Prognostic impact of permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

BACKGROUND: Conduction disturbances requiring permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) remain a common complication of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the prognostic impact of PPI after TAVR according to the timing of implantation relative to TAVR. METHODS: A total of 1199 patients (median age 83 years; interquartile range 78-86 years; 549 [45.8%] female) were included in the analysis, of whom 894 (70.8%) had not undergone PPI, 130 (10.8%) had undergone previous PPI, 116 (9.7%) had undergone in-hospital PPI, and 59 (4.9%) had undergone PPI during follow-up. Median follow-up was 2.94 years (1.42-4.32 years). The primary outcome was the composite of all-cause mortality and hospitalization for heart failure. RESULTS: PPI during follow-up was associated with a higher occurrence of the primary outcome (hazard ratio [HR] 2.11; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.39-3.20) whereas previous PPI and in-hospital PPI were not (HR 0.96; 95% CI 0.71-1.29 and HR 1.26; 95% CI 0.88-1.81, respectively). PPI during follow-up was associated with a higher risk of hospitalization for heart failure (sub-HR 3.21; 95% CI 2.02-5.11), while this relationship was only borderline significant for previous PPI (sub-HR 1.51; 95% CI 0.99-2.29). In contrast, there was no relationship between in-hospital PPI and the subsequent risk of hospitalization for heart failure. CONCLUSION: Previous PPI and in-hospital PPI had no long-term prognostic impact on the risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalization for heart failure, whereas PPI during follow-up was associated with a higher risk of hospitalization for heart failure. The present study questions the deleterious influence of periprocedural post-TAVR PPI, which has previously been suggested by certain studies.

Determinants and Impact of Heart Failure Readmission Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) readmission is common post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Nonetheless, limited data are available regarding its predictors and clinical impact. This study evaluated the incidence, predictors, and impact of HF readmission within 1-year post-TAVR, and assessed the effects of the prescription of HF therapies at discharge on the risk of HF readmission and death. METHODS: Patients included in the TAVR registry of a single expert center from 2009 to 2017 were analyzed. Competing-risk and Cox regressions were performed to identify predictors of HF readmission and death. RESULTS: Among 750 patients, 102 (13.6%) were readmitted for HF within 1-year post-TAVR. Overall, 53 patients (7.1%) experienced late readmissions (>30 days post-TAVR), and 17 (2.3%) had multiple readmissions. In ≈30% of readmissions, no trigger could be identified. Predominant causes of readmissions were changes in medication/nonadherence and supraventricular arrhythmia. Independent predictors of HF readmission included diabetes mellitus, chronic lung disease, previous acute HF, grade III or IV aortic regurgitation, and pulmonary hypertension both at discharge from the index hospitalization but not HF therapies. Overall, HF readmission did not significantly impact all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.36 [95% CI, 0.99-1.85]). However, late (HR, 1.90 [95% CI, 1.30-2.78]) and multiple HF readmissions (HR, 2.10 [95% CI,1.17-3.76]) were significantly associated with all-cause mortality. Prescription of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors at discharge was associated with a lower rate of all-cause mortality, especially among patients receiving doses of 25% to <50% (HR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.48-0.94]) and 75% to 100% (HR, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.37-0.98]) of the optimal daily dose. CONCLUSIONS: HF readmission is common within 1-year of TAVR. Late and multiple HF readmissions associate with an increased risk of long-term all-cause mortality. Baseline comorbidities (diabetes, chronic lung disease, previous acute HF) and echocardiographic findings at discharge (grade III or IV aortic regurgitation, pulmonary hypertension) identified patients at high risk of HF readmission.

Predictors of 6-month poor clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

BACKGROUND: Patient selection for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remains a major concern. Indeed, despite promising results, it is still unclear which patients are most and least likely to benefit from this procedure. AIMS: To identify predictors of 6-month poor clinical outcomes after TAVI. METHODS: Patients who were discharged from our institution with a transcatheter-implanted aortic valve were followed prospectively. Our population was divided into two groups ('good outcomes' and 'poor outcomes') according to occurrence of primary endpoint (composite of all-cause mortality, all stroke, hospitalizations for valve-related symptoms or worsening heart failure from discharge to 6 months or 6-month New York Heart Association functional class III or IV). Patient characteristics were studied to find predictors of poor outcomes. RESULTS: We included 163 patients (mean age, 79.9 ± 8.8 years; 90 men [55%]; mean logistic EuroSCORE, 18.4 ± 11.4%). The primary endpoint occurred in 49 patients (mean age, 83 ± 5 years; 31 men [63%]). By multivariable analysis, atrial fibrillation (odds ratio [OR] 3.94), systolic pulmonary artery pressure ≥60 mmHg (OR 7.56) and right ventricular dysfunction (OR 3.55) were independent predictors of poor outcomes, whereas baseline aortic regurgitation ≥2/4 (OR 0.07) demonstrated a protective effect. CONCLUSION: Atrial fibrillation, severe baseline pulmonary hypertension and right ventricular dysfunction (i.e. variables suggesting a more evolved aortic stenosis) were predictors of 6-month poor outcomes. Conversely, baseline aortic regurgitation ≥2/4 showed a protective effect, which needs to be confirmed in future studies. Our study highlights the need for a specific 'TAVI risk score', which could lead to better patient selection.