RESUMEN
Robotic surgery is becoming more popular among practicing physicians as a new modality with improved visualization and mobility (1-2). As patients also desire minimally invasive procedures with quicker recoveries, there is a desire for new surgical residents and fellows to pursue robotic techniques in training (3-4). To develop a new colorectal robotics training program, an institution needs a well-formulated plan for the trainees and mentors with realistic expectations. The development of a robotics training program has potential obstacles, including increased initial cost, longer operative times, and overcoming learning curves. We have devised a four-phase training protocol for residents in colorectal surgical fellowship. Each of these phases attempts to create a curricular framework that outlines logical progression and sets expectations for trainees, Program Directors, and residency faculty. Phase zero begins prior to fellowship and is preparatory. Phase one focuses on an introduction to robotics with learning bedside console troubleshooting and simulation exercises. Phase Two prioritizes operative experience and safety while completing steps independently in a progressive fashion. Phase Three polishes the resident prior to graduation for future practice. We recommend frequent evaluation and open-mindedness while establishing a focused robotics program. The end goal is to graduate fellows with an equivalency certificate who can continue to practice colorectal robotic surgery.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Female surgeons are subjected to implicit bias throughout their careers. The evaluation of gender bias in training is warranted with increasing numbers of female trainees in colon and rectal surgery. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate gender bias in colon and rectal surgery training program operative experience. DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study. SETTING: The Association of Program Directors for Colon and Rectal Surgery robotic case log database contains operative details (procedure, attending surgeon, case percentage, and operative segments) completed by trainees as console surgeon for 2 academic years (2016-2017, 2017-2018). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary outcomes measured are the percentage of trainee console participation and the completion of total mesorectal excision. Resident and attending surgeon gender was recorded retrospectively. The cohort was separated into 4 groups based on resident and attending surgeon gender combination. Case volume, average console participation per case, and completion of total mesorectal excisions were compared for each group by using interaction regression analysis. RESULTS: Fifty-two training programs participated, including 120 trainees and 190 attending surgeons. Forty-five (37.5%) trainees and 36 (18.9%) attending surgeons were women. The average number of cases per trainee was 23.27 per year for women and 28.15 per year for men (p = 0.19). Average console participation was 53.5% for women and 61.7% for men (p < 0.001). Male attending surgeons provided female trainees less console participation than male counterparts (52.1% vs 59.7%, p < 0.001). Female attending surgeons provided the same amount of console participation to female and male trainees (63.3% vs 61.8%, p = 0.62). Male trainees performed significantly more complete total mesorectal excision console cases than female trainees (57.16% vs 42.38%, p < 0.0001). LIMITATIONS: The data are subject to self-reporting bias. CONCLUSIONS: There is gender disparity in robotic operative experience in colon and rectal surgery training programs with less opportunity for console participation and less opportunity to complete total mesorectal excisions for female trainees. This trend should be highlighted and further evaluated to resolve this disparity. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B224. PROGRAMAS DE CAPACITACIÓN ROBÓTICA SOBRE CIRUGÍA DE COLON Y RECTO: UNA EVALUACIÓN DE LAS DISPARIDADES DE GÉNERO: Cirujanos mujeres están sujetas a sesgos implícitos a lo largo de sus carreras. La evaluación del sesgo de género en el entrenamiento se amerita por un número cada vez mayor de aprendices femeniles en cirugía de colon y recto.Evaluar el sesgo de género en la experiencia operativa en programas de entrenamiento de cirugía de colon y recto.Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo.La base de datos de registro de casos robóticos de la Asociación de Directores de Programas para Cirugía de Colon y Rectal contiene detalles operativos (procedimiento, cirujano asistente, porcentaje de casos y segmentos operativos) completados por los alumnos como cirujanos de consola durante dos años académicos (2016-17, 2017-18).Porcentaje de participación de la consola de entrenamiento y finalización de la escisión mesorrectal total. Se registraron retrospectivamente el sexo de los médicos residentes y asistentes. La cohorte se separó en cuatro grupos según la combinación de género residente y asistente. El volumen de casos, la participación promedio de la consola por caso y la finalización de las extirpaciones mesorrectales totales se compararon para cada grupo mediante el análisis de regresión de interacción.Participaron 52 programas de capacitación, incluidos 120 aprendices y 190 cirujanos asistentes. Cuarenta y cinco (37.5%) aprendices y 36 (18.9%) cirujanos asistentes eran mujeres. El número promedio de casos por aprendiz fue de 23.27 / año para mujeres y 28.15 / año para hombres (p = 0.19). La participación promedio de la consola fue del 53.5% para las mujeres y del 61.7% para los hombres (p <0.001). Los cirujanos asistentes masculinos proporcionaron a las mujeres aprendices menos participación en la consola en comparación con sus compañeros masculinos (52.1% vs 59.7%, p <0.001). Los cirujanos asistentes femeninos proporcionaron la misma cantidad de participación en la consola a los aprendices femeninos y masculinos (63.3% vs 61.8%, p = 0.62). Los aprendices masculinos realizaron casos de consola TME significativamente más completos que las aprendices femeninas (57.16% vs 42.38%, p <0.0001).Los datos están sujetos a sesgos de autoinforme.Existe una disparidad de género en la experiencia quirúrgica robótica en los programas de entrenamiento de cirugía de colon y recto con menos oportunidades para la participación de la consola y menos oportunidades para completar las extirpaciones mesorrectales totales para las mujeres en formación. Esta tendencia debe destacarse y evaluarse para resolver esta disparidad. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B224. (Traducción-Dr. Adrián Ortega).
Asunto(s)
Cirugía Colorrectal/educación , Educación/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/educación , Cirujanos/educación , Colectomía/educación , Colectomía/métodos , Cirugía Colorrectal/instrumentación , Educación/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sexismo , Cirujanos/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Surgical video review has been shown to improve technical skill in novice surgeons; however, to date, there are no studies examining the use of video review by experts. This study sought to understand the process expert robotic surgeons use when they review their surgical videos. METHODS: In this qualitative pilot study, eight expert robotic colorectal surgeons individually participated in semi-structured interviews and video elicitation sessions. Grounded theory was used to develop a process model on how expert surgeons review their robotic videos. RESULTS: The participants identified four categories of video review: critical incidents, unique cases, new techniques/procedures, and routine cases. They ask themselves questions with the primary goal of improving surgical technical skills. Surgeons compare their performance to benchmark videos and share videos for teaching and collaboration. CONCLUSIONS: Expert robotic surgeons use video review for self-reflection and self-assessment. They recognize that improving surgical skills requires a growth mindset. These findings may contribute to the surgical education of novices.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Cirujanos , Humanos , Competencia Clínica , Teoría Fundamentada , Proyectos Piloto , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/educación , Cirujanos/educación , Grabación en VideoRESUMEN
Background: Rectal diverticula are a very rare occurrence compared to diverticula of the colon. They are reported to account for only 0.08% of all diverticulosis. Diverticula of the rectum can be caused by congenital or acquired factors. The majority are asymptomatic, diagnosed incidentally, and require no treatment. The low incidence of rectal diverticulosis may be attributed to the unique anatomical structure and physiological environment of the rectum. However, complications can arise and may necessitate surgical or endoscopic treatment. Case Description: We report the case of a 72-year-old female with a history of diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, and hypothyroidism who presented to the colorectal surgery clinic with symptoms of constipation of nearly a 50-year duration. The patient underwent an anorectal exam under anesthesia which revealed a 3 cm defect in the left levator muscles with herniated rectal wall. A large left lateral rectal diverticulum was diagnosed during the work-up for pelvic organ prolapse on defecography. She underwent robotic assisted ventral mesh rectopexy and recovered uneventfully. After 1 year of follow-up, the patient is asymptomatic, and the control colonoscopy shows no signs of the rectal diverticulum. Conclusions: Rectal diverticula can present in the setting of pelvic organ prolapse and can be safely managed with ventral mesh rectopexy.