Prophylactic dexamethasone for rebound pain after peripheral nerve block in adult surgical patients: systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis of randomised controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Rebound pain occurs after the resolution of peripheral nerve block and hampers patient recovery in the postoperative period. We sought to synthesise available data from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy of prophylactic dexamethasone for rebound pain in adult patients undergoing surgery with a peripheral nerve block. METHODS: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, RCTs reporting rebound pain and use of dexamethasone in the context of a peripheral nerve block were searched in various databases and updated in May 2023. The primary outcome was the incidence of rebound pain; secondary outcomes included the severity and time to onset of rebound pain, patient satisfaction with pain control, sleep disturbance because of pain, and adverse effects of dexamethasone. Subgroup analysis was conducted based on the effect of route of administration (intravenous or perineural) on the incidence of rebound pain. Trial sequential analysis was performed to rule out the possibility of a false positive result. RESULTS: Seven RCTs comprising 574 patients were included in this review. The dexamethasone group was associated with a reduction in the incidence of rebound pain with an odds ratio of 0.16 (95% confidence interval 0.10-0.27, P=0.00, I2=0%) compared with the control group. Trial sequential analysis confirmed the adequate information size for the beneficial effect of dexamethasone. Subgroup analysis showed that both intravenous and perineural administration were associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of rebound pain. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence suggests that both intravenous and perineural dexamethasone reduce the incidence of rebound pain after a peripheral nerve block provided for postoperative analgesia. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL: PROSPERO CRD42023424031.

Loss-of-Resistance Versus Dynamic Pressure-Sensing Technology for Successful Placement of Thoracic Epidural Catheters: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: The traditional loss-of-resistance (LOR) technique for thoracic epidural catheter placement can be associated with a high primary failure rate. In this study, we compared the traditional LOR technique and dynamic pressure-sensing (DPS) technology for primary success rate and secondary outcomes pertinent to identifying the thoracic epidural space. METHODS: This pragmatic, randomized, patient- and assessor-blinded superiority trial enrolled patients ages 18 to 75 years, scheduled for major thoracic or abdominal surgeries at a tertiary care teaching hospital. Anesthesiology trainees (residents and fellows) placed thoracic epidural catheters under faculty supervision and rescue. The primary outcome was the success rate of thoracic epidural catheter placement, evaluated by the loss of cold sensation in the thoracic dermatomes 20 minutes after injecting the epidural test dose. Secondary outcomes included procedural time, ease of catheter placement, the presence of a positive falling meniscus sign, early hemodynamic changes, and unintended dural punctures. Additionally, we explored outcomes that included number of attempts, needle depth to epidural space, need for faculty to rescue the procedure from the trainee, patient-rated procedural discomfort, pain at the epidural insertion site, postoperative pain scores, and opioid consumption over 48 hours. RESULTS: Between March 2019 and June 2020, 133 patients were enrolled; 117 were included in the final analysis (n = 57 for the LOR group; n = 60 for the DPS group). The primary success rate of epidural catheter placement was 91.2% (52 of 57) in the LOR group and 96.7% (58 of 60) in the DPS group (95% confidence interval [CI] of difference in proportions: -0.054 [-0.14 to 0.03]; P = .264). No difference was observed in procedural time between the 2 groups (median interquartile range [IQR] in minutes: LOR 5.0 [7.0], DPS 5.5 [7.0]; P = .982). The number of patients with epidural analgesia onset at 10 minutes was 49.1% (28 of 57) in the LOR group compared to 31.7% (19 of 60) in the DPS group ( P = .062). There were 2 cases of unintended dural punctures in each group. Other secondary or exploratory outcomes were not significantly different between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our trial did not establish the superiority of the DPS technique over the traditional LOR method for identifying the thoracic epidural space ( Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03826186).

Neuromodulation using a hybrid technique of combined perineural local anesthetic and nerve stimulation in six challenging clinical scenarios.

PURPOSE: Postamputation pain is challenging because of complex mechanisms involving a multitude of pain pathways and psychological factors. This patient population also tends to have extensive comorbidities with or without a background of chronic pain. Electrical neuromodulation such as peripheral nerve stimulation has gained traction in the realm of chronic pain. Recently, the off-label use of hybrid perineural nerve stimulation in combination with locoregional block via the stimulating nerve block catheter has been described in single-center case reports. CLINICAL FEATURES: Herein, we present a case series of six patients from two different Canadian hospitals using such a hybrid technique in three different clinical scenarios. These scenarios were (1) local anesthetic dose minimization in the presence of multiple nerve block catheters, (2) analgesia augmentation when local anesthetic alone is insufficient, and (3) provision of an analgesic adjunct as part of a multimodal regimen. A stimulating sciatic nerve block catheter was inserted under ultrasound and nerve stimulation guidance for these cases. Patients tended to experience pain on the subsequent postoperative days whereby the off-label use of nerve stimulation successfully reduced their pain score and stabilized or decreased their opioid consumption or minimized the need to increase the local anesthetic dose when doing so could have precipitated local anesthetic toxicity. CONCLUSION: Our case series supports the feasibility of using a combination of low-frequency perineural stimulation and local anesthetic infusion via a single perineural nerve block catheter to manage challenging postamputation pain.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: La douleur post-amputation est difficile à soulager en raison de mécanismes complexes impliquant une multitude de voies de la douleur et de facteurs psychologiques. Cette population de patients a également tendance à présenter de nombreuses comorbidités, avec ou sans antécédents de douleur chronique. Les techniques de neuromodulation électrique, telle que la stimulation nerveuse périphérique, sont de plus en plus populaires dans le domaine de la douleur chronique. Récemment, des présentations de cas monocentriques ont décrit l'utilisation hors indication d'une modalité hybride de stimulation nerveuse périneurale en combinaison avec un bloc locorégional via un cathéter de bloc nerveux stimulant. CARACTéRISTIQUES CLINIQUES: Nous présentons ici une série de cas de six patients de deux hôpitaux canadiens différents utilisant une telle technique hybride dans trois cas cliniques différents. Ces cas étaient (1) la minimisation de la dose d'anesthésique local en présence de plusieurs cathéters de blocs nerveux, (2) l'augmentation de l'analgésie lorsque l'anesthésique local seul était insuffisant, et (3) la fourniture d'un adjuvant analgésique dans le cadre d'un régime multimodal. Un cathéter stimulant pour l'administration d'un bloc du nerf sciatique a été inséré sous échoguidage et guide de stimulation nerveuse pour ces cas. Les patients ont eu tendance à ressentir de la douleur les jours postopératoires suivants, et l'utilisation hors indication de la stimulation nerveuse a alors réussi à réduire leur score de douleur, à stabiliser ou diminuer leur consommation d'opioïdes, ou à réduire la nécessité d'augmenter la dose d'anesthésique local alors que cela aurait pu précipiter une toxicité anesthésique locale. CONCLUSION: Notre série de cas soutient la faisabilité de l'utilisation d'une technique combinée de stimulation périnerveuse à basse fréquence et de perfusion d'anesthésique local via un seul cathéter de bloc nerveux périneural pour prendre en charge la douleur post-amputation.

Comparison of the Quality of Recovery-15 score in patients undergoing oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery under monitored anesthesia care versus general anesthesia: a prospective quality improvement study.

