Thrombotic vs. Bleeding Events of Interruption of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy within 12 Months among Patients with Stent-Driven High Ischemic Risk Definition following PCI.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of real-world data regarding the clinical impact of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) interruption (temporary or permanent) among patients at high ischemic risk. The aim of this study was to assess the risk of cardiovascular events after interruption of DAPT in high-risk PCI population. METHODS: This study used data from the Fuwai PCI registry, a large, prospective cohort of consecutive patients who underwent PCI. We assessed 3,931 patients with at least 1 high ischemic risk criteria of stent-related recurrent ischemic events proposed in the 2017 ESC guidelines for focused update on DAPT who were free of major cardiac events in the first 12 months. The primary ischemic endpoint was 30-month major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, and the key safety endpoints were BARC class 2, 3, or 5 bleeding and net adverse clinical events. RESULTS: DAPT interruption within 12 months occurred in 1,122 patients (28.5%), most of which were due to bleeding events or patients' noncompliance to treatment. A multivariate Cox regression model, propensity score (PS) matching, and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) based on the propensity score demonstrated that DAPT interruption significantly increased the risk of primary ischemic endpoint compared with prolonged DAPT (3.9% vs. 2.2%; Cox-adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 1.840; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.247 to 2.716; PS matching-HR: 2.049 [1.236-3.399]; IPTW-adjusted HR: 1.843 [1.250-2.717]). This difference was driven mainly by all-cause death (1.8% vs. 0.7%) and MI (1.3% vs. 0.5%). Furthermore, the rate of net adverse clinical events (4.9% vs. 3.2%; Cox-adjusted HR: 1.581 [1.128-2.216]; PS matching-HR: 1.639 [1.075-2.499]; IPTW-adjusted HR: 1.554 [1.110-2.177]) was also higher in patients with DAPT interruption (≤12 months), whereas no significant differences between groups were observed in terms of BARC 2, 3, or 5 bleeding. These findings were consistent across various stent-driven high-ischemic risk subsets with respect to the primary ischemic endpoints, with a greater magnitude of harm among patients with diffuse multivessel diabetic coronary artery disease. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing high-risk PCI, interruption of DAPT in the first 12 months occurred infrequently and was associated with a significantly higher adjusted risk of major adverse cardiovascular events and net adverse clinical events. 2017 ESC stent-driven high ischemic risk criteria may help clinicians to discriminate patient selection in the use of long-term DAPT when the ischemic risk certainly overcomes the bleeding one.

Angiographic characteristics and in-hospital mortality among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction presenting without typical chest pain: an analysis of China Acute Myocardial Infarction registry.

BACKGROUND: Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who present without typical chest pain are associated with a poor outcome. However, whether angiographic characteristics are related to a higher risk of mortality in this population is unclear. This study aimed to investigate whether the higher mortality risk in patients with STEMI without chest pain could be explained by their "high-risk" angiographic characteristics. METHODS: We used data of 12,145 patients with STEMI who was registered in China Acute Myocardial Infarction registry from January 2013 to September 2014. We compared the infarct-related artery (IRA), thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade in the IRA, and other angiographic characteristics between patients without and those with chest pain. Multivariable logistic regression model was used to identify independent risk factor of in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: The 2922 (24.1%) patients with STEMI presented without typical chest pain. These patients had a higher TIMI flow grade (mean TIMI flow grade: 1.00 vs. 0.94, P = 0.02) and a lower rate of IRA disease of the left anterior descending artery (44.6% vs. 51.2%, χ = 35.63, P < 0.01) than did those with typical chest pain. Patients without chest pain were older, more likely to have diabetes, longer time to hospital and higher Killip classification, and less likely to receive optimal medication treatment and primary percutaneous coronary intervention and higher In-hospital mortality (3.3% vs. 2.2%, χ = 10.57, P < 0.01). After adjusting for multi-variables, presentation without chest pain was still an independent predictor of in-hospital death among patients with STEMI (adjusted odds ratio: 1.36, 95% confidence interval: 1.02-1.83). CONCLUSIONS: Presentation without chest pain is common and associated with a higher in-hospital mortality risk in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Our results indicate that their poor prognosis is associated with baseline patient characteristics and delayed treatment, but not angiographic lesion characteristics. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01874691, https://clinicaltrials.gov.

