RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has changed our lifestyle by imposing restrictions, such as physical distancing. The effect of COVID-19 prevalence on seasonal variations in glycemic control in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) remains unknown. METHODS: This single-center retrospective cohort study evaluated glycemic control in patients with type 2 DM who visited Sugi Cardiovascular Hospital in December 2021. We evaluated the clinical findings of all patients treated regularly between March 1, 2019, and December 31, 2021, including the periods both before and after the COVID-19 pandemic. All the standard treatments were approved. Furthermore, seasonal changes in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels were evaluated using stratified analyses based on age. RESULTS: This study analyzed 86 patients (mean age, 69.6 ± 9.2 years; men, 57). Median HbA1c (National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program [Union of Clinical Chemistry]) levels in spring (March) were 7.70% (interquartile range (IQR):7.23%-8.30%) [60.6 mmol/mol (IQR:55.4-67.2 mmol/mol)], 7.35% (IQR:6.90%-7.90%) [56.8 mmol/mol (IQR:51.9-62.8 mmol/mol)], and 7.50% (IQR:7.10%-8.00%) [58.5 mmol/mol (IQR:54.1-63.9 mmol/mol)] in 2019, 2020, and 2021, respectively. During these periods, HbA1c levels and body mass index (BMI) revealed significant seasonal variations "high in spring" and "low in autumn." Median HbA1c levels in spring (March) and autumn (September) were 7.86% [61.2 mmol/mol] and 7.48% [57.4 mmol/mol] in 2019 (P < 0.001), 7.50% [57.7 mmol/mol] and 7.17% [54.2 mmol/mol] in 2020 (P < 0.001), and 7.61% [58.3 mmol/mol] and 7.19% [53.8 mmol/mol] in 2021 (P < 0.001). Seasonal variations in HbA1c levels and BMI were maintained over the past 3 years, including the pandemic period. None of the patients in this study developed COVID-19 during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Seasonal variations in glycemic control in patients with DM were not influenced by lifestyle modifications associated with COVID-19. Maintenance of physical activity is necessary to prevent the development of sarcopenia. Moreover, seasonal variations in glycemic metabolism should be considered an independent factor for DM management. Additional extensive multifacility investigations are necessary to corroborate our findings.
Asunto(s)
Glucemia , COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Hemoglobina Glucada , Control Glucémico , Estaciones del Año , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/sangre , Masculino , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangre , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Femenino , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Japón/epidemiología , Hemoglobina Glucada/análisis , Hemoglobina Glucada/metabolismo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Glucemia/metabolismo , Glucemia/análisis , SARS-CoV-2 , Anciano de 80 o más AñosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Treatment with antiviral drugs for non-severe, early time from onset, adult outpatients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) had not been established in 2021. However, some new variants of SARS-CoV-2 had caused rapid exacerbation and hospitalization among non-elderly outpatients with COVID-19, contributing to widespread crises within healthcare systems. METHODS: From July to October 2021, we urgently assessed a therapeutic program using oral colchicine (1.0 mg loading dose, followed approximately half a day later by 0.5 mg twice daily for 5 days, and then 0.5 mg once daily for 4 days) and low-dose aspirin (100 mg once daily for 10 days), for non-elderly, non-severe, early time from onset, adult outpatients with COVID-19. To verify its effectiveness, we set loxoprofen as a control arm, and com parison of these two arms was performed. The primary outcomes were hospitalization, criticality, and death rates. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients (23 receiving colchicine and low-dose aspirin [CA]; 15 receiving loxoprofen [LO]) were evaluated. Hospitalization rate was lower in the CA group (1/23; 4.3%) than in the LO group (2/15; 13.3%); however, no significant difference was found between the two groups (p=0.34). No critical cases, deaths, or severe adverse events were found in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Our CA regimen did not show superiority over LO treatment. However, our clinical experience should be recorded as part of community health care activities carried out in Kurume City against the unprece dented COVID-19 pandemic.
Asunto(s)
Aspirina , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Colchicina , Humanos , Colchicina/administración & dosificación , Colchicina/efectos adversos , Colchicina/uso terapéutico , Aspirina/administración & dosificación , Aspirina/uso terapéutico , Aspirina/efectos adversos , Masculino , Femenino , Japón/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , COVID-19/epidemiología , Administración Oral , Quimioterapia Combinada , Hospitalización , SARS-CoV-2 , Resultado del Tratamiento , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/administración & dosificación , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Pacientes Ambulatorios , FenilpropionatosRESUMEN
Childhood cancer survivors (CCSs) who have undergone bone marrow transplantation with systemic chemotherapy and whole-body irradiation often experience impaired glucose tolerance with marked insulin resistance. Incomplete acquired diabetic lipodystrophy should be considered as a late complication of bone marrow transplantation. A 24-year-old Japanese female patient with incomplete acquired lipodystrophy, a CCS of acute lymphocytic leukemia at the age of 3 years, was treated for diabetes mellitus and dyslipidemia at our hospital. Administration of multiple daily insulin injections (70 units/day), and oral administration of 500 mg/day metformin, 15 mg/day pioglitazone, and 200 mg/day bezafibrate had proven ineffective for her metabolic disorders. Subcutaneous administration of metreleptin improved her insulin resistance and hypertriglyceridemia within a month; however, it failed to maintain adequate plasma glucose levels in the long term. When oral administration of 10 mg/day empagliflozin was added to the metreleptin supplementation, her HbA1c value (National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program) improved from 11% to 8%, which was maintained for an additional 18 months. This is the first case report of incomplete lipodystrophy that shows efficacy of a combination therapy with metreleptin and a sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor for the treatment of diabetes and dyslipidemia. An SGLT2 inhibitor attenuates hyperglycemia through urinary glucose excretion and has been suggested to enhance lipid catabolism in the extra-adipose tissues, especially in the liver and skeletal muscles. Furthermore, metreleptin supplementation could enhance the action of the SGLT2 inhibitor by promoting satiety and lipolysis through the central nervous system. Combination therapy with metreleptin and an SGLT2 inhibitor was suggested to recover the volume of adipose tissue, possibly through improvement of insulin resistance in the adipose tissue. This report highlights the pathophysiological mechanism of an SGLT2 inhibitor in the improvement of glucose metabolism in non-healthy lean CCSs with insulin resistance. Administration of SGLT2 inhibitor, along with metreleptin supplementation, could be a good alternative therapy for diabetic lipodystrophy observed in CCSs.