PURPOSE: Whether changing the institutional practice from general anesthesia (GA) to monitored anesthesia care (MAC) affects postoperative quality of recovery for oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is currently unknown. We designed this quasi-experimental study to evaluate a quality improvement (QI) initiative instituted in Edmonton, AB, Canada. METHODS: We chose a prospective controlled cohort study design for this QI study, where patients underwent oncoplastic BCS under MAC in one hospital and BCS under GA at another hospital (control). A total of 125 patients undergoing surgery between May 2021 and February 2022 were enrolled. Exclusion criteria were male sex, total mastectomy, or age under 18. All other patients were included. The primary outcome was the change in Quality of Recovery-15 score at 24 hr compared with a preoperative baseline. Secondary outcomes included intra- and postoperative time profiles, perioperative analgesic and antiemetic use and length of hospital stay. Statistical analysis included a propensity score analysis to account for confounding variables. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients received GA and 61 MAC. No enrolled patients were lost to follow up but two were excluded secondarily. No patients receiving MAC needed conversion to GA or unplanned airway management. Monitored anesthesia care was associated with superior outcomes for the primary outcome (ß/SE[ß], 3.31; 99.5% confidence interval, 0.45 to 6.17; P = 0.001) and most secondary outcomes, when accounting for confounding factors. CONCLUSIONS: A care transformation initiative for patients undergoing oncoplastic BCS under MAC was associated with a higher quality recovery profile and shorter length of stay without any increase in perioperative or postoperative adverse events.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: On ignore actuellement si le fait de modifier la pratique institutionnelle de l'anesthésie générale (AG) à la sédation procédurale (monitored anesthesia care) affecte la qualité de la récupération postopératoire en cas de chirurgie mammaire conservatrice oncoplastique. Nous avons conçu cette étude quasi expérimentale pour évaluer une initiative d'amélioration de la qualité mise en place à Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. MéTHODE: Nous avons choisi une méthodologie d'étude de cohorte prospective contrôlée pour cette étude d'amélioration de la qualité, dans laquelle des patientes ont bénéficié d'une chirurgie mammaire conservatrice oncoplastique sous sédation procédurale dans un hôpital et de la même chirurgie sous anesthésie générale dans un autre hôpital (groupe témoin). Au total, 125 patientes bénéficiant d'une intervention chirurgicale entre mai 2021 et février 2022 ont été recrutées. Les critères d'exclusion étaient le sexe masculin, la mastectomie totale ou un âge de moins de 18 ans. Toutes les autres personnes ont été incluses. Le critère d'évaluation principal était la variation du score de Qualité de la récupération 15 à 24 heures par rapport aux valeurs initiales préopératoires. Les critères d'évaluation secondaires comprenaient les profils temporels per- et postopératoires, l'utilisation périopératoire d'analgésiques et d'antiémétiques et la durée du séjour à l'hôpital. L'analyse statistique comprenait une analyse par score de propension pour tenir compte des variables de confusion. RéSULTATS: Soixante-quatre patientes ont reçu une anesthésie générale et 61 une sédation procédurale. Aucune patiente recrutée n'a été perdue au suivi, mais deux ont été exclues secondairement. Aucune patiente recevant une sédation procédurale n'a eu besoin d'une conversion en anesthésie générale ou d'une prise en charge non planifiée des voies aériennes. La sédation procédurale était associée à des issues supérieures pour le critère d'évaluation principal (ß/ET[ß], 3,31; intervalle de confiance à 99,5 %, 0,45 à 6,17; P = 0,001) et la plupart des critères d'évaluation secondaires, en tenant compte des facteurs de confusion. CONCLUSION: Une initiative de transformation des soins pour les patientes bénéficiant d'une chirurgie mammaire conservatrice oncoplastique sous sédation procédurale a été associée à un profil de récupération de meilleure qualité et à une durée de séjour plus courte sans augmentation des événements indésirables périopératoires ou postopératoires.

Diagnostic Performance of Airway Ultrasound for the Assessment of Difficult Laryngoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to review and appraise the evidence regarding airway ultrasound assessment in predicting difficult laryngoscopy in adult patients. DESIGN: A systematic review of the literature was conducted according to the Cochrane collaboration guidelines and the recommendations for the systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic studies. Observational studies that evaluated the diagnostic performance of airway ultrasound for the prediction of difficult laryngoscopy were included for consideration. SETTING: Literature searches were performed in 4 databases (PubMed [Medline], Embase, Clinical Trials, and Google Scholar) to identify all observational studies using any ultrasound technique to assess difficult laryngoscopy. The search terms included "sonography," "ultrasound," "airway," "difficult airway," "difficult laryngoscopy," "Cormack," "risk factors," "ultrasound at the point of care," "difficult ventilation," "difficult intubation" and others, combined with sensitive filters. The search was done for studies performed in the last 20 years in English or Spanish. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients older than 18 years old under general anesthesia for an elective procedure. Evident anatomic airway abnormalities, obstetric populations, those using an alternative imaging method besides ultrasound, and animal studies were excluded. INTERVENTIONS: Preoperative bedside ultrasound measuring distances and ratios from the skin to different reference points, such as the ratio of the hyomental distance in a neutral position (HMDN) and hyomental distance in extension (HMDR), HMDN, and the skin-to-epiglottis distance (SED), the preepiglottic area, and tongue thickness, among others. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 24 studies evaluated the prediction of a difficult laryngoscopy using airway ultrasound. The diagnostic performance and the number of ultrasound parameters reported in the studies were variable. Meta-analysis was performed for 3 measurements consistently included in most studies. The SED and the HMDR ratio presented a sensitivity of 75% and 61%, respectively, and a specificity of 86% and 88%, respectively. The ratio of the preepiglottic distance to the epiglottic distance at the midpoint of the vocal cords (pre-E/E-VC) presented the best performance for predicting a difficult laryngoscopy (sensitivity: 82%, specificity: 83%, diagnostic odds ratio: 22.2). CONCLUSION: With the currently available evidence, the 3 commonly used point-of-care ultrasound measures used to identify difficult laryngoscopy, (SED, HMDR, and pre-E/E-VC), showed better sensitivity and similar specificity to clinical measures. Future studies and more data may change the authors' confidence in these conclusions, given the wide variability of measurements noted in studies.

