardia spp. (26 calves), C. parvum (25), non-O157 STEC (17), Campylobacter spp. (11), 3 serotypes of Salmonella enterica (10) and E. coli O157:H7 (2). Risk factors among children included caring for an ill calf and getting visible manure on their hands. Always washing hands with soap after touching a calf and washing hands before going home were protective. Prevention measures implemented in 2000 failed to prevent the second outbreak. CONCLUSIONS: Calves were the reservoir of multiple enteric pathogens for children at a farm day camp. Health care providers should consider numerous zoonotic pathogens in patients presenting with gastroenteritis after contact with cattle. Public health officials should help venue operators prospectively implement published guidelines to prevent zoonotic disease transmission.


Asunto(s)
Bovinos/microbiología , Brotes de Enfermedades , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/epidemiología , Animales , Campylobacter/aislamiento & purificación , Niño , Cryptosporidium parvum/aislamiento & purificación , Reservorios de Enfermedades , Escherichia coli/aislamiento & purificación , Heces/microbiología , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/etiología , Humanos
12.
Health Aff (Millwood) ; 33(11): 1975-84, 2014 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25367993

RESUMEN

Health care payment and delivery models that challenge providers to be accountable for outcomes have fueled interest in community-level partnerships that address the behavioral, social, and economic determinants of health. We describe how Hennepin Health--a county-based safety-net accountable care organization in Minnesota--has forged such a partnership to redesign the health care workforce and improve the coordination of the physical, behavioral, social, and economic dimensions of care for an expanded community of Medicaid beneficiaries. Early outcomes suggest that the program has had an impact in shifting care from hospitals to outpatient settings. For example, emergency department visits decreased 9.1 percent between 2012 and 2013, while outpatient visits increased 3.3 percent. An increasing percentage of patients have received diabetes, vascular, and asthma care at optimal levels. At the same time, Hennepin Health has realized savings and reinvested them in future improvements. Hennepin Health offers lessons for counties, states, and public hospitals grappling with the problem of how to make the best use of public funds in serving expanded Medicaid populations and other communities with high needs.


Asunto(s)
Organizaciones Responsables por la Atención/organización & administración , Relaciones Comunidad-Institución , Conducta Cooperativa , Medicaid , Proveedores de Redes de Seguridad/organización & administración , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Minnesota , Estudios de Casos Organizacionales , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA