Programmatic approach to patients with advanced ischemic cardiomyopathy: Integrating microaxial support into strategies for the modern era.

Patients with advanced ischemic cardiomyopathy manifesting as left ventricular dysfunction exist along a spectrum of severity and risk, and thus decision-making surrounding optimal management is challenging. Treatment pathways can include medical therapy as well as revascularization through percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting. Additionally, temporary and durable mechanical circulatory support, as well as heart transplantation, may be optimal for select patients. Given this spectrum of risk and the complexity of treatment pathways, patients may not receive appropriate therapy given their perceived risk, which can lead to sub-satisfactory outcomes. In this review, we discuss the identification of high-risk ischemic cardiomyopathy patients, along with our programmatic approach to patient evaluation and perioperative optimization. We also discuss our strategies for therapeutic decision-making designed to optimize both short- and long-term patient outcomes.

Derivation and Validation of Clinical Phenotypes of the Cardiopulmonary Bypass-Induced Inflammatory Response.

BACKGROUND: Precision medicine aims to change treatment from a "one-size-fits-all" approach to customized therapies based on the individual patient. Applying a precision medicine approach to a heterogeneous condition, such as the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB)-induced inflammatory response, first requires identification of homogeneous subgroups that correlate with biological markers and postoperative outcomes. As a first step, we derived clinical phenotypes of the CPB-induced inflammatory response by identifying patterns in perioperative clinical variables using machine learning and simulation tools. We then evaluated whether these phenotypes were associated with biological response variables and clinical outcomes. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective cohort study used Cleveland Clinic registry data from patients undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB from January 2010 to March 2020. Biomarker data from a subgroup of patients enrolled in a clinical trial were also included. Patients undergoing emergent surgery, off-pump surgery, transplantation, descending thoracoabdominal aortic surgery, and planned ventricular assist device placement were excluded. Preoperative and intraoperative variables of patient baseline characteristics (demographics, comorbidities, and laboratory data) and perioperative data (procedural data, CPB duration, and hemodynamics) were analyzed to derive clinical phenotypes using K-means-based consensus clustering analysis. Proportion of ambiguously clustered was used to assess cluster size and optimal cluster numbers. After clusters were formed, we summarized perioperative profiles, inflammatory biomarkers (eg, interleukin [IL]-6 and IL-8), kidney biomarkers (eg, urine neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin [NGAL] and IL-18), and clinical outcomes (eg, mortality and hospital length of stay). Pairwise standardized difference was reported for all summarized variables. RESULTS: Of 36,865 eligible cardiac surgery cases, 25,613 met inclusion criteria. Cluster analysis derived 3 clinical phenotypes: α, ß, and γ. Phenotype α (n = 6157 [24%]) included older patients with more comorbidities, including heart and kidney failure. Phenotype ß (n = 10,572 [41%]) patients were younger and mostly male. Phenotype γ (n = 8884 [35%]) patients were 58% female and had lower body mass index (BMI). Phenotype α patients had worse outcomes, including longer hospital length of stay (mean = 9 days for α versus 6 for both ß [absolute standardized difference {ASD} = 1.15] and γ [ASD = 1.08]), more kidney failure, and higher mortality. Inflammatory biomarkers (IL-6 and IL-8) and kidney injury biomarkers (urine NGAL and IL-18) were higher with the α phenotype compared to ß and γ immediately after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Deriving clinical phenotypes that correlate with response biomarkers and outcomes represents an initial step toward a precision medicine approach for the management of CPB-induced inflammatory response and lays the groundwork for future investigation, including an evaluation of the heterogeneity of treatment effect.

Design and characteristics of the prophylactic intra-operative ventricular arrhythmia ablation in high-risk LVAD candidates (PIVATAL) trial.

BACKGROUND: The use of a Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD) in patients with advanced heart failure refractory to optimal medical management has progressed steadily over the past two decades. Data have demonstrated reduced LVAD efficacy, worse clinical outcome, and higher mortality for patients who experience significant ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VTA). We hypothesize that a novel prophylactic intra-operative VTA ablation protocol at the time of LVAD implantation may reduce the recurrent VTA and adverse events postimplant. METHODS: We designed a prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized-controlled clinical trial enrolling 100 patients who are LVAD candidates with a history of VTA in the previous 5 years. Enrolled patients will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to intra-operative VTA ablation (n = 50) versus conventional medical management (n = 50) with LVAD implant. Arrhythmia outcomes data will be captured by an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) to monitor VTA events, with a uniform ICD programming protocol. Patients will be followed prospectively over a mean of 18 months (with a minimum of 9 months) after LVAD implantation to evaluate recurrent VTA, adverse events, and procedural outcomes. Secondary endpoints include right heart function/hemodynamics, healthcare utilization, and quality of life. CONCLUSION: The primary aim of this first-ever randomized trial is to assess the efficacy of intra-operative ablation during LVAD surgery in reducing VTA recurrence and improving clinical outcomes for patients with a history of VTA.

Aspirin and Hemocompatibility Events With a Left Ventricular Assist Device in Advanced Heart Failure: The ARIES-HM3 Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) enhance quality and duration of life in advanced heart failure. The burden of nonsurgical bleeding events is a leading morbidity. Aspirin as an antiplatelet agent is mandated along with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) with continuous-flow LVADs without conclusive evidence of efficacy and safety. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether excluding aspirin as part of the antithrombotic regimen with a fully magnetically levitated LVAD is safe and decreases bleeding. DESIGN, SETTING, and PARTICIPANTS: This international, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of aspirin (100 mg/d) vs placebo with VKA therapy in patients with advanced heart failure with an LVAD was conducted across 51 centers with expertise in treating patients with advanced heart failure across 9 countries. The randomized population included 628 patients with advanced heart failure implanted with a fully magnetically levitated LVAD (314 in the placebo group and 314 in the aspirin group), of whom 296 patients in the placebo group and 293 in the aspirin group were in the primary analysis population, which informed the primary end point analysis. The study enrolled patients from July 2020 to September 2022; median follow-up was 14 months. Intervention: Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive aspirin (100 mg/d) or placebo in addition to an antithrombotic regimen. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The composite primary end point, assessed for noninferiority (-10% margin) of placebo, was survival free of a major nonsurgical (>14 days after implant) hemocompatibility-related adverse events (including stroke, pump thrombosis, major bleeding, or arterial peripheral thromboembolism) at 12 months. The principal secondary end point was nonsurgical bleeding events. RESULTS: Of the 589 analyzed patients, 77% were men; one-third were Black and 61% were White. More patients were alive and free of hemocompatibility events at 12 months in the placebo group (74%) vs those taking aspirin (68%). Noninferiority of placebo was demonstrated (absolute between-group difference, 6.0% improvement in event-free survival with placebo [lower 1-sided 97.5% CI, -1.6%]; P < .001). Aspirin avoidance was associated with reduced nonsurgical bleeding events (relative risk, 0.66 [95% confidence limit, 0.51-0.85]; P = .002) with no increase in stroke or other thromboembolic events, a finding consistent among diverse subgroups of patient characteristics. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In patients with advanced heart failure treated with a fully magnetically levitated LVAD, avoidance of aspirin as part of an antithrombotic regimen, which includes VKA, is not inferior to a regimen containing aspirin, does not increase thromboembolism risk, and is associated with a reduction in bleeding events. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04069156.

Outcomes of heart transplant recipients with prior left ventricular assist device associated stroke.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) improve survival in patients with end-stage heart failure but are associated with ischemic stroke and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). The impact of LVAD-associated stroke on transplant candidacy and outcomes has not been characterized. METHODS: Adult patients undergoing LVAD implantation at Cleveland Clinic between 2004 to 2021 were reviewed and patients who developed ischemic stroke or ICH were identified. Post-transplant survival analysis was performed between patients with LVAD-associated stroke vs. without. RESULTS: 917 patients had an LVAD implantation of whom 244 (median age 57, 79% male) underwent subsequent transplant including 25 with prior LVAD-associated stroke. The 1- and 2-year survival after transplant in patients with LVAD-associated stroke were 100% and 95% respectively, compared with 92% and 90% in patients without stroke (p=0.156; p=0.323) Similarly, there was no difference in stroke incidence at 1- and 2 years after transplant between patients with LVAD-associated stroke (4% and 5%) and those without prior stroke (5% and 6%, p = 0.884; p=0.744). CONCLUSIONS: In this single-center retrospective study, patients with LVAD-associated stroke were significantly less likely to undergo heart transplant, but those who underwent heart transplant had similar post-transplant outcomes as patients without history of LVAD-associated stroke. Given the similar outcomes seen in this population, history of LVAD-associated stroke should not be viewed as an absolute contraindication to subsequent heart transplant.

Procedure-Specific Relationships Between Postoperative Troponin T and a Composite of Mortality and Low Cardiac Output Syndrome: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Myocardial injury after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is defined as troponin concentrations >10 times 99th percentile upper reference limit (URL) according to the Fourth Universal Definition. However, troponin concentrations after non-CABG cardiac surgery which indicate greater-than-expected myocardial injury and increased risk for complications remain unclear. Our goal was to assess procedure-specific relationships between troponin T and a composite outcome of low cardiac output syndrome and in-hospital mortality in cardiac surgical patients. METHODS: Patients having cardiac surgery between January 2010 and December 2017 were categorized into 4 groups by procedure: (1) CABG; (2) mitral valve repair; (3) aortic valve repair/replacement (AVR); (4) mitral valve replacement (MVR) or CABG + valve surgeries. Exclusion criteria were elevated preoperative troponin T, preoperative kidney failure, circulatory arrest, or preoperative/planned mechanical circulatory support. Logistic regression was used to assess the association between troponin T and composite outcome, both overall and by procedure, including assessment of the interaction between procedure and troponin T on outcome. RESULTS: Among 10,253 patients, 37 (0.4%) died and 393 (3.8%) developed the primary outcome. Troponin T concentrations differed by procedure (P < .001). Compared to CABG, AVR had 0.53 (99.2% confidence interval [CI], 0.50-0.56; unadjusted P < .001) times lower troponin T concentrations, while MVR/CABG + valve were 1.54 (99.2% CI, 1.45-1.62, unadjusted P < .001) times higher. There were linear relationships between log2 troponin T concentration and log odds mortality/low cardiac output syndrome. The (unadjusted) relationships were parallel for various types of surgery (interaction P = .59), but at different levels of the outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The relative increase in odds for mortality/low cardiac output syndrome per a similar increase in troponin T concentrations did not differ among cardiac surgical procedures, but the absolute troponin T concentrations did. Troponin concentrations should thus be interpreted in context of surgical procedure.

Predictive Accuracy of a Perioperative Laboratory Test-Based Prediction Model for Moderate to Severe Acute Kidney Injury After Cardiac Surgery.

Importance: Effective treatment of acute kidney injury (AKI) is predicated on timely diagnosis; however, the lag in the increase in serum creatinine levels after kidney injury may delay therapy initiation. Objective: To determine the derivation and validation of predictive models for AKI after cardiac surgery. Design, Setting, and Participants: Multivariable prediction models were derived based on a retrospective observational cohort of adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery between January 2000 and December 2019 from a US academic medical center (n = 58 526) and subsequently validated on an external cohort from 3 US community hospitals (n = 4734). The date of final follow-up was January 15, 2020. Exposures: Perioperative change in serum creatinine and postoperative blood urea nitrogen, serum sodium, potassium, bicarbonate, and albumin from the first metabolic panel after cardiac surgery. Main Outcomes and Measures: Area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) and calibration measures for moderate to severe AKI, per Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO), and AKI requiring dialysis prediction models within 72 hours and 14 days following surgery. Results: In a derivation cohort of 58 526 patients (median [IQR] age, 66 [56-74] years; 39 173 [67%] men; 51 503 [91%] White participants), the rates of moderate to severe AKI and AKIrequiring dialysis were 2674 (4.6%) and 868 (1.48%) within 72 hours and 3156 (5.4%) and 1018 (1.74%) within 14 days after surgery. The median (IQR) interval to first metabolic panel from conclusion of the surgical procedure was 10 (7-12) hours. In the derivation cohort, the metabolic panel-based models had excellent predictive discrimination for moderate to severe AKI within 72 hours (AUC, 0.876 [95% CI, 0.869-0.883]) and 14 days (AUC, 0.854 [95% CI, 0.850-0.861]) after the surgical procedure and for AKI requiring dialysis within 72 hours (AUC, 0.916 [95% CI, 0.907-0.926]) and 14 days (AUC, 0.900 [95% CI, 0.889-0.909]) after the surgical procedure. In the validation cohort of 4734 patients (median [IQR] age, 67 (60-74) years; 3361 [71%] men; 3977 [87%] White participants), the models for moderate to severe AKI after the surgical procedure showed AUCs of 0.860 (95% CI, 0.838-0.882) within 72 hours and 0.842 (95% CI, 0.820-0.865) within 14 days and the models for AKI requiring dialysis and 14 days had an AUC of 0.879 (95% CI, 0.840-0.918) within 72 hours and 0.873 (95% CI, 0.836-0.910) within 14 days after the surgical procedure. Calibration assessed by Spiegelhalter z test showed P >.05 indicating adequate calibration for both validation and derivation models. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients undergoing cardiac surgery, a prediction model based on perioperative basic metabolic panel laboratory values demonstrated good predictive accuracy for moderate to severe acute kidney injury within 72 hours and 14 days after the surgical procedure. Further research is needed to determine whether use of the risk prediction tool improves clinical outcomes.

Incremental Value of Global Longitudinal Strain to Michigan Risk Score and Pulmonary Artery Pulsatility Index in Predicting Right Ventricular Failure Following Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

BACKGROUND: The incremental utility of right ventricular (RV) strain on predicting right ventricular failure (RVF) following left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation, beyond clinical and haemodynamic indices, is not clear. METHODS: Two hundred and forty-six (246) patients undergoing LVAD implantation, who had transthoracic echocardiograms pre and post LVAD, pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPI) measurements and Michigan risk score, were included. We analysed RV global longitudinal strain (GLS) using speckle tracking echocardiography. RVF following LVAD implantation was defined as the need for medical support for >14 days, or unplanned RV assist device insertion after LVAD implantation. RESULTS: Mean preoperative RV-GLS was -7.8±2.8%. Among all, 27% developed postoperative RVF. A classification and regression tree analysis identified preoperative Michigan risk score, PAPI and RV-GLS as important parameters in predicting postoperative RVF. Eighty per cent (80%) of patients with PAPI <2.1 developed postoperative RVF, while only 4% of patients with PAPI >6.8 developed RVF. For patients with a PAPI of 2.1-3.2, having baseline Michigan risk score >2 points conferred an 81% probability of subsequent RVF. For patients with a PAPI of 3.3-6.8, having baseline RV-GLS of -4.9% or better conferred an 86% probability of no subsequent RVF. The sensitivity and specificity of this algorithm for predicting postoperative RVF were 67% and 93%, respectively, with an area under the curve of 0.87. CONCLUSION: RV-GLS has an incremental role in predicting the development of RVF post-LVAD implantation, even after controlling for clinical and haemodynamic parameters.

Dynamic Assessment of Pulmonary Artery Pulsatility Index Provides Incremental Risk Assessment for Early Right Ventricular Failure After Left Ventricular Assist Device.

BACKGROUND: The pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi) has been studied to predict right ventricular failure (RVF) after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation, but only as a single time point before LVAD implantation. Multiple clinical factors and therapies impact RV function in pre-LVAD patients. Thus, we hypothesized that serial PAPi measurements during cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) optimization before LVAD implantation would provide incremental risk stratification for early RVF after LVAD implantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients who underwent sequential pulmonary artery catherization with cardiac intensive care optimization before durable LVAD implantation were included. Serial hemodynamics were reviewed retrospectively across the optimization period. The optimal PAPi was defined by the initial PAPi + the PAPi at optimized hemodynamics. RVF was defined as need for a right ventricular assist device or prolonged inotrope use (>14 days postoperatively). Patients with early RVF had significantly lower mean optimal PAPi (3.5 vs 7.5, P < .001) compared with those who did not develop RVF. After adjusting for established risk factors of early RVF after LVAD implantation, the optimal PAPi was independently and incrementally associated with early RVF after LVAD implantation (odds ratio 0.64, 95% confidence interval 0.532-0.765, P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Optimal PAPi achieved during medical optimization before LVAD implantation provides independent and incremental risk stratification for early RVF, likely identifying dynamic RV reserve.

Association between In-hospital Mortality and Low Cardiac Output Syndrome with Morning versus Afternoon Cardiac Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Recent work suggests that having aortic valve surgery in the morning increases risk for cardiac-related complications. This study therefore explored whether mortality and cardiac complications, specifically low cardiac output syndrome, differ for morning and afternoon cardiac surgeries. METHODS: The study included adults who had aortic and/or mitral valve repair/replacement and/or coronary artery bypass grafting from 2011 to 2018. The components of the in-hospital composite outcome were in-hospital mortality and low cardiac output syndrome, defined by requirement for at least two inotropic agents at 24 to 48 h postoperatively or need for mechanical circulatory support. Patients who had aortic cross-clamping between 8 and 11 am (morning surgery) versus between 2 and 5 pm (afternoon surgery) were compared on the incidence of the composite outcome. RESULTS: Among 9,734 qualifying operations, 0.4% (29 of 6,859) died after morning, and 0.7% (20 of 2,875) died after afternoon surgery. The composite of in-hospital mortality and low cardiac output syndrome occurred in 2.8% (195 of 6,859) of morning patients and 3.4% (97 of 2,875) of afternoon patients: morning versus afternoon confounder-adjusted odds ratio, 0.96 (95% CI, 0.75 to 1.24; P = 0.770). There was no evidence of interaction between morning versus afternoon and surgery type (P = 0.965), and operation time was statistically nonsignificant for surgery subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients having aortic valve surgery, mitral valve surgery, and/or coronary artery bypass grafting with aortic cross-clamping in the morning and afternoon did not have significantly different outcomes. No evidence was found to suggest that morning or afternoon surgical timing alters postoperative risk.