Feasibility and Utility of Routine Point-of-Care Gastric Ultrasonography in Patients Undergoing Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Procedures: A Prospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES: Previous studies have indicated that point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) of the gastric antrum can predict the adequacy of fasting before surgery and anesthesia. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of gastric POCUS in patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy procedures. METHODS: We performed a single-center cohort study in patients undergoing upper GI endoscopy. Consenting patient's gastric antrum was scanned before anesthetic care for endoscopy to determine the cross-sectional area (CSA) and qualitatively determine safe and unsafe contents. Further, an estimate of residual gastric volume was determined using the formula and the nomogram methods. Subsequently, gastric secretions aspirated during endoscopy were quantified and further correlated with nomogram and formula-based assessments. No patient required a change in the primary anesthetic plan except for using rapid sequence induction in those with unsafe contents on POCUS scans. RESULTS: Qualitative ultrasound measurements consistently determined safe and unsafe gastric residual contents in 83 patients enrolled in the study. Unsafe contents were determined by qualitative scans in 4 out of 83 cases (5%) despite adequate fasting status. Quantitatively, only a moderate correlation was demonstrated between measured gastric volumes and nomogram (r = .40, 95% CI: 0.20, 0.57; P = .0002) or formula-based (r = .38, 95% CI: 0.17, 0.55; P = .0004) determinations of residual gastric volumes. CONCLUSION: In daily clinical practice, qualitative POCUS determination of residual gastric content is a feasible and useful technique to identify patients at risk of aspiration before upper GI endoscopy procedures.

The practice of regional anesthesia during the COVID-19 pandemic: an international survey of members of three regional anesthesia societies.

PURPOSE: To determine the preferences and attitudes of members of regional anesthesia societies during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We distributed an electronic survey to members of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Regional Anaesthesia-UK, and the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia & Pain Therapy. A questionnaire consisting of 19 questions was developed by a panel of experienced regional anesthesiologists and distributed by email to the participants. The survey covered the following domains: participant information, practice settings, preference for the type of anesthetic technique, the use of personal protective equipment, and oxygen therapy. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 729 participants from 73 different countries, with a response rate of 20.1% (729/3,630) for the number of emails opened and 8.5% (729/8,572) for the number of emails sent. Most respondents (87.7%) identified as anesthesia staff (faculty or consultant) and practiced obstetric and non-obstetric anesthesia (55.3%). The practice of regional anesthesia either expanded or remained the same, with only 2% of respondents decreasing their use compared with the pre-pandemic period. The top reasons for an increase in the use of regional anesthesia was to reduce the need for an aerosol-generating medical procedure and to reduce the risk of possible complications to patients. The most common reason for decreased use of regional anesthesia was the risk of urgent conversion to general anesthesia. Approximately 70% of the responders used airborne precautions when providing care to a patient under regional anesthesia. The most common oxygen delivery method was nasal prongs (cannula) with a surgical mask layered over it (61%). CONCLUSIONS: Given the perceived benefits of regional over general anesthesia, approximately half of the members of three regional anesthesia societies seem to have expanded their use of regional anesthesia techniques during the initial surge of the COVID-19 pandemic.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Déterminer les préférences et les attitudes des membres des sociétés d'anesthésie régionale pendant la pandémie de COVID-19. MéTHODE: Nous avons distribué un sondage électronique aux membres de l'American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, de Regional Anesthesia-UK et de l'European Society of Regional Anaesthesia & Pain Therapy. Un questionnaire composé de 19 questions a été élaboré par un panel d'anesthésiologistes régionaux d'expérience et distribué par courriel aux participants. Le sondage couvrait les domaines suivants : les renseignements sur les participants, les contextes de pratique, leur préférence quant au type de technique d'anesthésie, l'utilisation d'équipement de protection individuelle et l'oxygénothérapie RéSULTATS: Le sondage a été complété par 729 participants provenant de 73 pays différents, avec un taux de réponse de 20,1 % (729/3630) pour le nombre de courriels ouverts et de 8,5 % (729/8572) pour le nombre de courriels envoyés. La plupart des répondants (87,7 %) se sont identifiés comme anesthésiologistes (académique ou consultant) et pratiquaient l'anesthésie obstétricale et non obstétricale (55,3 %). Leur pratique de l'anesthésie régionale s'est étendue ou est demeurée inchangée, et seulement 2 % des répondants ont indiqué avoir diminué leur utilisation de cette pratique par rapport à la période pré-pandémique. Les principales raisons d'une augmentation de l'utilisation de l'anesthésie régionale étaient de réduire la nécessité d'une intervention médicale générant des aérosols et de réduire le risque de complications potentielles pour les patients. La raison la plus courante de diminution du recours à l'anesthésie régionale était le risque de conversion urgente à une anesthésie générale. Environ 70 % des intervenants ont utilisé des précautions en matière de propagation des aérosols lorsqu'ils procuraient des soins à un patient sous anesthésie régionale. La méthode d'administration d'oxygène la plus fréquemment utilisée était les canules nasales avec un masque chirurgical superposé (61 %). CONCLUSION: Compte tenu des avantages perçus de l'anesthésie régionale par rapport à l'anesthésie générale, environ la moitié des membres de trois sociétés d'anesthésie régionale semblent avoir élargi leur utilisation des techniques d'anesthésie régionale pendant la vague initiale de la pandémie de COVID-19.

How I Do It: Technical report on surgically-initiated rectus sheath catheter using catheter-over-needle assembly.

Development of chronic postsurgical pain following major abdominal or pelvic surgeries is increasingly recognized. Multimodal analgesia including regional anesthesia such as rectus sheath block is growing in popularity. While the literature mainly describes ultrasound-guided rectus sheath blocks, there are many advantages to surgically-initiated rectus sheath catheter performed at the end of surgery. In this technical description, we describe the rationale and technique of surgical insertion of rectus sheath catheters following major urologic surgery with midline incision which is routinely performed by urologists at our institution. Furthermore, we would like to highlight the type of catheter used during rectus sheath catheter insertion, namely the catheter-over-needle assembly. It is simple to insert while minimizes complications such as local anesthetic leakage at the insertion site causing dressing disruption and premature catheter dislodgement, as the catheter-over-needle assembly fits snugly with the skin after insertion.

Effect of combining peri-hamstring injection or anterior obturator nerve block on the analgesic efficacy of adductor canal block for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Pain after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with autologous hamstring graft can be attributed to both arthroscopic surgery and the graft donor site. This study investigated whether donor site pain control was superior with the addition of either peri-hamstring injection or anterior division obturator nerve block in comparison with adductor canal block (ACB) alone. METHODS: Patients scheduled to undergo knee arthroscopy with ACLR using a graft from the ipsilateral hamstring were randomised to one of three groups. All patients received ACB and multimodal analgesia. Subjects in Group H received peri-hamstring local anaesthetic injection while subjects in Group O received an anterior division of the obturator nerve block, and subjects in Group C served as a control group (ACB alone). RESULTS: In 105 subjects undergoing ACLR, there was no significant difference between groups H, O, and C for the primary outcome of pain on movement as assessed by numerical rating scale (NRS) on knee flexion at 2 h after operation (P=0.11). There was no difference in NRS at any time point in the first 48 h after operation, nor was there a difference in oxycodone consumption between the three groups at 24 h (P=0.2). Worst knee pain was initially at the graft donor site in all three groups, which transitioned to anterior knee pain after 12 h. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of ultrasound-guided peri-hamstring injection or anterior division of obturator nerve block to ACB did not result in a significant reduction in pain or opioid consumption after ACLR with ipsilateral hamstring graft. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01868282.

The impact of sevoflurane anesthesia on postoperative renal function: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials.