Differences in symptoms and pre-hospital delay among acute myocardial infarction patients according to ST-segment elevation on electrocardiogram: an analysis of China Acute Myocardial Infarction (CAMI) registry.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 70% patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) presented without ST-segment elevation on electrocardiogram. Patients with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) often presented with atypical symptoms, which may be related to pre-hospital delay and increased risk of mortality. However, up to date few studies reported detailed symptomatology of NSTEMI, particularly among Asian patients. The objective of this study was to describe and compare symptoms and presenting characteristics of NSTEMI vs. STEMI patients. METHODS: We enrolled 21,994 patients diagnosed with AMI from China Acute Myocardial Infarction (CAMI) Registry between January 2013 and September 2014. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to ST-segment elevation: ST-segment elevation (STEMI) group and NSTEMI group. We extracted data on patients' characteristics and detailed symptomatology and compared these variables between two groups. RESULTS: Compared with patients with STEMI (N = 16,315), those with NSTEMI (N = 5679) were older, more often females and more often have comorbidities. Patients with NSTEMI were less likely to present with persistent chest pain (54.3% vs. 71.4%), diaphoresis (48.6% vs. 70.0%), radiation pain (26.4% vs. 33.8%), and more likely to have chest distress (42.4% vs. 38.3%) than STEMI patients (all P < 0.0001). Patients with NSTEMI were also had longer time to hospital. In multivariable analysis, NSTEMI was independent predictor of presentation without chest pain (odds ratio: 1.974, 95% confidence interval: 1.849-2.107). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with NSTEMI were more likely to present with chest distress and pre-hospital patient delay compared with patients with STEMI. It is necessary for both clinicians and patients to learn more about atypical symptoms of NSTEMI in order to rapidly recognize myocardial infarction. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.gov (No. NCT01874691).

Clinical significance of diabetes on symptom and patient delay among patients with acute myocardial infarction-an analysis from China Acute Myocardial Infarction (CAMI) registry.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes is frequently associated with poor prognosis among acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients. Patients with these comorbidities often have atypical symptoms and subsequent delay in treatment. Few studies have reported detailed AMI symptoms in patients with diabetes. This study compared AMI symptoms and presentation characteristics between diabetics and non-diabetics. METHODS: We included patients from the China AMI registry diagnosed with AMI between January 2013 and September 2014. Baseline characteristics, symptomology, and delay in treatment were compared between diabetics and non-diabetics. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to explore independent predictors of atypical symptoms. RESULTS: A total of 4450 (20.2%) patients had diabetes. They were older, more often women, higher in body mass index, and more likely to have non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction. Fewer diabetic patients presented with persistent precordial chest pain (63.1% vs. 68%, P < 0.0001), diaphoresis (60.1% vs. 65.6%, P < 0.0001), fatigue (16.7% vs. 18.3%, P = 0.0123), and incontinence (0.4% vs. 0.7%, P = 0.0093). Time to hospital presentation was longer among patients with diabetes than those without. In multivariable analysis, diabetes was identified as an independent predictor of atypical symptoms (OR: 1.112, 95% CI: 1.034-1.196). CONCLUSIONS: Our study is the first large-scale study providing evidence that diabetics are less likely to present with typical chest pain and more likely to experience treatment delay when suffering from an AMI. Our results may increase clinician awareness of recognizing AMI patients rapidly to reduce diagnosis and treatment delay, particularly in the context of diabetes.

Feasibility and safety of robotic PCI in China: first in man experience in Asia.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of a second generation robotic percutaneous coronary intervention (R-PCI) system in China. BACKGROUND: Robotic PCI has been shown to be an effective method for conducting coronary interventions. It has further benefits of more accurate lesion measurement, improved stent deployment, reduced incidence of geographic miss and reduction of operator radiation exposure. METHODS: This single center evaluation enrolled 10 consecutive patients who had been selected for PCI. Clinical success was defined as residual stenosis < 30% and no in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events. Learning curve effect was assessed by comparing efficiency metrics of early vs. later cases. RESULTS: Eleven lesions were treated all successfully without manual interruption or MACE events. Most lesions (63%) were ACC/AHA class B2 and C. Mean procedure time was 57.7 ± 26.4 min, however two procedures were part of live demonstrations. Excluding the two live cases, the mean procedure time was 51.8 ± 23.7 min. Procedural efficiency tended to improve from early cases to later cases based on PCI time (48.3 ± 32.9 vs. 25.5 ± 13.0 min, P = 0.27), fluoroscopy time (20.3 ± 8.2 vs. 12.5 ± 4.6 min, P = 0.16), contrast volume (145.0 ± 28.9 vs. 102.5 ± 17.1 mL, P = 0.05) and Air Kerma dose (1932 ± 978 vs. 1007 ± 70 mGy, P = 0.31). CONCLUSIONS: Second generation robotic PCI was safe, effective and there were trends toward improvements in procedural efficiency during this early experience in China.