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to evaluate a novel case log used as part of a standardized robotic colon and rectal surgery resident training program. DESIGN: This observational study describes a detailed procedure log developed to standardize training of residents in robotic colorectal surgery. The procedure log tracks resident total case numbers and execution of specific steps of eleven colorectal procedures. Case log data were accumulated and analyzed to assess resident progress. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: The study includes colon and rectal surgery residents during the 2016-2017 academic year. The national Colon and Rectal Surgery Robotic Training Program was developed and implemented during the 2010-2011 academic year in response to increasing adoption of robotic-assisted colorectal surgery. This program evolved to include online modules, dry lab exercises, simulation and cadaveric courses. RESULTS: Forty of 93 residents in 54 colon and rectal surgery programs participated in the case log system and the comprehensive training program. Residents participated as console surgeon in an average of 28 cases (range 1-115). Sixty-five percent of participating residents performed ≥20 complex colorectal cases as console surgeon. Of the 1080 operations entered, the three most frequently performed procedures were low anterior resections (nâ¯=â¯360, 33.3%), sigmoid resections (nâ¯=â¯172, 15.9%), and right colectomies with intracorporeal anastomosis (nâ¯=â¯138, 12.8%). Residents with 10 or more robotic cases had a 27% increase in cases as console surgeon and a 28% decrease in cases completed as bedside assistant. Experience and progression to the console varied by resident and by program. CONCLUSION: This detailed standardized case log system provides comprehensive assessment of resident experience that allows preparation for a robotic colon and rectal surgery practice after fellowship. As adoption of the robotic approach for colon and rectal cases continues to increase, novel methods that evaluate teaching methods and resident progress warrant further study.
Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica , Cirugía Colorrectal/educación , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/normas , Internet/estadística & datos numéricos , Internado y Residencia/normas , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/educación , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Internado y Residencia/métodos , Masculino , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/educación , Proyectos de Investigación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Robótica/educación , Análisis y Desempeño de Tareas , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Applications for surgical staplers continue to grow, due to the increase in minimally invasive surgical approaches, and range from vessel ligation to tissue transection and anastomoses. Complications associated with stapled tissue, such as bleeding or leaks, continue to be a concern for surgeons, as both can be associated with prolonged operative times and can contribute to postoperative morbidity and mortality. The goal of this retrospective study was to evaluate the performance of the da Vinci® Xi EndoWrist® Stapler 45 with SmartClamp™ technology during robotic-assisted right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis. We reviewed 113 consecutive cases from four medical centers. Preclinical diagnoses were inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) (n = 5), benign bowel disease (n = 77), and malignant bowel disease (n = 31). No anastomotic leaks occurred; one event of anastomotic bleeding (0.88%) resolved without surgical intervention. Overall, there were 643 clamp attempts (5.7 attempts per case), and 570 fires (5.0 fires per case). SmartClamp™ occurrences happened in approximately one out of three cases, with the highest proportion of occurrences in the IBD group (2.0 occurrences per case). The most commonly fired reload was blue (1.5 mm closed height) with 4.1 blue reloads fired per case overall. No incomplete fires occurred during the procedures. The study data demonstrate the performance of the da Vinci Xi EndoWrist® Stapler 45 as used in right colon resection with intracorporeal anastomosis. The collection and analysis of these data provide surgeons with information related to stapler firings, which were not previously available; as such, this analysis may lead to deductions that are useful for intraoperative decision-making and clinical outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Anastomosis Quirúrgica/métodos , Colectomía/métodos , Enfermedades Intestinales/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Engrapadoras Quirúrgicas , Anciano , Fuga Anastomótica/epidemiología , Fuga Anastomótica/etiología , Fuga Anastomótica/prevención & control , Femenino , Hemorragia/epidemiología , Hemorragia/etiología , Hemorragia/prevención & control , Humanos , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Estudios Retrospectivos , Engrapadoras Quirúrgicas/efectos adversos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Colonoscopic polypectomy reduces the risk of colon cancer development by interrupting the adenoma to carcinoma progression. A variety of techniques are available to perform polypectomy including the use of forceps or snare device with or without electrocautery. While forceps polypectomy tends to be the procedure of choice for small polyps, snare polypectomy has been found to be the preferred method for removal of polyps 1 cm or greater in size. The two most common post-polypectomy complications are bleeding and perforation. Though rare in the case of polypectomy, any mechanical device used in a procedure has an inherent risk of malfunction. Here, we present a case of an attempted snare polypectomy with malfunctioning of the device, failure of endoscopic retrieval and subsequent management with laparoscopic resection of the affected segment.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The primary objective of this study was to retrospectively compare short-term outcomes of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis for minimally invasive laparoscopic and robotic-assisted right colectomies for benign and malignant disease. Recent studies suggest potential short-term outcomes advantages for the intracorporeal anastomosis technique. METHODS: This is a multicenter retrospective propensity score-matched comparison of intracorporeal and extracorporeal anastomosis techniques for laparoscopic and robotic-assisted right colectomy between January 11, 2010, and July 21, 2016. RESULTS: After propensity score-matching, there were a total of 1029 minimal invasive surgery cases for analysis-379 right colectomies (335 robotic-assisted and 44 laparoscopic) done with an intracorporeal anastomosis and 650 right colectomies (253 robotic-assisted and 397 laparoscopic) done with an extracorporeal anastomosis. There were no significant differences in any preoperative patient characteristics between groups. The minimally invasive intracorporeal anastomosis group had significantly longer operative times (p<0.0001), lower conversion to open rate (p = 0.01), shorter hospital length of stay (p = 0.02) and lower complication rate from after discharge to 30-days (p = 0.04) than the extracorporeal anastomosis group. CONCLUSIONS: This comparison shows several clinical outcomes advantages for the intracorporeal anastomosis technique in minimally invasive right colectomy. These data may guide future refinements in minimally invasive training techniques and help surgeons choose among different minimally invasive options.
Asunto(s)
Anastomosis Quirúrgica/métodos , Colectomía/métodos , Enfermedades del Colon/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Neurological injury and Parkinson disease (PD) are often associated with the increase of nitric oxide (NO) and free radicals from resident glial cells in the brain. In vitro, exposure to L-3-4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA), one of the main therapeutic agents for the treatment of PD, can lead to neurotoxicity. In this study, lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and interferon-gamma (IFN-g) were used to stimulate C6 glioma cells in the presence of varying concentrations of L-DOPA (1 microM-1 mM). The results indicated a slight augmentation of NO(2)(-) production at low concentrations of L-DOPA (<100 microM) and complete inhibition of NO(2)(-) at higher concentrations (500 microM, 1 mM), (p < 0.001). Western blot analysis corroborated that L-DOPA effects on iNOS was at the level of its protein expression. Total reactive oxygen species (ROS) were detected using 2', 7'-dichlorofluorescein diacetate fluorescence dye (2', 7'-DCFC) and there was an increase of intensity with the increasing concentrations of L-DOPA. Furthermore, large amounts of superoxide (O(2)(-)) and hydrogen peroxide (H(2)O(2)) were generated from the autoxidation of L-DOPA. C6 cells contain high levels of catalase, with inadequate levels of superoxide dismutase (SOD); therefore, there was an accumulation of O(2)(-), tantamount to elevation in 2'7'-DCFC intensity. Simultaneous accumulation of O(2)(-) and NO(2)(-) would propel formation of peroxynitrite (ONOO-). SOD completely attenuated the autoxidation of L-DOPA and significantly reversed the inhibitory effects on iNOS at high concentrations. The data obtained confirmed that the observed effects on iNOS were not due to the activation of the D(1) or beta1 adrenergic receptors by L-DOPA. It was concluded from this study that L-DOPA contributed to the modulation of iNOS and to the increase of O(2)(-) production in the stimulated glioma cells in vitro.