PURPOSE: Renal damage secondary to fluoride ions and compound A (CpdA) after sevoflurane anesthesia remains unclear. For safety reasons, some countries still recommend minimum fresh-gas flows (FGFs) with sevoflurane. We review the evidence regarding the intraoperative use of sevoflurane for anesthesia maintenance and postoperative renal function compared with other anesthetic agents used for anesthetic maintenance. Secondarily, we examine the effects of peak plasma fluoride and CpdA levels and the effect of FGF and duration of anesthesia on these parameters. SOURCE: The databases of MEDLINE (OVID and Pubmed), EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Health Technology Assessment Database, CINAHL, and Web of Science were searched from inception until 23 April 2020 to identify randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) in humans utilizing sevoflurane or an alternative anesthetic for anesthesia maintenance with subsequent measurements of renal function. Two different paired reviewers independently selected the studies and extracted data. The quality of the evidence was appraised using GRADE recommendations. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Of 3,766 publications screened, 41 RCTs in human patients were identified. There was no difference between creatinine at 24 hr (21 studies; n = 1,529), or creatinine clearance (CCR) at 24 hr (12 studies; n = 728) in the sevoflurane vs alternative anesthetic groups. Peak fluoride and fluoride measured at 24 hr were higher with sevoflurane compared with other inhaled anesthetics. Subgroup analyses for sevoflurane usage in various contexts showed no significant difference between sevoflurane and alternative anesthetics for creatinine or CCR at 24 hr at varying FGF, duration of exposure, baseline renal function, or absorbent use. CONCLUSIONS: We did not find any association between the use of sevoflurane and postoperative renal impairment compared with other agents used for anesthesia maintenance. The scientific basis for recommending higher FGF with the use of sevoflurane needs to be revisited.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Les lésions rénales secondaires aux ions fluorure et au composé A (CpdA) après une anesthésie au sévoflurane demeurent incertaines. Pour des raisons de sécurité, certains pays recommandent encore des débits de gaz frais (DGF) minimaux lors de l'utilisation du sévoflurane. Nous avons passé en revue les données probantes concernant l'utilisation peropératoire de sévoflurane pour le maintien de l'anesthésie sur la fonction rénale postopératoire comparativement à d'autres agents anesthésiques utilisés pour le maintien de l'anesthésie. En analyse secondaire, nous avons examiné les effets des taux plasmatiques maximaux de fluorure et de CpdA et l'effet du DGF et de la durée de l'anesthésie sur ces paramètres. SOURCE: Des recherches ont été menées dans les bases de données de MEDLINE (OVID et Pubmed), EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Health Technology Assessment Database, CINAHL et Web of Science, de leur création jusqu'au 23 avril 2020. Nous y avons identifié les études randomisées contrôlées (ERC) réalisées sur des sujets humains utilisant du sévoflurane ou un agent anesthésique alternatif pour le maintien de l'anesthésie et présentant des mesures subséquentes de la fonction rénale. Deux différents réviseurs appariés ont sélectionné de manière indépendante les études et extrait les données. La qualité des données probantes a été évaluée à l'aide des recommandations GRADE. CONSTATATIONS PRINCIPALES: Parmi les 3766 publications passées en revue, 41 ERC réalisées chez des patients humains ont été identifiées. Aucune différence n'a été observée en ce qui touchait à la valeur de créatinine à 24 h (21 études; n = 1529) ou de la clairance de la créatinine (CCR) à 24 h (12 études; n = 728) dans les groupes sévoflurane vs autres anesthésiques. Les taux maximaux de fluorure et le fluorure mesuré à 24 h étaient plus élevés lors de l'utilisation de sévoflurane que d'autres agents anesthésiques halogénés. Les analyses de sous-groupe portant sur l'utilisation du sévoflurane dans divers contextes n'ont démontré aucune différence significative entre le sévoflurane et les autres anesthésiques en matière de valeur de créatinine ou de CCR à 24 h selon différents DGF, durées d'exposition, fonctions rénales de base ou absorbants. CONCLUSION: Nous n'avons pas trouvé d'association entre l'utilisation du sévoflurane et des détériorations de la fonction rénale postopératoires par rapport aux autres agents utilisés pour le maintien de l'anesthésie. Les raisons scientifiques sur lesquelles repose la recommandation d'un DGF plus élevé lors de l'utilisation de sévoflurane doivent être réexaminées.

Bilateral Thoracic Paravertebral Blocks Compared to Thoracic Epidural Analgesia After Midline Laparotomy: A Pragmatic Noninferiority Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Bilateral paravertebral block (PVB) is a suitable alternative to thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) for abdominal surgeries. This randomized clinical trial aims to determine if PVB is noninferior to TEA in terms of analgesia after midline laparotomy. METHODS: Seventy American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I-III patients undergoing a laparotomy through a midline incision were randomized to receive either TEA (TEA group) or continuous bilateral PVB (PVB group) as a part of a multimodal analgesia regimen in an open-label design. Noninferiority was to be concluded if the mean between-group difference in pain on movement at the 24 postoperative hours was within a margin of 2 points on a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS). Pain score at rest and on movement, analgesic consumption, hemodynamics, and adverse events during the first 72 postoperative hours were the secondary outcome measures assessed for superiority. Postblock and steady-state plasma concentrations of ropivacaine and pattern of dye spread were also recorded in the PVB group. RESULTS: The primary outcome of pain scores on movement at 24 postoperative hours was noninferior in PVB group in comparison to TEA group (mean difference [95% confidence interval {CI}], 0.43 [-0.72-1.58]). The pain scores at rest and on movement at other time points of assessment were within clinically acceptable limits in both groups with no significant differences between the groups over time. Arterial plasma ropivacaine levels were within safe limits, while steady-state venous level was higher than an acceptable threshold in 9 of 34 cases. CONCLUSIONS: As a component of multimodal analgesia, bilateral PVB provides noninferior analgesia compared to TEA for midline laparotomy.

Practice advisory on the bleeding risks for peripheral nerve and interfascial plane blockade: evidence review and expert consensus.

The risk of bleeding complications during regional anesthesia procedures is a significant patient safety consideration. Nevertheless, existing literature provides limited guidance on the stratification of bleeding risk for peripheral nerve and newly described interfascial plane blocks. Our objective was to produce an evidence-based consensus advisory that classifies bleeding risks in patients undergoing regional peripheral nerve and interfascial plane block procedures. This advisory is intended to facilitate clinical decision-making in conjunction with national or local guidelines and to guide consideration for appropriate alterations to anticoagulation regimens before specific regional anesthesia procedures. In pursuit of this goal, the Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain Section of the Canadian Anesthesiologists Society (CAS) assembled a panel of seven Canadian experts to classify the risk of bleeding complications associated with regional peripheral nerve and interfascial plane blocks. At the 75th annual meeting of the CAS in June 2018, the panel's expert opinion was finalized and the published literature was quantified within an organized framework. All common peripheral nerve and interfascial plane blocks were categorized into "low risk", "intermediate risk", and "high risk" based on the literature evidence, bleeding risk scores, and consensus opinion (in that order of priority). Clinical data is often limited, so readers of this consensus report should be reminded that these recommendations are mostly based on expert consensus. Hence, this advisory should not to be defined as a standard of care but rather serve as a resource for clinicians assessing the risk and benefits of regional anesthesia in management of their patients.

Effect of Beam Steering on Echogenic and Nonechogenic Needle Visibility at 40°, 50°, and 60° Needle Insertion Angles.

Currently, there is little understanding of the role of echogenic needles and beam steering at moderate angles of needle insertion. The ultrasound images of the echogenic and nonechogenic needles inserted into pork at 40°, 50°, and 60° were scored by anesthesiologists on a scale of 0-10. The effect of different levels of beam steer was also explored. At 40°, steep beam steering improves visualization of both nonechogenic and echogenic needles to an equal, satisfactory level. At 50° and 60°, visualization of nonechogenic needles is poor, whereas visibility of an echogenic needle was adequate and may be improved with steep beam steering.

Ultrasound-guided lateral-medial transmuscular quadratus lumborum block for analgesia following anterior iliac crest bone graft harvesting: a clinical and anatomical study.

BACKGROUND: The anterior iliac crest (AIC) is one of the most common sites for harvesting autologous bone, but the associated postoperative pain can result in significant morbidity. Recently, the transmuscular quadratus lumborum block (TQL) has been described to anesthetize the thoraco-lumbar nerves. This study utilizes a combination of cadaveric models and clinical case studies to evaluate the dermatomal coverage and analgesic utility of TQL for AIC bone graft donor site analgesia. METHODS: Ten ultrasound-guided TQL injections were performed in five cadaver specimens using a lateral-to-medial transmuscular approach. Twenty mL of 0.5% methylcellulose was injected on each side after ultrasound confirmation of the needle tip ventral to the quadratus lumborum muscle (QLM). Cranio-caudal and medial-lateral extent of the dye spread in relation to musculoskeletal anatomy and direct staining of the thoraco-lumbar nerves were recorded. Following the anatomical findings, continuous catheter TQL blocks were performed in four patients undergoing ankle surgery with autologous AIC bone graft. The dermatomal anesthesia and postoperative analgesic consumption were recorded. RESULTS: In the anatomical component of the study, 9/10 specimens showed a lateral spread anterior to the transversalis fascia and medially between the QLM and psoas major muscle. Direct staining of the branches of the T12, L1, and L2 nerves was noted ventral to the QLM, while variable staining of the T9-T11 nerves was seen laterally in the transversus abdominis plane and the transversalis fascia. The vertical spread of injectate anterior to the QLM was T12 to the iliac crest (n = 5/10) and L1 to the iliac crest (n = 4/10). In the four patients who received TQL, the T9-L2 dermatomal anesthesia correlated with the injectate spread seen in the cadavers and provided effective analgesia at the bone graft donor site. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided TQL injections consistently cover the thoraco-lumbar innervation relevant to the AIC graft donor site. The injectate spread seen in anatomical dissections correlated with the dermatomal anesthesia clinically. The TQL has the potential to provide reliable analgesia for patients undergoing AIC bone graft harvesting.

How I do it: Surgically inserted transversus abdominis plane (TAP) catheters for flank incisions.

Pain control following major abdominal surgery remains a significant barrier to patient comfort. Although thoracic epidurals have been used to provide analgesia for these surgeries, the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is gaining popularity. The TAP catheter insertion method has transformed over the past two decades from a blinded technique to one conducted primarily under ultrasound guidance by anesthesiologists. Recently, however, interest has increased on the potential for direct surgical insertion of catheters into the TAP plane following flank incisions due to anatomical considerations. Proposed advantages include a reduction in operating time, requirement of minimal expertise and increased accuracy of catheter placement. In this report, we describe the rationale and the technique of surgical insertion of TAP catheters following open nephrectomies as performed by urologists at our institution.

Factors Associated With Risk of Neurologic Complications After Peripheral Nerve Blocks: A Systematic Review.

The onset of neurologic complications after regional anesthesia is a complex process and may result from an interaction of host, agent, and environmental risk factors. The purpose of this systematic review was examine the qualitative evidence relating to various risk factors implicated in neurologic dysfunction after peripheral nerve block (PNB). The MEDLINE, OVID, and EMBASE databases were primary sources for literature. Cochrane, LILACS, DARE, IndMed, ERIC, NHS, and HTA via Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD; York University) databases were searched for additional unique results. Randomized controlled studies, case-control studies, cohort studies, retrospective reviews, and case reports/case series reporting neurologic outcomes after PNB were included. Relevant, good-quality systematic reviews were also eligible. Human and animal studies evaluating factors important for neurologic outcomes were assessed separately. Information on study design, outcomes, and quality was extracted and reviewed independently by the 2 review authors. An overall rating of the quality of evidence was assigned using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) criteria. Relevant full-text articles were separated based on type (prospective, retrospective, and nonhuman studies). Strengths of association were defined as high, moderate, inconclusive, or inadequate based on study quality and direction of association. The evidence from 77 human studies was reviewed to assess various host, agent, and environmental factors that have been implicated as possible risks. Most of the available evidence regarding the injurious effects of the 3 cardinal agents of mechanical insult, pressure, and neurotoxicity was extracted from animal studies (42 studies). Among the risk factors investigated in humans, block type had a strong association with neurologic outcome. Intraneural injection, which seems to occur commonly with PNBs, showed an inconsistent direction of association. Measures meant to increase precision and ostensibly reduce the occurrence of complications such as currently available guidance techniques showed little effect on the incidence of neurologic complications. Recovery from neurologic injury appears to be worse in patients with pre-existing risk factors. Categorization and definition of neurologic complication varied among studies, making synthesis of evidence difficult. Also, a significant portion of the evidence surrounding neurologic injury associated with PNB comes from animal or laboratory studies, the results of which are difficult to translate to clinical scenarios. Of the human studies, few had an a priori design to test associations between a specific risk factor exposure and resultant neurologic sequelae. A few risk factor associations were identified in human studies, but overall quality of evidence was low. Much of the evidence for risk factors comes from animal models and case reports. The final neurologic outcome seems to represent the complex interaction of the host, agent, and the environment.